WEBVTT

00:00:00.386 --> 00:00:07.767
- Good evening folks Adam Wason public works director for the city of Bloomington. I've got 5 31 p.m.

00:00:07.767 --> 00:00:12.638
- On Tuesday April 21st on my clock right now. This is the regular.

00:00:12.802 --> 00:00:19.293
- Board of Public Works meeting for Tuesday April 21st 2026 we're here in council chambers at City Hall

00:00:19.293 --> 00:00:26.103
- on the agenda and on the website there's also a zoom link for the meeting with a meeting ID and a passcode

00:00:26.103 --> 00:00:32.658
- looks like we might have a couple members of the public on the zoom link if you do have public comment

00:00:32.658 --> 00:00:39.213
- or any items on the agenda and you are virtual we'll use the raised hand function or the chat function

00:00:39.213 --> 00:00:41.822
- for that and for any of the agenda items

00:00:42.594 --> 00:00:49.154
- And otherwise, I'll turn it over to Elizabeth Carone for tonight's meeting. Thank you, Adam. I call

00:00:49.154 --> 00:00:55.846
- to order tonight's meeting of the Board of Public Works for April 21, 2026. First, we will begin with

00:00:55.846 --> 00:01:02.471
- messages from board members. Are there any messages from the board tonight? Seeing none. Next on the

00:01:02.471 --> 00:01:09.294
- agenda are appeals. We have two appeals tonight. We will start with the noise appeal at 613 East Brenda

00:01:09.294 --> 00:01:12.574
- Lane. Again, Adam Weissen, Public Works Director.

00:01:12.674 --> 00:01:20.585
- This is on behalf of city legal and Bloomington police but on March 13th 2026 around 10 30 p.m. noise

00:01:20.585 --> 00:01:28.497
- citation 4 0 7 8 4 was issued by to Vincent LaBella at 6 13 East Brenda Lane by officer shields. They

00:01:28.497 --> 00:01:36.564
- received a call from dispatch regarding loud music coming from the garage area of the home. The officer

00:01:36.564 --> 00:01:38.270
- parked at the school.

00:01:38.946 --> 00:01:45.982
- nearby and could hear the music from the road and the music was pending for more than 15 minutes prior

00:01:45.982 --> 00:01:52.949
- to the issue and so the citation and I do believe we've got the appellant here in the room but it was

00:01:52.949 --> 00:01:54.110
- decided that the

00:01:54.914 --> 00:02:02.473
- There was a violation of Bloomington Municipal Code fourteen point oh nine dash oh one oh and BPD recommends

00:02:02.473 --> 00:02:09.616
- that the citation be upheld based on that information. And if Mr. LaBella would like to offer anything

00:02:09.616 --> 00:02:16.620
- to the board he is welcome to you. If you if you would please state your name at the podium and then

00:02:16.620 --> 00:02:24.318
- we'd be happy to hear what you have to say. Thanks. So my name is Vincent LaBella on March 13th of last month.

00:02:24.418 --> 00:02:29.483
- Received the noise citation at my my own home I'm appealing the citation as it was issued without a

00:02:29.483 --> 00:02:34.751
- prior warning and contains minimal detail regarding how the noise violation was determined The incident

00:02:34.751 --> 00:02:39.968
- occurred around 1030, which is near the beginning of typical quiet hours I was not made aware that the

00:02:39.968 --> 00:02:45.286
- noise had reached a level that would result in a citation and I would have immediately complied if asked

00:02:45.286 --> 00:02:50.503
- Additionally, the citation does not specify any measurable standards such as distance or decibel level

00:02:50.503 --> 00:02:53.086
- used to determine that the noise was excessive and

00:02:53.314 --> 00:02:58.589
- This is my first offense and I take responsibility for being more mindful moving forward I respect the

00:02:58.589 --> 00:03:03.967
- purpose of the ordinance and maintaining peaceful environment for my neighbors as a first-time homeowner

00:03:03.967 --> 00:03:09.293
- and a lifelong member of the Bloomington community I'm committed to being respectful and compliant with

00:03:09.293 --> 00:03:14.568
- the city standards. This is my first offense and I will ensure it does not happen again I respectfully

00:03:14.568 --> 00:03:19.792
- am asking for a dismissal or reduction. I Appreciate the time and consideration regarding this matter

00:03:19.792 --> 00:03:22.558
- and request a favor of resolution Thank you very much

00:03:24.706 --> 00:03:34.289
- New questions from the board is the officer present with us on zoom. We don't have the officer does

00:03:34.289 --> 00:03:44.446
- the officer need to be present legal represent our legal representative. We'll have legal to answer that.

00:03:54.562 --> 00:04:01.917
- Castamania from City of Livington Legal Department So the officer we will you guys can continue based

00:04:01.917 --> 00:04:09.416
- on the staff report and you continue with your findings and you can also continue Based on the citation

00:04:09.416 --> 00:04:16.627
- that was issued So I'm happy to answer any questions that you have for the police department or for

00:04:16.627 --> 00:04:23.838
- the legal department Thank you, we could also postpone and wait if you guys want to wait but Thanks

00:04:29.186 --> 00:04:40.332
- I would ask the officer this Is it standard to provide a warning before noise violations or not provide

00:04:40.332 --> 00:04:53.086
- a warning before noise violations That's correct warnings are not issued So first offense would automatically go to it

00:04:53.314 --> 00:05:02.806
- The first fine. Yes. And the first fine is fifty dollars. So the first offense is fifty dollars and

00:05:02.806 --> 00:05:13.153
- their warnings are not part of not part of the citation process for noise violations. So any other questions

00:05:13.153 --> 00:05:21.886
- or other questions from the board. No I don't have any other questions. I just was going to

00:05:22.242 --> 00:05:30.968
- restate from the the staff report because it was mentioned in the appeal document that there wasn't

00:05:30.968 --> 00:05:39.869
- a specific measure that it was Found against and that is in part because of the way that ordinance is

00:05:39.869 --> 00:05:48.682
- written that it's not based on a certain decibel level or a measurement but rather If there is noise

00:05:48.682 --> 00:05:51.998
- that can be heard from outside of the

00:05:52.194 --> 00:06:03.493
- Under the Bloomington Code chapter 14 additionally, there is a pending time limit. So it's 15 minutes

00:06:03.493 --> 00:06:14.681
- once it's called from dispatch. So the officers do make sure that that time frame is met before they

00:06:14.681 --> 00:06:21.438
- go in to check and so the it's the reasonable person measure

00:06:21.570 --> 00:06:31.069
- under Chapter fourteen point oh nine zero one. Oh as as written in the staff report Unreasonable unnecessary

00:06:31.069 --> 00:06:40.046
- excessive and offensive noise from all sources subjects subjects to its police power It's unlawful for

00:06:40.046 --> 00:06:49.022
- any person to cause or make unreasonable noise or to allow any unreasonable noise to be caused or made

00:06:49.282 --> 00:06:58.189
- on any real or personal property. So we would argue that there was noise. That is a fact. And the citation

00:06:58.189 --> 00:07:06.847
- was issued. And the noise had been pending for 15 minutes once the call came in from dispatch. And also

00:07:06.847 --> 00:07:15.838
- that warnings are not part of, it's not under our code to issue warnings for noise appeal, noise citations.

00:07:17.986 --> 00:07:25.695
- Just confirm that the call log we have in our packet Does mean that a complaint call was called into

00:07:25.695 --> 00:07:33.710
- dispatch, which is correct. Okay. Thank you I do want to make one correction that I noticed in the staff

00:07:33.710 --> 00:07:41.420
- report There was some language from one of the previous carryover cases on both of the staff reports

00:07:41.420 --> 00:07:44.702
- for the noise or noise appeals and section

00:07:45.346 --> 00:07:51.567
- under our facts there's language included in here about the apartment when teaching his roommate how

00:07:51.567 --> 00:07:57.850
- to DJ that's from a previous one that was not edited out of this document and that's in both of these

00:07:57.850 --> 00:08:04.071
- staff reports for tonight that will be struck from the record that's not for that was an error to be

00:08:04.071 --> 00:08:10.293
- included so thank you I did see that when I was reading over the weekend and neglected to bring that

00:08:10.293 --> 00:08:14.974
- up at the work session so thank you for saying that last appeals okay sorry

00:08:15.394 --> 00:08:23.506
- Is there any public comment on this item? Not on zoom, all right seeing none is there a motion Does

00:08:23.506 --> 00:08:31.780
- the opponent have anything else that they do you want to add anything else at this point? I just want

00:08:31.780 --> 00:08:39.892
- to make sure you had a chance. Perfect. Thank you Is there a motion I Move that we uphold the noise

00:08:39.892 --> 00:08:42.974
- citation for 613 East Brindle Lane. I

00:08:43.778 --> 00:08:54.879
- And I second with the motion and a second I will call the roll Cox Decker. I Caron I motion passes.

00:08:54.879 --> 00:09:06.313
- Thank you for coming. Next we have a noise appeal at 1521 West Isaac Drive. This is for noise citation

00:09:06.313 --> 00:09:11.198
- 4 2 8 6 3 is issued to Emmanuel. I'm sorry.

00:09:12.130 --> 00:09:18.469
- Akinsy at 1520 West Isaac Drive. Thank you for the assist there Emanuel And this was issued by officer

00:09:18.469 --> 00:09:24.992
- Chad Dorman. It does not appear that officer Dorman is here this evening Do we have him online by chance?

00:09:24.992 --> 00:09:31.331
- Okay, and so The officer became alerted to the noise when they received a call from dispatch regarding

00:09:31.331 --> 00:09:36.254
- loud music coming from the home Reported by the roommate the roommate left left

00:09:36.354 --> 00:09:43.407
- Officer Dorman into the building where the officer could clearly hear music and visually saw about 10

00:09:43.407 --> 00:09:50.530
- to 10 to 15 people partying And the appellant is here. This is another case where it was declared that

00:09:50.530 --> 00:09:57.514
- the policy of the city was violated and prohibiting unreasonable unnecessary excessive and offensive

00:09:57.514 --> 00:10:02.078
- noise from the sources above certain levels and is detrimental to

00:10:02.274 --> 00:10:10.137
- to the well-being of the public nearby. Also just stating that that it was a standard of unreasonable

00:10:10.137 --> 00:10:18.386
- noise and that a complaint was received on this one as well. If the appellant would like to offer anything

00:10:18.386 --> 00:10:26.172
- to the board now would be your chance. If you could state your name please at the podium. My name is

00:10:26.172 --> 00:10:31.646
- Emanuel McKenzie and on the 18th of March there was a noise complaint.

00:10:32.514 --> 00:10:38.201
- For my understanding, on that particular day, it was an apartment to be precise. I had a few friends

00:10:38.201 --> 00:10:43.831
- over. It was during the spring break. And I don't want to cause a disturbance or anything. Before I

00:10:43.831 --> 00:10:49.518
- had this gathering, I spoke with my neighbors that I live with and I asked if I'm going to be having

00:10:49.518 --> 00:10:55.486
- people over. So they said, oh, you can do that, kids. We're not going to be here during the spring break.

00:10:55.810 --> 00:11:01.229
- On that particular day, I spoke with my roommate. I lived with three other people. One of my roommate

00:11:01.229 --> 00:11:06.700
- was not here. He went home for spring break. The other two people, I had a conversation with the other

00:11:06.700 --> 00:11:12.066
- person. And the last person that reported this, that was my, I made a mistake and I forgot to inform

00:11:12.066 --> 00:11:17.644
- him because I had some other things. I was supposed to tell him the old thing that, oh yes, I was having

00:11:17.644 --> 00:11:21.150
- people over, but I made a mistake and I forgot to inform him that

00:11:21.666 --> 00:11:27.395
- But on that particular day, I was playing music, but not so loud to the point where it was causing too

00:11:27.395 --> 00:11:33.069
- much disturbance to the other people in the building. But I feel like that noise is just too much for

00:11:33.069 --> 00:11:38.798
- my neighbor, World's Liveaway, and I take responsibility for that. It wasn't my intention to make them

00:11:38.798 --> 00:11:44.416
- uncomfortable because I was supposed to communicate with them, but I made a mistake not telling them

00:11:44.416 --> 00:11:50.590
- sooner than before having the party over. And I apologize for wasn't making noise, causing a disturbance to my

00:11:50.690 --> 00:12:00.732
- Roommate and I just hope I could get a second chance. Um So because this is my first offense and I've

00:12:00.732 --> 00:12:10.281
- made um Steps not to make this kind of mistake again not to cause disturbance saying I've better

00:12:10.281 --> 00:12:17.566
- communication with my tape with my roommate Questions from the board Just

00:12:18.338 --> 00:12:26.622
- Question from city legal we were talking about the 15-minute time period in the prior noise appeal I

00:12:26.622 --> 00:12:34.824
- just want to confirm that that was also upheld and the 15-minute time period was upheld in this one

00:12:34.824 --> 00:12:43.517
- as well They wait 15 minutes from the time that they get the call of dispatch to see if the noise becomes

00:12:43.517 --> 00:12:46.142
- unreasonable if it continues so

00:12:46.306 --> 00:12:53.676
- In this particular case, um, when the officer arrived, uh, the call was actually, actually came from

00:12:53.676 --> 00:13:01.046
- the roommate, um, from Mr. Kenzie's roommate. Um, and the roommate did lead the officer to where the

00:13:01.046 --> 00:13:08.343
- noise was coming from, but, um, well before the officer, um, got to the actual apartment, he could,

00:13:08.343 --> 00:13:14.910
- um, hear the music and he visually saw about 10 to 15 people, um, in the home. Um, again,

00:13:15.042 --> 00:13:25.429
- I stated in the previous citation BPD does not issue warnings for the citations. They are $50 and and

00:13:25.429 --> 00:13:35.816
- Unless that it falls within an enumerated exception under our code There is no warning. Thank you Any

00:13:35.816 --> 00:13:43.454
- public comments on this item None on zoom. All right, is there a motion? I

00:13:44.194 --> 00:13:56.336
- Move that we uphold the noise citation for 1521 West Isaac Drive And I second I will call the roll Cox

00:13:56.336 --> 00:14:06.238
- Deckard. I Caron I motion passes Thank you very much for coming Just for the record

00:14:06.498 --> 00:14:11.887
- You know, it has been pretty clearly established with the noise violations over the last couple years

00:14:11.887 --> 00:14:17.329
- that the warnings aren't issued, that we are gonna always ask the board to uphold them, and thus there

00:14:17.329 --> 00:14:22.824
- are some very extenuating circumstances. You know, I wish there was opportunities for just quick second

00:14:22.824 --> 00:14:28.107
- chances, but I do appreciate both of the appellants and the way that they said that they understood

00:14:28.107 --> 00:14:33.549
- that it was a violation, but they wanted to try to make right by it, so I appreciate that. Just wanted

00:14:33.549 --> 00:14:35.134
- to mention it for the record.

00:14:38.402 --> 00:14:45.748
- We have petitions and remonstrances. This is a time for anybody to make public comment on items that

00:14:45.748 --> 00:14:53.021
- are not in tonight's agenda If there's anyone in council chambers, they may approach the podium and

00:14:53.021 --> 00:15:00.367
- if you are on zoom Use the raise hand function or chat Thank You Miranda we will move to the consent

00:15:00.367 --> 00:15:05.822
- agenda on tonight's consent agenda the minutes from February 10th 2026 and

00:15:05.922 --> 00:15:15.621
- resolution 20 26-0 to 1 mobile vendor Kona ice truck 1 resolution 20 26-0 to 2 mobile vendor Kona ice

00:15:15.621 --> 00:15:25.700
- truck 2 resolution 20 26-0 to 3 mobile vendor flame and grill service agreement for biohazard remediation

00:15:25.700 --> 00:15:33.022
- with MSI LLC right of way special event for family night out on Kirkwood and

00:15:33.218 --> 00:15:40.377
- service agreement with Cummins for facilities, noise permit for Duke Energy for IU circuit relocation,

00:15:40.377 --> 00:15:47.674
- resolution 2026-024, surplus by Bloomington Police Department, and payroll. Is there anything that needs

00:15:47.674 --> 00:15:54.902
- to come off the consent agenda this evening? All right, questions from the board on the consent agenda?

00:15:54.902 --> 00:16:00.254
- Any questions, or I'm sorry, comments from the public on the consent agenda?

00:16:01.762 --> 00:16:08.979
- Just wanted to make note the MSI LLC is the correct Current way that martial security and how we pay

00:16:08.979 --> 00:16:16.196
- their invoices So we did change that to MSI LLC James had mentioned it yesterday in the work session

00:16:16.196 --> 00:16:23.413
- And I just wanted to state that for the record it is MSI LLC Thank you for that confirmation With no

00:16:23.413 --> 00:16:25.342
- comment is there a motion?

00:16:26.274 --> 00:16:35.341
- Move that we approve the consent agenda for April 21st of 2026. I Second I will call the roll Cox Decker.

00:16:35.341 --> 00:16:44.494
- I Korone I motion passes Next we'll move along to new business First we have amendment one to the contract

00:16:44.494 --> 00:16:53.219
- with Crossroads engineers for preliminary engineering of Hopewell South Thanks for hearing me tonight

00:16:53.219 --> 00:16:55.614
- this is an amendment to the

00:16:55.778 --> 00:17:03.296
- Preliminary engineering contract for Hopewell South. So we initially entered into a contract with Crossroad

00:17:03.296 --> 00:17:10.327
- engineers PC to do the subdivision and the design of the Hopewell South Neighborhood that the RDC is

00:17:10.327 --> 00:17:17.566
- moving forward. There's a PUD being considered by City Council actually tomorrow and then a lot of work

00:17:17.566 --> 00:17:25.502
- to follow whatever comes out of that but these specific items were not identified in the initial contract this is

00:17:25.570 --> 00:17:31.899
- a new water main in Wiley and stormwater detention along Wiley. This is something that came about after

00:17:31.899 --> 00:17:38.472
- further evaluation of the site. This is something that would be required no matter what kind of development

00:17:38.472 --> 00:17:44.923
- is going into Hopewell South, so it's not dependent on the PUD. So we're moving forward with the contract

00:17:44.923 --> 00:17:51.070
- amendment to add that survey work. This also includes additional geotechnical exploration on the 714

00:17:51.070 --> 00:17:54.174
- South Rogers building site, which is kind of being

00:17:54.274 --> 00:18:00.631
- Pursued for some kind of reuse. There's some testing going on with the geotechnical Consultant that

00:18:00.631 --> 00:18:07.115
- will help inform what that site can be used for so those are the two items in this contract amendment

00:18:07.115 --> 00:18:13.662
- tonight Just for your knowledge. This was approved for funding at the RDC last night with a resolution

00:18:13.662 --> 00:18:20.464
- So this is the final step to getting the contract amendment Approved and I'm happy to answer any questions

00:18:20.464 --> 00:18:23.070
- on it Thank you questions from the board

00:18:24.226 --> 00:18:31.320
- I don't have any questions either. Are there public comments on this item? Again, if you are on zoom,

00:18:31.320 --> 00:18:38.623
- feel free to use the raise hat hand function or the chat None on the zoom Seeing none is there a motion?

00:18:38.623 --> 00:18:45.787
- I move that we approve amendment one to contract with Crossroads engineers for preliminary engineering

00:18:45.787 --> 00:18:51.838
- of Hopewell South Second, I will call the roll Cox Decker. I Korone I motion passes. I

00:18:54.018 --> 00:19:02.370
- Next we have a contract with ENB paving for Grimes Lane Kirkwood Avenue Patterson Drive and Roger Street

00:19:02.370 --> 00:19:10.483
- maintenance project. Good evening Sarah Gomez with engineering department requesting approval for the

00:19:10.483 --> 00:19:18.834
- award of contract to be paving for the Grimes Lane Kirkwood Avenue Patterson Rogers maintenance project.

00:19:18.834 --> 00:19:22.334
- The project includes resurfacing restriping

00:19:22.658 --> 00:19:29.453
- and other work, including replacing a traffic signal at the intersection of West Kirkwood and Rogers

00:19:29.453 --> 00:19:36.316
- Street, reconstruction of pedestrian curb ramps and crosswalks and other related maintenance work and

00:19:36.316 --> 00:19:43.313
- the project limits. The maintenance of traffic for the project will include a full road closure on West

00:19:43.313 --> 00:19:50.511
- Kirkwood, which will be a maximum of 10 days, not necessarily consecutive. For West Grimes Lane, Patterson

00:19:50.511 --> 00:19:52.126
- Drive and South Rogers,

00:19:52.322 --> 00:19:58.825
- One lane road closures will be in place throughout the project. The bids for Grimes Lane Kirkwood were

00:19:58.825 --> 00:20:05.264
- opened publicly and read aloud at noon on April 10th twenty twenty six at City Hall atrium EMB paving

00:20:05.264 --> 00:20:11.640
- was the lowest responsible and responsive bidder with a bid of four million six hundred seventy nine

00:20:11.640 --> 00:20:15.870
- thousand nine hundred fifty fifteen dollars and ninety nine cents.

00:20:16.098 --> 00:20:22.173
- milestone contractors at four million six hundred eighty five thousand six hundred ninety six dollars

00:20:22.173 --> 00:20:28.366
- and fifty nine cents and Criter and Criter with five point sorry five million four hundred seventy four

00:20:28.366 --> 00:20:34.381
- thousand thirty two dollars and thirty five cents engineering recommends awarding the contract to EU

00:20:34.381 --> 00:20:40.575
- and be paving as They were the lowest responsible and responsive better Happy to answer questions Thank

00:20:40.575 --> 00:20:42.302
- you questions from the board

00:20:42.818 --> 00:20:51.514
- Do we know roughly the timeline for the project? It's 180 days, so it's a very tight timeline. And after

00:20:51.514 --> 00:20:59.962
- award tonight, we will figure out when that start date is. I imagine they'll want to start as soon as

00:20:59.962 --> 00:21:08.659
- possible, maybe May 1st. And then there are restrictions on the closure on Kirkwood as well as the other

00:21:08.659 --> 00:21:10.398
- part of the project.

00:21:11.682 --> 00:21:18.444
- Believe the dates are May 22nd through June, August. I can't remember the exact date, but yeah, before

00:21:18.444 --> 00:21:25.338
- students return. Avoiding the problematic traffic time, which is, of course, what I'm asking. Of course.

00:21:25.338 --> 00:21:32.100
- So I'm actually currently also looking at a document that talks about all of our projects that we have

00:21:32.100 --> 00:21:38.206
- going on throughout the whole community this summer. And so we're balancing a lot right now.

00:21:38.562 --> 00:21:45.415
- Pavement maintenance projects that are outside of this contract that are also adjacent To the area where

00:21:45.415 --> 00:21:51.943
- we're gonna have paving here You know, this is these are all of the main thoroughfares in that kind

00:21:51.943 --> 00:21:58.078
- of quadrant of the city from the Norbert Nordic site north on Patterson up to third and fifth

00:21:58.210 --> 00:22:04.134
- Kirkwood because it wouldn't be a road in Bloomington without three names. And then over to the portion

00:22:04.134 --> 00:22:10.116
- of Kirkwood we're actually going to do from like Adams to... We're going Pine to Rogers. Pine to Rogers.

00:22:10.116 --> 00:22:11.198
- You know, so we're

00:22:11.426 --> 00:22:17.088
- Coordinating all of these with other projects in mind as well We also still have the continued work

00:22:17.088 --> 00:22:22.863
- on 2nd Street throughout the summer with utility relocation. So the folks like Sarah and You know the

00:22:22.863 --> 00:22:28.638
- the street staff and everybody that are doing the like fine fine tuning coordination of balancing all

00:22:28.638 --> 00:22:34.413
- this Really appreciate those efforts because there is a lot of balancing that we're trying to do with

00:22:34.413 --> 00:22:40.414
- all these various projects It wouldn't be a summer in Bloomington if we weren't closing some streets. Yes

00:22:40.802 --> 00:22:47.665
- All in the name of good investments into our infrastructure for long term maintenance and minimum impact

00:22:47.665 --> 00:22:54.201
- trying to get them all in during the same time period. So appreciate that coordination. I just want

00:22:54.201 --> 00:23:00.933
- to confirm you said that the full closure at West Kirkwood and Rogers would be 10 days not necessarily

00:23:00.933 --> 00:23:02.110
- consecutive days.

00:23:02.786 --> 00:23:09.538
- And it won't it won't just be at Rogers intersection. It would be along that corridor from pine to Rogers

00:23:09.538 --> 00:23:15.972
- because we are putting in some raised crosswalks for safety purposes. So those will be needing maybe

00:23:15.972 --> 00:23:22.660
- a few days closure each. And so those will be spaced out over time depending on how the contractor wants

00:23:22.660 --> 00:23:29.412
- to get it done. So it'll be up to them if they want to make it consecutive or not consecutive. OK. That's

00:23:29.412 --> 00:23:30.686
- helpful. Thank you.

00:23:32.674 --> 00:23:39.011
- Any other questions from the board questions from or I'm sorry public comment on this item.

00:23:39.011 --> 00:23:45.968
- None on zoom. All right. Seeing none is there a motion. I move that we approve the contract with Ian

00:23:45.968 --> 00:23:53.063
- be paving for Grimes Lane Kirkwood Avenue Patterson Drive and Roger Street maintenance project. Second

00:23:53.063 --> 00:23:59.262
- I will call the roll. Cox Decker. I Korone I motion passes. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks.

00:23:59.650 --> 00:24:07.172
- Next we have a public improvement bond amount of forty thousand three hundred and fifty two dollars

00:24:07.172 --> 00:24:15.296
- and ten cents for Wimbledon Lane subdivision This is a public improvement bond for a single lot subdivision

00:24:15.296 --> 00:24:22.969
- in sycamore Knolls on Wimbledon Lane the bond amount is in the amount of forty thousand three hundred

00:24:22.969 --> 00:24:29.438
- and fifty two dollars and ten cents that'll cover sidewalk curb work asphalt patching

00:24:29.698 --> 00:24:37.075
- Street trees seed and straw to put the right-of-way back the way it needs to be Like I said, this is

00:24:37.075 --> 00:24:44.379
- a single lot subdivision they'll have two years from Approval of the final plat which they will get

00:24:44.379 --> 00:24:51.828
- it's regulated to staff So once this bond is approved and then we receive the bond their plat will be

00:24:51.828 --> 00:24:54.750
- signed and ready for them to record and

00:25:00.482 --> 00:25:08.917
- All right, is there a motion I move that we approve the public improvement bond amount of forty thousand

00:25:08.917 --> 00:25:17.111
- three hundred fifty two dollars and ten cents for Wimbledon Lane subdivision I Second I will call the

00:25:17.111 --> 00:25:25.385
- rule Cox Decker I Caron I motion passes. Thank you. Thank you Next is the right-of-way closure request

00:25:25.385 --> 00:25:30.366
- for amber rentals at 612 North Lincoln Street Hello Zach Bell

00:25:30.658 --> 00:25:36.934
- engineering Amber rentals is requesting a sidewalk closure for three to five days at 612 North Lincoln

00:25:36.934 --> 00:25:43.515
- Street sidewalk detour will route pedestrians from the sidewalk on the east side of Lincoln to the sidewalk

00:25:43.515 --> 00:25:49.608
- on the west side of the street via curb ramps at the intersection of 10th and North Lincoln and the

00:25:49.608 --> 00:25:55.701
- intersection of each East Cottage Grove and North Lincoln Street Modification of traffic plans have

00:25:55.701 --> 00:25:59.966
- been submitted. I also reached out to the applicant to inform them of

00:26:00.354 --> 00:26:09.221
- not to plan on working during commencement. Great. Thank you. Any questions from the board. Public comment

00:26:09.221 --> 00:26:17.508
- on this item. All right. Is there a motion. I move that we approve the right of way closure request

00:26:17.508 --> 00:26:25.795
- for Amber rentals at 612 North Lincoln Street. I second. I will call the roll. Cox Decker. I own. I

00:26:25.795 --> 00:26:27.038
- motion passes.

00:26:28.546 --> 00:26:36.150
- Next up is the right-of-way closure request for Revere's run at Moores Pike Due to the new way that

00:26:36.150 --> 00:26:43.981
- we agenda with the Google Drive this will actually be struck from as a Since the final agenda has come

00:26:43.981 --> 00:26:52.345
- out we will actually strike this but leave the documentation in place with the new accessibility requirements

00:26:52.345 --> 00:26:53.790
- that we had met so

00:26:53.890 --> 00:27:00.355
- That's why I didn't actually take it off after 2 o'clock today when the final agenda went out So if

00:27:00.355 --> 00:27:06.821
- we do end up removing items and I believe this was at the request of the petitioner correct Then it

00:27:06.821 --> 00:27:13.609
- will stay in our files. It will just show as a removed item that was not voted upon To table like remove

00:27:13.609 --> 00:27:20.074
- it or table you do not because we are not tabling we won't bring we if we bring it back I assume it

00:27:20.074 --> 00:27:22.014
- will be in a different format

00:27:22.786 --> 00:27:31.675
- Yeah, they they could they had some expenses come up and this is not their focus anymore So they asked

00:27:31.675 --> 00:27:40.738
- it to be taken off We will go to The right of way closure from Maynard Brothers concrete for two parking

00:27:40.738 --> 00:27:49.886
- spaces on Arbutus Drive All right, Maynard Brothers concrete is Kelly spit from Maynard Brothers concrete

00:27:50.050 --> 00:27:57.745
- Requesting two reservations for parking spots for three weeks in total on Arbitus Drive They were given

00:27:57.745 --> 00:28:05.663
- two weeks of reservations starting April 7th 2026 from parking and are seeking an additional week starting

00:28:05.663 --> 00:28:13.358
- April 22nd I assume those first two weeks were approved by parking at a staff level and the third needs

00:28:13.358 --> 00:28:18.686
- to come to us. Okay. Thank you public comment on this item None on zoom

00:28:20.194 --> 00:28:27.723
- Alright, is there a motion? I move that we approve right-of-way closure from Maynard Brothers concrete

00:28:27.723 --> 00:28:35.251
- for two parking spaces on Arbutus Drive I Second with the motion in a second. I will call the roll Cox

00:28:35.251 --> 00:28:42.707
- Decker. I her own. I motion passes Next is the right-of-way closure request for Duke Energy near 1100

00:28:42.707 --> 00:28:46.142
- South strong drive Zach Bell again engineering

00:28:46.530 --> 00:28:53.685
- Duke energy is requesting lane and sidewalk closures in order to install two poles switch box and bore

00:28:53.685 --> 00:29:00.910
- approximately 1100 linear feet of cable near 1100 south strong drive work will consist of four separate

00:29:00.910 --> 00:29:08.065
- closures for each closure the sidewalk and lanes will only need closed during working hours. Temporary

00:29:08.065 --> 00:29:14.526
- traffic control plans have been submitted for all work. Thank you. Questions from the board.

00:29:16.450 --> 00:29:25.534
- Public comment on this item Not on zoom is there a motion I move that we approve the right-of-way closure

00:29:25.534 --> 00:29:34.446
- request for Duke energy near 1100 South strong drive. I Second I will call the roll Cox Decker. I grown

00:29:34.446 --> 00:29:43.359
- I motion passes Next is the right-of-way closure request for Duke energy near 3271 West profile Parkway

00:29:43.359 --> 00:29:45.758
- Zach Bell engineering again

00:29:46.370 --> 00:29:52.955
- Duke Energy is requesting approval of Lane and sidewalk closures to perform 800 linear feet of underground

00:29:52.955 --> 00:29:59.109
- boring near 3 2 7 1 West profile Parkway. The boring will pass under West profile Parkway and along

00:29:59.109 --> 00:30:05.509
- North Gates Drive. The work will consist of three phased closures. Road and sidewalk closures will only

00:30:05.509 --> 00:30:08.894
- be active during working hours for all three closures.

00:30:09.282 --> 00:30:16.785
- Temporary traffic control plans have been submitted for all work and Duke Energy is coordinating with

00:30:16.785 --> 00:30:24.435
- the county who owns the right-of-way on West profile Parkway Thank you questions from the board I Would

00:30:24.435 --> 00:30:31.864
- just like to say that For the record we discuss all of these at our work session on Monday So we are

00:30:31.864 --> 00:30:37.822
- not just flippantly approving all of these but they have all been just discussed

00:30:38.626 --> 00:30:46.063
- Thanks. Public comment on this item. None on Zoom. All right. Is there a motion. I move that we approve

00:30:46.063 --> 00:30:53.285
- the right of way closure request for Duke Energy near thirty two seventy one West profile parkway. I

00:30:53.285 --> 00:31:00.793
- second that. I will call the roll. Cox Decker. I her own. I motion passes one more right of way closure.

00:31:00.793 --> 00:31:08.158
- Next on the agenda the right of way closure request for Duke Energy at Roger Street and Second Street.

00:31:08.418 --> 00:31:16.580
- West This project this project involves the installation of new lighting infrastructure at or near Roger

00:31:16.580 --> 00:31:24.587
- Street and 2nd Street Hopewell West the work is being completed in response to a lighting request from

00:31:24.587 --> 00:31:25.598
- the city and

00:31:25.698 --> 00:31:32.544
- The scope includes the installation of new lighting poles near Rogers Street just off Second Street.

00:31:32.544 --> 00:31:39.865
- These poles will be connected via underground wiring to an existing power source located at an intersecting

00:31:39.865 --> 00:31:47.051
- hand hole. Construction is anticipated to take approximately three weeks and is expected to occur between

00:31:47.051 --> 00:31:54.100
- April 22nd, 2026 and May 31st, 2026. Sidewalk closures will be required during construction activities.

00:31:54.100 --> 00:31:54.846
- Thank you.

00:31:55.010 --> 00:32:03.658
- Questions from the board public comment on this item None on zoom is there a motion I move that we approve

00:32:03.658 --> 00:32:11.983
- the right-of-way closure request for Duke Energy at Roger Street and 2nd Street for Hopewell West Nice

00:32:11.983 --> 00:32:21.278
- second. I will call the roll Cox-Dickard. I Korone I motion passes. Thank you Next is adopt a roundabout policy. I

00:32:22.306 --> 00:32:28.765
- Good evening board Adam Wason public works director for the city of Bloomington. This is something we've

00:32:28.765 --> 00:32:34.979
- been working on for last several months with staff from several city departments including parks and

00:32:34.979 --> 00:32:41.192
- recreation engineering department and others and So this is a program that will seek out sponsorship

00:32:41.192 --> 00:32:47.651
- monies for the support and maintenance of four of our roundabouts and this kind of this came to us after

00:32:47.651 --> 00:32:49.374
- some interested parties and

00:32:49.730 --> 00:32:57.036
- asked about any programs that we had in place for such work and Realized we didn't have anything formal

00:32:57.036 --> 00:33:04.273
- in place that really could Help us to meet some of our goals to not only beautify but maintain several

00:33:04.273 --> 00:33:11.439
- of our roundabouts There is a sponsorship agreement that's been included in your packet And this will

00:33:11.439 --> 00:33:18.605
- also go to the Board of Parks commissioners for their approval some things to note that there are You

00:33:18.605 --> 00:33:19.518
- know several

00:33:19.682 --> 00:33:28.155
- of goals or intentions listed here in terms of the beautification and such, but also that there are

00:33:28.155 --> 00:33:36.881
- terms in which the sponsor provides the financial support and what type of recognition they get in the

00:33:36.881 --> 00:33:42.558
- roundabout with signage and such. It also lists out that there are

00:33:43.778 --> 00:33:49.907
- Industries and products that may not participate in the adopter on about program including religious

00:33:49.907 --> 00:33:56.462
- religious organizations party based or issue based political organizations or campaigns Businesses regarded

00:33:56.462 --> 00:34:02.713
- as adult businesses as defined by Indiana code and companies that derive 50% or more of their business

00:34:02.713 --> 00:34:08.478
- from the sale of any of the following alcohol tobacco or vape alcohol tobacco or vape products

00:34:08.578 --> 00:34:18.438
- firearms or ammunition pornography or gambling so there are some restrictions and some language in there

00:34:18.438 --> 00:34:28.298
- to that Outline who may not participate in this type of program and then just also list that the program

00:34:28.298 --> 00:34:35.998
- is a 12-month sponsorship and that the Board of Parks both the Parks director and

00:34:36.738 --> 00:34:45.796
- Parks Department and the Public Works Department will work on these sponsorship and agreements in partnership

00:34:45.796 --> 00:34:54.524
- Any questions from the board Regarding the Sponsorship levels, is there like a maximum number of sponsors

00:34:54.524 --> 00:35:03.005
- per roundabout? Okay, so as many as we can fit the signs in we could have like multiple you could have

00:35:03.005 --> 00:35:04.158
- a landmark or

00:35:04.418 --> 00:35:11.555
- but also a welcome maybe in the same roundabout potentially. I don't know that we'll have overwhelming

00:35:11.555 --> 00:35:19.038
- number of individuals or businesses knocking on the door but we have a few that are interested and you know

00:35:19.426 --> 00:35:27.789
- Ideally, we would seek sponsors of all of the different roundabouts instead of multiple ones at a single

00:35:27.789 --> 00:35:36.151
- one But we also understand some of them probably have higher traffic counts than others, etc. So Imagine

00:35:36.151 --> 00:35:44.354
- a situation where they'd prefer a certain roundabout exactly. Yeah Does this language match other city

00:35:44.354 --> 00:35:45.310
- sponsorship

00:35:46.498 --> 00:35:53.421
- Activity like what is it? Is it crafted from something that has parks parks has had sponsorship for

00:35:53.421 --> 00:36:00.413
- trees Beeline backers program, so We pretty much pulled from previous examples work for city legal I

00:36:00.413 --> 00:36:07.336
- believe some of the language may even come from the adopt a road sponsorship program that we've had

00:36:07.336 --> 00:36:13.982
- partnership with the solid waste management district on so We did not try to reinvent the wheel

00:36:17.058 --> 00:36:26.258
- One is about the recognition signage says it shall not exceed 16 square feet in total area per sign

00:36:26.258 --> 00:36:35.458
- that 16 square feet is that four by four feet? Yes, just like is That's a very very large sign with

00:36:35.458 --> 00:36:41.438
- that not impede No, so when you really think about it in traffic

00:36:41.602 --> 00:36:48.999
- You'd be surprised at how small 4x4 sign would actually look as you're in a vehicle or something like

00:36:48.999 --> 00:36:56.323
- that. It would not. So all of these standards are based on the UDO and the manual on uniform traffic

00:36:56.323 --> 00:37:03.937
- control devices, otherwise known as the MUTCD, and their signage standards for roadway signage and such.

00:37:03.937 --> 00:37:09.086
- Okay. Thank you. I'm not an engineer. It just sounds large to me. Yes.

00:37:10.146 --> 00:37:18.383
- Overall not as big as you would think. Okay And I just have a question for city legal This came up yesterday

00:37:18.383 --> 00:37:26.167
- during our work session and I would just like to make sure our colleague who is not here Has his voice

00:37:26.167 --> 00:37:33.725
- heard could you explain the list of industries and products that may not participate in the program

00:37:33.725 --> 00:37:35.614
- how that was defined and

00:37:41.378 --> 00:37:50.877
- I can tell you that I was part of this conversation largely with parks and they have the same list when

00:37:50.877 --> 00:38:00.559
- it comes to park sponsorship So who can put up banners and who can sponsor things? through their programs

00:38:00.559 --> 00:38:04.030
- Frankly, I would have to look back at

00:38:04.354 --> 00:38:11.277
- At the statute, but I believe that there's a lot of those things are taken from statute, especially

00:38:11.277 --> 00:38:18.269
- the definitions of things Some of those things are just are some of the items on the those lists are

00:38:18.269 --> 00:38:25.815
- pretty standard for municipalities or other governmental entities there are already pretty strict guidelines

00:38:25.815 --> 00:38:28.446
- we have to follow when you talk about

00:38:29.186 --> 00:38:37.435
- political signs in on government property Potentially religious signs on government property. So there

00:38:37.435 --> 00:38:46.004
- those are already things that we have to be very conscious and careful of And to avoid bringing everything

00:38:46.004 --> 00:38:54.012
- back to this board every single sign back to this board It can be easier for us to make a rule with

00:38:54.012 --> 00:38:56.094
- these items on the list I

00:38:56.194 --> 00:39:05.471
- cannot remember the basis for decisions regarding adult products, smoking, vaping, alcohol, those kinds

00:39:05.471 --> 00:39:14.391
- of things. But I can tell you those are also pretty standard in governmental prohibitions regarding

00:39:14.391 --> 00:39:23.311
- signs and advertisements on government property across governmental entities. Thank you. Yes. Other

00:39:23.311 --> 00:39:25.630
- questions from the board?

00:39:27.202 --> 00:39:38.967
- We did at one point in the distant past have some sort of sponsored like roundabout sponsor situation.

00:39:38.967 --> 00:39:41.822
- This is a long time ago.

00:39:41.922 --> 00:39:47.993
- I'm just curious. I don't remember all the details of it. This seems like a more formalized process,

00:39:47.993 --> 00:39:54.486
- though, than what we had before. So I'm just asking, like, is this essentially an improved process compared

00:39:54.486 --> 00:40:00.677
- to what may have been in place in the past if any organizations had participated in the plan? Yes. One

00:40:00.677 --> 00:40:06.689
- of the things I didn't quite have time on my plate, this was on a to-do list for quite some time to

00:40:06.689 --> 00:40:11.678
- get it updated. And we brought on some new staff that was able to devote the time.

00:40:11.842 --> 00:40:18.248
- Shout out to Cassie Warnie for her work on this. It was just one of those where it finally had somebody

00:40:18.248 --> 00:40:24.407
- that was able to put the time and effort to work with parks, get it formalized, get it updated, and

00:40:24.407 --> 00:40:30.997
- make it something that would work better. It still has terms and language on if the sponsor is not meeting

00:40:30.997 --> 00:40:37.280
- their obligations, things like that. But one of the issues in the past was that the sponsorship often

00:40:37.280 --> 00:40:40.606
- included the maintenance side of it from the sponsor.

00:40:41.250 --> 00:40:47.880
- Pulling weeds from around about in the middle of Sarah and Rogers probably not your favorite day of

00:40:47.880 --> 00:40:54.776
- activities for most people So we did have some issue in the past with that. This is more of a financial

00:40:54.776 --> 00:41:01.406
- contribution So then we can then contract for the maintenance. Yeah, I noticed that which I thought

00:41:01.406 --> 00:41:08.302
- was an improvement an improvement, especially for the sponsors Great. Thank you Not on zoom, all right,

00:41:08.302 --> 00:41:09.694
- is there a motion to

00:41:10.370 --> 00:41:19.528
- I move that we approve the adopt a roundabout policy. Nice second with a motion and a second. I will

00:41:19.528 --> 00:41:27.870
- call the roll Cox Decker. I Caron I motion passes Next is amendment to to contract with IMS

00:41:28.002 --> 00:41:34.401
- All right. This is after we discussed this at length yesterday. I think we've got a much more clear

00:41:34.401 --> 00:41:40.800
- and concise reason for how we've ended up where we're at here. But this is amendment number two not

00:41:40.800 --> 00:41:47.327
- amendment number one and it is in the amount of two thousand four hundred and eighty dollars. This is

00:41:47.327 --> 00:41:52.382
- just an amendment to add 12 months of additional of an additional time period.

00:41:52.514 --> 00:41:58.253
- for the photo images from the data collection project that we're doing that we would have it for an

00:41:58.253 --> 00:42:04.050
- extended period of time being 12 months. This brings the total amount of the contract to two hundred

00:42:04.050 --> 00:42:09.444
- and fifty three thousand three hundred and seventy one dollars. And we request your approval.

00:42:09.444 --> 00:42:15.183
- Thank you. I'll just say I appreciate the clarification after our conversation yesterday. Questions

00:42:15.183 --> 00:42:20.980
- from the board. That got pretty confusing yesterday for everybody. I'm glad that was a work session.

00:42:20.980 --> 00:42:21.726
- Not tonight.

00:42:22.498 --> 00:42:29.855
- No, I don't have any other questions. Okay public comment on this item None on zoom is there a motion

00:42:29.855 --> 00:42:37.284
- I move that we approve amendment 2 to contract with IMS and I second I will call the roll Cox Deckard.

00:42:37.284 --> 00:42:44.569
- I'm Caron. I motion passes Next on the agenda staff reports Miranda beaver on behalf of Zach Bell. I

00:42:44.569 --> 00:42:52.286
- think he forgot he had a follow-up on the IU circuit relocation notification I did meet with him today and

00:42:52.450 --> 00:43:01.282
- We discussed the Duke energy's process for notification, um, with Corey, um, Hamlin from Duke energy

00:43:01.282 --> 00:43:10.113
- and he did send an email out to them, um, to get a little more clarification on it. However, they do

00:43:10.113 --> 00:43:19.294
- have a text messaging and a, um, email notification process for 72 hours before the outage is, um, going

00:43:19.294 --> 00:43:20.606
- to occur. And,

00:43:20.706 --> 00:43:27.537
- They also have to this was the other thing that I think we missed yesterday in the work session

00:43:27.537 --> 00:43:34.724
- is clarification that they have to meet the iurc standard of Notification process for an a scheduled

00:43:34.724 --> 00:43:41.911
- outage. So all we are doing is approving the noise during that time period the iurc really navigates

00:43:41.911 --> 00:43:46.750
- the notification for those longer period of time outages which when

00:43:46.914 --> 00:43:54.097
- Zach and Kyle followed up. It is a 72 hour notification that they will be Aware of but we did try to

00:43:54.097 --> 00:44:01.564
- get more information on exactly which businesses in advance of this so that we can get That that figured

00:44:01.564 --> 00:44:08.747
- out and this is Something that was requested by the KCA. It is an update to this circuit relocation.

00:44:08.747 --> 00:44:15.646
- That is their dedicated circuit for These power outages to not happen and that at those download

00:44:15.746 --> 00:44:23.575
- Downtown locations. So Kyle is pretty sure that all of the businesses down there are aware because they're

00:44:23.575 --> 00:44:28.990
- in favor of having this upgrade done to this circuit Thank you, all right

00:44:29.122 --> 00:44:35.980
- That report for me now just really quickly Lots going on we're starting construction season as we talked

00:44:35.980 --> 00:44:42.643
- about with the contract for the paving with West Kirkwood Patterson and Rogers We have major projects

00:44:42.643 --> 00:44:49.697
- going on throughout the entire summer as you know as is kind of typical around here for summer construction

00:44:49.697 --> 00:44:56.752
- season, but We will have several projects kicking off right after graduation that Monday May 11th including

00:44:56.752 --> 00:44:59.038
- our Kirkwood sidewalk project with

00:44:59.138 --> 00:45:06.667
- brick rehabilitation. We are repaving our downtown parking lots. So the surface lots that are under

00:45:06.667 --> 00:45:14.346
- city control downtown are all getting a refresh and with pavement. We've got several other contracted

00:45:14.346 --> 00:45:16.830
- pavement projects on 6th Street.

00:45:16.994 --> 00:45:23.543
- on 5th Street between College and Walnut Kirkwood between College and Walnut. We've got alley projects

00:45:23.543 --> 00:45:29.902
- that will take place between 8th and 11th College and Walnut. So busy busy active summer. But these

00:45:29.902 --> 00:45:36.260
- are the investments that we need to be continuing to make will be issuing a news release. We've got

00:45:36.260 --> 00:45:37.214
- some different

00:45:37.346 --> 00:45:44.240
- On the data portal. We've got some different maps that outline all these projects and where we're going

00:45:44.240 --> 00:45:50.869
- to be working on things So just want to make the public aware. We've got a big summer ahead of good

00:45:50.869 --> 00:45:57.564
- investments to keep maintaining our public rights of way And that's all I have for you tonight Thank

00:45:57.564 --> 00:46:04.325
- you very much Last on the agenda is the approval of claims there any questions from the board tonight

00:46:04.325 --> 00:46:06.910
- on claims any public comment on claims

00:46:07.810 --> 00:46:14.608
- Not on zoom. All right. Is there a motion. I move that we approve claims in the amount of one million

00:46:14.608 --> 00:46:21.273
- two hundred and seventy eight thousand four hundred twenty six dollars and seven cents. I second. I

00:46:21.273 --> 00:46:28.004
- will call the roll. Cox Decker. I Caron. I motion passes. And with nothing else on the agenda I will

00:46:28.004 --> 00:46:29.470
- call for adjournment.
