WEBVTT 00:00:00.162 --> 00:00:07.450 - I call to order the Board of Public Works meeting tonight for Tuesday, October 6th. We are in council 00:00:07.450 --> 00:00:14.667 - chambers at City Hall at 401 North Morton Street. If you are on the Zoom link at the time for public 00:00:14.667 --> 00:00:21.884 - comment, you are welcome to either use the raise hand function or the chat. We will start tonight on 00:00:21.884 --> 00:00:26.814 - our agenda with opening of bids, which occurred at the work session. 00:00:26.914 --> 00:00:33.957 - Yesterday so we will move along to messages from board members any messages from the board. I Do have 00:00:33.957 --> 00:00:41.000 - one message in the interest of the meeting length and the fact that many of these items are ones that 00:00:41.000 --> 00:00:47.973 - we have heard in the past I'd like to make a motion that the board adopt a rule limiting oral public 00:00:47.973 --> 00:00:54.878 - comment on each agenda item to five minutes per speaker All right with the motion is there a second 00:00:56.290 --> 00:01:04.101 - I second that motion. All right, I will call the roll. Roach? Aye. Cox-Deckard? Aye. Caron, aye. Motion 00:01:04.101 --> 00:01:11.763 - passes. So public comment tonight will be limited to five minutes per individual. All right, first we 00:01:11.763 --> 00:01:19.424 - have an appeal for Wells and Wells of the engineering notice of violation issued November 24th, 2025, 00:01:19.424 --> 00:01:20.926 - the second hearing. 00:01:27.394 --> 00:01:37.141 - The appeals process will now be that the appellant will go first and then the city of Bloomington will 00:01:37.141 --> 00:01:46.603 - make their statements. So if someone is here to speak on behalf of Wells and Wells, you may step up 00:01:46.603 --> 00:01:56.350 - to the podium and state your name. Thank you, Miranda. Jesse Graber with Wells and Wells Construction. 00:01:57.410 --> 00:02:08.147 - Sorry, I just want to make sure that the captioning is picking up everything is. There we go, thank 00:02:08.147 --> 00:02:18.132 - you perfect. Absolutely again recording in progress. Here with the same petition and request 00:02:18.132 --> 00:02:24.574 - and understanding as the last time we all met. I think the. 00:02:24.962 --> 00:02:35.390 - You know, there's no reason to rehash what happened at the time. There is a substantial punitive fine 00:02:35.390 --> 00:02:45.817 - for opening the streets a couple days after our permit had expired. We discussed in quite detail last 00:02:45.817 --> 00:02:50.622 - time the reasons why our owners have requested 00:02:50.722 --> 00:03:03.048 - Which was at least an initially favorably received by transportation that we. donate or pay in kind 00:03:03.048 --> 00:03:07.486 - to the amount of the proposed fine. 00:03:07.650 --> 00:03:15.097 - to a capital improvement project on Washington Street that's much needed given the amount of current 00:03:15.097 --> 00:03:22.838 - student traffic and the proposed student traffic with a 600 car parking garage at the end of Washington. 00:03:22.838 --> 00:03:30.137 - The east side of Washington was fully redeveloped under the construction plans with new sidewalks, 00:03:30.137 --> 00:03:36.478 - new curb, new ADA ramps. The west side of Washington is in its original current state 00:03:36.930 --> 00:03:44.018 - There are no curbs. There are no sidewalks for the students. There is considerable amount of erosion 00:03:44.018 --> 00:03:51.317 - and runoff every time it rains down Washington Street and ruts out the property. We do acknowledge that 00:03:51.317 --> 00:03:58.686 - there is some construction damage that has been done to the west side of Washington that will need to be 00:03:58.786 --> 00:04:05.529 - addressed but in no way shape or form to the degree that would be required to support the amount of 00:04:05.529 --> 00:04:12.406 - students and traffic that is that Washington Street is going to receive. We had met transportation on 00:04:12.406 --> 00:04:15.710 - site a few months ago thought we at least had a. 00:04:15.906 --> 00:04:22.965 - plan to move ahead with a proposed capital improvement project, but was asked to come back here for 00:04:22.965 --> 00:04:30.095 - a second hearing. So no nothing new, same position as before. So happy to help the community and the 00:04:30.095 --> 00:04:37.436 - city with a project there that helps everyone. And I think one of the property owners from Washington's 00:04:37.436 --> 00:04:44.566 - here who had reached out to me, I just mentioned to her that there was a hearing tonight as well. So 00:04:44.566 --> 00:04:45.342 - thank you. 00:05:07.202 --> 00:05:16.307 - Hi, good evening, Alex Pratt with City Legal. I will just recap for the board real quick what this appeal 00:05:16.307 --> 00:05:25.326 - is about. So the appellant, Wells and Wells Construction, was issued a notice of violation that occurred 00:05:25.326 --> 00:05:34.174 - on September 20th, 2025. And basically the appellant was granted approval via permit for road closures 00:05:34.306 --> 00:05:42.724 - both North Lincoln Street from July 2nd to July 23rd, 2025, and again at North Washington Street from 00:05:42.724 --> 00:05:51.060 - July 23rd to August 13th of 2025. Appellant requested extension for the closure dates for these both 00:05:51.060 --> 00:05:57.662 - locations and was given a deadline until September 19th of 2025 for completion. 00:05:57.890 --> 00:06:06.585 - The parent was not able to complete the project in a satisfactory condition and was assessed a fine 00:06:06.585 --> 00:06:15.367 - of 27,000 in accordance with Bloomington Municipal Code. And we asked the board to uphold the notice 00:06:15.367 --> 00:06:23.454 - of violation and deny the appeal. And we would also request that the board just refrain from 00:06:23.810 --> 00:06:38.896 - adjudicating how the funds will be spent because under the code, their authority is to render a decision 00:06:38.896 --> 00:06:53.694 - and uphold or reduce or eliminate the fine. Yes, thanks. Just a general clarification, and I think you 00:06:54.018 --> 00:07:02.916 - I'm sorry, I forget your name. I think you said it right there at the end. Tonight's request and the 00:07:02.916 --> 00:07:11.814 - charge of the board is to determine whether a fine or excuse me, excuse me, a violation happened and 00:07:11.814 --> 00:07:18.686 - whether the city should uphold the fining structure that exists in city code. 00:07:20.130 --> 00:07:28.506 - not to make any kind of determination about any negotiation that may or may not have happened or negotiations 00:07:28.506 --> 00:07:36.348 - that fell apart or how those fine dollars should be spent. Is that correct? Yes, that is correct. Just 00:07:36.348 --> 00:07:43.963 - a little clarification that you are able to reduce the fine if you see extenuating circumstances in 00:07:43.963 --> 00:07:45.790 - this appeal. Thank you. 00:08:02.114 --> 00:08:16.470 - Hello, my name is Mitzi Lewis, I live at 110 East 19th Street I am here regarding the poor and unsafe 00:08:16.470 --> 00:08:28.574 - condition of North Washington Street between 19th South to the new parking garage and 00:08:29.154 --> 00:08:37.540 - I own two student rental properties on North Washington directly across from Hub 2. And we've rented 00:08:37.540 --> 00:08:45.927 - those properties 135 years, 120 years, at least. And I would just want to say the relocating and new 00:08:45.927 --> 00:08:54.562 - level of North Washington Street has left the west side of the street with wide gaps of dirt, unsightly 00:08:54.562 --> 00:08:56.638 - and unfinished sections. 00:08:56.930 --> 00:09:05.787 - My own asphalt parking area in front of 1321 destroyed The asphalt was replaced with compacted fill 00:09:05.787 --> 00:09:14.822 - which is treacherous as my tenants Step out from their cars onto these loose stone pebbles on a slope 00:09:14.822 --> 00:09:21.022 - now there's a slope because Washington's lower than it was before and 00:09:21.474 --> 00:09:29.417 - But maybe worst of all is there is now a significant drop off from the edge of the pavement along the 00:09:29.417 --> 00:09:37.361 - west edge of the street. Because the street was also moved to the east a bit. So I call this drop off 00:09:37.361 --> 00:09:45.382 - a gully because after every hard rain or two, the rock which gets repeatedly replaced to fill this gap 00:09:45.382 --> 00:09:50.366 - washes out and we're quickly back to this significant drop off. 00:09:51.234 --> 00:09:58.746 - I believe this gullies a liability for the city and will become a bigger problem when the traffic and 00:09:58.746 --> 00:10:06.479 - significantly increases once Hub two is completed in the parking garages in full use I Did send pictures 00:10:06.479 --> 00:10:13.917 - today of North Washington Street to your public works email I don't know if you had a chance to look 00:10:13.917 --> 00:10:20.030 - at those and I just would encourage this may not be your you know a wheelhouse but 00:10:20.258 --> 00:10:27.989 - Or your decision, but I just encourage you maybe to visit the area and take a look in person what I'm 00:10:27.989 --> 00:10:35.948 - trying to describe and with the pictures. This section of North Washington Street badly needs curb slash 00:10:35.948 --> 00:10:44.286 - gutter. Install to eliminate the goalie and the side and they need sidewalk replacement and much more I just. 00:10:44.706 --> 00:10:52.687 - guess I'd like to know maybe you're not again not the party to ask but does the city have a plan and 00:10:52.687 --> 00:11:00.747 - money to do these much needed upgrades and so I just like to say I vote in favor of the appeal not to 00:11:00.747 --> 00:11:08.728 - find them but rather let them use their resources toward this capital improvement project that needs 00:11:08.728 --> 00:11:14.654 - to be done. Seems like that would be a better use of resources. Thank you. 00:11:19.298 --> 00:11:31.509 - Any final questions from the board Excuse me, I guess this is for city staff probably Andrew Are there 00:11:31.509 --> 00:11:43.364 - any short or long-term plans for any public improvements in this general area? Good evening, Andrew 00:11:43.364 --> 00:11:45.854 - seabor city engineer 00:11:46.242 --> 00:11:54.615 - The city of Bloomington does not have a city-funded capital project programmed on North Washington at 00:11:54.615 --> 00:12:03.069 - this time. We are aware that the condition of some of the work in the area still needs to be remedied, 00:12:03.069 --> 00:12:11.442 - and that's been coordinated and in process with the developer, but there are no city capital projects 00:12:11.442 --> 00:12:15.710 - currently planned. What I'm hearing you say is that 00:12:15.938 --> 00:12:23.385 - problems created as a direct result of construction will be remedied. That's what I would expect, not 00:12:23.385 --> 00:12:30.759 - knowing the details, but any damages caused should be brought back to equal or better condition. But 00:12:30.759 --> 00:12:35.358 - not necessarily other capital plans. Correct. Okay, thank you. 00:12:47.234 --> 00:12:54.439 - engineering program manager. Just to state that those conditions are very common around any work area 00:12:54.439 --> 00:13:01.502 - and the expectation if there's no planned improvements for that section would be for restoration to 00:13:01.502 --> 00:13:08.919 - at least the standard that they were currently existing in prior to the start of the project. And before 00:13:08.919 --> 00:13:13.086 - the start of the project was that area of North Washington 00:13:15.682 --> 00:13:26.212 - on any kind of future list for improvements? Not that I'm aware of. Okay, thank you. All right, is there 00:13:26.212 --> 00:13:36.240 - any other public comment, Miranda? None on Zoom. Okay, thank you. Is there a motion? I move that we 00:13:36.240 --> 00:13:45.566 - uphold the engineering notice of violation issued to Wells and Wells on November 24th, 2025. 00:13:47.106 --> 00:13:58.400 - Second. With a motion and a second, I will call the roll. Roach? Aye. Cox-Dekard? Aye. Caron, aye. Motion 00:13:58.400 --> 00:14:10.334 - passes. Next, we have the CGR appeal of engineering notice of violation, issue June 10th, 2026, second hearing. 00:14:15.874 --> 00:14:24.361 - There's a representative from CGR to speak on behalf of this appeal. You may step up to the microphone. 00:14:24.361 --> 00:14:32.521 - If you would state your name, please, and then you'll have five minutes. Thank you. Yes. My name is 00:14:32.521 --> 00:14:39.294 - Carvin Thomas. I am the managing partner of CGR services LLC Bloomington, Indiana. 00:14:43.362 --> 00:14:51.229 - And when I left here the last time, I wasn't for sure what the reason was for the table. Adam suggested 00:14:51.229 --> 00:14:58.869 - we table this motion into this meeting. I'm not sure what he was seeking to find. But I will just go 00:14:58.869 --> 00:15:07.038 - back and reiterate what I said before, that this project that we started begun under RAD 2. It was a RAD 2. 00:15:07.490 --> 00:15:15.618 - project up at Crestmont. Actually, Rad 1, we were involved in down at Stonewood on the south side of 00:15:15.618 --> 00:15:24.148 - Bloomington. Not, I'm sorry, Walnut Woods south side of Bloomington. And continued up at Reverend Butler, 00:15:24.148 --> 00:15:32.839 - Rad 1. Rad 2 began on Crestmont, and that's where we started this project. After Rad 2, we were contracted, 00:15:32.839 --> 00:15:36.702 - we were contracted to do some sidewalk repairs. 00:15:36.994 --> 00:15:44.990 - in addition to the continuation of the RAD2 project. During the... when we signed the initial contract 00:15:44.990 --> 00:15:53.528 - for the concrete sidewalk repair, there was nowhere in the contract that had stated we needed a right-of-way. 00:15:53.528 --> 00:16:01.369 - We just can... we, CGR, just assumed we were continuing to work under the RAD2 project, which didn't 00:16:01.369 --> 00:16:04.862 - require right-of-ways to finish the project. 00:16:05.090 --> 00:16:11.653 - So we were approached after we were shut down. Rhonda from the city of Bloomington shut us down for 00:16:11.653 --> 00:16:18.478 - like a month and a half. We weren't allowed to continue our repairs, so we come back shortly in January 00:16:18.478 --> 00:16:25.040 - and continued our repair when we were approached by the city to have right-of-way permits, which we 00:16:25.040 --> 00:16:30.750 - thought was unfair to CGR, because we would have put that in the cost of the contract. 00:16:30.946 --> 00:16:38.455 - for right-of-way permits. So we were under the assumption we would continue to operate under the RAT2 00:16:38.455 --> 00:16:46.332 - agreement, which was what we were doing was to fence off all of our repairs, and mind you, like I repeated 00:16:46.332 --> 00:16:54.061 - last time, like I said the last time, we were talking probably 10 feet, sometimes five feet of concrete, 00:16:54.061 --> 00:16:58.110 - sometimes 10 feet of concrete, and there were probably 00:16:58.914 --> 00:17:07.584 - you know, 10 to 15 spots all over Crestmont that we had repaired. And like I said last time, we had 00:17:07.584 --> 00:17:16.341 - came together under the Rad2 agreement and agreed that the best way to partition off these sidewalks 00:17:16.341 --> 00:17:25.272 - for safety was to put up the orange fencing, which is what we continued to do under this project. Then 00:17:25.272 --> 00:17:27.006 - we were approached, 00:17:27.106 --> 00:17:34.765 - about the right-of-way, which for our position, again, had we known from the beginning, we would have 00:17:34.765 --> 00:17:42.499 - factored in those costs. So for that to happen to us midstream, we kind of felt like that was a little 00:17:42.499 --> 00:17:49.182 - unfair to us. But as Secretary Roach had discussed last time, it was all about the city, 00:17:49.282 --> 00:17:56.486 - and putting up the signs for street closures, which, at that time, I thought was not as effective as 00:17:56.486 --> 00:18:03.262 - the orange fencing. I get what you said about the safety, and I just wanted to reiterate that. 00:18:04.450 --> 00:18:11.496 - We know up at Crestmont, there's tons of kids, there's tons of folks. It was around starting back to 00:18:11.496 --> 00:18:18.543 - school, and we knew there would be a lot of folks getting on buses, so we put up the orange fencing, 00:18:18.543 --> 00:18:25.659 - which we thought was the best way to proceed with that. And just a further one last point I'd like to 00:18:25.659 --> 00:18:32.775 - make, that when we received our final payment for this project, it came out of the RAD2 funds for our 00:18:32.775 --> 00:18:33.822 - final payment. 00:18:34.306 --> 00:18:42.312 - So just to try to boast our point that we thought we were continuing this project under the Rad2 agreement, 00:18:42.312 --> 00:18:49.948 - which called for no right-of-way offsets or permits. Again, I'm not sure why Adam tabled that. I never 00:18:49.948 --> 00:18:57.583 - did get an excuse on why this was tabled. I don't know what he was looking at. If there was additional 00:18:57.583 --> 00:19:01.438 - information, I'm not sure what that was. All right. 00:19:03.458 --> 00:19:17.541 - You have someone from the city, please. Alex Pratt with CityLego again. So a brief recap of this appeal, 00:19:17.541 --> 00:19:30.686 - the appellant's CGR services, LLC, was issued a notice of violation that occurred from April 7th. 00:19:31.042 --> 00:19:42.579 - 2026 to April 24th of 2026 Appellant applied for right-of-way permits with the city and After that staff 00:19:42.579 --> 00:19:54.336 - repeatedly requested additional information in order to issue the permit The appellant failed continuously 00:19:54.336 --> 00:19:59.390 - failed to provide that information and was on 00:19:59.650 --> 00:20:08.392 - April 24, 2026 there was issued a fine of $3,000 for working in the right of way without a permit. The 00:20:08.392 --> 00:20:16.964 - parent was eventually issued a retroactive permit. And so we asked the board to uphold the notice of 00:20:16.964 --> 00:20:23.838 - violation and the fine and deny the appeal. Thank you. Questions from the board? 00:20:29.250 --> 00:20:38.164 - Alex, don't go away too fast. Just to, like I did last time, I just want to reiterate my understanding 00:20:38.164 --> 00:20:46.906 - of our charge tonight. Our charge is to determine whether a violation took place, and whether that's 00:20:46.906 --> 00:20:55.906 - the fine assessed by the city is in line with city code, but we do have the ability to adjust that fine 00:20:55.906 --> 00:20:57.118 - as necessary. 00:20:57.218 --> 00:21:14.204 - Charge is to not adjudicate contract disputes That is correct. Okay. Thank you All right seeing no other 00:21:14.204 --> 00:21:23.102 - board questions is there public comment on this item I 00:21:27.074 --> 00:21:37.278 - None on Zoom. Thank you. Is there a motion? I move that we uphold the engineering notice of violation 00:21:37.278 --> 00:21:47.681 - to CGR issue June 10th of 2026. Second. I will call the roll. Roach? Aye. Cox-Deckard? Aye. Crohn? Aye. 00:21:47.681 --> 00:21:49.182 - Motion passes. 00:21:53.122 --> 00:22:01.014 - Next on tonight's agenda is petitions and remonstrances. This is a time for public to comment on any 00:22:01.014 --> 00:22:09.298 - item that is not on tonight's agenda. Again, if you are on Zoom, feel free to use the raise hand function 00:22:09.298 --> 00:22:17.503 - or chat. None on Zoom. All right, so we will move along to the consent agenda. Tonight is a noise permit 00:22:17.503 --> 00:22:21.566 - request for 50 year celebration at Rinseable Spoon. 00:22:21.954 --> 00:22:29.010 - Contract renewal with Ivy Tech for CDL training. Engineering service agreement with Rundle Ernstberger 00:22:29.010 --> 00:22:36.134 - Associates Inc. Preliminary engineering contract amendment two with Crossroad Engineers PC for Hopewell 00:22:36.134 --> 00:22:42.985 - South and payroll. Are there any items that need to be removed from the consent agenda tonight? Any 00:22:42.985 --> 00:22:49.150 - board questions on the consent agenda? Is there any public comment on the consent agenda? 00:22:51.266 --> 00:22:59.881 - None on zoom. All right. Is there a motion? I Move that we approve the consent agenda for October 6th 00:22:59.881 --> 00:23:08.580 - of 2026 second I will call the roll Roach. I Cox Decker. I Caron I motion passes Next we'll move along 00:23:08.580 --> 00:23:16.350 - to new business. We have a right-of-way closure request from Duke energy on Grimes Lane and 00:23:20.930 --> 00:23:29.022 - Good evening, Kyle Ball from Engineering again. Duke Energy had submitted this request for a right-of-way 00:23:29.022 --> 00:23:37.343 - closure along Grimes Lane just west of the South Walnut intersection to relocate some power that's currently 00:23:37.343 --> 00:23:45.054 - running to that signal ahead of some intersection improvements that are becoming, I believe in 2027. 00:23:45.634 --> 00:23:53.779 - The proposed closure includes or closures rather include the southern sidewalk and the southern eastbound 00:23:53.779 --> 00:24:02.001 - traffic lane. So this would actually be in between the B line trail overhead crossing and the intersection 00:24:02.001 --> 00:24:09.993 - itself roughly. Flaggers would be utilized for the lane closure and there would be a hard closure point 00:24:09.993 --> 00:24:13.758 - for the pedestrian traffic that would have folks 00:24:13.890 --> 00:24:20.133 - move around that closure to the north side along South Walnut Street and then we would actually get 00:24:20.133 --> 00:24:26.563 - to utilize our new mid-block crossing on that section of street just about 50 feet to the west of this 00:24:26.563 --> 00:24:33.055 - work area. So they're planning to perform this work between November 2nd and December 18th of this year 00:24:33.055 --> 00:24:36.926 - and plan for three to five days for the work to be completed. 00:24:46.146 --> 00:24:55.300 - Seeing none, is there any public comment on this item? None on Zoom. All right, is there a motion? I 00:24:55.300 --> 00:25:04.544 - move that we approve the right-of-way closure request from Duke Energy on Grimes Lane. Second. I will 00:25:04.544 --> 00:25:11.070 - call the roll. Roach? Aye. Cox-Deckard? Aye. Caron? Aye. Motion passes. 00:25:12.578 --> 00:25:19.635 - Next is a right of way closure request for August Mac environmental on North Morton between West 6th 00:25:19.635 --> 00:25:27.041 - Street and West Kirkwood and West 6th Street between North Morton and North College Avenue. Hello Rebecca 00:25:27.041 --> 00:25:34.237 - Davis from engineering department August Mac environmental is requesting approval of a temporary right 00:25:34.237 --> 00:25:35.774 - of way closure at the 00:25:36.098 --> 00:25:43.227 - on the 200 block of West 6th Street to accommodate removing environmental monitoring wells as well as 00:25:43.227 --> 00:25:50.426 - the repair of the sidewalks. The request includes temporary closures of the south sidewalk of West 6th 00:25:50.426 --> 00:25:57.695 - Street as well as the west sidewalk of North Morton Avenue in the same block. The closures are proposed 00:25:57.695 --> 00:26:02.238 - for periods of approximately 48 hours including overnight hours. 00:26:02.370 --> 00:26:09.909 - to allow for demolition and repair. Pedestrian traffic will be detoured in accordance with the approved 00:26:09.909 --> 00:26:17.447 - maintenance of traffic plan. The date of the closures is as of yet to be determined, but is anticipated 00:26:17.447 --> 00:26:24.696 - to be late October or early November. Again, the sidewalk closure of the south sidewalk of West 6th 00:26:24.696 --> 00:26:25.566 - Street will 00:26:25.698 --> 00:26:32.715 - be detoured to the north sidewalk of West 6th Street and the sidewalk closure of the east sidewalk of 00:26:32.715 --> 00:26:39.594 - North Morton will be detoured to the west sidewalk which is the beeline trail. The petitioner shall 00:26:39.594 --> 00:26:46.474 - install and maintain all required signage, barricades, and traffic control devices, maintain access 00:26:46.474 --> 00:26:54.110 - to adjacent properties, and limit the closure to the minimum area and duration necessary to complete the work. 00:26:56.546 --> 00:27:09.138 - Seeing none is their public comment on this item None on zoom, okay, I will call the roll Roach. 00:27:09.138 --> 00:27:14.590 - Oh I'm sorry. Is there a motion first? Oh 00:27:15.106 --> 00:27:20.827 - Yeah, I'll make a motion. I move that we approve the right-of-way closure request for August 00:27:20.827 --> 00:27:27.287 - MAC environmental on North Morton between 6th Street and West Kirkwood and West 6th Street between North 00:27:27.287 --> 00:27:33.993 - Morton and North College Avenue. Second. Now, with a motion and a second, I will call the roll. I apologize. 00:27:33.993 --> 00:27:37.438 - Roach? Aye. Cox-Dekard? Aye. Caron, aye. Motion passes. 00:27:39.394 --> 00:27:46.059 - On staff reports, we have a settlement agreement for Beacon Builders, Kinzer Ridge Engineering Notice 00:27:46.059 --> 00:27:52.921 - of Violation. I know there was a brief report at the work session yesterday, but is there anything you'd 00:27:52.921 --> 00:27:59.194 - like to include today? If I can pull it up, yes. So just noting, sorry, Kyle Ball, Engineering, 00:27:59.194 --> 00:28:05.859 - once again, just noting that this settlement is a little over a year in the making, so we're happy to 00:28:05.859 --> 00:28:07.166 - get this done with. 00:28:07.330 --> 00:28:14.860 - We have agreed in principle between both legal teams to settle on an amount of $21,250 to settle the 00:28:14.860 --> 00:28:22.389 - two NOVs surrounding the Kinzer Ridge development on Prow, Acuff area north of the Bloomington North 00:28:22.389 --> 00:28:30.068 - High School. And we're in the middle of executing that agreement at this point in time. So I just want 00:28:30.068 --> 00:28:37.150 - to make note of it. Great, thank you. Thank you. Next on the agenda is the approval of claims. 00:28:37.570 --> 00:28:48.506 - in the amount of $1,220,488.95. Does the board have any questions tonight on claims? Is there any public 00:28:48.506 --> 00:28:59.234 - comment on claims? None on Zoom. Is there a motion? I move that we approve the claims for this evening 00:28:59.234 --> 00:29:06.942 - in the amount of $1,220,488.95. Second. I will call the roll. Roach? Aye. 00:29:07.106 --> 00:29:14.782 - Cox Deckard? Aye. Caron? Aye. Motion passes. And with nothing else on the agenda, I will call for adjournment.