- I am calling to order this meeting of the Board of Public Works this Tuesday February 10th of twenty
- twenty six. If you are joining us by zoom then you have likely found the link from the packet to the
- zoom meeting. If you are interested in making comments during the meeting you can use the raised hand
- function or the chat function to let us know that you would like to make a public comment.
- First up on our agenda this evening is messages from board members. Do we have any messages from the
- board. Next meeting week I'm traveling for work. I'll be completely unavailable for the work session
- and it's highly unlikely I'll be available for the regular session. Thank you.
- Next up we have appeals under appeals. We have beacon builders appeal for notice of violation for a
- cuff road closure Good evening Kyle ball engineering right away program manager So just a little background
- on this particular NOV So we had a permit that was issued on August 18th of 2025 through September 1st
- of 2025 and
- So we had worked through all those nuances and on September 10th of 2025 We did contact the permit holder
- the email to notify them that the roadway was required to be reopened no later than September 17th 2025
- and then that enforcement action was possible after that date and
- They did respond the same day and indicated that on September 18th that asphalt would be laid to reopen
- that roadway So on the September 25th staff was able to confirm that the roadways still remain closed
- beyond that additional approved permit date and Communicated that we needed a compliance deadline which
- ended up sorry ended a in a no V and
- being issued or notice of violation on September 29th of 2025 for failure to reopen that roadway. During
- that period, we had a few complaints that had come in from public, some via you report, some phone calls,
- just to note that they were unsettled by the closure extension with the location being adjacent to the
- school there and also Meadows Hospital.
- As part of that NOV enforcement action, an administrative extension was granted through October 3rd
- of 2025 at the permit holder's request. This timeline also was delayed in reaching an opening of that
- roadway. This additional time, sorry, rereading here.
- So this was a provision within that notice of violation that we reissued an extension for that timeframe,
- which was then granted. So that was stipulation there. So that was the first NOV that was issued for
- this site. Sorry, that was all background. The current NOV that was under appeal is laid out in this
- section. So on October 3rd of 2025, the permit holder
- Submitted an additional request for an extension. However, that request was not approved because at
- that point The closure had already been in place for roughly 53 days You know based on that 14 day original
- request So staff determined that further extensions were not reasonable or consistent with good right-of-way
- management practices Despite that approved extension which began or sorry which expired on October 3rd
- The roadway did remain closed until October 6th of 2025. So that was the period that the second notice
- of violation was issued for That is on the docket tonight You know we as a staff feel that we've worked
- really hard to try and work with the applicant to Make it be known that when these roadways need to
- be reopened and I know that there's extenuating circumstances sometimes that it might be outside of
- the control but
- Know that that thoroughfare is very important obviously with all the adjacent properties that it was
- affecting So our accommodation is that we uphold Have you take any questions and I believe Thank you
- Now we have the opportunity to hear from the appellant if the appellant would like to make any comments I
- My name is Jim boar. I'm from clandestine Johnson and boar. I'm here representing beacon builders and
- also here is a bill Evans from beacon builders We're here to appeal the NOV that Kyle just laid out
- for you. I like to first Remind you what the purpose of the ud o section 2006 100 is for the
- assessment of fines for NOVs, it's to punish bad behavior, to force compliance with the UDO, and to
- discourage future noncompliance with people that aren't following the purposes of the UDO. Also, when
- interpreting the UDO, the UDO itself says it should be based upon the clear and plain meaning of the
- provision's wording,
- the intended purpose of the provision, the general purposes ought to be served by the UDO, and there
- ought to be consistency with the comprehensive plan. When you look at these facts, in this particular
- situation, you will see that Beacon applied for and obtained permission for the road closure, so they
- didn't avoid asking for permission. The road was
- Finally opened to traffic in October of 2025 seems like a really long time to have the road closed But
- did they just not work when they should have worked did they slow death? Work this thing. Did they not
- pay attention? No what happened was they encountered a lot of unforeseen problems in the construction
- Here's what happened
- They found a fiber optic line. It wasn't mapped on any of the city's maps. Then when they did the locate,
- locate didn't know it was there, didn't find it either. They started digging and there was a fiber optic
- line. Nobody knew who owned it. They had to figure out who even owned it to contact the owner and see
- if they could move it. Then they found a water valve. It wasn't.
- On the locate it wasn't on the map either Then they had to move that so they had to redraw the plans
- they had to go back to engineering ask if they could move that to a different location and then Redo
- their construction based on that water valve then when they did the sub base the sub base compaction
- failed and
- and they had to go back and redo that. Then they found a second water valve. The second water valve
- had to be relocated in the plans as well. They had to redraw the plans, go back to engineering, get
- approval for that, redraw the plans, move some things around, and do some things differently. So all
- those things led to delays.
- It wasn't that they were just lollygagging around and not doing things. They found lots of problems
- when they went to construct this road. They opened the road as quickly as they could. They got extensions.
- They asked for extensions. They got several extensions. When they went back to get the last extension,
- they told them, no, sorry, we've been getting some calls.
- The last extension they got, they were waiting on utilities to be moved. Comcast, Duke, and other utility
- companies were doing their work out there. It's like pushing a string up a hill. You can't move them
- any quicker. And the utility companies were out there doing their work, yes. But Beacon, the people
- that you're trying to find or that the city has fined,
- excuse me, are not the ones that were delaying the work at that point. It was the utility companies,
- and they had to wait for them to finish their work before they could finish paving and finish the work.
- So what's the bottom line here? If you find the builder, you're going to make the houses that the builder
- is building out there more expensive. We've heard a lot about affordable
- Housing in this county in this city You're going to make the houses that they're building and selling
- more expensive so are you going to Make it so that the builder doesn't do this again They did everything
- they could they tried to comply they tried to be timely they tried to do everything that they possibly
- could to comply and
- But it just didn't work this time. And what's the purpose of the fine in this case? It's just not going
- to serve the purpose of the UDO. So we're asking for a waiver. We think that it's appropriate in this
- case to waive it. We think that the fine serves no purpose that the UDO would have that
- Fine was set out for in the penalty section and that fine would penalize Not the builder in this case,
- but future homeowners by making their homes more expensive So we ask you to consider that to take that
- into account and not to assess the fine in this particular case to use your discretion and
- to waive the fine and to say my goodness in this case the builder did everything possible. They tried
- to do it. They tried to do it right. They tried to follow the rules but it just didn't work out and
- it would not be fair. It would not be reasonable to assess a fine under these conditions. Thank you.
- Thank you. All right. Questions from the board on this item.
- I have a question about the fine structure. I don't know if this is for Kyle or Audrey, but if the background
- of what you mentioned tonight is a separate notice of appeal, and we are only looking at the notice,
- the NOB from October 3rd to October 6th,
- why did the fines continue building instead of starting again with that October 4th date? Right, so
- the fine schedule that's on the basis of this second NOV, so whenever we have a fine type that's a violation
- of Title 12, we would double that fine for every occurrence for the permit holder. So the amounts are
- based off that first NOV,
- That first NOV, I believe, was issued late September, early October, and the appeal deadline was technically
- seven days after. So that fine amount was based on that original fine. That original fine NOV has not
- been settled yet. But the starting rate per day, essentially, is the same fine type as the earlier.
- So even though we're considering the two NOVs
- separately, that's why this particular fine starts with the full amount of 7,500 on October 4th. Okay,
- thank you. Of course. And just to clarify some of those details, because I had similar questions, the
- first set of fines that were part of the background issue, you said those haven't been settled yet.
- By that, do you mean like
- Was there an appeal put forward and the appeal submission denied because of timing? Or like what's the,
- what's happening with that first set? Correct, so we had, like I said, that was issued late September,
- early October. We got the actual appeal for that NOV with this actual appeal. So that came December
- time frame whenever this second one
- Issued so this one was within time as far as where we're at in the process with that first one. I might
- have to lean on Miranda So any appeals that are filed after the seven-day time period are not seen by
- the Board of Public Works Unless they're authorized to be seen by our legal department. So I only received
- the set of appeal for the second violation that was within the time frame and
- So the other appeals if if there was an appeal put forward for those those would be with our legal department
- Deciding whether we will see those since they were issued in September but not filed for appeal until
- December past the appeal deadline Does that make sense? Some questions about the timeline During the
- timeline that we were
- Talking about and the complications that arose during the construction Was there Good communication
- back and forth was the city officials aware of the problems that the developer was experiencing So no
- bill was in pretty regular contact with some of our staff members We were in a bit of a staff transition
- at that time so we didn't have the
- Linocyte to it that we would typically have or would want to have So that's why we came in when we did
- and you know wanted to give the opportunity to correct with these deadlines And offer those administrative
- extensions things of that nature and then you know, so the submissions are sorry the Extensions that
- were granted were based off the dates that Beacon was giving us Just a follow-up to the the
- that were laid out, the fiber optic line, the water valves, are those atypical or do you see those sorts
- of things in construction projects often? So those are fairly common, I'll say. Really the tough part
- of it is do we, and just thinking grand picture here, if we're looking at a build out of a new development
- or a redevelopment of something like that nature,
- Ideally we're relocating all those utilities well ahead of time of that structure or that road new roadway
- being built in that area So that's what we ran into we were kind of doing two things at the same time
- So some of that goes into project management, but there are unseen circumstances fairly common You're
- welcome to approach the microphone and you can state your name and offer your response I like
- Thank you. My name is Bill Evans. I'm with Beacon Builders. Just real quick. We started working with
- Duke January of 2025 on the relocation of the power. We have been working with Duke for a year and a
- half to get power to our facilities or to our subdivision today. Tomorrow they're going to have it in
- line. They finally got it done. So we started working with them.
- Long and even when the road was open it has taken us from October to February To get them to give us
- power and we believe me. I'm not the type of person to let things go and and we've tried our best to
- do that the communications with AT&T was really good. They helped us out. They moved things right along
- they offered Comcast to move their lines while they were there and
- Comcast rejected and held us up for three weeks And we had to pay them their $18,000 to move their lines
- off the poles We started the if Duke would have been in there the way they were supposed to they would
- have had it done a month before we started Duke went to North Carolina on an emergency because of the
- hurricanes and the thing they left for three weeks and didn't come back We had no control over that
- Tried and I just wanted to point it out that That problem was 90% of the time and had we'd wait till
- they got back to open up to start the road We wouldn't be out building homes right now We'd be another
- three months down the road and we couldn't do that because we started the process in December of 2024
- and we're now two years later starting to build homes, so Thank you for your time
- Do have a question while you're here What was the first date you requested an extension of that road
- closure to city? Kyle's correct. It was It was after the second week time period on the 25th Okay. Yeah
- his time his time his timelines are correct the But we we did have Phil Peden
- And a lot of your managers out on site that day that something happens to help us work through these
- problems. But with the fiber optic line, with water valves, with storm sewers that needed to be fixed,
- we just had so much going on. We also kept the sidewalk open the whole time that we were working for
- individuals to walk. That was never shut down or closed while we were working. And I did speak with
- some neighbors while we were out there.
- And I did get one or two phone calls but I didn't get and I did speak with the dispatcher Scott with
- the schools. So we had we were in constant communication. However my name was on the notice of the public
- notice that was sent out with my phone number and my email. So we responded to anything that we could.
- Thank you. Thank you.
- I have another question for Kyle, if I may. You mentioned in the staff report that the extension, the
- administrative extension that was granted through October 3rd was explicitly tied to the original NOV.
- Can you explain a little bit more of that? Yes, yes, sorry. I was trying to recollect there.
- Whenever we write an NOV, if there's some corrective action that we're needing to have done, along with
- the issuance of the actual fines themselves, there might be a list of items of special provisions, if
- you will, things that we need to remediate the situation and consider those closed out. As part of that,
- we requested a new timeline to be added to the existing permit. Sorry, with no recusal of the fines that had
- Amassed since then correct. Okay. Thank you along along the same lines I'm curious what Consideration
- you gave or the city gave in terms of the second request for extension and if you could explain a little
- bit about the nature of the complaints that you did receive from the public and how this Closure might
- have impacted them
- Yeah, so the complaints that we received were basically just in consideration of the location.
- As we know, that's a pretty used thoroughfare with the high school and with the hospital there. So those
- complaints came in via at least one year report and a couple of phone calls over the course of that
- closure. And those were stemmed off of whenever we look into the
- Our mapping system of our closures that are you know emergency services school system all of those use
- that same mapping system? The original closure date had surpassed that noted date in that system. I
- Guess what I'm asking is in what sort of sick situation might you have granted that additional extension? It's very
- Context-based I'll say you know in this case. We knew that the extension had already been granted previously
- We were well passed that original 14-day window and in reality we need Those things to be called out
- early and often in these large complex projects ideally we're looking at the entire list of utility
- relocations and
- How that timeline interacts what the critical path is to getting all those done to where the work for
- the actual development can start? Adam's on go ahead
- Sorry, if I may. Apologies, I'm not in person tonight. I did not want to spread any germs around the
- room. And just wanted to kind of make a couple comments here. Public Works Director for the City of
- Bloomington and Mr. Evans, we haven't met yet. I apologize that we haven't met. Just wanted to make
- a couple comments here real quick. You know, these situations are difficult to navigate and manage.
- As the opponents kind of talked about,
- challenges with the utility relocation utility relocations unforeseen site conditions, etc. I think
- Kyle made some good points there right towards the end about how, you know, trying to, you know, unforeseen
- circumstances are one thing, but with the utility relocations, you know,
- With all of the developments we have around the city. We consistently hear about some challenges with
- utility relocations and timelines not matching up with what developers want. Want to need for their
- developments compared to what the utility companies are able to provide. So that's, you know, something
- that It's a challenge across the board. And our hope is that when we get to the point that we're actually
- going to be closing city streets is that
- that's going to be taken into account and figured out well in advance of that closure to do their streets
- themselves. The other part I want to make here point I want to make here and I always try to make comment
- about you know staff some difficult positions here in the sense that you know the attorney for
- The appellant was referring to some UDO, Unified Development Ordinance standards and such. We have a
- lot of standards in city code that we're asked to uphold as city staff members. And Kyle and the team
- in engineering do a fantastic job of trying to understand site circumstances and other things while
- trying to protect the public's use of the right-of-way as well. So that's the challenge here.
- I'm struggling on how to go about this one and how to advise the board. In the end, we had a road that
- was closed for an extended period of time beyond what was permitted. That's why the NLDs were issued.
- You've heard from Mr. Evans that hurricanes in North Carolina can affect things in Bloomington, Indiana.
- Absolutely.
- you know, that's part of the challenge with these developments and such. I do want to also make one
- comment here and just make note that, you know, I apologize, I did not catch the attorney's name, but,
- you know, the notion that, you know, fines like these are going to lead to higher home prices for the
- people that will eventually move into these homes. I got to, I understand that that,
- correlation could be made, but I also want to be very cautious to say we have these parts of city code
- and these fine structures in place to make sure that we are
- be able to hold developers accountable, hold people that are using the public right-of-way accountable.
- And to make a comment about affordability, I don't know that that can be the correlation to be made
- there, or if I appreciate that correlation in that sense. We're tasked with also trying to balance the
- public's use of the right-of-way with trying to assist developers and others that are trying to build
- homes in the community. Yes, we all recognize we want more housing at an affordable price and such,
- but I want to be cautious
- just with that argument. I do defer to the board here. You know, I don't know if we, if I would, I defer
- to the board here on the decision based on what's been supplied to you this evening and appreciate all
- the consideration that goes into these tough decisions. Thank you. I do have one other just clarifying
- question. It's already been asked, but I wanna just make sure I have
- total understanding. The way that the fine schedule is assessed is based on the permit and the permit
- holder. So when a permit holder has a permit, the fine is assessed on day one and it continues to accumulate
- across those days. Even if the property comes into compliance or the right of way comes into compliance
- and then goes out of compliance,
- because it's based on the same permit, the fee schedule continues based on that permit and permit holder.
- I just want to make sure I fully understand. It looks like we have legal interpretation. Yeah, so I
- just wanted to make a clarification real quick. So even though this situation happened within
- the subdivision, the NOV was issued under Title 12.
- which guides the right-of-way closure and the permit structure that goes with that. And so under Title
- 12, let me just read it, any violation as defined herein is hereby declared a common and public nuisance.
- So the way the penalties and
- Violations are assessed under the UGO and Title 12 is different. So I just want to make sure the board
- is cognizant of that distinction. And then as far as the penalty is concerned, so if you look at the
- code, a penalty is not tied to a permit. It's tied to the number of violations that this contractor
- has committed over a three-year period. So regardless of whether the previous violation happened under
- a different permit,
- the code looks at how many violations were there before that, before the clock sets again after the
- three year period. Okay. So it's based on a three year period of the, um, I mean, in this case contractor
- or permit holder, not associated with the permit, but correct. It could be for this location or it could
- be for another location. It doesn't matter. Okay. And under different permits as well. Okay.
- That's, thank you, that is exactly what I needed to understand. I appreciate it. Other questions from
- the board?
- If I may, I'm going to just jump in one more time here. Adam Wason, again, Public Works. I was trying
- to ask Audrey over email. I'm not sure on these appeals. We don't have too many of these come to the
- board. So in terms of logistically, is it possible to table this decision for the time being to have
- some further negotiations and conversations with the developer about this specific NOV?
- Or is it one where the board is with it being publicly noticed? Is there a decision required today?
- Does the board have the power to table? Hi, Audrey Brittingham city attorney. Yes, I agree that the
- board can table it Alex agrees with me as Well, so I think that's totally within the board's authority Thank you
- All right without being next to Kyle to ask him if he's okay with this I guess I'd ask the board to
- table this one for right now while we have some further negotiations discussions about this specific
- fine And then if we needed to we can bring it back at a subsequent meeting Thanks for that recommendation
- any questions from the board All right, do we have a motion from the board I Move that we table the
- appeal in front of us the beacon
- Builders appeal for notice of violation for Acuff Road closure until further discussion and potentially
- a future meeting as suggested by Adam Wason. Second. All right. We have a motion in a second. I will
- call the roll. I broach. Hi. Cox Deckard. I motion passes.
- Next up, I should mention we did make an agenda change. We're moving the item election of officers to
- the end of the agenda. So we will take that up at the end of our agenda. Thank you. Have a good evening.
- Next up, we have petitions and remonstrances. This is an opportunity for anyone to make a public comment
- about something that is not on our agenda this evening. If you'd like to make a public comment about
- something not on the agenda, and if you are on Zoom, feel free to use the raised hand function or the
- chat function to let us know. If you're in the room, you are welcome to approach the microphone.
- None on Zoom. All right, seeing none.
- Next is the consent agenda. Under the consent agenda are the minutes for November 3rd of 2025, the minutes
- from November 18th of 2025, resolution 2026-010, mobile vendor Blooming Bowls, right-of-way special
- event candy stripe criteria, service agreement with Steve Chafin for right-of-way weed management, outdoor
- lighting service agreement with Duke Energy for South Jackson Street and South Rogers Street,
- Change order package for Thornton Arden Washington traffic calming and Greenway project and payroll.
- Do we have any items that need to be removed from the consent agenda this evening. Do we have any public
- comment on anything within the consent agenda this evening. None on zoom. All right. Seeing none is
- there a motion. I move that we approve the consent agenda for tonight's meeting of February 10th 2026 second.
- I will call the roll Caron. I roach hi Cox Deckard. I motion passes Next we have new business first
- under new business is approved right-of-way closures for FA Wilhelm at the Poplar's development Good
- evening Kyle ball right away permitting program manager once again
- Apologies for another wordy request tonight, so I'll just get after it So FA Wilhelm is requesting sidewalk
- closures metered parking reservations and alley closures surrounding the former Poplar's building located
- at 400 East 7th Street This request includes the eastern sidewalk and the adjacent parking lanes on
- North Dunn Street the southern sidewalk at East 7th Street and the East West alley between East 6th
- and East 7th Street
- The requested closures are being requested to accommodate the completion of the exterior facade work,
- which includes the masonry cleaning and ceiling Followed by sidewalk reconstruction and perimeter landscaping
- along the east side of the Poplar's building there on Dunn Street So the traffic control on North Dunn
- Street is proposed to be in place from February 23rd of 2026 through July 17th 2026 the traffic control
- in East 7th Street and within the East West Alley
- Between East 6th and 7th Street would have remained in place until July 27th 2026 to support the final
- Concrete work and landscaping associated with the project completion. So January, I'm sorry July 27th
- of 2026 is the estimated completion date for the project
- So city staff did meet with FA Wilhelm to review the scope of work associated with this request And
- to evaluate if there were any alternate options available that would include pedestrian diversions Or
- and or roadway closures and based on the review The staff determined that the proximity of the worksite
- to the pedestrian facilities could create just undesirable interactions between the work area and that
- passing traffic
- During the same meeting we did discuss the anticipated timeline for reopening the 7th Street bike lane
- And I'm happy to announce that that is on schedule to reopen on March 3rd At the time at this time the
- only remaining Expected right away request would surround Grant Street on the west side of the building
- Where we're going to have a mirror of kind of what we're doing or what's being requested now the final
- infrastructure rebuild and demo Obviously not in that order So we're expecting that request to come
- in at a later date that's the long and short Thank you, of course questions from the board on this item
- We expect that additional request that you mentioned Would go through only July 27th, 20 correct. Yes Thank you
- We talked about this quite a bit during the work session. I don't have a lot of questions. I would just
- ask, is everything going okay, just generally speaking on the project? Like, communication's going well?
- Yes, yes. Yeah, happy to speak to that. So I will say, like many projects, at the onset of the project,
- you know, we had issues that we had to work out. Unforeseen site circumstances, unforeseen interactions,
- things of that nature.
- FAA Wilhelm has been great to work with and honestly, we point to them in their site to other contractors
- as a good case of what to do, right? Any public comment on this item? None on zoom Seeing none is there
- a motion I move that we approve the right-of-way closures for FAA Wilhelm at the Poplar's development
- Second. All right. I will call the roll crown. I I
- Roach hi Cox Deckard. I motion passes Next we have contract addendum to CGR services contract for economic
- and sustainable development Department bus stop project to build additional bus stops Hello
- Audrey Brittingham I'm here for Shawn Mia from the economic and sustainable development department who
- couldn't be here tonight I
- This is a contract to add an additional stopped bus stop Shelter to an existing project so CGR has a
- contract already with the ESD with ESD to install five bus stop shelters and ESD had an additional bus
- stop shelter and
- Ready to be put in place. They hadn't secured a location yet. So they worked with transit They subsequently
- after entering into the initial contract secured a location We determined that the cost to install it
- would exceed a 20% change order So they issued an additional bid in CJR came in yet again as the lowest
- responsive and responsible bidder So this is a contract to for them to install a sixth bus stop shelter
- Thank you. Thank you questions from the board Just to reiterate from yesterday's work session The other
- bus stops are coming along. All right, and you're pleased with the way You're working with this particular
- contractor That's what that is my understanding from director Mia. Yes, that's correct. Thank you Any
- public comments on this item
- None on zoom. Seeing none is there a motion. I move that we approve the contract addendum to CGR services
- contract for economic and sustainable development department bus stop project to build additional bus
- stops. Second. All right. I will call the roll. Caron I Roach I Cox Deckard I motion passes. Next we
- have contract with Jack Laurie group for animal care and control cat room floor replacement.
- Miranda Beaver Public Works for the Public Works facilities director JD Boruff the flooring in the cat
- room at Animal Care and Control is in need of removal and replacement and three quotes were solicited
- Bounds flooring incorporated came in at twelve thousand fifty two dollars carpets plus came in at nine
- thousand nine hundred and seventy seven dollars and twelve cents Jack Laurie floors LLC came in at seventy
- five hundred dollars
- The large difference in the quoted prices comes down to the use of contracted installation, which is
- utilized by the two higher quotes and Jack Laurie group does in-house installation. So that would be
- the difference in those quoted prices there. So the stack recommends the approval of the contract with
- Jack Laurie floors. Thank you. Questions on this item. Any public comments on this item.
- None on zoom. Seeing none is there a motion. I move that we approve the contract with Jack Laurie group
- for animal care and control cat room floor replacement. Second. All right. I will call the roll. I Roach
- I Cox Deckard I motion passes. Next is staff reports and other business. We do not have any at this
- time. Thank you.
- Next is approval of claims. Are there any questions from the board on the claims this evening? Any public
- comments on claims? None on Zoom. Seeing none, is there a motion on claims? I move that we approve claims
- this evening in the amount of $4,718,073.67. Second.
- All right, I will call the roll. Caron? Aye. Roach? Aye. Cox-Dekard? Aye. Motion passes. Next up we
- have the election of officers. It is that time of year to select our officers for the Board of Public
- Works. I would like to make a motion that we elect Elizabeth Caron as president
- uh, Kyla Cox Deckard as vice president and James Roach as secretary. Do you need a second for that?
- I would love to second that. Thank you. We have a motion of second. I will open it up in case there
- are any members of the public who would like to comment on these officers. We do not have any members
- of the public on zoom at this time.
- Excellent. All right. Seeing none. We have a motion in a second. I will call the roll. Caron broach.
- Hi. Cox Deckard. I motion passes and we have nothing else on our agenda. So I will call for adjournment.
- Thank you.