WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.160
-  Good evening seen as we have a quorum and it is 630. I'm gonna go ahead and call this

00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:13.180
-  Deliberation session of the Bloomington Common Council to order here on Wednesday, April 9th. Will

00:00:13.180 --> 00:00:15.120
-  the clerk please call the roll?

00:00:15.120 --> 00:00:25.320
-  Councilmember Flaherty here Ruff here Rallo here Piedmont Smith here Stossberg

00:00:25.320 --> 00:00:28.560
-  Daly is absent Zulek here

00:00:29.560 --> 00:00:32.060
-  Rosenberger here and Asari

00:00:32.060 --> 00:00:35.720
-  Thank you

00:00:35.720 --> 00:00:37.720
-  I've been trying to start out most meetings

00:00:37.720 --> 00:00:40.560
-  this year with some

00:00:40.560 --> 00:00:43.040
-  items of historical interest I

00:00:43.040 --> 00:00:47.600
-  Skipped that last week because we were trying really really hard to have a really fast meeting

00:00:47.600 --> 00:00:50.680
-  Which we accomplished very well

00:00:50.680 --> 00:00:53.840
-  So but today I am going to start off with

00:00:54.600 --> 00:00:58.560
-  This little tidbit related to black culture in Bloomington

00:00:58.560 --> 00:01:01.000
-  so in the early 1970s

00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:05.840
-  Dr. Herman C. Hudson oversaw several developments related to black culture on the IU campus

00:01:05.840 --> 00:01:07.860
-  including founding the black studies department

00:01:07.860 --> 00:01:14.160
-  Opening the black culture center and the afro-american arts institute and that includes the african-american

00:01:14.160 --> 00:01:15.040
-  dance company

00:01:15.040 --> 00:01:19.500
-  And I wanted to highlight that tonight because this weekend they are having their 50th anniversary

00:01:20.120 --> 00:01:24.830
-  Two-part performance on Friday and Saturday night at the bus car chumbly. So I just thought that

00:01:24.830 --> 00:01:27.040
-  that was something important to note

00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:31.920
-  Especially in this moment where it seems like there's a lot of pieces of culture that are trying to

00:01:31.920 --> 00:01:32.600
-  be canceled

00:01:32.600 --> 00:01:38.270
-  This is something this weekend that is going to continue to be highlighted. Hopefully for at least

00:01:38.270 --> 00:01:39.280
-  another 50 years

00:01:39.280 --> 00:01:45.200
-  So on to our agenda summation

00:01:45.800 --> 00:01:51.560
-  Since last week's meeting was very brief. We're gonna start with a period of councilmember reports

00:01:51.560 --> 00:01:52.040
-  tonight

00:01:52.040 --> 00:01:56.920
-  Then we are gonna have a council discussion related to budget priorities for 2026

00:01:56.920 --> 00:02:01.880
-  We're gonna have public comment related to budget priorities some notes on council schedule and

00:02:01.880 --> 00:02:03.000
-  then adjournment

00:02:03.000 --> 00:02:05.360
-  So we will start on

00:02:05.360 --> 00:02:09.040
-  My right with councilmember reports councilmember Flaherty

00:02:09.040 --> 00:02:12.240
-  Thank You councilmember rough

00:02:13.440 --> 00:02:19.060
-  Councilmember Rallo. Yes, just to announce that councilmember Ruff and I have our monthly

00:02:19.060 --> 00:02:24.660
-  constituent meeting this Saturday at 10 a.m. Which is April

00:02:24.660 --> 00:02:28.360
-  12 I believe

00:02:28.360 --> 00:02:35.500
-  So you can find a link at the council website Bloomington dot ion dot gov slash council and

00:02:35.500 --> 00:02:38.200
-  You're welcome to join us

00:02:38.200 --> 00:02:39.960
-  Thank you

00:02:39.960 --> 00:02:41.960
-  Thank You councilmember Piedmont Smith

00:02:41.960 --> 00:02:43.960
-  Yes

00:02:43.960 --> 00:02:46.080
-  Yes

00:02:46.080 --> 00:02:48.400
-  As many of you know, there was a large

00:02:48.400 --> 00:02:54.000
-  Demonstration here in Bloomington and many cities throughout the country on Saturday a hands-off

00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:54.440
-  rally

00:02:54.440 --> 00:03:00.640
-  to let the federal government and especially Donald Trump's administration know that

00:03:00.640 --> 00:03:04.040
-  We value

00:03:04.040 --> 00:03:08.720
-  Social justice we value integrity. We value the rights of

00:03:08.720 --> 00:03:11.920
-  people from all walks of life

00:03:12.280 --> 00:03:14.280
-  value diversity equity and inclusion

00:03:14.280 --> 00:03:20.120
-  And many other things that that were addressed during the rally

00:03:20.120 --> 00:03:25.020
-  And I just wanted to mention that and there was a good turnout and councilmember Zulek and I spoke

00:03:25.020 --> 00:03:26.700
-  and councilmember Asari as well

00:03:26.700 --> 00:03:32.400
-  and some of our colleagues from the county and state governments as well and

00:03:32.400 --> 00:03:37.270
-  It's just very important for us to keep speaking out about what's happening in our federal

00:03:37.270 --> 00:03:40.560
-  government because it is not normal and it is not acceptable

00:03:41.200 --> 00:03:43.200
-  For

00:03:43.200 --> 00:03:49.440
-  Myself, I do have a constituent meeting this Saturday is always the second Saturday of the month

00:03:49.440 --> 00:03:52.520
-  It'll be at 11 a.m.

00:03:52.520 --> 00:03:56.560
-  And since the farmers market has started back up

00:03:56.560 --> 00:03:58.760
-  in

00:03:58.760 --> 00:04:03.440
-  In front of City Hall, there will be an in-person component. So it'll be a hybrid meeting

00:04:03.440 --> 00:04:07.680
-  I will be in person in the McCloskey room of City Hall from 11 to 12

00:04:07.680 --> 00:04:11.140
-  11 to 12, but you can also join via zoom and

00:04:11.140 --> 00:04:14.080
-  There will be a link

00:04:14.080 --> 00:04:20.090
-  As for councilmembers are all own rough. There's a link on the City Council web page to that zoom

00:04:20.090 --> 00:04:20.700
-  meeting

00:04:20.700 --> 00:04:23.560
-  Thank you

00:04:23.560 --> 00:04:28.590
-  Great. Thank you going down to the other end councilmember. Sorry no report. Thanks. That's member

00:04:28.590 --> 00:04:29.120
-  Rosenberger

00:04:29.120 --> 00:04:31.800
-  councilmember Zulek

00:04:31.800 --> 00:04:39.480
-  My my new newsletter will be releasing on Monday. So if you'd like to subscribe you can go to tiny

00:04:39.480 --> 00:04:39.780
-  URL

00:04:39.780 --> 00:04:41.880
-  calm

00:04:41.880 --> 00:04:45.260
-  Civic zoo. I hope to be interesting. Thanks

00:04:45.260 --> 00:04:47.640
-  Thank you

00:04:47.640 --> 00:04:51.920
-  and I have a small report I

00:04:51.920 --> 00:04:53.880
-  also want to

00:04:53.880 --> 00:04:58.140
-  Make sure to announce my constituent meeting well in advance. It is not this Saturday. It is next

00:04:58.140 --> 00:04:59.840
-  Saturday April 19th

00:04:59.840 --> 00:05:05.680
-  And it will be here right down the hall in the McCloskey room at 11 from 11 to 12

00:05:05.680 --> 00:05:11.280
-  And then also this Saturday in addition to a councilmember Piedmont Smith's constituent meeting

00:05:11.280 --> 00:05:16.200
-  There's actually the Indiana Democratic Party has organized a people's town hall here

00:05:16.200 --> 00:05:18.600
-  in City Hall from

00:05:18.600 --> 00:05:21.680
-  10 to 1130 and there will be various

00:05:21.680 --> 00:05:27.230
-  Democratic officials there having that town hall. So that is the second thing that I wanted to

00:05:27.230 --> 00:05:27.520
-  share

00:05:28.160 --> 00:05:32.620
-  and then this transitions us into our discussion tonight, so

00:05:32.620 --> 00:05:40.970
-  We have a little community survey which is linked to a QR code that I believe our council attorney

00:05:40.970 --> 00:05:41.520
-  is going to get up

00:05:41.520 --> 00:05:43.200
-  on the screen

00:05:43.200 --> 00:05:45.920
-  That is a very simple survey

00:05:45.920 --> 00:05:50.300
-  Of what we are starting to talk about tonight, which is

00:05:50.300 --> 00:05:54.400
-  budget outcome areas and budget outcomes

00:05:54.400 --> 00:05:59.210
-  We are shifting to outcome based budgeting and so part of the idea with that is to prioritize our

00:05:59.210 --> 00:05:59.800
-  outcomes

00:05:59.800 --> 00:06:03.280
-  What kind of outcomes do we want so before we ever have any discussion about it?

00:06:03.280 --> 00:06:07.460
-  I want members of the public to take this little survey and take like three four minutes. It is

00:06:07.460 --> 00:06:08.000
-  literally

00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:13.480
-  Your top five

00:06:13.480 --> 00:06:20.470
-  Outcome areas without any other additional information right now in terms of what any of that means

00:06:20.470 --> 00:06:20.840
-  or

00:06:21.360 --> 00:06:27.040
-  What might fit into those areas and it's you can this is what this is what happens when you have a

00:06:27.040 --> 00:06:27.720
-  teacher in charge

00:06:27.720 --> 00:06:34.040
-  Of things is the teacher gives you a pretest. So this is like a pretest. I'm sorry, not really

00:06:34.040 --> 00:06:34.180
-  though

00:06:34.180 --> 00:06:39.720
-  So

00:06:39.720 --> 00:06:44.810
-  This is the moment where council pauses for just a second to give the public just a minute to do

00:06:44.810 --> 00:06:46.560
-  that survey while

00:06:47.520 --> 00:06:52.600
-  Council members can also think about that because we had a whole little budget worksheet that we

00:06:52.600 --> 00:06:54.780
-  were supposed to work on

00:06:54.780 --> 00:07:01.980
-  And hopefully we will be prepared for that conversation next

00:07:01.980 --> 00:07:15.780
-  Take this little survey that's probably okay, too, but we're gonna talk about it. So

00:07:15.780 --> 00:07:17.780
-  So

00:07:17.780 --> 00:07:38.820
-  I'm sorry what no

00:07:38.820 --> 00:07:45.740
-  That that would have been that would have been fun if I thought of that earlier

00:07:45.740 --> 00:07:47.740
-  I

00:07:47.740 --> 00:07:51.820
-  For for

00:07:51.820 --> 00:07:55.580
-  Just to review the process by which we're going to

00:07:55.580 --> 00:08:00.580
-  Manage this year's budget conversations for those of you who maybe were not

00:08:00.580 --> 00:08:06.700
-  We're not at the meeting last week tonight's discussion sort of starts off

00:08:06.700 --> 00:08:13.540
-  This process of prioritization of council and so we're going to have a conversation tonight

00:08:14.340 --> 00:08:19.050
-  Next week at the Fiscal Committee meeting the Fiscal Committee is charged with kind of synthesizing

00:08:19.050 --> 00:08:22.160
-  the conversation tonight and building a priority

00:08:22.160 --> 00:08:24.860
-  lists like like a

00:08:24.860 --> 00:08:27.460
-  priority, oh my gosh a

00:08:27.460 --> 00:08:32.540
-  Prioritized list of council budget priorities and

00:08:32.540 --> 00:08:37.620
-  Then we will come back as a full council on the 30th to

00:08:37.620 --> 00:08:40.340
-  Vote on that list from the Fiscal Committee

00:08:40.500 --> 00:08:44.590
-  Basically, it'll be a test to see if the Fiscal Committee managed to synthesize the conversation.

00:08:44.590 --> 00:08:44.660
-  Well

00:08:44.660 --> 00:08:52.530
-  So so this is just the beginning of the conversation and so at the Fiscal Committee meeting next

00:08:52.530 --> 00:08:54.160
-  week there will certainly be the

00:08:54.160 --> 00:08:56.620
-  results of this

00:08:56.620 --> 00:09:00.420
-  And I appreciate the the seven responses that have come in so far

00:09:00.420 --> 00:09:04.820
-  Eight responses that have come in so far fantastic

00:09:04.820 --> 00:09:07.500
-  That will be open

00:09:08.140 --> 00:09:13.380
-  I'll leave it open for a little while longer, but I really did want to kind of get like a pre look

00:09:13.380 --> 00:09:14.720
-  from people

00:09:14.720 --> 00:09:21.600
-  and I kind of do expect that things might might change after hearing discussion and after

00:09:21.600 --> 00:09:25.220
-  this whole process tonight, but I

00:09:25.220 --> 00:09:30.140
-  Think

00:09:30.140 --> 00:09:32.740
-  That we're gonna move on right now

00:09:33.020 --> 00:09:39.260
-  To our actual conversation. So in terms of council members and how we're gonna facilitate this

00:09:39.260 --> 00:09:39.660
-  today

00:09:39.660 --> 00:09:43.060
-  We're gonna start with that conversation of step one

00:09:43.060 --> 00:09:47.540
-  Choosing and defining outcome areas with everybody being able to kind of

00:09:47.540 --> 00:09:53.960
-  Talk about their top one or two or three and the reasons why they chose those those outcome areas

00:09:53.960 --> 00:10:01.220
-  I'm hoping that that takes I believe oh, I forgot to write my times down on my cheat sheet here

00:10:01.220 --> 00:10:04.780
-  I believe that that was 20 to 30 minutes set aside for that part

00:10:04.780 --> 00:10:10.460
-  And then we're gonna move on to part two, which is facilitating discussions of specific budget

00:10:10.460 --> 00:10:12.060
-  interest or items

00:10:12.060 --> 00:10:17.410
-  Okay, so specific things that council members go. Yes, I definitely want that in and then we're

00:10:17.410 --> 00:10:20.420
-  kind of gonna have a break slash community engagement activity

00:10:20.420 --> 00:10:24.600
-  so if you're in chambers, you'll notice that there's some big sheets of paper there over on the

00:10:24.600 --> 00:10:26.620
-  side and on those sheets of paper are the

00:10:27.300 --> 00:10:34.620
-  12 items that were on that survey and that were in the packet as examples of outcome areas

00:10:34.620 --> 00:10:40.460
-  So our task for the community and council members to during that break is to think of a specific

00:10:40.460 --> 00:10:42.340
-  program activity

00:10:42.340 --> 00:10:48.290
-  Something that the city does that you personally just think is really really valuable or is really

00:10:48.290 --> 00:10:48.700
-  important

00:10:48.700 --> 00:10:52.340
-  It can be something really big or it can be you know, something really small

00:10:52.580 --> 00:10:57.630
-  Write it on a post-it note and then stick it under whichever particular area. It is that you think

00:10:57.630 --> 00:10:58.420
-  it fits under

00:10:58.420 --> 00:11:01.340
-  after that we're going to

00:11:01.340 --> 00:11:07.890
-  Council's gonna come back together and have the discussion of step to the broad goals and the kind

00:11:07.890 --> 00:11:10.580
-  of specific measurable outcomes that we think

00:11:10.580 --> 00:11:13.380
-  That we've thought of already

00:11:13.380 --> 00:11:18.340
-  then we'll have a period of general public comment around the budget items and

00:11:18.340 --> 00:11:21.820
-  That will essentially be our meeting. Okay

00:11:22.820 --> 00:11:27.180
-  Does anybody have any questions about what we're doing here tonight before we start?

00:11:27.180 --> 00:11:36.340
-  Great so who wants to start by telling me or us their

00:11:36.340 --> 00:11:42.460
-  Top one or two or three outcome areas

00:11:47.260 --> 00:11:52.060
-  Yeah, say the bullets you picked say why you picked them like order them if you can like I know

00:11:52.060 --> 00:11:53.780
-  like I personally kind of

00:11:53.780 --> 00:11:58.860
-  Have a number one and a number one a and one B and then a number two and a number three

00:11:58.860 --> 00:12:03.300
-  So, I don't know how everybody else did it. But yeah sharing those things and the wise

00:12:03.300 --> 00:12:07.040
-  Who wants to start or do I need to just like go down the list that?

00:12:07.040 --> 00:12:12.460
-  All right, go ahead councilmember Rosenberger

00:12:13.140 --> 00:12:16.060
-  What I put on the list on the QR code

00:12:16.060 --> 00:12:19.660
-  I'm just looking at the worksheet that I filled out

00:12:19.660 --> 00:12:25.110
-  And you're looking you're asking us about the number step one choose or define outcome areas. Yes.

00:12:25.110 --> 00:12:26.660
-  So my top three I think were

00:12:26.660 --> 00:12:28.820
-  affordable housing

00:12:28.820 --> 00:12:34.300
-  and homelessness transportation and mobility and public safety, I guess I would say

00:12:34.300 --> 00:12:36.700
-  I

00:12:36.700 --> 00:12:39.540
-  chose those in general because I

00:12:40.300 --> 00:12:42.860
-  think they are the areas where

00:12:42.860 --> 00:12:45.620
-  things are in crisis and

00:12:45.620 --> 00:12:54.250
-  I think they are the areas where we have the ability via our code and as councilmembers to make the

00:12:54.250 --> 00:12:55.080
-  most impact

00:12:55.080 --> 00:12:59.940
-  In terms like, you know the work we're legally allowed to do here

00:12:59.940 --> 00:13:08.260
-  Okay, I want to put a hat or put a

00:13:08.260 --> 00:13:10.260
-  I

00:13:10.260 --> 00:13:15.850
-  Think I want to ask you said those are the areas where you think council members can have the most

00:13:15.850 --> 00:13:16.620
-  impact and

00:13:16.620 --> 00:13:22.260
-  I'm not sure if right now I want to have that specific discussion, but maybe in a little bit

00:13:22.260 --> 00:13:26.180
-  I want to know what specific impact do you think council members can have in those areas?

00:13:26.180 --> 00:13:32.780
-  Who's next

00:13:32.780 --> 00:13:36.940
-  Councilmember Piedmont Smith

00:13:37.820 --> 00:13:45.340
-  So I had I was also thinking of what the most dire needs of our community are and

00:13:45.340 --> 00:13:48.900
-  So I had

00:13:48.900 --> 00:13:50.900
-  affordable housing homelessness

00:13:50.900 --> 00:13:52.940
-  Then I had Health and Human Services

00:13:52.940 --> 00:13:58.940
-  thinking mostly of mental health care and substance use disorder treatment and

00:13:58.940 --> 00:14:05.220
-  Then I had public safety which is of course those three are all tied together as well

00:14:05.660 --> 00:14:08.380
-  Now equity was one item in the list

00:14:08.380 --> 00:14:13.220
-  But I I have a hard time thinking of that as a separate thing

00:14:13.220 --> 00:14:16.180
-  I think that that should be interwoven with all the other goals

00:14:16.180 --> 00:14:25.820
-  Great who wants to go next

00:14:25.820 --> 00:14:29.860
-  Councilmember sorry, I

00:14:29.860 --> 00:14:33.540
-  Think to me one of the

00:14:34.620 --> 00:14:37.880
-  I think one of the one of the things that's maybe not

00:14:37.880 --> 00:14:42.180
-  Directly reflected often our budget is maybe the way I was I was thinking about it

00:14:42.180 --> 00:14:44.780
-  But I'm economic health and jobs is something that

00:14:44.780 --> 00:14:47.780
-  You know, I'd like to see us

00:14:47.780 --> 00:14:51.140
-  Prioritizing was probably I think has a lot of downstream

00:14:51.140 --> 00:14:54.300
-  Effects on a lot of other things affordable housing

00:14:54.300 --> 00:14:57.480
-  Probably, you know 1a or or 2

00:14:57.480 --> 00:15:02.140
-  And neighborhood livability and social health. That's why I said it's three

00:15:02.140 --> 00:15:07.320
-  I was just say sort of maybe to also maybe I don't know be provocative or open it up for a further

00:15:07.320 --> 00:15:08.680
-  conversation as well that

00:15:08.680 --> 00:15:10.580
-  the I

00:15:10.580 --> 00:15:15.020
-  Think there's some discussion about whether these I mean, I think these are interesting

00:15:15.020 --> 00:15:19.250
-  Suggestions of the categories and like, you know, maybe there's some overlap with some of them as

00:15:19.250 --> 00:15:19.860
-  well, you know

00:15:19.860 --> 00:15:24.860
-  And you know, obviously helped to help had had a hand in and making this list, right?

00:15:24.860 --> 00:15:26.860
-  but I but I think it's an interesting question of

00:15:26.860 --> 00:15:30.620
-  Even like what we might define as our buckets

00:15:30.620 --> 00:15:34.780
-  I think there's a really good start there, but I think there's some overlap. I think as councilmember

00:15:34.780 --> 00:15:36.340
-  Piedmont Smith

00:15:36.340 --> 00:15:38.640
-  Mentioned as well

00:15:38.640 --> 00:15:44.520
-  Yeah, those those probably mine. I think sort of my my one one star is economic health and jobs

00:15:44.520 --> 00:15:51.140
-  Affordable housing and then neighborhood livability and social health which to me sort of involves

00:15:51.140 --> 00:15:53.360
-  transportation and public safety and things like that as well

00:15:53.360 --> 00:15:57.340
-  Great thank you

00:15:58.340 --> 00:16:04.220
-  I'll just say my number one priority is affordable housing and I think that a lot of

00:16:04.220 --> 00:16:08.420
-  these categories tie into each other and sometimes if

00:16:08.420 --> 00:16:11.020
-  taking care of one

00:16:11.020 --> 00:16:13.580
-  Some of the other things will be taken care of as well

00:16:13.580 --> 00:16:19.580
-  For example public safety. We know that when people have the resources that they need crime goes

00:16:19.580 --> 00:16:20.000
-  down

00:16:20.000 --> 00:16:25.380
-  stuff like that, and so I think everything is pretty intertwined, but

00:16:26.460 --> 00:16:32.420
-  Making sure that everyone has an affordable place to live and then I would say to

00:16:32.420 --> 00:16:36.340
-  a and to be our transportation mobility and

00:16:36.340 --> 00:16:42.750
-  Neighborhood livability and social health. I think they all tie in together as to what like a

00:16:42.750 --> 00:16:43.920
-  healthy successful

00:16:43.920 --> 00:16:45.540
-  life

00:16:45.540 --> 00:16:47.540
-  Looks like

00:16:47.540 --> 00:16:51.180
-  Thank you who's next down here at the other end

00:16:53.300 --> 00:16:57.500
-  Councilor Barallo sure I I picked five actually

00:16:57.500 --> 00:17:03.600
-  And then prioritize them, but I couldn't I could winnow it down to three that would where I could

00:17:03.600 --> 00:17:05.240
-  apply specific budget

00:17:05.240 --> 00:17:14.500
-  Well, and some are more related to policy directions than actual expenditures, but public safety

00:17:14.500 --> 00:17:17.500
-  housing

00:17:17.500 --> 00:17:19.500
-  economic development

00:17:20.300 --> 00:17:24.780
-  equity health and human services sort of together on that one and

00:17:24.780 --> 00:17:28.600
-  Environment sustainability

00:17:28.600 --> 00:17:34.180
-  Great thank you next

00:17:34.180 --> 00:17:38.420
-  Comes member Flaherty

00:17:38.420 --> 00:17:45.620
-  Like my colleagues I would say, you know, a lot of these topics are intersectional

00:17:46.700 --> 00:17:50.700
-  So it feels a bit arbitrary to prioritize them. I think they're all important but

00:17:50.700 --> 00:17:54.500
-  In naming a few I think I would focus on

00:17:54.500 --> 00:17:59.660
-  Where we're struggling the most and have the most need for making change from where we are now

00:17:59.660 --> 00:18:02.780
-  Number one for me would be transportation and mobility

00:18:02.780 --> 00:18:07.580
-  Specifically, we've adopted a goal of zero deaths and serious injuries in our streets

00:18:07.580 --> 00:18:11.280
-  We have had hundreds and hundreds of serious injuries in our streets and quite a few deaths in the

00:18:11.280 --> 00:18:11.980
-  last five years

00:18:11.980 --> 00:18:15.460
-  I would also call that the biggest public safety problem we have

00:18:16.060 --> 00:18:18.060
-  So pretty similar

00:18:18.060 --> 00:18:23.760
-  Affordable housing and homelessness and then equity and would just again

00:18:23.760 --> 00:18:27.020
-  Yeah echo that those are those are like

00:18:27.020 --> 00:18:32.590
-  Transportation equities about how we improve safety for marginalized users of our roadways things

00:18:32.590 --> 00:18:33.100
-  like that

00:18:33.100 --> 00:18:38.520
-  Changes to our zoning code and how we increase housing supply more diverse housing types housing

00:18:38.520 --> 00:18:40.980
-  affordability, etc. That's a housing equity issue

00:18:42.380 --> 00:18:47.260
-  Etc, but I think equity for me is and I guess if I have to name the three it's transportation

00:18:47.260 --> 00:18:47.740
-  mobility

00:18:47.740 --> 00:18:50.220
-  affordable housing and homelessness and equity

00:18:50.220 --> 00:18:52.580
-  and then last note is just that

00:18:52.580 --> 00:18:56.810
-  Again sustainability and action on climate implement our climate action plan is deeply intersectional

00:18:56.810 --> 00:18:58.180
-  with those as well. Thank you

00:18:58.180 --> 00:19:10.340
-  Councilmember sorry, what's your question? Yeah, I'm just reflecting as well. I think I agree with

00:19:10.340 --> 00:19:11.620
-  councilmember Flaherty

00:19:11.620 --> 00:19:13.620
-  and

00:19:13.620 --> 00:19:19.700
-  Thought and in terms of thought experiment one thing that I'm thinking a lot about is I

00:19:19.700 --> 00:19:23.100
-  Think we might all prioritize

00:19:23.100 --> 00:19:29.010
-  You know affordable housing as an example, but we don't see that often reflected in our budget per

00:19:29.010 --> 00:19:30.060
-  se and I think you know

00:19:30.060 --> 00:19:36.820
-  Maybe the the levers that we have for that are perhaps more policy-based or less

00:19:36.820 --> 00:19:40.620
-  Let's budgetary but but I'm interested in sort of thinking thinking through that too

00:19:40.620 --> 00:19:45.930
-  which is like, you know, what where are the things that we can have I think to the to the question

00:19:45.930 --> 00:19:46.260
-  of like

00:19:46.260 --> 00:19:48.620
-  what are our prior I like the like what are the

00:19:48.620 --> 00:19:56.120
-  The the word that you used our big pain points our emergency areas, right but it's like

00:19:56.120 --> 00:20:04.820
-  What what can we do in those spaces with with money and so I maybe was thinking about this too from

00:20:04.820 --> 00:20:05.700
-  the perspective of

00:20:05.700 --> 00:20:12.540
-  You know, which of these areas can the city make big moves in putting influxes of cash into?

00:20:12.540 --> 00:20:18.580
-  Yeah, that's an interesting thing to differentiate

00:20:18.580 --> 00:20:24.380
-  Councilmember rough do you want to go or do you want me to go?

00:20:24.380 --> 00:20:33.500
-  You know, I agree with everybody's very hard to rank these I didn't really have a success doing it

00:20:33.500 --> 00:20:34.500
-  and they are so

00:20:35.460 --> 00:20:36.740
-  inner

00:20:36.740 --> 00:20:42.420
-  You know, they're also interconnected. I'm at like councilman Flaherty's comment and councilmember

00:20:42.420 --> 00:20:42.620
-  sorry

00:20:42.620 --> 00:20:47.700
-  I think also suggested look, you know, we're looking at the ones the areas where

00:20:47.700 --> 00:20:53.100
-  We've come up shortest and in other words if they're all relatively equally important

00:20:53.100 --> 00:20:56.480
-  but some we may be doing better than other areas, which is

00:20:56.480 --> 00:21:01.620
-  Where we would want to start to maybe focus on where we can make the biggest difference. I think as

00:21:01.620 --> 00:21:02.820
-  customer 30

00:21:02.820 --> 00:21:05.380
-  suggested but to me

00:21:05.540 --> 00:21:09.740
-  And I don't know if anyone's mentioned this yet, but this this idea the high-performing government,

00:21:09.740 --> 00:21:10.300
-  right?

00:21:10.300 --> 00:21:14.580
-  That's the delivery of government services and that's what really is fundamentally about

00:21:14.580 --> 00:21:17.540
-  so I

00:21:17.540 --> 00:21:22.860
-  You know a lot of this falls under to me this idea of a high-performing

00:21:22.860 --> 00:21:27.020
-  government, that's what that's what people look to us for and

00:21:27.020 --> 00:21:29.620
-  That's what?

00:21:29.620 --> 00:21:32.380
-  You know business looks to have secure

00:21:33.220 --> 00:21:37.380
-  Something that can rely on a high-performing government to make investment in the community

00:21:37.380 --> 00:21:42.460
-  And so looking at areas where maybe we're not as high-performing

00:21:42.460 --> 00:21:48.940
-  Whether it's things like street maintenance of the streets, you know, I'm interested in

00:21:48.940 --> 00:21:53.420
-  Possibly the idea of bringing back the leaf pickup program for example

00:21:53.420 --> 00:21:59.220
-  Sort of basic some basic services. Anyway, that that was my only real comment. So thank you for

00:21:59.220 --> 00:22:00.540
-  giving me an opportunity

00:22:02.540 --> 00:22:07.230
-  Thanks, I would like to put a pin in the leaf pickup thing too because that should be under a

00:22:07.230 --> 00:22:08.700
-  specific budget item

00:22:08.700 --> 00:22:13.060
-  Interest in the part two of the discussion. So I want to make sure that that gets put under there

00:22:13.060 --> 00:22:23.040
-  I'll go ahead and share mine if I can find them

00:22:23.040 --> 00:22:30.100
-  So I also thought that they were really

00:22:31.620 --> 00:22:33.620
-  Intersectional of course and I

00:22:33.620 --> 00:22:38.820
-  kind of put my number one as neighborhood livability and social health kind of feeling like if

00:22:38.820 --> 00:22:39.980
-  people are

00:22:39.980 --> 00:22:42.940
-  doing well and

00:22:42.940 --> 00:22:46.860
-  There's livability and general social health then

00:22:46.860 --> 00:22:52.660
-  That will start a ripple effect through lots of other things and so kind of like a 1 1a and a 1b

00:22:52.660 --> 00:22:53.820
-  under that is

00:22:53.820 --> 00:22:58.180
-  affordable housing and public safety because if we really want people if we want neighborhoods to

00:22:58.180 --> 00:22:59.820
-  be livable and we want people to be

00:23:00.780 --> 00:23:02.780
-  socially mentally healthy then

00:23:02.780 --> 00:23:07.180
-  They need to have a place to live and they need to feel safe in that place

00:23:07.180 --> 00:23:13.780
-  And that encompasses I think both things like fire and police response, but also of councilmember Flaherty

00:23:13.780 --> 00:23:16.260
-  you mentioned the I think it was you

00:23:16.260 --> 00:23:20.100
-  transportation related or maybe it was councilmember Rosenberger I

00:23:20.100 --> 00:23:22.620
-  Can't remember who mentioned it first now

00:23:22.620 --> 00:23:27.460
-  Just in terms of safety and security. It's not all about policing or fire protection. It's also

00:23:27.460 --> 00:23:27.740
-  about

00:23:28.420 --> 00:23:32.060
-  Feeling safe to like go for a walk that you're not gonna get hit by a car or you know

00:23:32.060 --> 00:23:36.540
-  Drive a car and you're not gonna get into an accident because people are driving well, so and the

00:23:36.540 --> 00:23:38.720
-  roads are designed nicely. Um, and

00:23:38.720 --> 00:23:41.380
-  so then

00:23:41.380 --> 00:23:46.220
-  if that was my number one with those two little caveats then

00:23:46.220 --> 00:23:51.600
-  my number two was transportation and mobility partly because of how that ties into public safety

00:23:51.600 --> 00:23:52.860
-  and

00:23:52.860 --> 00:23:56.860
-  Livability in terms of being able to get to where you need to go

00:23:56.860 --> 00:23:59.700
-  and then number three was economic health and jobs kind of

00:23:59.700 --> 00:24:04.900
-  For what councilmember Asari said in terms of that trickle-down effect of like if people have jobs

00:24:04.900 --> 00:24:11.580
-  Then they're more likely to be able to you know, go to the doctor and access other pieces

00:24:11.580 --> 00:24:17.260
-  of the community and have stable housing and that kind of thing

00:24:17.260 --> 00:24:24.700
-  So I

00:24:25.220 --> 00:24:27.540
-  Think right now just to help out the Fiscal Committee

00:24:27.540 --> 00:24:36.660
-  What did people here were were areas that we had in common if we had to do a top three

00:24:36.660 --> 00:24:40.900
-  for all of council what did council members here that

00:24:40.900 --> 00:24:49.360
-  That we all had in common I'm gonna make you guys think so the Fiscal Committee has some help next

00:24:49.360 --> 00:24:49.920
-  week

00:24:49.920 --> 00:24:53.980
-  Housing

00:24:54.620 --> 00:24:56.620
-  Does everybody agree with that

00:24:56.620 --> 00:25:00.580
-  Yes, does anybody not agree with that

00:25:00.580 --> 00:25:10.170
-  I don't think that I necessarily said to rank but just try to do like three that that everybody

00:25:10.170 --> 00:25:11.280
-  kind of agreed with

00:25:11.280 --> 00:25:20.210
-  I neglected to mention one that I added myself. Can I just throw this out? Yeah basic

00:25:20.210 --> 00:25:22.540
-  infrastructure. That is

00:25:23.900 --> 00:25:31.520
-  Road paving stormwater sidewalks thinks that it's up to us to deliver to the to the public

00:25:31.520 --> 00:25:36.760
-  But I know I'm fine with housing being as one of the top priorities

00:25:36.760 --> 00:25:40.940
-  We can talk about what type of housing later

00:25:40.940 --> 00:25:44.900
-  Yeah, I also I want to put a pin in the basic infrastructure too

00:25:44.900 --> 00:25:50.040
-  Because I kind of thought of that under specific budget things in terms of

00:25:50.940 --> 00:25:56.100
-  Maintenance, so let's make sure that that gets brought up again, too. So generally speaking though

00:25:56.100 --> 00:25:58.820
-  We agree that housing should go

00:25:58.820 --> 00:26:01.420
-  Maybe on the list. I

00:26:01.420 --> 00:26:04.020
-  do want to ask though

00:26:04.020 --> 00:26:06.260
-  what we think in terms of

00:26:06.260 --> 00:26:11.780
-  What was mentioned already that difference between like

00:26:11.780 --> 00:26:16.940
-  Investing dollars

00:26:17.220 --> 00:26:21.000
-  versus like legislated legislation and

00:26:21.000 --> 00:26:27.600
-  If we could talk about that in context of housing maybe for just a minute in terms of like

00:26:27.600 --> 00:26:30.740
-  and I also think maybe it's helpful to

00:26:30.740 --> 00:26:36.520
-  To councilman Flaherty's point that I mean at the moment. This is like we said, I mean, it's a

00:26:36.520 --> 00:26:36.940
-  little arbitrary

00:26:36.940 --> 00:26:40.300
-  prioritizing them per se I mean as

00:26:42.100 --> 00:26:48.600
-  And councilman Rosenberger was just saying some good things. You should say them feel welcome to

00:26:48.600 --> 00:26:49.420
-  but the

00:26:49.420 --> 00:26:53.940
-  you know, maybe we want to cycle back to the question of

00:26:53.940 --> 00:26:59.390
-  Ranking and prioritization as we talked through about specific things. We want to see in the budget

00:26:59.390 --> 00:27:00.300
-  pertinent to this

00:27:00.300 --> 00:27:06.840
-  Because I mean to your point it's like if there are things we can fund for to improve affordable

00:27:06.840 --> 00:27:07.260
-  housing

00:27:08.060 --> 00:27:13.910
-  And that is our priority already in the general sense. It's there's like there's a conversation of

00:27:13.910 --> 00:27:15.060
-  like what our general priorities

00:27:15.060 --> 00:27:19.280
-  Comprehensive plans and things like that. But then there's also the question of like what's our

00:27:19.280 --> 00:27:21.300
-  priority for this budget specifically?

00:27:21.300 --> 00:27:28.180
-  Comes Barbara Rosenberger, did you want to share something?

00:27:34.700 --> 00:27:39.220
-  I was just there was a question on this end that about

00:27:39.220 --> 00:27:44.700
-  How could we fund afford like what could we fund in terms of affordable housing and housing affordability?

00:27:44.700 --> 00:27:48.060
-  So I just like shot out some ideas, but I don't know that it's time, you know

00:27:48.060 --> 00:27:54.980
-  Like one example was just

00:27:54.980 --> 00:27:59.900
-  Like incentivizing like some kind of program like down payment assistance

00:27:59.900 --> 00:28:04.940
-  but for small developers who are maybe wanting to build like 10 unit apartment buildings or

00:28:04.940 --> 00:28:09.100
-  you know a 10 unit apartment building that is affordable and so like

00:28:09.100 --> 00:28:10.860
-  incentivizing

00:28:10.860 --> 00:28:15.460
-  The types of housing we want to see that we're not seeing because it's not financially feasible

00:28:15.460 --> 00:28:16.740
-  basically right now

00:28:16.740 --> 00:28:23.820
-  Of course, the other part would be opening that up in the UDO so that people can build them as well

00:28:23.820 --> 00:28:25.820
-  You

00:28:25.820 --> 00:28:33.860
-  Talked you have something down. Yeah, I mean I mean for I mean for that matter though

00:28:33.860 --> 00:28:38.270
-  I think what's pertinent to a lot of recent conversation that we've had it's that you know at the

00:28:38.270 --> 00:28:38.580
-  end of

00:28:38.580 --> 00:28:42.620
-  At the end of last budget session when planning was here the conversation

00:28:42.620 --> 00:28:48.620
-  Directly was are we going to what what what are we doing in this budget to move towards a form-based

00:28:48.620 --> 00:28:48.940
-  UDO?

00:28:48.940 --> 00:28:50.940
-  And they said well, we'll put that in next year's budget

00:28:51.540 --> 00:28:56.690
-  As as as an example of another thing we can find there should be prioritized if if that's the

00:28:56.690 --> 00:28:57.960
-  direction we're trying to take

00:28:57.960 --> 00:29:06.580
-  Other thoughts on housing as something that we had in common

00:29:06.580 --> 00:29:10.780
-  Councilmember all oh

00:29:10.780 --> 00:29:12.660
-  Yes, I think

00:29:12.660 --> 00:29:18.860
-  Housing generally or an agreement type of housing. I think maybe we differ. I don't know

00:29:19.780 --> 00:29:23.900
-  But that's something we need to discuss some of its policy related

00:29:23.900 --> 00:29:27.740
-  I've wondered for a long time a lot of this

00:29:27.740 --> 00:29:31.740
-  owner occupied potential single-family homes

00:29:31.740 --> 00:29:38.060
-  Are now occupied by Airbnb something to the order of 900. I know West Lafayette has

00:29:38.060 --> 00:29:46.400
-  Code that prohibits or caps it at least I don't know if that's possible still

00:29:46.400 --> 00:29:48.340
-  I

00:29:48.340 --> 00:29:49.620
-  think

00:29:49.620 --> 00:29:54.740
-  You know, we're apartment rich community, but we're a owner occupied poor community

00:29:54.740 --> 00:29:57.740
-  so the type of housing really does matter and

00:29:57.740 --> 00:30:03.740
-  I'm interested in all types that could be owner occupied and I'm certainly versed to

00:30:03.740 --> 00:30:07.380
-  Policy that would remove

00:30:07.380 --> 00:30:11.500
-  Affordable

00:30:11.500 --> 00:30:17.460
-  Single-family or owner occupied homes from the market. So these there's more to say

00:30:17.460 --> 00:30:19.460
-  I mean in terms of investment

00:30:19.460 --> 00:30:24.640
-  I would be interested in bonding for a land bank in order to

00:30:24.640 --> 00:30:30.560
-  Provide space that we could dictate the type of housing that we need for the community things like

00:30:30.560 --> 00:30:30.860
-  that

00:30:30.860 --> 00:30:34.580
-  It's been discussed before Councilman Flaherty's mentioned it. So I think there are points of

00:30:34.580 --> 00:30:36.420
-  agreement. There are points of difference

00:30:36.420 --> 00:30:40.340
-  But I think I've said enough so

00:30:41.580 --> 00:30:46.260
-  As a follow-up to that, how does that relate to the summit land trust or are you kind of talking

00:30:46.260 --> 00:30:47.420
-  about types of things?

00:30:47.420 --> 00:30:49.420
-  Like the summit land trust as being something

00:30:49.420 --> 00:30:52.000
-  That you would be interested in

00:30:52.000 --> 00:31:00.540
-  You said that you were interested in bonding for a land bank

00:31:00.540 --> 00:31:07.260
-  And my follow-up question to that was like how is that like or different from the summit land trust?

00:31:07.260 --> 00:31:10.040
-  and so is it really that you're like interested in

00:31:10.520 --> 00:31:12.520
-  in

00:31:12.520 --> 00:31:19.480
-  Providing more support to that land trust movement. Yes, I think that would be one one way to go

00:31:19.480 --> 00:31:26.760
-  I don't know exactly what types of control that we actually have. I think I need to

00:31:26.760 --> 00:31:30.800
-  Review that but the point is is that

00:31:30.800 --> 00:31:38.650
-  the market doesn't seem to be delivering the the type of housing that is in demand and the housing

00:31:38.650 --> 00:31:39.480
-  study of

00:31:40.320 --> 00:31:41.520
-  2019

00:31:41.520 --> 00:31:49.140
-  Indicated that that's what people wanted was to purchase and build equity in homes rather than rent

00:31:49.140 --> 00:31:52.060
-  because people are trapped in a rent trap and

00:31:52.060 --> 00:31:55.120
-  Then there's much more to say about

00:31:55.120 --> 00:31:57.880
-  rental housing in this community, too

00:31:57.880 --> 00:32:04.800
-  Whether or not these large structures are even fully occupied I understand that they're not

00:32:07.680 --> 00:32:10.440
-  Anyhow, so sorry to Terry on that

00:32:10.440 --> 00:32:17.460
-  But I do think I mean, I'm sorry go for it like

00:32:17.460 --> 00:32:21.840
-  It's it's this tension here. I think that's getting at the the main point

00:32:21.840 --> 00:32:27.840
-  I mean if the if the core question is what is it that we want to see reflected in this budget?

00:32:27.840 --> 00:32:33.020
-  In terms of areas that we'd really like to see funded

00:32:33.020 --> 00:32:35.840
-  I

00:32:35.840 --> 00:32:37.960
-  Feel like a lot of yeah

00:32:37.960 --> 00:32:43.720
-  I mean the most most a lot of those things are in the policy realm, right and so

00:32:43.720 --> 00:32:50.470
-  How do we hone out like how do we tease out the things that we actually want to get funded in each

00:32:50.470 --> 00:32:51.520
-  of these areas?

00:33:01.160 --> 00:33:06.950
-  So anybody else have anything that they want to add about housing as an area of commonality councilmember

00:33:06.950 --> 00:33:08.000
-  Piedmont Smith

00:33:08.000 --> 00:33:14.720
-  Well, I just don't want to leave out the other part of that which is homelessness

00:33:14.720 --> 00:33:17.680
-  housing and homelessness, I

00:33:17.680 --> 00:33:19.720
-  mean, I guess

00:33:19.720 --> 00:33:23.440
-  there's there's been a long long-standing tension between

00:33:26.800 --> 00:33:33.900
-  Addressing homeless people helping people who are unhoused now and using funds for that

00:33:33.900 --> 00:33:38.100
-  versus building solutions so that eventually we'll have

00:33:38.100 --> 00:33:41.220
-  Hardly any unhoused people at all

00:33:41.220 --> 00:33:46.260
-  And I think both are important I mean I

00:33:46.260 --> 00:33:52.770
-  But I I don't want to lose sight of you know, we need to make sure nobody dies homeless on our

00:33:52.770 --> 00:33:53.240
-  streets

00:33:53.240 --> 00:33:55.240
-  I

00:33:55.240 --> 00:34:01.830
-  Do think it might be worth splitting those two just because they do require two very different

00:34:01.830 --> 00:34:03.280
-  things and

00:34:03.280 --> 00:34:10.640
-  Funding for one looks very different than funding for the other even if they are intertwined

00:34:10.640 --> 00:34:18.200
-  Well as a follow-up on that I

00:34:20.360 --> 00:34:25.280
-  Mean we have it as affordable housing and homelessness and even if we split those then it's

00:34:25.280 --> 00:34:26.520
-  affordable housing

00:34:26.520 --> 00:34:31.040
-  Which is maybe different from just housing

00:34:31.040 --> 00:34:40.360
-  So is it that we have housing in common or that we have affordable housing in common

00:34:40.360 --> 00:34:45.800
-  Well, right

00:34:45.800 --> 00:34:47.800
-  You

00:34:47.800 --> 00:34:58.040
-  Well that that may come out in further

00:34:58.040 --> 00:35:00.600
-  Talking about what?

00:35:00.600 --> 00:35:06.760
-  Councilmember Osari said as far as where do we actually want to spend money in 2026?

00:35:06.760 --> 00:35:09.920
-  So that might be teased out a little more when we get to that level

00:35:11.680 --> 00:35:16.320
-  Members Oh, I'll just point out that in different

00:35:16.320 --> 00:35:19.760
-  community engagement events with

00:35:19.760 --> 00:35:23.280
-  Different

00:35:23.280 --> 00:35:27.940
-  organizations who work with who work closely with the unhoused a lot of what we've talked about is

00:35:27.940 --> 00:35:28.220
-  that

00:35:28.220 --> 00:35:35.440
-  four to eight hundred dollar a month gap that's really missing in the zero to four hundred as

00:35:35.440 --> 00:35:37.600
-  well and

00:35:37.600 --> 00:35:43.360
-  There are units available that are just going for way higher than then

00:35:43.360 --> 00:35:49.790
-  Really the majority of people in Bloomington can afford and so I would say it's not a housing

00:35:49.790 --> 00:35:50.480
-  problem

00:35:50.480 --> 00:35:52.480
-  It is an affordable housing problem

00:35:52.480 --> 00:35:58.440
-  Other thoughts on the housing that we had in common

00:35:58.440 --> 00:36:06.790
-  All right, what else did anybody hear that there was also I think transportation came up in almost

00:36:06.790 --> 00:36:07.360
-  all of our

00:36:07.600 --> 00:36:10.200
-  And what do we call it transportation and mobility?

00:36:10.200 --> 00:36:19.050
-  All right, does everybody agree or does anybody disagree about putting transportation and mobility

00:36:19.050 --> 00:36:20.280
-  as a priority

00:36:20.280 --> 00:36:30.300
-  Can I have a question I ask a question so are we ranking all of those

00:36:30.300 --> 00:36:36.480
-  Are they all going to be prioritized to some degree or are we just choosing a subset? How is this?

00:36:36.720 --> 00:36:38.960
-  I think right now. This is kind of a thought exercise

00:36:38.960 --> 00:36:45.640
-  And I would actually suggest on that point like maybe we should move on and cycle back to the

00:36:45.640 --> 00:36:47.600
-  question of you know with

00:36:47.600 --> 00:36:50.360
-  because I think when we talk about specifics as

00:36:50.360 --> 00:36:55.610
-  Councilmember Piedmont Smith said I think it will help it will help tease out it'll answer for

00:36:55.610 --> 00:36:57.240
-  itself this question. I

00:36:57.240 --> 00:37:04.560
-  Agree, I think we may have different things in mind regarding these topics and

00:37:05.880 --> 00:37:11.840
-  By informing each other one might rise above another or fall relative to each other

00:37:11.840 --> 00:37:14.800
-  So maybe we should proceed in that way

00:37:14.800 --> 00:37:30.000
-  So we want to move on to the next stage in my

00:37:30.000 --> 00:37:33.480
-  Facilitation which is discussion of specific budget items

00:37:34.120 --> 00:37:36.640
-  Because that does I mean it it could play in

00:37:36.640 --> 00:37:39.760
-  We've already kind of been talking about that a little bit

00:37:39.760 --> 00:37:44.440
-  Well, if we do that, why don't we

00:37:44.440 --> 00:37:50.180
-  Stick with the transportation and mobility the council members already cited that we have in common

00:37:50.180 --> 00:37:50.520
-  and

00:37:50.520 --> 00:37:57.160
-  Does anybody have any specific budget items that they were interested in related to transportation

00:37:57.160 --> 00:37:58.000
-  and mobility?

00:38:02.240 --> 00:38:06.680
-  Downtown circulator. I would like to see us fund a downtown circulator

00:38:06.680 --> 00:38:10.200
-  Okay

00:38:10.200 --> 00:38:21.140
-  All right, so we have a downtown circulator on the

00:38:21.140 --> 00:38:27.480
-  On the list of things that people want to fund

00:38:31.760 --> 00:38:35.160
-  Related to transportation. Are there other things related to transportation?

00:38:35.160 --> 00:38:42.800
-  I'll say this and I mean I know that I mean that's open up to this conversation. We have a

00:38:42.800 --> 00:38:45.800
-  transportation plan. So, you know

00:38:45.800 --> 00:38:52.040
-  Let's how about how about transportation plan be in the budget?

00:39:00.720 --> 00:39:02.720
-  Did anybody

00:39:02.720 --> 00:39:08.230
-  Does anybody want to cite specific pieces of the transportation plan that they want to councilmember

00:39:08.230 --> 00:39:10.400
-  Flaherty? Yeah a

00:39:10.400 --> 00:39:17.340
-  Number of these areas we're not starting from whole cloth. We do have plans policies

00:39:17.340 --> 00:39:19.960
-  goals in place already

00:39:19.960 --> 00:39:24.520
-  The transportation plan and the safety action plan under safe streets for all both should be

00:39:24.520 --> 00:39:26.240
-  guiding transportation decision-making

00:39:27.320 --> 00:39:31.880
-  In implementation we had a high priority network that we have not finished building out the

00:39:31.880 --> 00:39:33.640
-  timeline for which ends this year

00:39:33.640 --> 00:39:39.320
-  So we did relatively well, maybe 70 80 percent but failed to fully implement the priority network

00:39:39.320 --> 00:39:46.730
-  Established in the transportation plan so continuing to fund that and or updating that and funding

00:39:46.730 --> 00:39:48.600
-  an update that might be

00:39:48.600 --> 00:39:54.500
-  More informed by the safe streets for all safety action plan would be one approach

00:39:54.720 --> 00:40:00.080
-  we've also chronically underfunded sidewalks for I don't know decades and

00:40:00.080 --> 00:40:05.920
-  Pushed for more funding secured a very small amount of increased funding this year in the council

00:40:05.920 --> 00:40:07.080
-  sidewalk budget

00:40:07.080 --> 00:40:13.440
-  Sidewalk committee budget of 500k that's still almost nothing relative to the needs and relative to

00:40:13.440 --> 00:40:15.600
-  what our stated values and goals are

00:40:15.600 --> 00:40:21.080
-  So I think we need to see considerable increases in funding across it. I think of it in multiple

00:40:21.080 --> 00:40:21.600
-  buckets

00:40:21.600 --> 00:40:23.840
-  This is kind of evolved over time. I think of sidewalks

00:40:23.840 --> 00:40:27.480
-  I think of multi-use paths which serve both pedestrians and wheeled mobility users

00:40:27.480 --> 00:40:31.720
-  I think of protected bicycle infrastructure and increasingly I've been thinking about intersection

00:40:31.720 --> 00:40:34.920
-  treatments as well. So shorter crossing distances

00:40:34.920 --> 00:40:39.800
-  Accessibility curb ramps. Those are kind of distinct from any of those other buckets

00:40:39.800 --> 00:40:47.320
-  So again multi-use path protective bicycle infrastructure sidewalks and intersections and we really

00:40:47.320 --> 00:40:47.920
-  need

00:40:47.920 --> 00:40:52.080
-  Annual capital funding for these things. I mean we had a discussion last year about

00:40:53.120 --> 00:40:54.920
-  You know

00:40:54.920 --> 00:40:59.370
-  bonding for capital expenditures, which is which is all well and good, but when it's a recurring

00:40:59.370 --> 00:41:00.880
-  need and it's it's needed annually

00:41:00.880 --> 00:41:05.660
-  More or less in perpetuity or at least for decades before we're gonna, you know dig ourselves out

00:41:05.660 --> 00:41:06.240
-  of the hole

00:41:06.240 --> 00:41:09.200
-  Or possibly achieve our vision zero goals

00:41:09.200 --> 00:41:14.170
-  I think the general budget is a perfectly appropriate place for for this type of capital

00:41:14.170 --> 00:41:14.760
-  expenditure

00:41:14.760 --> 00:41:17.800
-  That's going to be recurring it would allow a level of planning and implementation that we simply

00:41:17.800 --> 00:41:18.880
-  haven't been able to achieve

00:41:18.880 --> 00:41:21.120
-  I

00:41:21.120 --> 00:41:25.560
-  Mean, we'll see what's possible. I think eight million dollars is a figure that is reasonable

00:41:25.560 --> 00:41:27.520
-  relative to the ambition and goals

00:41:27.520 --> 00:41:29.680
-  We have again to eliminate deaths on our streets

00:41:29.680 --> 00:41:32.600
-  and

00:41:32.600 --> 00:41:36.960
-  You know relative to the progress we've been able to make so far

00:41:36.960 --> 00:41:41.750
-  I tried to get into the numbers a little bit last year with the city engineer and actually assess

00:41:41.750 --> 00:41:42.840
-  the capital outlay

00:41:42.840 --> 00:41:45.960
-  Remaining to implement some of these things on the timelines

00:41:45.960 --> 00:41:49.280
-  We said we were going to and then estimating what the local match would need to be

00:41:49.640 --> 00:41:53.250
-  Assuming we're gonna be leveraging MPO dollars and everything else that we do to the maximum, you

00:41:53.250 --> 00:41:54.380
-  know ability to

00:41:54.380 --> 00:41:56.960
-  The maximum we can max we can

00:41:56.960 --> 00:42:01.840
-  So I don't know those are those are some of the things informing my thinking on it

00:42:01.840 --> 00:42:06.200
-  The different categories of things we need to be investing in for a complete streets approach,

00:42:06.200 --> 00:42:07.780
-  which is what our city policy is

00:42:07.780 --> 00:42:10.480
-  and to

00:42:10.480 --> 00:42:12.360
-  Essentially make progress on our vision zero goal

00:42:12.360 --> 00:42:16.560
-  Like that is going to require a pretty radical shift in how we think about and fund infrastructure

00:42:16.560 --> 00:42:17.920
-  if we're serious about it

00:42:18.800 --> 00:42:20.800
-  Second

00:42:20.800 --> 00:42:25.920
-  Can I ask you a follow-up on that real quick you threw out that eight million dollar number

00:42:25.920 --> 00:42:30.730
-  Is that what you think probably needs to be spent like per year right now on that kind of

00:42:30.730 --> 00:42:32.000
-  infrastructure?

00:42:32.000 --> 00:42:36.800
-  like generally speaking in an ongoing way or until we catch up or

00:42:36.800 --> 00:42:41.680
-  Was that just kind of a no, I think I mentioned four buckets

00:42:41.680 --> 00:42:44.880
-  You could think of that as maybe approximately two million two million in each bucket

00:42:46.240 --> 00:42:49.600
-  That would maybe equate to something like 60/40 in favor of

00:42:49.600 --> 00:42:54.590
-  Pedestrians over wheeled mobility users in terms of like who's the primary beneficiary in each of

00:42:54.590 --> 00:42:56.000
-  those different buckets

00:42:56.000 --> 00:43:00.710
-  Two million would be four times the the council sidewalk budget right now for sidewalks

00:43:00.710 --> 00:43:01.780
-  specifically for instance

00:43:01.780 --> 00:43:05.800
-  It would allow us to actually start addressing things like the South Walnut Street Pike

00:43:05.800 --> 00:43:09.760
-  Missing sidewalk where a pedestrian was killed a couple years ago

00:43:09.760 --> 00:43:13.800
-  Lots of other sidewalk gaps like that in the community that we are not making progress on

00:43:14.360 --> 00:43:16.880
-  And so we need to plan to coordinate the action

00:43:16.880 --> 00:43:21.880
-  But yes, I think that's like a reasonable like achievable level. We could certainly spend more

00:43:21.880 --> 00:43:24.200
-  There's plenty more to you know to be done

00:43:24.200 --> 00:43:27.960
-  But I think if you sustain that level of investment over a couple of decades

00:43:27.960 --> 00:43:30.960
-  We would see real transformative change

00:43:30.960 --> 00:43:35.840
-  That's my brother I

00:43:35.840 --> 00:43:38.600
-  Think councilmember Rosenberger had her

00:43:40.880 --> 00:43:46.170
-  I was just gonna get a little more nitty-gritty and just how the climate action plan is and you can

00:43:46.170 --> 00:43:47.520
-  just it's really I mean

00:43:47.520 --> 00:43:51.840
-  I think it's quite fun and exciting to read our goals because when we look at the transportation

00:43:51.840 --> 00:43:53.720
-  part of the climate action plan

00:43:53.720 --> 00:43:55.720
-  Just like it's you know

00:43:55.720 --> 00:44:02.520
-  Increased transit utilization by ten percent over 2018 by 2030

00:44:02.520 --> 00:44:07.560
-  increased shared mobility like carpooling by three percent of work commutes

00:44:08.360 --> 00:44:12.120
-  Encouraged density and increased housing options and affordability with the goal of increasing

00:44:12.120 --> 00:44:16.180
-  gross density by three percent of 2018 values

00:44:16.180 --> 00:44:19.100
-  That one isn't about cars. It's about housing

00:44:19.100 --> 00:44:22.280
-  obviously

00:44:22.280 --> 00:44:26.600
-  But I'm just saying like so we have all these right we have these goals that it's great that we don't

00:44:26.600 --> 00:44:27.700
-  like reinvent any wheels

00:44:27.700 --> 00:44:30.960
-  unintended because

00:44:30.960 --> 00:44:36.520
-  Reduce reduce single occupancy automobile used by eight percent of 2018 values, right?

00:44:36.520 --> 00:44:40.440
-  So all these climate action plan goals are also just so

00:44:40.440 --> 00:44:43.160
-  intertwined with our transportation

00:44:43.160 --> 00:44:47.160
-  Outcome in itself, you know and safe streets for all

00:44:47.160 --> 00:44:55.320
-  I also to some degree want to put a pin in that too

00:44:55.320 --> 00:45:01.800
-  Or just note that that also relates to like the step three of specific outcomes of measurable

00:45:01.800 --> 00:45:02.400
-  results

00:45:02.400 --> 00:45:06.620
-  Because all of those things are also measurable results that you know, we want to see that come out

00:45:06.620 --> 00:45:07.360
-  of those plans

00:45:07.360 --> 00:45:09.360
-  And now the climate action plan is kind of full of those

00:45:09.360 --> 00:45:17.640
-  Yeah, I wanted to mention that and these are interconnected as we said

00:45:17.640 --> 00:45:23.240
-  but when I was thinking of an ask this year for basic infrastructure and

00:45:23.240 --> 00:45:27.140
-  Mayor Thompson, I think alluded to it during the state of the city

00:45:27.140 --> 00:45:31.040
-  It was to pave neglected streets

00:45:31.040 --> 00:45:33.040
-  I

00:45:33.040 --> 00:45:37.410
-  Mean it doesn't do a bicyclist any good to hit a pothole. In fact, they're probably gonna be far

00:45:37.410 --> 00:45:37.720
-  more damaged than a

00:45:37.720 --> 00:45:41.720
-  car hitting a pothole. Well that might break you break an axle

00:45:41.720 --> 00:45:47.160
-  I'm aware. I've been around long enough to know that

00:45:47.160 --> 00:45:51.360
-  I've asked many many times public works

00:45:51.360 --> 00:45:57.560
-  What is the street paving schedule and I've been variably told that it's a 12-day paving schedule

00:45:58.080 --> 00:46:01.460
-  And I've been variably told that it's a 20-year cycle

00:46:01.460 --> 00:46:06.650
-  however, I know I've been here long enough to know that there are streets that haven't been paved

00:46:06.650 --> 00:46:07.620
-  in 40 years and

00:46:07.620 --> 00:46:14.080
-  They're crumbling and yet, you know, I hate to beat this horse

00:46:14.080 --> 00:46:18.020
-  But if a greenway goes in where there's crumbling

00:46:18.020 --> 00:46:24.080
-  Street I I think that that sends the wrong signal

00:46:24.080 --> 00:46:26.800
-  Especially one that's not necessary

00:46:27.080 --> 00:46:29.080
-  to the public and that is that

00:46:29.080 --> 00:46:35.520
-  Our priorities are scrambled. So that's this is one of my top I think

00:46:35.520 --> 00:46:40.820
-  Requests this year of the mayor of the administration is

00:46:40.820 --> 00:46:48.680
-  The maintenance of our streets and can we get on it? Can we can we repair the the ones that are

00:46:48.680 --> 00:46:50.280
-  most affected and

00:46:50.280 --> 00:46:54.080
-  Crumbling and then can we get on a 20-year cycle?

00:46:54.360 --> 00:46:59.400
-  Is that conceivable in and have some dedicated fund for that purpose?

00:46:59.400 --> 00:47:03.060
-  So it doesn't get neglected in the future

00:47:03.060 --> 00:47:09.880
-  Thank you councilmember Piedmont Smith, I saw your hand up earlier does she wanna

00:47:09.880 --> 00:47:13.760
-  Okay

00:47:13.760 --> 00:47:18.760
-  Go for it comment councilmember Ruff I

00:47:18.760 --> 00:47:24.160
-  Wanted I appreciate that councilmember Flaherty's, you know

00:47:24.400 --> 00:47:26.400
-  obviously spent some time on the numbers and

00:47:26.400 --> 00:47:29.100
-  Coming up come out with some estimates of what?

00:47:29.100 --> 00:47:33.480
-  Could oh the numbers of what the cost would be to

00:47:33.480 --> 00:47:35.480
-  increase

00:47:35.480 --> 00:47:37.120
-  progress in

00:47:37.120 --> 00:47:39.120
-  the areas of transportation that

00:47:39.120 --> 00:47:46.040
-  That he was talking about my question is for councilmember Flaherty because I'm interested in

00:47:46.040 --> 00:47:50.920
-  Might be a relative to the cost of the actual capital investment. It might not be

00:47:52.040 --> 00:47:54.440
-  As significant, but do you envision?

00:47:54.440 --> 00:48:00.800
-  additional staffing in planning transportation and engineering would be

00:48:00.800 --> 00:48:03.920
-  necessary to

00:48:03.920 --> 00:48:05.920
-  Maintain sort of a have a year after year

00:48:05.920 --> 00:48:08.840
-  increase in

00:48:08.840 --> 00:48:10.840
-  dedicated

00:48:10.840 --> 00:48:12.760
-  Investment and

00:48:12.760 --> 00:48:14.760
-  progress in construction and

00:48:14.760 --> 00:48:19.480
-  development of the of the transportation that you see would it would probably require

00:48:20.920 --> 00:48:22.520
-  additional

00:48:22.520 --> 00:48:24.520
-  folks

00:48:24.520 --> 00:48:28.200
-  Madam president

00:48:28.200 --> 00:48:35.650
-  Good question. I met with city engineering agency board this morning for a good period of time

00:48:35.650 --> 00:48:37.780
-  talking about this and some other things

00:48:37.780 --> 00:48:42.600
-  And we talked about that specific question. I think it's possible. Yes

00:48:42.600 --> 00:48:48.580
-  I think cities that have taken their vision zero goal seriously tend to have vision zero positions

00:48:48.580 --> 00:48:51.420
-  I a good friend of mine is the lead vision zero engineer for the city of Chicago

00:48:51.420 --> 00:48:55.620
-  Formally city Seattle before that smaller communities also have these positions though

00:48:55.620 --> 00:49:00.830
-  And so yeah, maybe something like that in the planning department ultimately would be needed and

00:49:00.830 --> 00:49:02.220
-  then not on the engineering side

00:49:02.220 --> 00:49:07.370
-  There are constraints that we run into relative to the ability to manage projects. Some of that can

00:49:07.370 --> 00:49:07.800
-  be managed by

00:49:07.800 --> 00:49:12.360
-  Contracting out the projects, but they're still require a level of oversight and project management

00:49:12.360 --> 00:49:14.960
-  that I think can be a factor

00:49:14.960 --> 00:49:16.280
-  I

00:49:16.280 --> 00:49:21.470
-  Know they're trying to hire right now another traffic engineer position that should help with some

00:49:21.470 --> 00:49:21.800
-  of that

00:49:21.800 --> 00:49:24.680
-  And I've had some other restructuring in the department to help

00:49:24.680 --> 00:49:32.680
-  Reformulate positions and have them better suited to do that type of management. So I think some of

00:49:32.680 --> 00:49:34.380
-  that's already in motion. I think

00:49:34.380 --> 00:49:39.300
-  Also, yes, it's possible. This would warrant a position or two

00:49:39.300 --> 00:49:42.160
-  Additionally possibly one in each department

00:49:42.160 --> 00:49:44.720
-  If we're able to make those kind of commitments

00:49:45.480 --> 00:49:47.480
-  You

00:49:47.480 --> 00:49:50.440
-  Thank you other

00:49:50.440 --> 00:49:57.060
-  Specific funding proposals related to transportation before we move on to like other specific

00:49:57.060 --> 00:49:58.240
-  funding things

00:49:58.240 --> 00:50:03.560
-  Okay

00:50:03.560 --> 00:50:08.560
-  Other specific funding things like at all like wait

00:50:08.560 --> 00:50:11.320
-  I asked somebody to put a pin in something earlier and I don't remember what it was

00:50:14.160 --> 00:50:18.680
-  Was it was it maybe it was councilmember Rallo with the maintenance and that already got in here

00:50:18.680 --> 00:50:22.840
-  Yeah, you did

00:50:22.840 --> 00:50:26.520
-  We already talked about yours a little bit, yeah

00:50:26.520 --> 00:50:32.140
-  Other specific councilmember Piedmont Smith

00:50:32.140 --> 00:50:38.940
-  Yeah, I mean we've talked about housing as an overall issue that we all agree is important in one

00:50:38.940 --> 00:50:39.760
-  way or another

00:50:39.760 --> 00:50:43.520
-  So I had

00:50:44.520 --> 00:50:45.720
-  I

00:50:45.720 --> 00:50:51.640
-  had an idea more specific idea for for that topic and that is

00:50:51.640 --> 00:50:57.960
-  To fund a housing summit to discuss strategies with builders and funders of affordable housing

00:50:57.960 --> 00:51:04.640
-  So that would be the cost of the event the staff time the follow-up possibly

00:51:04.640 --> 00:51:08.680
-  Consultant to

00:51:09.200 --> 00:51:14.500
-  Either run such a summit or follow up with some kind of action plan

00:51:14.500 --> 00:51:21.300
-  But I think that's long overdue. I mean we've had housing studies, but have we ever actually

00:51:21.300 --> 00:51:23.900
-  invited people who build housing to these things?

00:51:23.900 --> 00:51:27.080
-  Who fund affordable housing?

00:51:27.080 --> 00:51:31.440
-  I think that would be a great first step

00:51:35.800 --> 00:51:41.760
-  I also think that we should maybe look into funding a potential change to the UDO. I've heard that

00:51:41.760 --> 00:51:43.420
-  there are some hesitancies in

00:51:43.420 --> 00:51:46.240
-  terms of

00:51:46.240 --> 00:51:52.040
-  Pursuing different UDO changes because it's so expensive and I think if we went into the next year

00:51:52.040 --> 00:51:53.720
-  knowing that like this is a priority

00:51:53.720 --> 00:51:57.360
-  For us that maybe some of those hesitancies would

00:51:57.360 --> 00:52:00.440
-  Be alleviated

00:52:02.480 --> 00:52:07.520
-  Yeah, I would like to concur with that I said it since last year

00:52:07.520 --> 00:52:13.840
-  But also I mean it has played into decisions that we've made in the last several weeks even that

00:52:13.840 --> 00:52:14.640
-  that the

00:52:14.640 --> 00:52:19.390
-  Potential of that happening. So I would be like absolutely. I would very much want to see that in

00:52:19.390 --> 00:52:20.480
-  the in the budget

00:52:20.480 --> 00:52:25.960
-  What kind of funding do you think is needed for UDO changes?

00:52:25.960 --> 00:52:30.690
-  I mean last year last year, I think if somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but I think director Hiddle

00:52:30.690 --> 00:52:31.080
-  said

00:52:31.840 --> 00:52:33.840
-  something to the extent of

00:52:33.840 --> 00:52:36.000
-  $300,000

00:52:36.000 --> 00:52:45.790
-  To do what exactly I think to get consultants to actually start the the process instead of you know

00:52:45.790 --> 00:52:46.920
-  instead of this like

00:52:46.920 --> 00:52:50.280
-  changing around the edges, but actually

00:52:50.280 --> 00:52:56.840
-  Starting okay, so it's like the full sort of yeah proposal. Okay, I

00:52:58.360 --> 00:53:02.080
-  Don't think that sort of ends in one year, but it to start that process. I think that

00:53:02.080 --> 00:53:11.120
-  Okay, um, I want to thank the

00:53:11.120 --> 00:53:16.520
-  Community member who just texted me and reminded me that leaf pickup was what a pin got put in

00:53:16.520 --> 00:53:18.420
-  earlier from councilmember ruff

00:53:18.420 --> 00:53:27.200
-  Councilmember Piedmont Smith

00:53:27.720 --> 00:53:29.720
-  Yeah, I mean I think that

00:53:29.720 --> 00:53:34.520
-  The idea of overhauling the UDO

00:53:34.520 --> 00:53:39.120
-  Has some merit I

00:53:39.120 --> 00:53:44.720
-  Think for the benefit of the public it and maybe for for colleagues as well

00:53:44.720 --> 00:53:49.080
-  I would like to hear what you mean by that and why that's going to be helpful

00:53:53.200 --> 00:54:00.480
-  I can happily I mean, I mean the in short I think that we we need a form-based UDO

00:54:00.480 --> 00:54:05.080
-  rather than a Euclidean one, so I would be

00:54:05.080 --> 00:54:08.600
-  Writing a form-based UDO

00:54:08.600 --> 00:54:16.580
-  Okay, sure for the benefit of the public so Euclidean UDO starts with the you know, there's three

00:54:16.580 --> 00:54:18.760
-  elements to planning right land use

00:54:19.840 --> 00:54:25.710
-  Management and and then form form-based UDO starts with form then does management then does land

00:54:25.710 --> 00:54:26.000
-  use

00:54:26.000 --> 00:54:30.360
-  it's and you know to the question of why it's

00:54:30.360 --> 00:54:36.160
-  perhaps I mean one it's I mean, it's the direction that that

00:54:36.160 --> 00:54:39.040
-  cities are moving in but I think the

00:54:39.040 --> 00:54:44.480
-  the main reason why to say succinctly is that it allows us to

00:54:44.480 --> 00:54:48.960
-  To deal with I think the sort of snake of

00:54:49.960 --> 00:54:54.130
-  Bloomington development, which is things like permitting the feedback that we've got from a lot of

00:54:54.130 --> 00:54:54.880
-  developers

00:54:54.880 --> 00:54:56.880
-  I'm into the point of wanting to do a summit

00:54:56.880 --> 00:55:02.600
-  Is that is that even though is it basically that our rules are quite complex here?

00:55:02.600 --> 00:55:04.120
-  It's difficult to do business here

00:55:04.120 --> 00:55:08.100
-  So it makes it a lot easier for developers makes it a lot easier for people wanting to be in the

00:55:08.100 --> 00:55:08.680
-  community

00:55:08.680 --> 00:55:10.680
-  but it also then allows us the

00:55:10.680 --> 00:55:13.120
-  capabilities of having the provisions to

00:55:14.360 --> 00:55:19.920
-  Keep certain characteristics that people might want while also allowing more housing to be built

00:55:19.920 --> 00:55:29.770
-  If I may just follow up I think that that would go well with a housing summit where we would have a

00:55:29.770 --> 00:55:31.000
-  housing summit first

00:55:31.000 --> 00:55:33.000
-  and we would invite input from

00:55:33.000 --> 00:55:35.600
-  people who build housing and

00:55:35.600 --> 00:55:38.200
-  people in the community who have

00:55:38.200 --> 00:55:42.480
-  concerns as well as expertise in this area and

00:55:42.880 --> 00:55:44.440
-  that

00:55:44.440 --> 00:55:46.440
-  May well lead us to

00:55:46.440 --> 00:55:52.620
-  Some concrete things we would want to see in a UDO revision. I totally agree would agree. Yeah

00:55:52.620 --> 00:55:55.320
-  As a follow-up

00:55:55.320 --> 00:56:00.840
-  Councilmember, sorry if you spoken with our planning department one-on-one about that concept

00:56:00.840 --> 00:56:04.280
-  Yes, and and also publicly in these meetings. Yes

00:56:04.280 --> 00:56:12.080
-  All right other specific

00:56:13.000 --> 00:56:16.060
-  Budget lines comes member Flaherty. Thank you

00:56:16.060 --> 00:56:21.760
-  Yeah, I want to develop on the same thread I'd written in my list of specific proposals here 200 to

00:56:21.760 --> 00:56:23.160
-  400,000

00:56:23.160 --> 00:56:26.840
-  For contract work to create a plan to change the Unified Development Ordinance in line with the

00:56:26.840 --> 00:56:27.840
-  existing city policies

00:56:27.840 --> 00:56:33.060
-  Seeking to increase housing supply diversity of housing types and housing affordability both subsidized

00:56:33.060 --> 00:56:33.900
-  and market rate

00:56:33.900 --> 00:56:37.920
-  I think that could be a form-based code change

00:56:37.920 --> 00:56:43.200
-  I think getting clarity on that point and the buy-in from the administration is critical

00:56:43.200 --> 00:56:45.720
-  because my recollection is that

00:56:45.720 --> 00:56:48.920
-  I've been advocating a reform-based code for at least eight years

00:56:48.920 --> 00:56:53.400
-  I think it was the approach we should have taken in 2019 when we updated the UDO

00:56:53.400 --> 00:56:58.460
-  We did not we have kind of a hybrid. We have some form-based elements, but it's still highly

00:56:58.460 --> 00:56:59.240
-  segregated by

00:56:59.240 --> 00:57:02.120
-  uses

00:57:02.120 --> 00:57:07.200
-  My understanding from director Hittle when he spoke on this last year was that

00:57:07.920 --> 00:57:14.800
-  It felt early or premature relative to the age of the UDO and when that was done to make a

00:57:14.800 --> 00:57:17.240
-  large switch to a form-based code

00:57:17.240 --> 00:57:20.400
-  And that that might be like five plus years out yet

00:57:20.400 --> 00:57:26.400
-  That's a really important thing to nail down with specificity specifically from the mayor

00:57:26.400 --> 00:57:28.360
-  and

00:57:28.360 --> 00:57:33.120
-  in writing if possible because there's been a lot of wiggle room and like kind of like

00:57:33.120 --> 00:57:36.520
-  Shifting on what I've heard from the administration over time on some of these things

00:57:36.520 --> 00:57:38.520
-  um

00:57:38.520 --> 00:57:43.560
-  Various changes we've looked at worked with staff staff on that staff understands is good policy

00:57:43.560 --> 00:57:44.000
-  experts

00:57:44.000 --> 00:57:49.120
-  Understand our good policy that they fully supported are things like adjusting lot size minimums to

00:57:49.120 --> 00:57:49.940
-  accord with

00:57:49.940 --> 00:57:52.800
-  existing form of neighborhoods

00:57:52.800 --> 00:57:58.440
-  existing adjusting setbacks to align with existing form of neighborhoods to have that control over

00:57:58.440 --> 00:58:00.040
-  the type of building that

00:58:00.040 --> 00:58:02.400
-  Style of development what it looks like

00:58:02.760 --> 00:58:07.800
-  But at the same time to enable more modest housing to be built specifically in that case

00:58:07.800 --> 00:58:11.400
-  It would probably enable a lot of single-family owner occupied housing

00:58:11.400 --> 00:58:15.680
-  But those are form-based changes that we can make and make progress on

00:58:15.680 --> 00:58:21.960
-  In interim steps forward in the absence of a full-on commitment to an overhaul of the UDO

00:58:21.960 --> 00:58:24.720
-  starting next year and like

00:58:24.720 --> 00:58:28.960
-  Repeatedly my understanding from staff was that we are not ready for that overhaul now

00:58:28.960 --> 00:58:34.160
-  We're hearing something different. And so I think getting clarity on that's really quite critical

00:58:34.160 --> 00:58:37.600
-  as we talk about what budget expenditures could look like

00:58:37.600 --> 00:58:45.940
-  I mean so so in the question and answers for for the budget

00:58:45.940 --> 00:58:50.280
-  I wrote I'm intrigued by the possibility of moving towards a form-based code in the future

00:58:50.280 --> 00:58:54.370
-  Could you elaborate on the timeline the potential cost associated with this shift how this

00:58:54.370 --> 00:58:56.800
-  transition improve the housing development outcomes?

00:58:57.200 --> 00:59:03.380
-  And the answer was a transition to a true post Euclidean form-based code would require a full overhaul

00:59:03.380 --> 00:59:03.800
-  of the UDO

00:59:03.800 --> 00:59:08.320
-  That would involve a relatively specialized ordinance rewrite and they said 300 to 500 K

00:59:08.320 --> 00:59:14.080
-  And a timeline of approximately 12 to 24 months. I mean, so this is in writing

00:59:14.080 --> 00:59:17.480
-  Right, but but I agree, but but I agree

00:59:17.480 --> 00:59:23.720
-  I mean to the point I very much agree with what councilmember Flaherty is saying that that as as

00:59:24.120 --> 00:59:30.070
-  Pertains to the budget and then and then the follow-on policy that that we may want to pursue or

00:59:30.070 --> 00:59:30.760
-  not pursue

00:59:30.760 --> 00:59:32.760
-  I think that that

00:59:32.760 --> 00:59:37.440
-  Just echoing that comment that I think the the conversation has to be had and this is the time

00:59:37.440 --> 00:59:38.640
-  where we get to have this

00:59:38.640 --> 00:59:42.560
-  Is is that actually a commitment and that's why we put money towards it, right?

00:59:42.560 --> 00:59:47.320
-  So so that's the point that I'm making is that I mean if we're gonna put money towards it so that

00:59:47.320 --> 00:59:47.940
-  it happens

00:59:47.940 --> 00:59:50.200
-  Is the way that I would view that?

00:59:51.320 --> 00:59:56.680
-  Actually ask a clarifying question from what yeah, sorry just quoted the 12 to 24 month timeline

00:59:56.680 --> 00:59:57.200
-  that all makes sense

00:59:57.200 --> 01:00:02.200
-  But did you did it say a starting time like when we would implement that or was that not part and

01:00:02.200 --> 01:00:03.120
-  if you recall?

01:00:03.120 --> 01:00:08.320
-  When during during the meeting that was one of I mean you have no reason to recall this, right?

01:00:08.320 --> 01:00:11.200
-  I mean we asked quadrillion questions over, you know two weeks

01:00:11.200 --> 01:00:17.780
-  But I asked I asked during the meeting to director Hiddle that question specifically and and the

01:00:17.780 --> 01:00:18.720
-  answer was

01:00:18.920 --> 01:00:22.180
-  That we expect to put this in the budget for next year. So

01:00:22.180 --> 01:00:27.320
-  So, I mean they're different, but yeah getting clarity on this point would be helpful. Thank you

01:00:27.320 --> 01:00:33.410
-  I've had a more recent conversation with him about that and I think the five-year timeline at least

01:00:33.410 --> 01:00:33.680
-  is

01:00:33.680 --> 01:00:36.200
-  is

01:00:36.200 --> 01:00:38.200
-  includes things like

01:00:38.200 --> 01:00:40.280
-  I

01:00:40.280 --> 01:00:44.480
-  think the one to two year timeline is literally like writing it as opposed to

01:00:44.920 --> 01:00:50.790
-  all of the public input and all of the community understanding and greater education about what

01:00:50.790 --> 01:00:52.440
-  form-based code is and how it's different from

01:00:52.440 --> 01:00:54.440
-  what we have now and

01:00:54.440 --> 01:01:00.720
-  That I think the actual writing of it is probably the easy part and the hard part is all of that

01:01:00.720 --> 01:01:01.240
-  other stuff

01:01:01.240 --> 01:01:03.240
-  That is a little bit grayer

01:01:03.240 --> 01:01:07.600
-  And would probably cost more in time than it would in money exactly

01:01:07.600 --> 01:01:11.880
-  But that's why I asked earlier if you had talked to him about that directly recently because I've

01:01:11.880 --> 01:01:13.520
-  talked to him about that within the last

01:01:14.040 --> 01:01:15.240
-  Yeah

01:01:15.240 --> 01:01:18.320
-  But I do think I do think as as pertains to the budget, right?

01:01:18.320 --> 01:01:21.600
-  I mean the and and you know this tension that we're walking between

01:01:21.600 --> 01:01:26.000
-  Policy changes and other priorities that we might have versus budgetary priorities

01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:30.170
-  I think that councilmember Flaherty's question is the guiding question and I think that the answer

01:01:30.170 --> 01:01:31.080
-  to that determines

01:01:31.080 --> 01:01:34.160
-  All of the answers to some of these other things that we're discussing

01:01:34.160 --> 01:01:40.200
-  All right councilmember as murder

01:01:40.560 --> 01:01:46.760
-  Thanks, I too would love to see a form-based code the idea of having a restaurant that looks like a

01:01:46.760 --> 01:01:47.980
-  house next door to my house

01:01:47.980 --> 01:01:50.600
-  Is a dream I would say

01:01:50.600 --> 01:01:55.280
-  So I don't have to cook things all the time and it smells good all the time in my backyard

01:01:55.280 --> 01:01:58.600
-  So that's very exciting

01:01:58.600 --> 01:02:04.080
-  From recent conversations. I also have had with director Hiddle. I

01:02:05.840 --> 01:02:11.680
-  Was told kind of like a four to five to ten year timeline, which ten seems not not right

01:02:11.680 --> 01:02:15.080
-  but four to five and then also that

01:02:15.080 --> 01:02:21.680
-  in that in those five years that also like making updates to our current UDO our

01:02:21.680 --> 01:02:26.760
-  Steps in the direction of a form-based code too. So as we allow more

01:02:26.760 --> 01:02:34.360
-  options in our zones that is getting people more ready for an entire form-based code because

01:02:34.720 --> 01:02:35.960
-  I

01:02:35.960 --> 01:02:41.510
-  Think most people out there don't know what a form-based code is, which is you know, why why should

01:02:41.510 --> 01:02:42.520
-  anyone and I?

01:02:42.520 --> 01:02:47.140
-  Think there will be of course like some major pushback about the ideas of like what could go in

01:02:47.140 --> 01:02:48.120
-  your neighborhood

01:02:48.120 --> 01:02:52.420
-  If it looks like what is next door to it will be startling to some people

01:02:52.420 --> 01:02:58.620
-  But so just a note to still encourage and say what I said in the beginning

01:02:58.620 --> 01:03:03.040
-  To some of you that I want both and I want a form-based code and I want to make

01:03:03.640 --> 01:03:08.560
-  Immediate changes to our UDO to help our housing supply problem

01:03:08.560 --> 01:03:13.920
-  Could I say another specific thing may be moving on to more things on the list?

01:03:13.920 --> 01:03:18.640
-  Hang on to that just a second though because comes from repeat month Smith

01:03:18.640 --> 01:03:22.700
-  Did you have a specific budget thing or did you want to add something on to the UDO conversation? I

01:03:22.700 --> 01:03:27.080
-  Had another budget thing relating to housing. Okay, great then

01:03:28.920 --> 01:03:33.840
-  Councilmember Piedmont Smith, why don't you go with that and then we'll come back to you well

01:03:33.840 --> 01:03:38.480
-  We have to recognize that the federal landscape and support for affordable housing from the federal

01:03:38.480 --> 01:03:40.880
-  government is very different this year as it

01:03:40.880 --> 01:03:44.760
-  Than it was in the past and we have some very important

01:03:44.760 --> 01:03:49.100
-  Programs that are already funded by HUD that the city runs

01:03:49.100 --> 01:03:52.260
-  like homeowner repair programs

01:03:52.260 --> 01:03:57.230
-  Individual rental assistance down payment assistance. These are all going to face cuts from the

01:03:57.230 --> 01:03:58.360
-  federal government

01:03:58.400 --> 01:04:03.520
-  And I think we need to spend some local money to keep these programs going

01:04:03.520 --> 01:04:08.540
-  Because they keep people in their in their current affordable housing

01:04:08.540 --> 01:04:11.680
-  So I'd like to see money

01:04:11.680 --> 01:04:14.160
-  Go towards that

01:04:14.160 --> 01:04:16.440
-  Great. Thank you

01:04:16.440 --> 01:04:20.760
-  Councilmember sorry, what was your on the on the train of housing?

01:04:20.760 --> 01:04:28.160
-  The question of permitting in this last year's budget we put money towards updated software

01:04:28.160 --> 01:04:31.440
-  That could then and then we did that interlocal agreement all those good things with the county

01:04:31.440 --> 01:04:36.940
-  I'd like to see us fund and I'll just for the sake of calling it something like a

01:04:36.940 --> 01:04:42.140
-  Permitting concierge service or something like that or piloting something like that

01:04:42.140 --> 01:04:48.720
-  Also funding updates to web presence web tools web-based tools

01:04:48.720 --> 01:04:51.680
-  to facilitate

01:04:51.680 --> 01:04:55.920
-  the permitting process I think both for building for

01:04:56.520 --> 01:04:58.520
-  business creation

01:04:58.520 --> 01:05:01.800
-  You know for art installation you name it

01:05:01.800 --> 01:05:04.520
-  Okay

01:05:04.520 --> 01:05:12.280
-  Other specific budget things before we move on to our activity of what currently councilor Flaherty

01:05:12.280 --> 01:05:12.460
-  I

01:05:12.460 --> 01:05:17.040
-  Had two other things so four things total one was

01:05:17.040 --> 01:05:20.440
-  Just voicing support for

01:05:20.440 --> 01:05:25.600
-  Appropriate funding for the council office to function. Well, yep, you know

01:05:26.200 --> 01:05:28.340
-  I think we're working through

01:05:28.340 --> 01:05:33.520
-  Some potential reclassification of positions to allow us to competitively attract and retain staff,

01:05:33.520 --> 01:05:34.840
-  which has been a challenge

01:05:34.840 --> 01:05:37.440
-  as well as

01:05:37.440 --> 01:05:41.520
-  Potentially the need for outside council, you know on retainer for some issues

01:05:41.520 --> 01:05:46.000
-  We have unique questions unique needs as the city's legislative and fiscal body

01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:51.520
-  Sometimes there are interpretations from the corporation council that are very favorable to the

01:05:51.520 --> 01:05:52.720
-  opinion of the mayor

01:05:52.720 --> 01:05:55.200
-  But might be counter to the council's interests. We have a different

01:05:56.160 --> 01:05:59.120
-  Set of interests and a different need to explore some of those things

01:05:59.120 --> 01:06:03.080
-  Additionally, I think that type of funding need can extend into

01:06:03.080 --> 01:06:07.720
-  Other types of contracted support beyond legal

01:06:07.720 --> 01:06:10.160
-  potentially

01:06:10.160 --> 01:06:12.680
-  You know, I think fiscal

01:06:12.680 --> 01:06:18.420
-  Expertise has been mentioned previously again for for kind of consulting services or advisory

01:06:18.420 --> 01:06:20.560
-  services to the council as well as

01:06:21.560 --> 01:06:26.020
-  Even like public engagement support if we're going if we are going to try to lead

01:06:26.020 --> 01:06:28.800
-  processes where the mayor

01:06:28.800 --> 01:06:33.080
-  Doesn't want to or is choosing not to but it's a priority to the council if we want to do that

01:06:33.080 --> 01:06:37.680
-  Well, it we frankly can't do that with with the staffing we have and the expectations for council

01:06:37.680 --> 01:06:38.640
-  members without it being

01:06:38.640 --> 01:06:41.600
-  Simply unsustainable. So I think I

01:06:41.600 --> 01:06:47.070
-  Wrote 200k. I don't know what that actually looks like. Maybe that's a high peg for like what would

01:06:47.070 --> 01:06:47.680
-  be needed

01:06:47.680 --> 01:06:51.960
-  But I think it is important to evolve our budget to reflect that so that's one

01:06:51.960 --> 01:06:56.080
-  I can say the second thing or I can go for it. Go for the second thing. The second thing was

01:06:56.080 --> 01:06:59.680
-  Again, I put this at 200 to 400 K. Maybe it's high

01:06:59.680 --> 01:07:03.880
-  But to integrate and operationalize equity in the whole of city government

01:07:03.880 --> 01:07:09.360
-  Including with deep community collaboration, especially equity and justice focused organizations

01:07:09.360 --> 01:07:12.880
-  and groups and with council involvement

01:07:14.080 --> 01:07:18.830
-  Last year, we talked about the possibility of staffing for this. I've you know, and we've kind of

01:07:18.830 --> 01:07:19.720
-  discussed it in two places

01:07:19.720 --> 01:07:21.520
-  That was the budget

01:07:21.520 --> 01:07:25.530
-  Conversations in which the administration said well, no, we need to take stock. We're not gonna

01:07:25.530 --> 01:07:26.880
-  hire anybody. We want to take stock

01:07:26.880 --> 01:07:30.480
-  We agree. This is important. We're gonna look internally create a plan create a team, etc

01:07:30.480 --> 01:07:34.400
-  So that was the commitment at

01:07:34.400 --> 01:07:38.280
-  August of last year and then also the council's process committee looked at this

01:07:38.280 --> 01:07:42.700
-  I kind of led a survey review of leading cities and what they're doing as well as leading entities

01:07:42.700 --> 01:07:45.080
-  like the government alliance and racial equity

01:07:45.080 --> 01:07:48.880
-  and kind of there's a range of options from

01:07:48.880 --> 01:07:53.430
-  You know framework development and tool development to use in the legislative and policy

01:07:53.430 --> 01:07:55.960
-  development process budgeting, etc to

01:07:55.960 --> 01:07:58.360
-  staffing and resourcing to training

01:07:58.360 --> 01:08:02.840
-  You know that we commit to on an ongoing basis. So there's a variety of options

01:08:03.880 --> 01:08:08.640
-  Out there, but it was clear in that survey because I also looked at our city policies and plans

01:08:08.640 --> 01:08:14.700
-  That it's very scattershot. There's no unifying framework or holistic vision or even definitions of

01:08:14.700 --> 01:08:16.120
-  what types of equity or justice

01:08:16.120 --> 01:08:20.520
-  We're talking about it kind of barely appears in the in the comprehensive plan

01:08:20.520 --> 01:08:24.880
-  so I think if we're serious about those values and

01:08:24.880 --> 01:08:30.920
-  I think most of us are it takes again probably contracted support. We don't have

01:08:31.960 --> 01:08:34.120
-  To the extent that we do have staff expertise in house

01:08:34.120 --> 01:08:39.750
-  It's not their primary job that you know, they're running departments or doing other things and

01:08:39.750 --> 01:08:40.840
-  engage with the community

01:08:40.840 --> 01:08:45.720
-  So if we're serious about actually taking a whole of government approach to equity and policy

01:08:45.720 --> 01:08:52.280
-  Development community engagement, etc. I do think that will take a plan and dedicated support

01:08:52.280 --> 01:08:55.440
-  And that was my ballpark of what it could look like

01:08:55.440 --> 01:08:58.400
-  So that's my other item. Thank you

01:08:58.400 --> 01:09:00.840
-  Thank you

01:09:00.840 --> 01:09:05.660
-  Before we we're gonna move on to the activity now, but I realized that I haven't said mine

01:09:05.660 --> 01:09:11.730
-  Though it relates to some other things totally agree with councilmember Piedmont Smith about those

01:09:11.730 --> 01:09:14.220
-  direct grants and assistant programs that support residents

01:09:14.220 --> 01:09:17.660
-  I think they're really important and that we should figure out a way to fund those and if they're

01:09:17.660 --> 01:09:18.920
-  not going to be federally funded then

01:09:18.920 --> 01:09:22.820
-  Then we should see if we can do that somehow in-house

01:09:22.820 --> 01:09:25.640
-  and then I also agree with

01:09:29.080 --> 01:09:31.080
-  Councilmember Rallo about

01:09:31.080 --> 01:09:36.360
-  The maintenance stuff and I kind of have this question that that I need to ask our controller

01:09:36.360 --> 01:09:40.680
-  like how much money do we actually spend right now on annual maintenance and

01:09:40.680 --> 01:09:47.240
-  Kind of like just to like keep things going at this like basic level of infrastructure

01:09:47.240 --> 01:09:49.760
-  funding and

01:09:49.760 --> 01:09:51.760
-  then I

01:09:51.760 --> 01:09:54.480
-  Also think that we need to invest in a crosswalk plan

01:09:54.480 --> 01:09:57.600
-  because

01:09:57.600 --> 01:10:01.560
-  And I've talked with us in planning before they're not all maintained

01:10:01.560 --> 01:10:06.060
-  There's not actually a plan for like how often they get repainted and there's so many crosswalks

01:10:06.060 --> 01:10:07.480
-  all over town that you just can barely

01:10:07.480 --> 01:10:09.480
-  even see anymore and

01:10:09.480 --> 01:10:14.130
-  I've actually had constituents reach out about different locations that don't have crosswalks at

01:10:14.130 --> 01:10:15.340
-  all that maybe need them

01:10:15.340 --> 01:10:22.070
-  Because there is this implied thing like every corner in theory as a pedestrian you have the right

01:10:22.070 --> 01:10:22.600
-  to cross

01:10:22.600 --> 01:10:28.720
-  But I mean cars barely stop for crosswalks as it is. They're not gonna stop at corners that don't

01:10:28.720 --> 01:10:29.760
-  even have them

01:10:29.760 --> 01:10:33.280
-  And

01:10:33.280 --> 01:10:36.200
-  This to some degree leads us

01:10:36.200 --> 01:10:38.920
-  into

01:10:38.920 --> 01:10:43.920
-  This activity. So once again, I and I want council members to do it too if they want to

01:10:43.920 --> 01:10:48.200
-  Okay, there are post-it notes over on the council table

01:10:48.200 --> 01:10:52.370
-  If somebody over there could hold up a pack of post-it notes and there's some pens so if you are in

01:10:52.370 --> 01:10:53.200
-  chambers right now

01:10:53.200 --> 01:10:57.040
-  You get to get up and move around and I want you to think about

01:10:57.040 --> 01:10:59.720
-  programs activities

01:10:59.720 --> 01:11:07.680
-  Etc things that the city currently does right currently funds that matter to you personally

01:11:07.680 --> 01:11:13.410
-  That you utilize personally that that makes a big difference in your life or something that you

01:11:13.410 --> 01:11:13.720
-  have

01:11:14.600 --> 01:11:19.800
-  Utilize an example. I'll give is we are giving like rebates essentially right now

01:11:19.800 --> 01:11:23.720
-  For electric bicycles for residents and at the state of the city

01:11:23.720 --> 01:11:27.960
-  There was actually a recipient of one of those who stood up and was like this has changed my life

01:11:27.960 --> 01:11:31.600
-  So sometimes those little things change people's lives

01:11:31.600 --> 01:11:36.390
-  So I want you to write that program or that activity or whatever it is, you know, it could be a

01:11:36.390 --> 01:11:36.840
-  park program

01:11:36.840 --> 01:11:40.120
-  You could go coach basketball at Twin Lakes

01:11:40.120 --> 01:11:42.880
-  and

01:11:42.880 --> 01:11:45.640
-  You know that matters to you a lot and your family a lot

01:11:45.640 --> 01:11:49.880
-  so I want you to write that down on a post-it note and I want you to put it under the

01:11:49.880 --> 01:11:52.600
-  budget

01:11:52.600 --> 01:11:56.040
-  Outcome area as

01:11:56.040 --> 01:12:00.240
-  You know those those 12 areas that were defined earlier

01:12:00.240 --> 01:12:00.800
-  Okay

01:12:00.800 --> 01:12:04.680
-  now if you're on zoom right now and you also want to participate in this I

01:12:04.680 --> 01:12:09.240
-  Would like you to if you can type a chat message to the host

01:12:09.480 --> 01:12:14.000
-  Saying what your activity is and then in parentheses is what?

01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:19.160
-  What outcome area it belongs in so we're just gonna take maybe 10

01:12:19.160 --> 01:12:24.140
-  15 minutes move around the room a little bit and think of some of those very specific things that

01:12:24.140 --> 01:12:25.760
-  the city currently does

01:12:25.760 --> 01:12:27.400
-  That really matters to you

01:12:27.400 --> 01:12:30.840
-  And so if you're on zoom and you chat those things those will all end up getting

01:12:30.840 --> 01:12:34.960
-  Recorded and for the person who earlier mentioned is there gonna be a record of this?

01:12:34.960 --> 01:12:39.780
-  This is also something that will end up at the fiscal committee meeting next week

01:12:39.780 --> 01:12:51.680
-  So thank you for that little break and move around and little bit of conversation and

01:12:51.680 --> 01:12:56.790
-  one of the things that I was thinking about as I was watching people in chambers put up post-it

01:12:56.790 --> 01:12:58.200
-  notes as I was reflecting on

01:12:58.200 --> 01:13:01.800
-  The places that didn't have any and reflecting on some

01:13:02.720 --> 01:13:08.240
-  Because the activity was supposed to be to think about things that the city already does

01:13:08.240 --> 01:13:14.140
-  that you like and that you support and that you really want to keep or increase funding to and one

01:13:14.140 --> 01:13:14.960
-  of the things that we

01:13:14.960 --> 01:13:17.400
-  Talked about earlier was that idea of?

01:13:17.400 --> 01:13:20.160
-  identifying places where

01:13:20.160 --> 01:13:26.290
-  That we think are important, but we are lacking in so that's that's kind of an interesting way to

01:13:26.290 --> 01:13:27.040
-  use this too

01:13:27.040 --> 01:13:31.240
-  It's not only to go like oh look at all the things that people love and the areas that we're doing

01:13:31.240 --> 01:13:32.080
-  well in but also

01:13:32.320 --> 01:13:37.020
-  What are some places that maybe we identified as important that don't?

01:13:37.020 --> 01:13:44.740
-  Don't have as much in them and how can we do better at that? So it's kind of a two-pronged activity

01:13:44.740 --> 01:13:50.280
-  So the last piece of our conversation tonight

01:13:50.280 --> 01:13:56.800
-  Before we go to public comment and so I want to go to public comment no later than 815

01:13:57.600 --> 01:14:04.410
-  is talking about some of those big broad goals of vision or policy direction and then also some of

01:14:04.410 --> 01:14:05.200
-  those specific

01:14:05.200 --> 01:14:11.760
-  Outcomes and I am gonna note again that one of those specific outcomes

01:14:11.760 --> 01:14:16.760
-  that councilmember Rosenberger already kind of said was she was

01:14:16.760 --> 01:14:21.440
-  reading some very specific measurable outcomes from the

01:14:21.440 --> 01:14:25.520
-  from the climate action plan, and so I just want to note that that

01:14:25.720 --> 01:14:27.720
-  That

01:14:27.720 --> 01:14:30.640
-  We talked about that and

01:14:30.640 --> 01:14:38.300
-  Those are that needs to be a piece of what gets identified in terms of some of those specific

01:14:38.300 --> 01:14:39.960
-  outcomes from our

01:14:39.960 --> 01:14:42.440
-  specific plans, so

01:14:42.440 --> 01:14:46.160
-  Broad goals vision or policy direction

01:14:46.160 --> 01:14:52.560
-  Specific outcomes measurable results. I think whoever wants to speak to either or both of those

01:14:52.560 --> 01:14:53.040
-  things

01:14:54.280 --> 01:14:56.280
-  Councilmember Rallo

01:14:56.280 --> 01:15:00.680
-  I'll just drill down on a couple specific budget items and

01:15:00.680 --> 01:15:08.520
-  So one is public safety related and this is

01:15:08.520 --> 01:15:15.120
-  To provide adequate fire response to the southwest quadrant of Bloomington

01:15:15.120 --> 01:15:19.280
-  Since the 2002 growth policies plan

01:15:19.280 --> 01:15:22.480
-  we were to

01:15:22.760 --> 01:15:25.760
-  Build a fire station in that location

01:15:25.760 --> 01:15:27.840
-  We were

01:15:27.840 --> 01:15:32.960
-  Assured that we would have land from the summit development. So we have the land to do it

01:15:32.960 --> 01:15:36.240
-  But we will probably need to bond for that

01:15:36.240 --> 01:15:42.520
-  Fire station, but I think it's a high priority because the population has been growing

01:15:42.520 --> 01:15:46.600
-  Steadily and now it's going to explode in that area and

01:15:46.600 --> 01:15:48.800
-  already

01:15:48.800 --> 01:15:50.800
-  my understanding is that

01:15:51.680 --> 01:15:53.680
-  The fire department has difficulty

01:15:53.680 --> 01:15:57.220
-  Getting there with a response time that they would like

01:15:57.220 --> 01:15:59.920
-  And I should say to that part

01:15:59.920 --> 01:16:03.440
-  Extending into the county

01:16:03.440 --> 01:16:05.280
-  so

01:16:05.280 --> 01:16:08.220
-  So I think that's a that's a high priority for me

01:16:08.220 --> 01:16:12.160
-  Another is

01:16:12.160 --> 01:16:19.700
-  Yeah, so is that under broad goals then in terms of no, that's a specific budget item

01:16:20.360 --> 01:16:25.020
-  Or it's a specific budget. It's not going to be in the budget per se, but it should be

01:16:25.020 --> 01:16:27.720
-  Probably a bond that would be

01:16:27.720 --> 01:16:32.790
-  You know presented by the administration that we would okay. So you were adding something on to

01:16:32.790 --> 01:16:34.040
-  what we talked about earlier

01:16:34.040 --> 01:16:38.320
-  Yeah instead of yeah, I've covered the broad goals

01:16:38.320 --> 01:16:43.240
-  So I thought it would just hit a couple of the specific budget items. Can I mention another?

01:16:43.240 --> 01:16:47.160
-  Maybe two I

01:16:47.160 --> 01:16:49.160
-  Don't have to cover everything. Well, we

01:16:49.840 --> 01:16:54.160
-  We had already talked about those and and you hadn't said it at the time, but go ahead

01:16:54.160 --> 01:16:58.120
-  Yes, you just said specifics

01:16:58.120 --> 01:17:04.300
-  No, I said broad goals and then and then measurable outcomes like the specific measurable results

01:17:04.300 --> 01:17:08.520
-  All right. So but the broad goal is public safety

01:17:08.520 --> 01:17:11.360
-  the

01:17:11.360 --> 01:17:12.800
-  specific

01:17:12.800 --> 01:17:20.240
-  Request is for a bond for a southwest fire station along tap road somewhere there in that area

01:17:20.240 --> 01:17:23.660
-  Obviously the specific outcome it would be

01:17:23.660 --> 01:17:27.620
-  To to to ensure

01:17:27.620 --> 01:17:32.400
-  Response time

01:17:32.400 --> 01:17:38.750
-  Needed for that area and also anticipating another ten or twelve thousand people living in that

01:17:38.750 --> 01:17:40.780
-  area with the summit development

01:17:40.940 --> 01:17:42.940
-  I

01:17:42.940 --> 01:17:49.580
-  Regarding I kind of mashed these together the equity and health and human services

01:17:49.580 --> 01:17:53.100
-  as a broad goal

01:17:53.100 --> 01:17:55.460
-  in

01:17:55.460 --> 01:17:57.740
-  particularly as councilmember Piedmont Smith

01:17:57.740 --> 01:18:06.060
-  Described which is that we need to prepare for not only potentially economic dislocation of people

01:18:06.060 --> 01:18:08.460
-  But the lack of federal funding

01:18:09.100 --> 01:18:15.220
-  Which has already been cut year by year CDBG block grants have been falling year by year

01:18:15.220 --> 01:18:19.420
-  I put it on the remember I presented that a year or so ago

01:18:19.420 --> 01:18:22.500
-  so

01:18:22.500 --> 01:18:26.540
-  Understanding that that is coming. I think that we need to double Jack Hopkins

01:18:26.540 --> 01:18:29.500
-  Spending

01:18:29.500 --> 01:18:31.100
-  We're spending half a million now

01:18:31.100 --> 01:18:36.340
-  We should spend a million and that would just put us where we used to be about 20 years ago

01:18:36.340 --> 01:18:40.220
-  Frankly with federal and local social service spending

01:18:40.220 --> 01:18:44.520
-  And obviously the you know this

01:18:44.520 --> 01:18:51.020
-  so that outcome would be it reestablishes social service spending from the past and

01:18:51.020 --> 01:18:55.860
-  Then I'll just mention one last one

01:18:55.860 --> 01:19:00.860
-  Since it we haven't talked about it. Well, we talked a little bit about sustainability and climate

01:19:00.860 --> 01:19:01.860
-  change and so forth, but

01:19:01.860 --> 01:19:04.740
-  specific to Bloomington

01:19:04.980 --> 01:19:06.980
-  And this is an ever-growing problem

01:19:06.980 --> 01:19:10.340
-  Reducing invasive plants

01:19:10.340 --> 01:19:12.660
-  We have a code

01:19:12.660 --> 01:19:14.660
-  It's supposed to be followed

01:19:14.660 --> 01:19:18.660
-  The developers many of them some do many of them don't

01:19:18.660 --> 01:19:25.340
-  Maybe they put in something that's a native. They maybe it fails. They put in fountain grass and

01:19:25.340 --> 01:19:27.020
-  then it spreads everywhere

01:19:27.020 --> 01:19:32.740
-  So those are propagules. It spreads from into the county into the environment

01:19:33.260 --> 01:19:40.500
-  The only way that's going to be addressed is a specific budget item, which is to have higher one FTE

01:19:40.500 --> 01:19:41.700
-  in planning

01:19:41.700 --> 01:19:46.340
-  for non-native enforcement and education and

01:19:46.340 --> 01:19:51.140
-  Obviously the outcome would be

01:19:51.140 --> 01:19:56.520
-  That we would at least mitigate if not diminish

01:19:56.520 --> 01:20:00.140
-  The invasive

01:20:01.660 --> 01:20:03.660
-  I'll quit there

01:20:03.660 --> 01:20:06.540
-  Talk about many more things, but I

01:20:06.540 --> 01:20:13.580
-  Do want to say to all councilmembers if there's something that like you don't quite get to tonight

01:20:13.580 --> 01:20:14.740
-  because there's only so much time

01:20:14.740 --> 01:20:21.180
-  That we have this evening like please email that to myself and councilmember Piedmont Smith as a

01:20:21.180 --> 01:20:24.180
-  chair of the fiscal

01:20:24.180 --> 01:20:29.660
-  Committee so that then we can incorporate those comments next week councilmember Rosenberger

01:20:30.700 --> 01:20:32.700
-  This is gonna be anything right?

01:20:32.700 --> 01:20:38.220
-  Anything so I mean it's hard because again we have four

01:20:38.220 --> 01:20:44.300
-  Big plans with tons of goals and metrics for measurement in them

01:20:44.300 --> 01:20:49.940
-  I mean talking about climate action plan again. It's just really what I have on top right now. I

01:20:49.940 --> 01:20:56.180
-  Guess I'm thinking too about what we've talked about in the budget before so

01:20:57.060 --> 01:21:02.780
-  The this is the goal of increasing organics diversion by 40% of 2018

01:21:02.780 --> 01:21:09.470
-  Values in our waste okay waste reduction. We don't even have a composting option for residents

01:21:09.470 --> 01:21:10.060
-  anymore

01:21:10.060 --> 01:21:15.680
-  We've never had it publicly a public service and now we don't have a private service, which I call

01:21:15.680 --> 01:21:17.420
-  it a very embarrassing thing

01:21:17.420 --> 01:21:25.580
-  There are all these like sub plans like things to do food scraps bag pilot

01:21:26.580 --> 01:21:32.940
-  Certification for businesses to go zero waste so some budget thoughts would be to stop subsidizing

01:21:32.940 --> 01:21:34.580
-  our trash pickup

01:21:34.580 --> 01:21:40.640
-  Because we do that. I think it's about a million a year and use this money to start composting

01:21:40.640 --> 01:21:46.570
-  Also look at a pay-as-you-throw program which helps people think more about what they're putting

01:21:46.570 --> 01:21:49.580
-  into their trash cans and whether or not they want

01:21:49.580 --> 01:21:54.940
-  to like consume less or put their can out less, right and

01:21:55.580 --> 01:21:59.020
-  That might mean upgrading our system

01:21:59.020 --> 01:22:02.500
-  I have no idea to keep track of each pickup because right now we do

01:22:02.500 --> 01:22:07.700
-  I don't know that we do that, but I think all of our bins do have scan tags on them

01:22:07.700 --> 01:22:11.540
-  That's a little thing

01:22:11.540 --> 01:22:20.060
-  Thank you others broad goals specific outcomes measurable results

01:22:22.740 --> 01:22:25.400
-  Councilmember councilmember, sorry

01:22:25.400 --> 01:22:33.530
-  One one thing that I'd love to see is and this sort of falls in a lot of categories is some some at

01:22:33.530 --> 01:22:34.900
-  least pilots around

01:22:34.900 --> 01:22:38.580
-  Food security

01:22:38.580 --> 01:22:42.660
-  So so I'll go through it with with that framework. I mean thinking

01:22:42.660 --> 01:22:49.820
-  About neighborhood livability and social health. I'd like to see some type of funding

01:22:50.380 --> 01:22:55.780
-  initiatives around community gardens mobile markets, perhaps meal delivery pantry partnerships

01:22:55.780 --> 01:23:01.200
-  type of things with specific outcomes for example of

01:23:01.200 --> 01:23:07.640
-  Increasing the number of households with access to fresh produce within walking distance by 25

01:23:07.640 --> 01:23:08.280
-  percent

01:23:08.280 --> 01:23:10.780
-  That's an example

01:23:10.780 --> 01:23:15.820
-  Or reducing in food and security rates. I don't know if we actually are measuring that but

01:23:16.460 --> 01:23:21.820
-  In targeted neighborhoods like Crescent as an example by 15 percent or something like that

01:23:21.820 --> 01:23:24.460
-  I think similarly under

01:23:24.460 --> 01:23:30.940
-  I'll skip that one under like economic health

01:23:30.940 --> 01:23:37.520
-  You know thinking about like food business microgrants is something I'd be interested in piloting

01:23:37.520 --> 01:23:38.460
-  and

01:23:38.460 --> 01:23:43.320
-  Looking for example to increase the number of food based small businesses launched or expanded

01:23:43.320 --> 01:23:45.620
-  next year by

01:23:45.620 --> 01:23:49.660
-  X-percent, I think there's you know zero so increase would be maybe easier to measure

01:23:49.660 --> 01:23:56.450
-  Or in increased gross sales at local farmers market at the farmers market by 25 percent something

01:23:56.450 --> 01:23:56.980
-  like that

01:23:56.980 --> 01:24:03.440
-  And I have others in other categories, but you know just I know we're short on time

01:24:03.440 --> 01:24:15.600
-  Members do look I think it would be worth looking into how we could invest in how the city communicates

01:24:15.600 --> 01:24:17.040
-  With the rest of the community

01:24:17.040 --> 01:24:22.880
-  There are quite a lot of really great programs at the city that when I go out and I talk to my

01:24:22.880 --> 01:24:23.240
-  constituents

01:24:23.240 --> 01:24:30.300
-  Like they don't know about and there's only so much that services that aren't being utilized can do

01:24:30.300 --> 01:24:31.920
-  for our community

01:24:31.920 --> 01:24:34.360
-  so I think

01:24:34.360 --> 01:24:37.080
-  It would be worth putting real money behind that so that

01:24:37.080 --> 01:24:41.980
-  People could take advantage of the programs that we do currently have and then the programs that we've

01:24:41.980 --> 01:24:42.800
-  talked about

01:24:43.960 --> 01:24:45.960
-  pursuing

01:24:45.960 --> 01:24:50.240
-  Thank you

01:24:50.240 --> 01:24:55.440
-  Councilmember Flaherty sure

01:24:55.440 --> 01:25:01.960
-  I had a little bit of hard time grappling with with some aspects of this. I think I

01:25:01.960 --> 01:25:08.840
-  Support the idea of outcomes based budgeting and holding ourselves accountable to outcomes. I think

01:25:08.840 --> 01:25:10.820
-  it's been mentioned. I mean

01:25:11.640 --> 01:25:17.020
-  We do have a variety of city plans that were developed with input of hundreds of residents informed

01:25:17.020 --> 01:25:17.960
-  by expertise

01:25:17.960 --> 01:25:20.200
-  You know that set goals and outcomes

01:25:20.200 --> 01:25:24.470
-  I think sometimes those aren't always the best goals like our comprehensive plan doesn't really

01:25:24.470 --> 01:25:26.440
-  have like smart goals for instances of frameworks and

01:25:26.440 --> 01:25:29.610
-  Everything's not always like the most measurable. I think there's some improvement that could

01:25:29.610 --> 01:25:32.980
-  happen there. I'm a little wary of us like introducing

01:25:32.980 --> 01:25:36.260
-  new outcomes or new metrics

01:25:37.240 --> 01:25:41.880
-  Maybe if it's in the area where we don't have plans in place already, but it feels like

01:25:41.880 --> 01:25:45.000
-  I'm not sure

01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:49.540
-  Council members just sort of like throwing out their own ideas here. It's like I don't know there's

01:25:49.540 --> 01:25:51.320
-  limits to that and also like in a

01:25:51.320 --> 01:25:55.500
-  We're sort of broadly talking about a theory of change of some kind

01:25:55.500 --> 01:25:57.840
-  Another way to think about that

01:25:57.840 --> 01:26:02.750
-  It's like a logic model that traces inputs to outcomes and impact and there's steps in between you

01:26:02.750 --> 01:26:03.680
-  go from inputs

01:26:03.680 --> 01:26:09.760
-  Which is the resourcing to activities and outputs that come before outcomes and and it

01:26:09.760 --> 01:26:14.740
-  So I'm very familiar with those frameworks and like we're sort of missing the middle pieces here,

01:26:14.740 --> 01:26:18.060
-  which is basically policy policy development implementation

01:26:18.060 --> 01:26:23.760
-  Some level of outputs that might have indicators of their own that lead to outcomes. So like

01:26:23.760 --> 01:26:24.320
-  increased

01:26:24.320 --> 01:26:28.840
-  miles of sidewalk for instance might lead to other outcomes like increased, you know

01:26:28.840 --> 01:26:31.480
-  pedestrian mode share

01:26:31.800 --> 01:26:35.240
-  Additionally, the other thing I'm worried about is like the time scales of some of these things

01:26:35.240 --> 01:26:37.420
-  relative to like an annual budgeting cycle

01:26:37.420 --> 01:26:40.080
-  and so I

01:26:40.080 --> 01:26:44.520
-  Think we didn't do a great job necessarily in our comp plan of like tracking the most useful

01:26:44.520 --> 01:26:48.960
-  Indicators and in particular lead indicators not lag indicators

01:26:48.960 --> 01:26:53.670
-  So often we're measuring things on a lag that does that is too late to be actionable and kind of

01:26:53.670 --> 01:26:54.200
-  just like

01:26:54.200 --> 01:26:56.440
-  It's like did this happen or not?

01:26:56.440 --> 01:27:01.180
-  But what we really want to lead is sorry what we really want to measure. I think are the outputs

01:27:01.180 --> 01:27:03.040
-  and things that we produce

01:27:03.040 --> 01:27:08.100
-  That will that based on evidence from other places will lead to the outcomes that we're looking for

01:27:08.100 --> 01:27:10.720
-  and

01:27:10.720 --> 01:27:12.720
-  so I

01:27:12.720 --> 01:27:14.720
-  Don't know

01:27:14.720 --> 01:27:18.160
-  And then and if so, I think like that's like that's the framework

01:27:18.160 --> 01:27:22.090
-  I'm kind of bringing to this and it feels like we're I know we're just iterating on a process and

01:27:22.090 --> 01:27:22.800
-  kind of like

01:27:22.800 --> 01:27:24.880
-  learning our way forward through doing

01:27:25.680 --> 01:27:29.890
-  But those are two things that kind of concerned me about I guess like how we're approaching this is

01:27:29.890 --> 01:27:31.920
-  one like if it's too divorced from

01:27:31.920 --> 01:27:37.840
-  Existing city policy, which certainly had a lot more public input and buy in across branches of

01:27:37.840 --> 01:27:39.340
-  government here

01:27:39.340 --> 01:27:44.160
-  then then like what we're starting with this process and then second is kind of like

01:27:44.160 --> 01:27:48.440
-  Some of the some of the pieces that might be missing from the framework

01:27:48.440 --> 01:27:53.850
-  So that's not you know, those aren't suggested that I mean zero deaths in our streets or one that I

01:27:53.850 --> 01:27:54.840
-  mentioned earlier, right?

01:27:54.840 --> 01:27:58.460
-  Like we could talk about like increase in housing starts for certain types of housing

01:27:58.460 --> 01:28:04.320
-  You know that we'd like to see that our plans except so like there's there's progress to be made on

01:28:04.320 --> 01:28:04.560
-  this

01:28:04.560 --> 01:28:09.240
-  But I don't know this feels a little divorced for me from like existing policy and plans

01:28:09.240 --> 01:28:14.160
-  Sorry, I realize that's like not helpful it's just a reflection

01:28:14.160 --> 01:28:24.140
-  I think everything everything you just said is so helpful. And I think the very I mean

01:28:24.620 --> 01:28:26.060
-  That is I wish you know

01:28:26.060 --> 01:28:28.900
-  I kind of wish we had got to that point earlier in the conversation, right?

01:28:28.900 --> 01:28:35.300
-  Like I think that that's in my mind was the was the appropriate outcome of this conversation. It's

01:28:35.300 --> 01:28:35.760
-  that

01:28:35.760 --> 01:28:40.780
-  You know, I think the the real like let's talk about the outcomes

01:28:40.780 --> 01:28:46.100
-  We want with try to change this our budget process is to directly tie our

01:28:46.100 --> 01:28:52.790
-  Our spending and our policy that follows two things that we've already got a lot of public input to

01:28:52.790 --> 01:28:53.860
-  and and I think

01:28:53.900 --> 01:28:58.840
-  So I wholeheartedly I think second what councilmember Flaherty said, I think that

01:28:58.840 --> 01:29:02.480
-  Yeah, I think I think you hit the nail on the head with that. I agree

01:29:02.480 --> 01:29:07.930
-  Yeah, I would also say probably that a lot of the thing probably not all of the things we've talked

01:29:07.930 --> 01:29:08.900
-  about tonight

01:29:08.900 --> 01:29:10.660
-  but a lot of them

01:29:10.660 --> 01:29:15.150
-  Were really familiar sounding to me from things that I've read in the comp plan when I read it and

01:29:15.150 --> 01:29:16.420
-  just going like oh, yeah

01:29:16.420 --> 01:29:20.540
-  Like we said we wanted to do this thing. How much money is being invested in it right now?

01:29:20.540 --> 01:29:24.660
-  How much could we invest in it? And with some things I feel like even if we do invest

01:29:24.660 --> 01:29:30.450
-  Money in it like that's not necessarily the solution that it needs like it doesn't necessarily need

01:29:30.450 --> 01:29:31.460
-  money right now

01:29:31.460 --> 01:29:36.820
-  I need something different and so I think teasing those things apart could be useful generally

01:29:36.820 --> 01:29:37.840
-  speaking

01:29:37.840 --> 01:29:47.660
-  I'm not sure who I should go to right now because I had three people express interest in speaking

01:29:47.660 --> 01:29:49.920
-  so councilmember Ruff

01:29:49.920 --> 01:29:51.920
-  quick

01:29:51.920 --> 01:30:01.680
-  Your mics off the the high-performing government broad goal, you know

01:30:01.680 --> 01:30:07.600
-  so paying our city employees a commensurate

01:30:07.600 --> 01:30:14.510
-  On par with other Midwestern peer cities. I just don't see how we can deliver a high-performing

01:30:14.510 --> 01:30:15.180
-  government

01:30:15.180 --> 01:30:19.800
-  If we aren't paying to get hyper to keep high-performing

01:30:20.280 --> 01:30:26.040
-  Employees and you know the side benefit of that is we hope it would have a slight

01:30:26.040 --> 01:30:30.240
-  upward pressure on general wages in the city the better we pay a

01:30:30.240 --> 01:30:35.660
-  Fairly large employer like planning. So that's that's important to me. And then the last thing I'll

01:30:35.660 --> 01:30:36.680
-  say real quick is

01:30:36.680 --> 01:30:39.520
-  Be interesting to do this exercise

01:30:39.520 --> 01:30:45.780
-  Coming from the other perspective like everything we've talked about is going to require some

01:30:45.780 --> 01:30:46.640
-  investment

01:30:46.640 --> 01:30:50.940
-  It's there's the wish kind of a wish list. Well, we're gonna need to raise taxes or

01:30:50.940 --> 01:30:55.740
-  Cut reduce our investment in some other things. So we kind of interesting to have this kind of

01:30:55.740 --> 01:30:57.760
-  discussion about where do we think?

01:30:57.760 --> 01:31:03.440
-  We would invest less or we would put less into anyway, that's all. Thank you

01:31:03.440 --> 01:31:11.760
-  We have about two minutes before I want to go public comment councilmember Piedmont Smith

01:31:14.480 --> 01:31:18.960
-  This is the last five minutes have been extremely interesting

01:31:18.960 --> 01:31:21.520
-  what I

01:31:21.520 --> 01:31:23.000
-  wanted to mention

01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:29.600
-  From my list is something that we don't really have a community plan on and maybe we should I don't

01:31:29.600 --> 01:31:29.980
-  know

01:31:29.980 --> 01:31:34.760
-  I think it it is something that kind of you know follows from other

01:31:34.760 --> 01:31:42.720
-  Community values that have been stated but that's on the in the realm of public safety

01:31:42.720 --> 01:31:46.080
-  And so I had two desired outcomes related to that

01:31:46.080 --> 01:31:52.520
-  One was the increase the capacity of stride mobile community responder program to handle all nonviolent

01:31:52.520 --> 01:31:55.280
-  mental health emergency calls through central

01:31:55.280 --> 01:31:57.280
-  dispatch by the end of

01:31:57.280 --> 01:31:59.520
-  2027 and

01:31:59.520 --> 01:32:01.320
-  then

01:32:01.320 --> 01:32:07.540
-  Following that decouple central dispatch from the BPD and trained dispatchers to send non-police

01:32:07.880 --> 01:32:13.660
-  Community responder units to address mental health emergencies as appropriate by the end of 2028

01:32:13.660 --> 01:32:23.040
-  Great councilmember Rosenberger, did you have one last thing to say before we go to public comment?

01:32:23.040 --> 01:32:26.360
-  Okay

01:32:26.360 --> 01:32:28.680
-  Councilmember Allah

01:32:28.680 --> 01:32:30.720
-  Very briefly

01:32:30.720 --> 01:32:32.720
-  great discussion I

01:32:33.200 --> 01:32:39.370
-  When I was looking through priorities when I was looking at specific budget items, I was keeping in

01:32:39.370 --> 01:32:39.760
-  mind

01:32:39.760 --> 01:32:42.720
-  where's the money coming from and

01:32:42.720 --> 01:32:51.920
-  I'm very very reticent to increase the Edie lit in very uncertain times for people

01:32:51.920 --> 01:32:55.280
-  Because unfortunately, it's a regressive tax

01:32:55.280 --> 01:32:58.940
-  It seems to be the only thing available to us

01:32:58.940 --> 01:33:03.080
-  So

01:33:03.120 --> 01:33:05.120
-  I'm looking at

01:33:05.120 --> 01:33:07.280
-  very I

01:33:07.280 --> 01:33:09.940
-  Guess I was prioritizing in terms of maintenance

01:33:09.940 --> 01:33:12.520
-  public safety

01:33:12.520 --> 01:33:14.520
-  common good items that

01:33:14.520 --> 01:33:21.400
-  Really need attention as priorities. I mean certainly there's a lot of things that could be funded

01:33:21.400 --> 01:33:30.020
-  So anyway, that's something that we need to maybe curb our enthusiasm about some of these items

01:33:32.480 --> 01:33:34.480
-  Thank you

01:33:34.480 --> 01:33:38.860
-  With that let's go ahead and go to a period of public comment on

01:33:38.860 --> 01:33:46.960
-  Budget 2026 on how the city spends money on whatever people out there want to talk about in terms

01:33:46.960 --> 01:33:47.440
-  of budget

01:33:47.440 --> 01:33:51.000
-  So if you are in council chambers, you can make your way to the podium

01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:54.920
-  You can sign in state your name for the record and then you'll have three minutes

01:33:54.920 --> 01:33:59.920
-  If you're online you can raise your hand using the raise hand function

01:33:59.920 --> 01:34:06.360
-  or you can send a chat message to the host and we do have somebody here in chambers who would like

01:34:06.360 --> 01:34:07.000
-  to speak so

01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:09.520
-  When you're ready

01:34:09.520 --> 01:34:12.160
-  You can go ahead and state your name

01:34:12.160 --> 01:34:17.480
-  These things start a little earlier than I remember

01:34:17.480 --> 01:34:22.560
-  From everything that you guys have talked about tonight it sounds like

01:34:23.680 --> 01:34:28.890
-  Government performance and how you deliver services is the thing that matters most to you from the

01:34:28.890 --> 01:34:31.320
-  simple service of maintaining roadways to

01:34:31.320 --> 01:34:34.200
-  Really just anything

01:34:34.200 --> 01:34:39.660
-  housing is important and I feel like that's a separate issue entirely from people who are unhoused

01:34:39.660 --> 01:34:39.960
-  and

01:34:39.960 --> 01:34:43.360
-  You guys will touch on that later

01:34:43.360 --> 01:34:48.040
-  I imagine and hopefully I can be a little more engaged and I've been over the last 10 years

01:34:48.040 --> 01:34:51.680
-  going forward as the city transitions to a

01:34:52.960 --> 01:34:54.960
-  new age

01:34:54.960 --> 01:34:57.520
-  Whatever it should be called here

01:34:57.520 --> 01:35:04.220
-  Something that I have personally been affected by recently is something not many of you may be able

01:35:04.220 --> 01:35:05.460
-  to elaborate on

01:35:05.460 --> 01:35:08.240
-  As I drive uber part-time

01:35:08.240 --> 01:35:15.130
-  The city recently decided that it should seasonally have a permanent closure of the Kirkwood and

01:35:15.130 --> 01:35:15.920
-  corridors

01:35:15.920 --> 01:35:19.840
-  I think that's a fascinating idea and it has its place here

01:35:19.840 --> 01:35:23.180
-  However between the downtown and places

01:35:23.180 --> 01:35:25.960
-  of the university

01:35:25.960 --> 01:35:28.840
-  There's an issue with getting around to pick up

01:35:28.840 --> 01:35:35.550
-  The majority of the users are students, but I myself am also a user of uber on the weekends as it's

01:35:35.550 --> 01:35:36.700
-  a lot

01:35:36.700 --> 01:35:38.700
-  Wiser to not drink and drive

01:35:38.700 --> 01:35:43.840
-  But in my thinking

01:35:43.840 --> 01:35:49.720
-  Having been asked to not stop and wait for a rider at the back end of the spia building

01:35:49.760 --> 01:35:53.580
-  And having to navigate now the downtown

01:35:53.580 --> 01:35:58.740
-  Why could we not utilize some of the spaces with like bike lanes?

01:35:58.740 --> 01:36:01.720
-  bus stops to have an

01:36:01.720 --> 01:36:04.640
-  uber and Lyft

01:36:04.640 --> 01:36:09.320
-  Shared space so users can kind of have a common ground to come to you

01:36:09.320 --> 01:36:14.180
-  I think also as they utilize the lime scooters. I don't know if that's even what they are anymore

01:36:14.180 --> 01:36:14.880
-  around here

01:36:14.880 --> 01:36:17.480
-  I'd like to do those myself downtown

01:36:17.840 --> 01:36:19.980
-  Just don't let me do it in Nashville, Tennessee

01:36:19.980 --> 01:36:22.320
-  I

01:36:22.320 --> 01:36:28.070
-  Think as those things continue to gain popularity and frequent use both from residents and from

01:36:28.070 --> 01:36:29.100
-  students alike

01:36:29.100 --> 01:36:31.760
-  Especially the lower-income who may not

01:36:31.760 --> 01:36:34.240
-  May not get to use them every day

01:36:34.240 --> 01:36:38.560
-  Just putting those pieces together and

01:36:38.560 --> 01:36:44.560
-  In a safe spot. I know we lost someone a couple years ago using a scooter

01:36:44.560 --> 01:36:50.210
-  and again the the main street of town being Walnut Street is heavily trafficked over the weekends

01:36:50.210 --> 01:36:52.800
-  with uber and Lyft drivers alike and

01:36:52.800 --> 01:36:57.480
-  Sometimes it's hard for drivers who are just trying to get through to get by and it makes it very

01:36:57.480 --> 01:36:57.880
-  unsafe

01:36:57.880 --> 01:37:03.600
-  So maybe having like I don't know ten cars length of distance for drivers to be able to stop

01:37:03.600 --> 01:37:07.610
-  I pay insurance to be an uber driver to drive people around so they get to where they need to go

01:37:07.610 --> 01:37:08.320
-  safely and

01:37:08.320 --> 01:37:11.780
-  I kind of expect the same for my driver. So thank you

01:37:14.080 --> 01:37:18.840
-  Thank you for your comment are there other people in chambers who would wish to make a comment

01:37:18.840 --> 01:37:25.420
-  Go ahead and state your name for the record and you'll have three minutes

01:37:25.420 --> 01:37:31.300
-  Good evening, madam president. I'm gonna write my name and say good evening at the same time

01:37:31.300 --> 01:37:34.000
-  It's Christopher energy from the greater limited chamber of commerce

01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:41.320
-  I'm gonna get out of my main soapbox. I have been which is sort of personnel costs, but to reader

01:37:41.320 --> 01:37:41.880
-  it was

01:37:43.160 --> 01:37:46.520
-  Councilmember Rallo said that you know money is tight

01:37:46.520 --> 01:37:52.400
-  we're heading through what looks to be could be a recession coming in with decreased revenue and

01:37:52.400 --> 01:38:00.900
-  Decreased means of getting revenue with SP one and some other items that the state has before us

01:38:00.900 --> 01:38:07.250
-  I want to sort of piggyback on a couple things that were said. I think councilmember Rosenberger

01:38:07.250 --> 01:38:08.440
-  had the

01:38:09.280 --> 01:38:12.960
-  statement early which is where does council make the biggest difference and

01:38:12.960 --> 01:38:18.280
-  One of the things she says which I think was kind of a good one, which was housing

01:38:18.280 --> 01:38:23.440
-  Well housing and sort of the unhoused are huge issues. Those are big lifts and what council can do

01:38:23.440 --> 01:38:26.280
-  I think is to a varying degree is

01:38:26.280 --> 01:38:29.800
-  is limited but having sort of

01:38:29.800 --> 01:38:32.640
-  council actions that spur

01:38:32.640 --> 01:38:38.400
-  Economic development that spur investment from the from the private sector with its developers

01:38:38.440 --> 01:38:43.620
-  That's something important to look at and I think councilmember Flaherty mentioned quite a bit on

01:38:43.620 --> 01:38:44.880
-  what I

01:38:44.880 --> 01:38:48.680
-  Think was a good agreement with everyone and what does the city do?

01:38:48.680 --> 01:38:52.280
-  Well what it can do which is the mobility and transportation aspect

01:38:52.280 --> 01:38:56.160
-  I think that investment in sidewalks and some other areas within

01:38:56.160 --> 01:38:59.500
-  potholes and road maintenance is just the basic

01:38:59.500 --> 01:39:02.840
-  essential services of government

01:39:04.280 --> 01:39:09.200
-  We've talked about outcome based budgeting and I look back. I think that was I don't it was that

01:39:09.200 --> 01:39:13.840
-  2021 with the the lit increase that was 19 million dollars

01:39:13.840 --> 01:39:16.920
-  What have what is the outcomes on that particular?

01:39:16.920 --> 01:39:22.540
-  Tax increasing sort of look at specifically that we had them in buckets and different things within

01:39:22.540 --> 01:39:24.320
-  the buckets and buckets within buckets

01:39:24.320 --> 01:39:29.360
-  So I think that would be a good place to sort of look at from you know, from point a to point B

01:39:29.360 --> 01:39:31.960
-  beginning and some of that and

01:39:32.600 --> 01:39:35.960
-  One thing that's come up a lot. We I did a parks

01:39:35.960 --> 01:39:38.760
-  focus group last week. Thank you

01:39:38.760 --> 01:39:43.680
-  Tim Street for that for putting that on and and one thing that from the group of business leaders

01:39:43.680 --> 01:39:49.300
-  We came up with which is a sort of overriding issue is asset management as parks has grown the need

01:39:49.300 --> 01:39:51.240
-  for upkeep on that is great

01:39:51.240 --> 01:39:56.160
-  What are we looking at on that and we have a lot of great wonderful, you know

01:39:56.160 --> 01:40:01.340
-  Banneker Center and all of these parks I sort of went on my high horse on turf fields at Winslow

01:40:01.340 --> 01:40:02.440
-  Field which are

01:40:02.440 --> 01:40:05.520
-  Get flooding just by looking at the forecast

01:40:05.520 --> 01:40:10.860
-  So we have a lot of work to do within that and that's not going into the Buzzkirk Theatre

01:40:10.860 --> 01:40:16.540
-  The Waldron Center all these wonderful city assets that just need upkeep. We're only as good as

01:40:16.540 --> 01:40:16.920
-  that

01:40:16.920 --> 01:40:22.490
-  Those things quickly deteriorate with deferred maintenance only causes, you know a ripple effect as

01:40:22.490 --> 01:40:23.440
-  far as that goes

01:40:25.640 --> 01:40:30.860
-  Housing summit really like that idea and my time all of a sudden is up. But thank you for your time

01:40:30.860 --> 01:40:35.760
-  Do we have anybody on zoom who would wish to make a comment?

01:40:35.760 --> 01:40:42.420
-  Okay, thank you, is there anybody else in chambers who would wish to make a comment

01:40:42.420 --> 01:40:48.360
-  Come on up, please sign in state your name for the record and you'll have three minutes

01:40:53.760 --> 01:40:57.240
-  My name is Gerard glom I teach economics at the University

01:40:57.240 --> 01:41:02.360
-  But I'm speaking on my own behalf when I go to social functions when people ask me what to do

01:41:02.360 --> 01:41:08.640
-  I say I'm an economist their response is supply and demand and then there's dead silence

01:41:08.640 --> 01:41:12.520
-  Evidently people think economics is very very boring

01:41:12.520 --> 01:41:18.680
-  Ever since January 20 economics has gone up in the excitement scale through the roof

01:41:18.680 --> 01:41:22.160
-  immigration cuts the Medicaid

01:41:22.520 --> 01:41:24.520
-  cuts the research

01:41:24.520 --> 01:41:26.640
-  misinformation about vaccines

01:41:26.640 --> 01:41:34.240
-  Communicable diseases all of those are exciting economic issues. The problem is there's a lot of

01:41:34.240 --> 01:41:37.360
-  misinformation bad information

01:41:37.360 --> 01:41:43.820
-  Silly formulas that are used to fund policy to justify policy

01:41:43.820 --> 01:41:47.360
-  So I guess my comments come under the hitting

01:41:49.280 --> 01:41:54.600
-  Performing government because I'm going to make something available to all of you for free

01:41:54.600 --> 01:42:00.640
-  You're all invited to Saturday afternoon 2 o'clock to come to the downtown library

01:42:00.640 --> 01:42:07.990
-  Professor Michael Hicks from Ball State will give a presentation on how terrorists influence jobs

01:42:07.990 --> 01:42:09.040
-  for Hoosiers

01:42:09.040 --> 01:42:11.840
-  I imagine you're part of Indiana

01:42:12.720 --> 01:42:18.640
-  Terrorists will have a big impact on this community. So all of you your staff to write a community

01:42:18.640 --> 01:42:20.440
-  is invited to learn about

01:42:20.440 --> 01:42:28.040
-  How tariffs might excellent influence the quality of our lives here in Bloomington, Monroe County

01:42:28.040 --> 01:42:29.720
-  in the rest of this state

01:42:29.720 --> 01:42:32.320
-  So again 2 o'clock

01:42:32.320 --> 01:42:34.880
-  downtown library auditorium

01:42:34.880 --> 01:42:39.560
-  Professor Michael Hicks from all state. I hope you can all be there

01:42:41.880 --> 01:42:43.880
-  Yeah, that was this Saturday

01:42:43.880 --> 01:42:48.620
-  Thank you for that comment next in chambers

01:42:48.620 --> 01:42:53.460
-  Please sign in state your name for the record and you have three minutes

01:42:53.460 --> 01:43:03.920
-  Steve Olin as a member of the

01:43:03.920 --> 01:43:09.280
-  Late lamented Parking Commission. One of the things that we had to do was

01:43:10.480 --> 01:43:12.480
-  try to identify

01:43:12.480 --> 01:43:19.340
-  Costs of parking across departments because even though there is now a parking services division

01:43:19.340 --> 01:43:22.280
-  there is the

01:43:22.280 --> 01:43:29.240
-  parking costs and revenues cut across multiple departments and so we asked for transaction level

01:43:29.240 --> 01:43:30.480
-  registers of

01:43:30.480 --> 01:43:35.040
-  Departmental budgets and there's an awful lot to learn in

01:43:35.760 --> 01:43:41.240
-  Doing so and I have to admit that as a council member doing regular business

01:43:41.240 --> 01:43:47.680
-  It never occurred to me that it was worth my time to look at literal

01:43:47.680 --> 01:43:50.760
-  every transaction in a department's

01:43:50.760 --> 01:43:55.860
-  Annual budget but it turned out that you can learn an awful lot from doing it

01:43:55.860 --> 01:43:59.200
-  So the first thing I'd like to encourage you all since we are talking about

01:43:59.200 --> 01:44:02.600
-  budgets here tonight is that you

01:44:03.520 --> 01:44:11.210
-  take adopt an apartment and ask the controller for every transaction they conducted in the last

01:44:11.210 --> 01:44:11.660
-  year and

01:44:11.660 --> 01:44:14.720
-  Just explore it with Excel

01:44:14.720 --> 01:44:22.000
-  You're going to learn a lot, but I would go further and say that I don't think that's enough

01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:26.120
-  I think that it's time that council think about

01:44:26.120 --> 01:44:29.120
-  literally auditing departments

01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.710
-  Part of the issue is that no matter what the esteem you hold a department head in or the the people

01:44:36.710 --> 01:44:38.000
-  of a department in

01:44:38.000 --> 01:44:43.140
-  They may be unaware that they could be doing things more efficiently

01:44:43.140 --> 01:44:48.660
-  You may be unaware that there is a department or a division that is wasting money

01:44:48.660 --> 01:44:55.460
-  But you have no way to know it except through the administration. And so I would suggest that you

01:44:56.200 --> 01:45:01.960
-  Seek to start putting money into you the council budget specifically to hire an outside auditor

01:45:01.960 --> 01:45:06.240
-  to work on behalf of the council to do an independent audit of

01:45:06.240 --> 01:45:08.840
-  departments over a period of time

01:45:08.840 --> 01:45:11.520
-  maybe not all at once, but

01:45:11.520 --> 01:45:18.320
-  You know like no matter what you're going to learn an awful lot from the audit

01:45:18.320 --> 01:45:24.920
-  An audit is not necessarily an effort to punish. It's a way to verify to understand to

01:45:25.320 --> 01:45:26.520
-  you

01:45:26.520 --> 01:45:28.520
-  Know to really dig into

01:45:28.520 --> 01:45:31.080
-  the details of a given

01:45:31.080 --> 01:45:33.480
-  department or division

01:45:33.480 --> 01:45:37.200
-  But I've heard enough just tonight in the various

01:45:37.200 --> 01:45:43.320
-  Areas that the council is concerned about that. I think that it's time that you think about

01:45:43.320 --> 01:45:49.810
-  Adding money for an independent auditor to work on behalf of council to analyze how the city is

01:45:49.810 --> 01:45:51.280
-  doing. Thank you

01:45:53.560 --> 01:45:57.580
-  Thank you, do we have anybody online who's raised their hand at this point

01:45:57.580 --> 01:46:03.590
-  Okay, looks like we have another comment or in chambers. Go ahead and sign in state your name for

01:46:03.590 --> 01:46:03.920
-  the record

01:46:03.920 --> 01:46:05.920
-  And then you'll have up to three minutes

01:46:05.920 --> 01:46:08.840
-  Hi, I'm Greg Alexander

01:46:08.840 --> 01:46:15.530
-  As you've heard me say we are missing sidewalks around the edge of the city pretty consistently you

01:46:15.530 --> 01:46:16.160
-  get about

01:46:16.160 --> 01:46:20.160
-  Quarter mile from the courthouse you start noticing little gaps and then you get a half mile

01:46:20.160 --> 01:46:24.080
-  You notice big gaps in a mile and the network becomes just a few choices

01:46:24.080 --> 01:46:30.400
-  That's not a coincidence providing basic city services to a low density population is not

01:46:30.400 --> 01:46:31.480
-  financially plausible

01:46:31.480 --> 01:46:37.800
-  They are in a city. They deserve basic city services, but aren't enough people living there to pay

01:46:37.800 --> 01:46:40.320
-  taxes to support things like sidewalks

01:46:40.320 --> 01:46:44.560
-  So, you know

01:46:47.120 --> 01:46:52.860
-  You get it from the other side too when you pay city staff you have to pay them a competitive wage

01:46:52.860 --> 01:46:54.860
-  But really you have to pay them enough to live here

01:46:54.860 --> 01:46:57.800
-  They have to be able to pay rent. They have to be able to pay a mortgage

01:46:57.800 --> 01:47:00.820
-  They have to imagine that they could stay and actually buy a house

01:47:00.820 --> 01:47:06.650
-  Housing is everything you do our wages are inflated because there isn't housing our tax burden is

01:47:06.650 --> 01:47:08.400
-  inflated because there isn't housing

01:47:08.400 --> 01:47:11.760
-  We need housing and then we can solve these financial problems

01:47:11.800 --> 01:47:18.250
-  But the life and death of cities is housing and without enough housing to sustain the tax burden

01:47:18.250 --> 01:47:19.100
-  that we have

01:47:19.100 --> 01:47:23.000
-  We're only going to be able to overtax people and under deliver. Thank you

01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:31.200
-  Thank you, is there anybody else in chambers who would like to make a comment about the budget

01:47:31.200 --> 01:47:33.620
-  money finances economics

01:47:33.620 --> 01:47:37.600
-  Did anybody end up raising their hand on zoom

01:47:39.160 --> 01:47:46.680
-  Great. Thank you. Welcome back to council then for just if anybody has any last comments on this

01:47:46.680 --> 01:47:48.720
-  that they want to add in

01:47:48.720 --> 01:47:51.920
-  for consideration at this point

01:47:51.920 --> 01:47:55.320
-  Councilmember Piedmont Smith

01:47:55.320 --> 01:47:59.760
-  I'm trying to wrap my head around

01:47:59.760 --> 01:48:01.760
-  how

01:48:01.760 --> 01:48:03.760
-  this discussion is

01:48:03.760 --> 01:48:06.900
-  Really outcome based budgeting

01:48:07.560 --> 01:48:13.000
-  So, I mean we all kind of set our ideas and our priorities and all that so

01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:18.080
-  Just kind of thinking out loud I heard a lot of

01:48:18.080 --> 01:48:22.400
-  Colleagues say we need to look at the city plans

01:48:22.400 --> 01:48:28.520
-  That already outline our goals and the outcomes we want to see so maybe that's one way

01:48:28.520 --> 01:48:32.400
-  to focus on outcomes, but other than that I've

01:48:32.400 --> 01:48:35.280
-  heard

01:48:35.280 --> 01:48:38.400
-  it as chair of the fiscal committee, I'm

01:48:38.400 --> 01:48:41.720
-  Envisioning it to be very difficult

01:48:41.720 --> 01:48:46.040
-  To pull from these diverse ideas up here

01:48:46.040 --> 01:48:53.060
-  Certain outcome priorities, so I just wanted to state that and see what people think

01:48:53.060 --> 01:48:58.200
-  Any responses to that

01:48:58.200 --> 01:49:03.590
-  Well, maybe it would be helpful to talk about what the rest of the process is I mean because this

01:49:03.590 --> 01:49:04.240
-  this is very

01:49:04.760 --> 01:49:06.680
-  early on and

01:49:06.680 --> 01:49:12.200
-  Earlier than we started last year as well. So what what is ahead in terms of?

01:49:12.200 --> 01:49:15.600
-  communication around

01:49:15.600 --> 01:49:18.600
-  Budget plans what happens next?

01:49:18.600 --> 01:49:24.600
-  Is the fiscal committee

01:49:24.600 --> 01:49:32.640
-  Gets together a week from now. I believe next Wednesday and has a discussion about trying to

01:49:34.040 --> 01:49:39.970
-  Prioritize the priorities so last year if you recall we had the budget advance meeting and we had

01:49:39.970 --> 01:49:41.480
-  these ideas thrown out

01:49:41.480 --> 01:49:43.040
-  and then we had a

01:49:43.040 --> 01:49:48.880
-  List of budget priorities that was given to the administration, but that list was not a prioritized

01:49:48.880 --> 01:49:51.000
-  list that list was was

01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:58.710
-  we can call it a randomized list and so this year there was I think most people most council

01:49:58.710 --> 01:50:00.240
-  members thought like well

01:50:00.240 --> 01:50:06.880
-  we should it would be more helpful to have a prioritized list of priorities so that then the

01:50:06.880 --> 01:50:11.580
-  Administration has greater understanding of what our priorities actually are and I personally kind

01:50:11.580 --> 01:50:12.820
-  of identified that as really

01:50:12.820 --> 01:50:20.640
-  Highly challenging from the beginning because we are as a body

01:50:20.640 --> 01:50:24.720
-  I think really diverse in a lot of ways in terms of how we

01:50:26.640 --> 01:50:30.640
-  of what our priorities are in terms of of

01:50:30.640 --> 01:50:36.600
-  Of how we should invest our money, so I guess I kind of as another member of the fiscal committee

01:50:36.600 --> 01:50:38.600
-  I kind of share that sentiment

01:50:38.600 --> 01:50:46.600
-  That like how does the fiscal committee even start trying to prioritize what are really different?

01:50:46.600 --> 01:50:50.600
-  Different inputs from

01:50:50.600 --> 01:50:52.520
-  all nine council members

01:50:52.520 --> 01:50:57.760
-  So but that's that's in theory what what we're trying to do is we're trying to have a little bit

01:50:57.760 --> 01:50:58.180
-  more

01:50:58.180 --> 01:51:04.400
-  If so

01:51:04.400 --> 01:51:10.700
-  So the the next meeting is of the fiscal committee and the goal of that meeting is for the fiscal

01:51:10.700 --> 01:51:11.740
-  committee to put together

01:51:11.740 --> 01:51:19.480
-  a sort of draft document of how we understand priorities to be what happens with that document my

01:51:20.680 --> 01:51:25.440
-  Let me ask three more questions. So then so then you can just answer at length, which is I think

01:51:25.440 --> 01:51:26.960
-  the point is that

01:51:26.960 --> 01:51:29.480
-  I think to

01:51:29.480 --> 01:51:33.320
-  Councilmember Piedmont Smith's point is that you know

01:51:33.320 --> 01:51:39.680
-  What other inputs do we need in order to move that process ahead? I think is the is the sort of

01:51:39.680 --> 01:51:42.560
-  guiding question here

01:51:42.560 --> 01:51:45.160
-  Yeah, I mean what happens to that like

01:51:45.160 --> 01:51:50.240
-  Prioritization list as it comes back to council at a special meeting on April 30th

01:51:50.640 --> 01:51:52.640
-  April 30th

01:51:52.640 --> 01:52:00.780
-  We have another deliberation session then and then it's a it's categorized as a special session

01:52:00.780 --> 01:52:04.840
-  Because we would have to actually vote on the list of priorities

01:52:04.840 --> 01:52:14.000
-  That's just for us and then after we have that kind of established

01:52:14.520 --> 01:52:19.700
-  Prioritization list then our next deliberative session in May is with the administration because in

01:52:19.700 --> 01:52:22.360
-  the meantime while we're trying to develop our priorities

01:52:22.360 --> 01:52:27.420
-  The administration is also developing their priorities. So then on the 14th of May it can be like,

01:52:27.420 --> 01:52:28.980
-  hey, these are council priorities

01:52:28.980 --> 01:52:33.960
-  These are mayor priorities. Where do they overlap? Where do they not overlap? How can we?

01:52:33.960 --> 01:52:38.880
-  Make all the things happen that people want to make happen

01:52:39.920 --> 01:52:45.160
-  So then so then the question I think to councilmember Puma Smith's point, I mean what what what

01:52:45.160 --> 01:52:47.200
-  input would be useful to you as the chair?

01:52:47.200 --> 01:52:49.760
-  To help move that process forward

01:52:49.760 --> 01:52:54.520
-  Because we can do that, you know, we can do that asynchronously

01:52:54.520 --> 01:53:02.440
-  We started talking about

01:53:03.840 --> 01:53:08.840
-  Points of agreement and we just talked about housing and then we talked about transportation. Well,

01:53:08.840 --> 01:53:11.560
-  we started to talk about transportation and mobility

01:53:11.560 --> 01:53:17.440
-  but there were a lot of other things mentioned, so I guess the I

01:53:17.440 --> 01:53:22.560
-  Don't know I don't even know

01:53:22.560 --> 01:53:30.640
-  Because like if I had to now, you know work with my three colleagues on the committee to prioritize

01:53:30.640 --> 01:53:32.640
-  I wouldn't know where to start

01:53:33.480 --> 01:53:37.430
-  Because I also know that there are probably things that colleagues didn't even mention because we

01:53:37.430 --> 01:53:39.560
-  didn't get to them, right? So

01:53:39.560 --> 01:53:43.160
-  So here's my plan on where to start

01:53:43.160 --> 01:53:47.560
-  and so my thought on where to start us is to

01:53:47.560 --> 01:53:50.480
-  consolidate

01:53:50.480 --> 01:53:53.120
-  notes and information basically and there are a couple of

01:53:53.120 --> 01:53:58.580
-  very nice volunteers in the audience today who helped take notes with this and so to receive those

01:53:58.580 --> 01:53:59.760
-  notes and and try to

01:54:02.120 --> 01:54:04.120
-  Put together what all the council members

01:54:04.120 --> 01:54:10.960
-  said into the different outcome areas and so my intention is to kind of do a bunch of preparation

01:54:10.960 --> 01:54:11.560
-  in

01:54:11.560 --> 01:54:16.580
-  terms of consolidation of what I heard tonight in preparation for the Fiscal Committee next week so

01:54:16.580 --> 01:54:18.120
-  that then the

01:54:18.120 --> 01:54:20.960
-  Information is already

01:54:20.960 --> 01:54:27.400
-  Consolidated even if the thoughts are really different and so that might help the Fiscal Committee

01:54:27.400 --> 01:54:28.080
-  next week

01:54:30.760 --> 01:54:32.520
-  That's my hope

01:54:32.520 --> 01:54:35.640
-  And to similarly take the survey data

01:54:35.640 --> 01:54:41.400
-  The community survey data just to be like what is it that people think is important?

01:54:41.400 --> 01:54:47.640
-  My colleagues to send

01:54:47.640 --> 01:54:50.480
-  Myself and councilmember Stossberg

01:54:50.480 --> 01:54:55.100
-  Your completed worksheets for tonight if you completed them

01:54:55.100 --> 01:54:57.680
-  And if you didn't complete them, I

01:54:57.680 --> 01:55:00.280
-  recommend you do or

01:55:01.040 --> 01:55:05.990
-  Do some substitute so that we have something from you because I know that we didn't all get to

01:55:05.990 --> 01:55:07.760
-  everything on the our list

01:55:07.760 --> 01:55:10.760
-  That would be helpful

01:55:10.760 --> 01:55:13.680
-  I wrote some things on my worksheet that were like

01:55:13.680 --> 01:55:17.720
-  See comprehensive plan or see climate action plan. I mean

01:55:17.720 --> 01:55:21.120
-  do you want me to like draw like

01:55:21.120 --> 01:55:26.280
-  specific outcomes from there that I plug into the worksheet or like I

01:55:26.280 --> 01:55:28.920
-  Mean, those are big plans obviously so it is

01:55:29.920 --> 01:55:32.440
-  In my opinion, I think that

01:55:32.440 --> 01:55:35.760
-  If

01:55:35.760 --> 01:55:40.120
-  I'm assuming that there's something say specific in the climate action plan or in the comp plan

01:55:40.120 --> 01:55:44.860
-  That you're looking at, you know a certain part of it and you're going we need to implement this

01:55:44.860 --> 01:55:45.400
-  part of it

01:55:45.400 --> 01:55:47.400
-  Is that a correct assumption?

01:55:47.400 --> 01:55:49.040
-  I

01:55:49.040 --> 01:55:50.920
-  Don't know I think

01:55:50.920 --> 01:55:53.880
-  Not exactly like I didn't that's not where I started

01:55:54.160 --> 01:56:00.170
-  So thinking about the inputs to go back to the transportation example and the different types of I

01:56:00.170 --> 01:56:00.320
-  mean

01:56:00.320 --> 01:56:03.520
-  It was guided by the transportation plan some of the infrastructure that we've said we want to

01:56:03.520 --> 01:56:03.800
-  build out

01:56:03.800 --> 01:56:06.600
-  It was guided by the safety action plan and some of the goals we've set for ourselves

01:56:06.600 --> 01:56:10.980
-  And the changes that will necessitate and the development of a sidewalk plan. So all those things

01:56:10.980 --> 01:56:12.320
-  are kind of happening and informing

01:56:12.320 --> 01:56:14.880
-  the input the requested input

01:56:14.880 --> 01:56:18.480
-  but as far as the outcomes I

01:56:19.640 --> 01:56:24.320
-  Think there's probably a bunch scattered across several plans that I could like pull in that sort

01:56:24.320 --> 01:56:25.360
-  of all support that

01:56:25.360 --> 01:56:28.400
-  Like it's not just one

01:56:28.400 --> 01:56:33.580
-  Like not just one plan not just one plan and not just one outcome. Yeah

01:56:33.580 --> 01:56:39.840
-  I don't know. Maybe I just need to go through the exercise to see what the limitations are like it's

01:56:39.840 --> 01:56:41.060
-  more granularity

01:56:41.060 --> 01:56:43.920
-  I think that right now we need to just do our best

01:56:43.920 --> 01:56:51.200
-  Yeah, and recognize that that what we're trying to do as a body and as a city is a transition to

01:56:51.200 --> 01:56:56.280
-  Outcome based budgeting and that it's it involves kind of a whole

01:56:56.280 --> 01:57:01.000
-  different mindset and a whole different like

01:57:01.000 --> 01:57:08.680
-  Formatting almost in terms of what we've seen before so it and and my understanding is that this is

01:57:09.360 --> 01:57:15.240
-  Kind of a I mean what councilmember sorry, this was your original like brainchild in some ways

01:57:15.240 --> 01:57:21.400
-  So what like two to three years? I think is what was kind of cited right originally in that

01:57:21.400 --> 01:57:25.160
-  Resolution in terms of a transition, so we're like

01:57:25.160 --> 01:57:30.120
-  This is really the first year that we've really tried to do this in a serious way

01:57:30.120 --> 01:57:32.600
-  So I guess my answer is do the best you can

01:57:34.080 --> 01:57:38.790
-  Okay, is that a good enough answer? Yes, it comes over Piedmont Smith. Is that a good enough answer

01:57:38.790 --> 01:57:39.920
-  for your needs as chair?

01:57:39.920 --> 01:57:43.280
-  Yes, it would be wonderful if you could pull those

01:57:43.280 --> 01:57:49.260
-  Items outcomes from the plans, but I understand that we all have time limitations

01:57:49.260 --> 01:57:59.400
-  Berallo well, it seems like this is going to be I

01:58:00.360 --> 01:58:05.640
-  Mean we're focused on this budget this year, and I think that this discussion has

01:58:05.640 --> 01:58:08.400
-  refined my thinking about

01:58:08.400 --> 01:58:13.320
-  Being very specific and for brevity having short

01:58:13.320 --> 01:58:18.400
-  Priorities not not having extensive priorities because there's going to be a lot to wade through

01:58:18.400 --> 01:58:20.920
-  and I think that you know

01:58:20.920 --> 01:58:24.120
-  we ought to prioritize things and then think about specifics and

01:58:25.040 --> 01:58:30.520
-  That would help the process. It seems to me sort through rather than having tomes to

01:58:30.520 --> 01:58:33.160
-  To try to read through and evaluate

01:58:33.160 --> 01:58:38.280
-  So anyway, that's just my suggestion keep it brief

01:58:38.280 --> 01:58:45.600
-  Maybe just two two two general thoughts

01:58:45.600 --> 01:58:50.420
-  I mean the though the one is for us not to get super and I think this is to council member Flaherty's

01:58:50.420 --> 01:58:51.000
-  earlier point

01:58:51.000 --> 01:58:55.760
-  It's for us not to get super caught up in you know, or disconnected

01:58:55.760 --> 01:58:59.730
-  I mean, it's very easy to just throw out numbers and metrics and then just you know start from

01:58:59.730 --> 01:59:01.280
-  there and move backwards

01:59:01.280 --> 01:59:03.400
-  That's not really the goal. I think that

01:59:03.400 --> 01:59:09.360
-  One thing that we've that we've sort of found here is that nobody had any critiques outside of the

01:59:09.360 --> 01:59:11.380
-  housing and homelessness separation

01:59:11.380 --> 01:59:14.120
-  Of any of the proposed categories

01:59:14.120 --> 01:59:19.110
-  I think these are almost directly reflective of like what other cities like Fort Collins have done

01:59:19.110 --> 01:59:19.600
-  with them

01:59:19.600 --> 01:59:23.620
-  I mean that might be an area where if you if you have a strong feeling we're actually like no

01:59:23.620 --> 01:59:24.760
-  I don't think you know

01:59:24.760 --> 01:59:29.780
-  I mean equity or something is not something that needs to be a separate area and in the budget but

01:59:29.780 --> 01:59:30.780
-  rather we want that

01:59:30.780 --> 01:59:34.860
-  You know throughout I think that's input that we probably still need

01:59:34.860 --> 01:59:38.640
-  But but I think one thing that's that's useful

01:59:38.640 --> 01:59:41.160
-  you know the core of

01:59:41.160 --> 01:59:43.960
-  implementing outcome-based budgeting like

01:59:44.240 --> 01:59:50.700
-  Is is is often what people call like offers or the sort of sales element of it that people come and

01:59:50.700 --> 01:59:51.480
-  they ask for things

01:59:51.480 --> 01:59:56.190
-  And then you and the council the legislative body the budgetary body. I'm sorry it makes offers of

01:59:56.190 --> 01:59:56.760
-  those things

01:59:56.760 --> 01:59:59.320
-  and importantly

01:59:59.320 --> 02:00:04.370
-  What we're really talking about there's I mean the vast majority of our budget is what you might

02:00:04.370 --> 02:00:05.960
-  think of as just a continuing offer

02:00:05.960 --> 02:00:08.480
-  and so I don't know if we need to

02:00:08.800 --> 02:00:13.860
-  Spend a lot of time thinking about the things that we already do that needs to just continue

02:00:13.860 --> 02:00:14.800
-  happening, right?

02:00:14.800 --> 02:00:20.870
-  I mean paying the lights at bills as you will and so it's that it's that space outside those what

02:00:20.870 --> 02:00:21.600
-  people would call

02:00:21.600 --> 02:00:27.610
-  Enhancement offers the you know the things that we want to see happen in that flexible space of our

02:00:27.610 --> 02:00:28.400
-  budget

02:00:28.400 --> 02:00:31.400
-  which is I think the

02:00:31.400 --> 02:00:35.440
-  you know in terms of limiting we don't need a

02:00:36.600 --> 02:00:41.910
-  What we don't need from everybody at this moment is not, you know, every single outcome you'd like

02:00:41.910 --> 02:00:42.880
-  to see in the budget

02:00:42.880 --> 02:00:44.880
-  but things you'd like to

02:00:44.880 --> 02:00:49.480
-  See either enhanced included that have not been included

02:00:49.480 --> 02:00:52.840
-  Increased so the type of conversation that

02:00:52.840 --> 02:00:58.600
-  Comes morello brought up, you know this, you know, we're doing well with with Jack Hopkins. We want

02:00:58.600 --> 02:00:59.320
-  to increase that

02:00:59.320 --> 02:01:04.970
-  that's that I think the sort of minds the the space that we need to be in and then have some like

02:01:04.970 --> 02:01:06.080
-  theory of change that

02:01:06.080 --> 02:01:10.360
-  That as councilman Fleury was saying like, you know, the reason why we think this should happen is

02:01:10.360 --> 02:01:11.040
-  yeah

02:01:11.040 --> 02:01:15.400
-  And so that helps us then in that final conversation of the okay

02:01:15.400 --> 02:01:20.970
-  Where is this money coming from if we think that it's that it's you know, our argument is by

02:01:20.970 --> 02:01:22.200
-  funding Jack Hopkins

02:01:22.200 --> 02:01:24.200
-  We will achieve

02:01:24.200 --> 02:01:29.240
-  Said outcome what other things are trying to do that right now and and when we put those in

02:01:29.240 --> 02:01:30.120
-  contrast

02:01:30.120 --> 02:01:34.040
-  Which of these is more worth the money in this context for this year

02:01:34.280 --> 02:01:38.990
-  So I think that sort of limits what we're talking about here. It's not you know, the whole the

02:01:38.990 --> 02:01:40.440
-  entirety of everything

02:01:40.440 --> 02:01:42.440
-  we're just talking about those sort of enhancements and

02:01:42.440 --> 02:01:46.240
-  Increases if you will

02:01:46.240 --> 02:01:54.200
-  Does anybody else have any other things to add

02:01:54.200 --> 02:02:00.240
-  Okay

02:02:00.240 --> 02:02:05.160
-  Thank you all for this conversation. Thank you to the public who've involved themselves in various

02:02:05.160 --> 02:02:05.560
-  ways

02:02:05.560 --> 02:02:09.580
-  I want to take a couple notes on council schedule

02:02:09.580 --> 02:02:15.280
-  First of all has has already been mentioned the fiscal committee will meet next week April 16th

02:02:15.280 --> 02:02:19.220
-  At 2 in the afternoon to kind of synthesize this discussion

02:02:19.220 --> 02:02:22.760
-  So if this was interesting to you that might be a meeting that you want to tune into

02:02:22.760 --> 02:02:29.600
-  It will be in person and online. It'll be a hybrid meeting

02:02:29.600 --> 02:02:34.800
-  So there will be a zoom link and I think right now it's scheduled to be in Allison

02:02:34.800 --> 02:02:39.330
-  But that might change to McCloskey not totally sure but you can that'll be updated on the calendar

02:02:39.330 --> 02:02:40.040
-  if it changes

02:02:40.040 --> 02:02:43.760
-  And then we'll have another special session on April 30th

02:02:43.760 --> 02:02:48.760
-  About budget again, and hopefully there'll be this prioritized list

02:02:48.760 --> 02:02:52.320
-  Other things going on that I wanted to be sure to mention tomorrow night

02:02:52.320 --> 02:02:56.520
-  The Parks Department is having a master planning work session at 6 o'clock in Allison conference

02:02:56.520 --> 02:02:58.240
-  room. So there was a couple messages

02:02:58.840 --> 02:03:00.840
-  references to parks programs

02:03:00.840 --> 02:03:06.560
-  And I know that I will be at that and I believe one or two other council members will as well

02:03:06.560 --> 02:03:09.600
-  So that'll be interesting and then I also wanted to highlight on

02:03:09.600 --> 02:03:16.430
-  April 23rd the Hopewell Commons grand opening is happening starting at 330 in the afternoon and

02:03:16.430 --> 02:03:18.600
-  lasting I think until about 6 so

02:03:18.600 --> 02:03:21.080
-  Those are things that you could put on your schedule

02:03:21.080 --> 02:03:25.400
-  Our next regular session will be next week on April 16th

02:03:25.800 --> 02:03:29.320
-  Are there other notes to add to the schedule councilmember Piedmont Smith?

02:03:29.320 --> 02:03:38.320
-  Processes is meeting on Monday April 14th 12 15 to 145 in the Allison conference room

02:03:38.320 --> 02:03:42.400
-  Thank you very much. Any other committee meetings to announce today

02:03:42.400 --> 02:03:51.780
-  The fiscal task force is meeting next Wednesday on on April 16th at what time

02:03:52.840 --> 02:03:56.560
-  At 9 a.m. And so the difference with the budget task force

02:03:56.560 --> 02:04:00.760
-  Oh 8 a.m. Sorry the budget task force versus the fiscal committee

02:04:00.760 --> 02:04:05.640
-  They do slightly different things related to this transition to outcome based budgeting

02:04:05.640 --> 02:04:10.650
-  So if you want more details on that just email me and I'll clue you and thank you if there's

02:04:10.650 --> 02:04:11.400
-  nothing else

02:04:11.400 --> 02:04:13.920
-  We are adjourned

02:04:43.920 --> 02:04:46.840
-  (orchestral music)

02:04:46.840 --> 02:04:49.760
-  (orchestral music)

02:04:49.760 --> 02:04:52.680
-  (orchestral music)

02:04:52.680 --> 02:04:55.600
-  (orchestral music)

02:04:55.600 --> 02:04:58.520
-  (orchestral music)

02:04:58.520 --> 02:05:01.440
-  (orchestral music)

02:05:01.440 --> 02:05:04.360
-  (orchestral music)
