WEBVTT

00:00:00.450 --> 00:00:12.908
- Okay, so we will call the Bloomington MPO meeting to order on this October 23rd, 2026. Can you hear

00:00:12.908 --> 00:00:26.114
- me now? So we will begin with introductions and we'll start to my left. Steve Bishop, City of Bloomington

00:00:26.114 --> 00:00:28.606
- Playing Commission.

00:00:30.082 --> 00:00:38.549
- Hopi Stossberg, City of Bloomington Common Council. Andrew Seabor, serving as proxy for Mayor Thompson.

00:00:38.549 --> 00:00:46.853
- Lisa Ridge, Monroe County Highway Department. Doug Horn, Bloomington Public Transit Corporation Board

00:00:46.853 --> 00:00:55.646
- of Directors. Scott Ferris, Monroe County Plan Commission. Sam Tobin-Hockstad, Citizens Advisory Committee.

00:00:57.986 --> 00:01:06.305
- Nate Nichols, City of Bloomington Public Works Department, proxy for Adam Wason, Public Works Director.

00:01:06.305 --> 00:01:14.544
- And it looks like we have two online. Becky, if you want to go first. Becky Packer, Indiana Department

00:01:14.544 --> 00:01:22.702
- of Transportation. I'm Julie Thomas, Monroe County Commissioner. Thank you. Item two, approval of the

00:01:22.702 --> 00:01:25.182
- agenda for October 23rd, 2026.

00:01:32.162 --> 00:01:41.894
- I'll move that we approve the agenda as presented. Second. We have a motion and we have a second. Any

00:01:41.894 --> 00:01:48.382
- discussion? Any public comment? Seeing none, roll call vote please.

00:02:04.162 --> 00:02:22.589
- Yes. Ridge. Yes. Horn. Can't hear you. Horn. Yes. Ferris. Yes. Bishop. Yes. Stasberg. Yes. Seaborg.

00:02:22.589 --> 00:02:34.014
- Yes. Nichol. Yes. Are they visible while we saw them? Packer.

00:02:35.618 --> 00:02:45.537
- Yes. And Thomas? Yes. Motion passes. Thank you. Moving on to item three, approval of the minutes from

00:02:45.537 --> 00:02:55.650
- August 28th, 2026. We have a motion. Hopi? I'll move that we approve the minutes from August 28th, 2026

00:02:55.650 --> 00:03:02.846
- as presented. Second. We have a motion. We have a second. Any discussion?

00:03:05.058 --> 00:03:20.375
- Any public comment? Seeing none, roll call vote please. Packer? Yes. Thomas? Yes. Bishop? Yes. Ferris?

00:03:20.375 --> 00:03:33.758
- Yes. Horne? Yes. Ridge? Yes. Seaborg? Yes. Tobin-Hashta? Yes. Nichol? Yes. Motion passes.

00:03:34.498 --> 00:03:45.541
- I'm a yes too. Stossberg. Thank you. Yes. Motion passes. Communications from chair or vice chair.

00:03:45.541 --> 00:03:57.034
- I have none. Okay. Communications from officers and or committees. So the citizens advisory committee

00:03:57.034 --> 00:04:03.006
- met on Wednesday and we approved the schedule and we

00:04:03.330 --> 00:04:12.971
- heard discussion of the upcoming tip that we will hear today. The TAC met this past Wednesday and also

00:04:12.971 --> 00:04:22.424
- had an opportunity to review the tip and have some discussion. I know the topic of e-bikes came up a

00:04:22.424 --> 00:04:32.158
- little bit and also approved the meeting schedule for next year. Thanks. Thank you. Reports from staff.

00:04:33.218 --> 00:04:40.173
- Okay, the first item we have is City of Bloomington press release, dated October 14th, 2026. This is

00:04:40.173 --> 00:04:46.577
- a temporary one-way traffic pattern, westbound only for West 2nd Street beginning on October

00:04:46.577 --> 00:04:53.601
- 27th. Anticipated to extend to November 25th. Might note that West Street will begin, I'm sorry, that

00:04:53.601 --> 00:05:01.726
- West 2nd Street will be westbound only, but 1st Street will be eastbound only. And this is only a temporary situation

00:05:02.082 --> 00:05:11.562
- due to the construction on 2nd Street where they are laying full-depth asphalt. And that date of extending

00:05:11.562 --> 00:05:20.511
- November 25th is what I would call, in case of bad weather, probably be finished prior to that. I'll

00:05:20.511 --> 00:05:29.726
- be happy to answer any questions anybody may have. Okay. Next item, October 8th, 2026 letter from NDOT.

00:05:30.306 --> 00:05:39.061
- for TIP project number does number 2101712. This is the Dillon Road Bridge number 83 replacement in

00:05:39.061 --> 00:05:47.816
- Monroe County, west of 3000 feet, west of 037. The letter essentially says that there is a historic

00:05:47.816 --> 00:05:56.571
- significance to the structure itself. It should be saved in some way or another be put on the adopt

00:05:56.571 --> 00:05:59.198
- a bridge program. And that's,

00:05:59.330 --> 00:06:08.370
- In a nutshell, that's exactly what the letter says. You can read the letter in its fullness if you want

00:06:08.370 --> 00:06:17.409
- to. Does anybody have any questions on that? Okay, next item. October 8th, 2026 letter from the Indiana

00:06:17.409 --> 00:06:25.406
- Department of Natural Resources for Transportation Improvement Program, DES number 2401216.

00:06:25.858 --> 00:06:33.649
- This is the existing pedestrian bridge over the State Road 45-46 bypass just east of Interstate 69.

00:06:33.649 --> 00:06:42.219
- This is an extensive evaluation of the structure in terms of its historical significance. The recommendations

00:06:42.219 --> 00:06:50.244
- are to relocate, well, dismantle and relocate the structure to another location, put it into the adopt

00:06:50.244 --> 00:06:51.646
- a bridge program.

00:06:52.034 --> 00:06:58.163
- I'm not sure how they would do the adopt a bridge program for something like this. It would probably

00:06:58.163 --> 00:07:04.716
- be best to be put into some sort of a park, a city park or a county park somewhere in the state of Indiana.

00:07:04.716 --> 00:07:10.784
- But again, that's a very extensive letter goes into the detail about the historical significance of

00:07:10.784 --> 00:07:17.156
- the structure itself. It's the only one. It's a one of one, I believe, in the state of Indiana. Be happy

00:07:17.156 --> 00:07:20.190
- to answer any questions you may have on that one.

00:07:23.842 --> 00:07:30.883
- Thank you. I guess on both of these, like what kind of effect does that have on us as an MPO or, cause

00:07:30.883 --> 00:07:37.855
- at least with that Kinzer one, that pedestrian bridge, right? That's the one that we're talking about

00:07:37.855 --> 00:07:44.691
- here. Yeah. And I mean, in dot that's an in dot plan to redo that bridge. So is there like a fiscal

00:07:44.691 --> 00:07:51.390
- impact? Is there, do we just have to, you know, think of places where this bridge could go? Like,

00:07:52.226 --> 00:08:01.211
- or is this a required sort of recommendation, or is this just like a hint? Well, the realization is

00:08:01.211 --> 00:08:10.465
- the structure is inadequate, and it needs to be replaced. The question is, where do you replace it at?

00:08:10.465 --> 00:08:19.180
- And the initial discussions were that you construct a new structure closer to Kinzer and Rogers,

00:08:19.180 --> 00:08:21.246
- move it, I don't know,

00:08:21.538 --> 00:08:29.842
- a couple thousand feet to the east or something like that. Then there's also, we had one citizen approach

00:08:29.842 --> 00:08:38.068
- us and suggested a tunnel underneath, though that's bedrock as far as I know, under there, so that would

00:08:38.068 --> 00:08:45.903
- be an issue. So I don't know where it's at right now, and NDOT is aware of the issue, the structure

00:08:45.903 --> 00:08:48.958
- needs to be replaced. The question is,

00:08:49.794 --> 00:08:57.706
- How would it be replaced? Where would it be replaced? When would it be replaced? How much would it cost?

00:08:57.706 --> 00:09:05.769
- And then you also have what's called connectivity. What's going to connect to? Where's the origin? Where's

00:09:05.769 --> 00:09:13.456
- the destination? Destination landing on the north side could be figured out pretty easily, but on the

00:09:13.456 --> 00:09:17.374
- east side, where do you land that at? I don't know.

00:09:17.922 --> 00:09:25.185
- So you have to have a logical termini, and that's where all of these variables are in play right now.

00:09:25.185 --> 00:09:32.804
- OK. But in terms of fiscal impact that we can determine right now or any kind of change in course, there's

00:09:32.804 --> 00:09:40.352
- not one? None. OK. And is that true with the Dillman Bridge situation, too, in terms of that? The Dillman

00:09:40.352 --> 00:09:41.278
- Road Bridge.

00:09:41.378 --> 00:09:48.347
- I mean, that's already programmed by the county. It's in preliminary engineering. I don't know if you're

00:09:48.347 --> 00:09:55.183
- doing right of way on that now. I think you've started right of way on that too, for that matter. That

00:09:55.183 --> 00:10:01.953
- one is moving right along for construction, for a contract letting in the near future. That one, it's

00:10:01.953 --> 00:10:09.122
- just a matter of taking the bridge apart, putting it somewhere. And the somewhere may be Limestone Greenway

00:10:09.122 --> 00:10:09.918
- Trail Park,

00:10:10.786 --> 00:10:18.389
- I think that's what Kelly Whitmer from Monroe County Parks had told us at the TAC meeting on Wednesday

00:10:18.389 --> 00:10:25.845
- was that would be the home, the new home, if not the possible home for that Dillman Road Bridge that

00:10:25.845 --> 00:10:33.374
- exists right now. The Dillman Road Bridge is a plank structure when you cross the deck. John Kennedy,

00:10:33.374 --> 00:10:39.870
- who's on the Citizens Advisory Committee, bicycle rider, he said he's lost a few tires.

00:10:40.162 --> 00:10:47.981
- in that bridge caught in between the joints there. And he said that he's even scared to walk on it too

00:10:47.981 --> 00:10:55.571
- with bicycle shoes. But other than that, it's safe for automobiles still at this point in time. OK,

00:10:55.571 --> 00:11:03.694
- but it's already in the process of being moved and we've figured out where it's going to go to. So there's

00:11:03.694 --> 00:11:09.918
- also no consequence really to that either because all of those plans were already

00:11:10.050 --> 00:11:20.347
- Okay, great, thanks. Yeah. Doug? Yeah, Pat, just the point of interest. The current pedestrian bridge

00:11:20.347 --> 00:11:30.543
- that we talked about shortly ago, does that meet current ADA requirements? I don't know. You know, I

00:11:30.543 --> 00:11:39.326
- remember when that thing went up. I think I was driving. I'm not sure. But I didn't...

00:11:39.458 --> 00:11:46.880
- You know, ADA may not have been as or what it is today when that thing went in. Katie says she thinks

00:11:46.880 --> 00:11:54.592
- not. I don't know because I don't familiarize myself with state structures, whether they're ADA compliant

00:11:54.592 --> 00:12:01.941
- or not. Sure, sure. But that's a question we can ask. We can give you an answer at our next meeting.

00:12:01.941 --> 00:12:08.926
- Oh, just of interest. If they're going to use it somewhere else, that might turn into an issue.

00:12:09.314 --> 00:12:17.313
- Yes, and I, yeah, if they place it somewhere else, the approach ramps would have to be redone. Yeah,

00:12:17.313 --> 00:12:25.391
- that arch to me, I keep thinking, is that one foot, you know, one inch per foot on that? I don't know

00:12:25.391 --> 00:12:33.311
- about that. What is it, one to eight or something like that? Yeah, I don't know. I think the letter

00:12:33.311 --> 00:12:38.142
- actually says that it doesn't meet accessibility guidelines.

00:12:38.946 --> 00:12:47.957
- I did not read the letter, so thank you. I read it and it didn't stick. Thank you. Okay, the last item

00:12:47.957 --> 00:12:56.793
- we've got for staff report is the recent updates to the MPO transportation improvement program. This

00:12:56.793 --> 00:13:05.804
- is the current program, the 26 through 30, yeah, 26 through 30 transportation improvement program with

00:13:05.804 --> 00:13:08.254
- locations on a virtual map.

00:13:08.482 --> 00:13:17.683
- If you click that link, it'll lead you to a GIS map, ArcGIS map, which shows you where the current projects

00:13:17.683 --> 00:13:26.372
- are and also identifies certain criteria associated with those projects too. Those are all updated on

00:13:26.372 --> 00:13:34.891
- a continuous basis. Question? We have a quarterly tracking meeting with the LPAs in a couple weeks,

00:13:34.891 --> 00:13:36.510
- so we'll have some

00:13:36.610 --> 00:13:48.242
- more updates on how the current projects are going next meeting. Any questions, anybody? Okay. All right.

00:13:48.242 --> 00:13:59.545
- Moving on, we have no old business listed. Item eight, new business. First review of the calendar year

00:13:59.545 --> 00:14:03.166
- 2027 committee meeting schedule.

00:14:04.418 --> 00:14:13.117
- Yeah, and I would call this a first review. Normally, we give this to you in December, and then we also

00:14:13.117 --> 00:14:21.482
- give it to the committees in January as a reinforcing mechanism. This identifies everything here. I

00:14:21.482 --> 00:14:30.014
- think we've got one conflict, well, one potential conflict, May 28, I believe. That's not a conflict,

00:14:30.014 --> 00:14:33.694
- but it is a Friday before a Monday holiday.

00:14:33.794 --> 00:14:41.321
- We could change that now or we could change it the month before. Go ahead, Pat. Sorry. Or we can change

00:14:41.321 --> 00:14:48.847
- it in December. It's just the awareness of the fact that that's the Friday before Memorial Day weekend.

00:14:48.847 --> 00:14:56.446
- And attendance on May 28th may be slim to none because everybody wants Saturday, Sunday, and Monday off.

00:14:59.618 --> 00:15:07.303
- So if we're setting this in our calendar, may we strike through that date and just expect a different

00:15:07.303 --> 00:15:15.062
- one? Yeah. I mean, we could postpone it till we talked about postponing it to a week later. That would

00:15:15.062 --> 00:15:23.124
- put you into June for the policy committee. And normally June is the recess month for the policy committee

00:15:23.124 --> 00:15:27.870
- itself. So the choices are we can postpone it to a week later.

00:15:28.162 --> 00:15:36.466
- or we can cancel the meeting altogether, one of the two. That's a decision made by the policy committee

00:15:36.466 --> 00:15:44.851
- itself on what they want to do. And that doesn't have to be made today. This is just an awareness factor

00:15:44.851 --> 00:15:53.474
- for you. So that way, if you didn't want to make a decision today, we could do this on, do this in December

00:15:53.474 --> 00:15:55.870
- when we meet on December 4th.

00:15:56.770 --> 00:16:04.665
- April 2nd. April 2nd. Didn't we do something different in the past for December or January

00:16:04.665 --> 00:16:13.514
- due to appointments on the board or not meet in January? In previous years, two years ago, the policy

00:16:13.514 --> 00:16:22.190
- committee used to meet on the second Friday of the month. And the TAC and the CAC would meet on the

00:16:22.190 --> 00:16:24.446
- fourth. We combined that.

00:16:24.578 --> 00:16:31.629
- this year, so that way everybody meets on the same week. That way you get a sequential process instead

00:16:31.629 --> 00:16:38.612
- of a bifurcated process. You get sequential decision making on Wednesday, Wednesday, and then Friday.

00:16:38.612 --> 00:16:45.595
- So that's how we came to a single week. Always the fourth Wednesday of the month is the fourth Friday

00:16:45.595 --> 00:16:52.440
- of the month. Makes it a lot easier on everybody meeting the schedules. Makes it easier in terms of

00:16:52.440 --> 00:16:54.494
- decision making also for that

00:16:58.018 --> 00:17:08.374
- Also note that April, the March meeting has been moved forward a week to April due to that Friday being

00:17:08.374 --> 00:17:18.332
- a holiday. March 26th is a holiday. It's generically known as spring holiday. And is that still the

00:17:18.332 --> 00:17:27.294
- 1030 meeting time? Is that still? Yes, all the meeting times would remain the same. Okay.

00:17:30.082 --> 00:17:37.167
- mean myself I would say not change anything for May at this point just because it's so far out there

00:17:37.167 --> 00:17:44.602
- and then you're gonna have two meetings in April so there could be a chance you could cancel that meeting

00:17:44.602 --> 00:17:51.617
- yes that's just my opinion yes yeah we will we will I promise no unnecessary meetings I mean we try

00:17:51.617 --> 00:17:58.772
- to be cognizant of your time in terms of coming to attend all the meetings and making decisions going

00:17:58.772 --> 00:17:59.614
- through the

00:17:59.842 --> 00:18:07.572
- luminous packets. I guess a question is the staff have a recommendation it sounds like our options are

00:18:07.572 --> 00:18:15.152
- to just approve what is presented knowing we could change it it is or to delay a vote until our next

00:18:15.152 --> 00:18:21.982
- meeting or to strike the like I'm just curious for for your recommendation on this agenda.

00:18:22.530 --> 00:18:30.370
- I, sorry, when I updated the 8.1 yesterday, I changed it to first review of the calendar, but I forgot

00:18:30.370 --> 00:18:38.133
- to remove the motion in second language, so sorry about that. That's confusing. So you do not have to

00:18:38.133 --> 00:18:46.125
- vote today. We'll ask you to approve it at the December meeting. Thank you. Yeah, the technical advisory

00:18:46.125 --> 00:18:52.062
- committee did not vote on it. The citizens advisory committee did vote on it.

00:18:52.194 --> 00:19:01.798
- Yeah, it's up to your option on what course of action you wish to choose. Is there a reason not to vote

00:19:01.798 --> 00:19:11.034
- on it? Another December is always better. I mean, it's closer. Closer to the time frame, yeah. Call

00:19:11.034 --> 00:19:20.638
- this version 1.0. If we wait until our next meeting, what will happen between now and our next meeting?

00:19:23.138 --> 00:19:31.904
- Nothing. There might be more people at the December meeting. So there might be a few more voices that

00:19:31.904 --> 00:19:41.185
- have an opinion about something, but. Yeah, we may have more people in December because that's the adoption

00:19:41.185 --> 00:19:50.209
- proposed adoption of the transportation improvement program. All right, so we'll move on to first review

00:19:50.209 --> 00:19:51.326
- of the draft

00:19:51.426 --> 00:20:01.320
- Bloomington Monroe County MPO fiscal year 2028-2032 transportation improvement program. Okay the program

00:20:01.320 --> 00:20:10.932
- which we have put together here and we've published we published this on well the first of all let me

00:20:10.932 --> 00:20:18.942
- go back the last updated version is October 1st this is what's posted on the website

00:20:19.522 --> 00:20:27.731
- We opened the public comment period after legal advertisements in the Herald Times, two legal advertisements

00:20:27.731 --> 00:20:35.487
- in the Herald Times on a Friday edition and also on a Sunday edition prior to a week before the public

00:20:35.487 --> 00:20:43.018
- meeting. October 1st was published date. October 2nd was the beginning of the 30-day public comment

00:20:43.018 --> 00:20:47.838
- period. 30-day public comment period extends till November 1st.

00:20:48.130 --> 00:20:55.626
- November 1st is on a Sunday. And originally, I told somebody 5 o'clock on Sunday, and the answer is

00:20:55.626 --> 00:21:03.347
- really 12 o'clock midnight on Sunday the 1st. So if you want to be up at 1159 making comments, you can

00:21:03.347 --> 00:21:11.593
- do that. We are accepting all comments in a written form, electronic form, postal. We had a letter yesterday,

00:21:11.593 --> 00:21:16.990
- first letter in a long time, but we had a letter yesterday on comments.

00:21:17.506 --> 00:21:24.792
- We also advertised an open house on the transportation improvement program that was held on the 12th.

00:21:24.792 --> 00:21:32.220
- Yeah, thank you, 12th. Sorry if I've got all the dates here. On October 12th, we had one person attend.

00:21:32.220 --> 00:21:39.935
- That individual was there for approximately an hour and a half. So hopefully I answered a lot of questions,

00:21:39.935 --> 00:21:43.006
- but then we also received formal comments.

00:21:43.618 --> 00:21:52.046
- from that individual in electronic form via an email and we also received comments via paper on a letter.

00:21:52.046 --> 00:22:00.394
- Again, if you've got any comments or questions on the transportation improvement program or your friends

00:22:00.394 --> 00:22:08.345
- and neighbors do, we encourage you to send those in. Again, public comment period is open until the

00:22:08.345 --> 00:22:12.638
- first. Now scrolling down on the program of projects,

00:22:16.738 --> 00:22:29.216
- down here on page 13. Page 13, this is our projected federal highway formula funds for fiscal year 28,

00:22:29.216 --> 00:22:41.936
- 29, 30, 31, 32. Notice we say estimate on the first two years. And the reason we say estimate is because

00:22:41.936 --> 00:22:43.390
- the current

00:22:44.386 --> 00:22:50.851
- Surface Transportation Bill, the Infrastructure and Investment Jobs Act. The bill is under a continuing

00:22:50.851 --> 00:22:57.626
- resolution in Congress. It's under its third, I believe, third continuing resolution. So these are estimates

00:22:57.626 --> 00:23:04.029
- given to us by the Indiana Department of Transportation. We don't come up with these ourselves. So the

00:23:04.029 --> 00:23:10.867
- carbon reduction program, the highway safety improvement program, the PROTECT program, which is Environmental

00:23:10.867 --> 00:23:13.726
- Section 164, which is penalty money for those

00:23:13.890 --> 00:23:20.885
- Well, for the states that aren't meeting standards, air quality standards, we get that funding. Surface

00:23:20.885 --> 00:23:27.409
- transportation block grant, which is always the biggest amount of money that we receive. Surface

00:23:27.409 --> 00:23:34.472
- transportation block grant, TIFIA. Transportation alternatives, which is the alternative transportation.

00:23:34.472 --> 00:23:41.534
- And then transportation alternatives, TIFIA. And then the anticipated spending authority is 4.5 million.

00:23:42.242 --> 00:23:50.783
- a little above 4.5 million. Now, those of you that are keenly aware, in prior years, we were in the

00:23:50.783 --> 00:23:59.495
- vicinity of more like 5.5, $5.2 million. We're down a million dollars. The reason for that is because

00:23:59.495 --> 00:24:08.037
- of the 2020 census. The 2020 census, we had 45,000 students who went home on March 15th. The census

00:24:08.037 --> 00:24:12.222
- came in and counted the urban area in April 1st,

00:24:12.674 --> 00:24:20.762
- And the allocation of funding to our MPO is based on per capita allocation. So as a result of losing

00:24:20.762 --> 00:24:29.090
- the population, losing the population, meaning they went home and they weren't counted, because of that

00:24:29.090 --> 00:24:37.097
- loss, we lost funding vis-a-vis the balance of the state of Indiana, which grew slightly. So that's

00:24:37.097 --> 00:24:41.822
- our penalty right there. So we've flatlined those numbers.

00:24:42.114 --> 00:24:50.738
- all the way across simply because that's the easiest way to estimate at this point in time. And then

00:24:50.738 --> 00:24:59.533
- stay tuned in January when Congress, new Congress comes in, it depends how that election goes in terms

00:24:59.533 --> 00:25:08.670
- of reauthorization of the Service Transportation Act. The next page we've got here on page 14 shows us the

00:25:10.178 --> 00:25:18.642
- The highway, federal highway formula funds by local, yeah, local public agency, city of Bloomington,

00:25:18.642 --> 00:25:27.274
- 14 million. Monroe County, 5.4 million. Anticipated spending authority is 19.7 million. Somebody asked

00:25:27.274 --> 00:25:34.398
- on Wednesday, why is this split? And it's based on the ask. We don't determine that.

00:25:34.786 --> 00:25:41.454
- It's based on the requests, the project requests that come in. Some years it's one entity has more money

00:25:41.454 --> 00:25:47.995
- than the other. In other years, it's another entity has more money. This is what the split is for this

00:25:47.995 --> 00:25:54.599
- current proposed transportation improvement program. And if you look at it in terms of local funds used

00:25:54.599 --> 00:26:00.950
- for transportation improvement projects sponsored by the local public agencies, you'll see what the

00:26:00.950 --> 00:26:03.998
- split is there. For 28, fiscal year, these are,

00:26:04.194 --> 00:26:11.694
- federal fiscal year, by the way, starting July 1st. Federal fiscal year 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and then

00:26:11.694 --> 00:26:19.194
- the total amounts shown out there. Total amount is $13.5 million. If you go to the next table, which

00:26:19.194 --> 00:26:26.620
- is on page 15, fiscal constraint. We are required by law, by federal law, to have fiscal constraint

00:26:26.620 --> 00:26:34.046
- for all of our projects. In other words, we can't spend more money than what's actually programmed.

00:26:34.754 --> 00:26:42.915
- We can spend the money in terms of you losing local dollars, but we can't overspend on federal funding

00:26:42.915 --> 00:26:50.839
- dollars. So our anticipated spending authority is at the top line there for fiscal year 28, 29, 30,

00:26:50.839 --> 00:26:58.921
- 31, and 32. Existing funding exchange agreements are shown there. These exchange agreements were done

00:26:58.921 --> 00:27:01.694
- for three projects in prior years.

00:27:01.986 --> 00:27:09.032
- Total available funding available for the MPOs and this is showing for each individual fiscal year.

00:27:09.032 --> 00:27:16.007
- And then showing under that is each individual project that is proposed for the new transportation

00:27:16.007 --> 00:27:23.265
- improvement program, college and Walnut corridor, crosswalk safety improvements phase three, crosswalk

00:27:23.265 --> 00:27:27.774
- safety improvements phase four, downtown curb ramps phase five,

00:27:28.130 --> 00:27:34.907
- Old State Road 37 and Dillman Road safety project North Dunn Street multi-use path. North Walnut Street

00:27:34.907 --> 00:27:42.010
- improvements phase one. North Walnut Street improvements phase two. Sidewalk and ADA ramp repair replacement

00:27:42.010 --> 00:27:48.526
- project and this is in Monroe County within the urbanized area and outside of the boundaries of the

00:27:48.526 --> 00:27:54.782
- city of Bloomington. So the total obligations there are totaled up at the bottom and then shows

00:27:55.266 --> 00:28:02.992
- percentage of obligation, there's not a penny left on the table. We'll be using all of our dollars.

00:28:02.992 --> 00:28:10.951
- And then the next, on page 16, we're showing the funding tables by individual program, category years,

00:28:10.951 --> 00:28:19.063
- and how much they're obligated by. I'm not gonna go into the details on this, but you can see that we're

00:28:19.063 --> 00:28:23.390
- balancing everything out to zero, zero, zero, and zero.

00:28:24.386 --> 00:28:32.699
- Then if you go to page 18 on the Federal Transit Administration funds, these are separate than the highway

00:28:32.699 --> 00:28:40.546
- funds in the sense that they are allocated based on formulas, formulas for Bloomington Transit based

00:28:40.546 --> 00:28:48.781
- on its size, based on number of passengers, based on passenger trip miles and a number of other variables

00:28:48.781 --> 00:28:52.510
- that are in there. So the 5307, which is there,

00:28:52.962 --> 00:29:03.208
- Operating assistance, we're looking at the funding there across the years. FTA 5310, look at the funding

00:29:03.208 --> 00:29:13.162
- there, 5311, 5339. Total funding for rural transit is down here also. We recommended to rural transit

00:29:13.162 --> 00:29:20.286
- that their needs for fiscal year 28, that they add a 4% inflation factor

00:29:20.770 --> 00:29:27.758
- to all of the years that are out there in the outline years, which they did. Total federal funding for

00:29:27.758 --> 00:29:34.746
- Bloomington Transit, you can see that down there, 5.2 million beginning fiscal year 28 and 5.5 million

00:29:34.746 --> 00:29:41.734
- out in fiscal year 32. Total federal funding down there, big numbers, 6 million, 6 million essentially

00:29:41.734 --> 00:29:48.926
- all the way across, except for one year fiscal year 30 at 9 million. And then state funding, this is the,

00:29:49.250 --> 00:29:56.737
- Public Mass Transportation Fund. And this is the allocation which would come to Bloomington Transit

00:29:56.737 --> 00:30:04.299
- and to Rural Transit for their operations. Doug, I don't know if you want to add anything to this at

00:30:04.299 --> 00:30:12.385
- all on the transit purview. This all ignores the capital construction of the new administration maintenance

00:30:12.385 --> 00:30:15.006
- operations building on Curry Pike.

00:30:19.554 --> 00:30:30.431
- Yeah, we've seen some of these numbers. Part of the downward trend in this is related to, I believe,

00:30:30.431 --> 00:30:41.522
- some historical ridership levels. And we're working steadfastly with a new management company to right

00:30:41.522 --> 00:30:47.230
- that ship. And we look forward to different numbers.

00:30:47.554 --> 00:30:55.758
- Yeah, Bloomington Transit ridership is facing a number of challenges in that there are a number of other

00:30:55.758 --> 00:31:03.728
- multimodal opportunities. Number one, Bloomington Transit riders could use, if they're students, they

00:31:03.728 --> 00:31:11.698
- could use IU campus bus instead of Bloomington Transit. Number two, there are scooters. Number three,

00:31:11.698 --> 00:31:16.542
- there are e-bikes. Number four, we've increased the number of

00:31:16.994 --> 00:31:25.429
- multimodal pathways within the city of Bloomington. Number four, walking, good old-fashioned walking,

00:31:25.429 --> 00:31:33.946
- and that's up also. And then there are the drivers that are out there, but the campus itself is really

00:31:33.946 --> 00:31:42.215
- the driver around that center. And then what Bloomington Transit is focused on is what I would call

00:31:42.215 --> 00:31:45.854
- the non-rider or the non-traditional rider.

00:31:46.210 --> 00:31:53.765
- people who normally would not ride the bus, but would be brought in at a convenience factor. And that's

00:31:53.765 --> 00:32:00.448
- being done in a number of ways with paratransit. It's also being done with microtransit and

00:32:00.448 --> 00:32:08.004
- the experimentation of that. Also the partnerships with Uber and Lyft for after hours. A number of ways

00:32:08.004 --> 00:32:15.486
- are out there to increase the ridership. It's up to the consumer which modal choice they wish to make.

00:32:15.586 --> 00:32:25.288
- when they make the modal choice of public transportation, is it campus bus or is it Bloomington Transit?

00:32:25.288 --> 00:32:35.267
- Yeah, I couldn't have said it better myself, Pat. Thank you. A couple of other things. The battery electric

00:32:35.267 --> 00:32:45.246
- buses have a certain height requirement, which has limited the traditional routes that have served parts of

00:32:45.602 --> 00:32:59.793
- Eastern campus. We're also going to be doing a route optimization study under our new general management

00:32:59.793 --> 00:33:07.902
- company. One has not been done for some time and we hope to

00:33:08.962 --> 00:33:18.356
- to bring our routes more in line with consumer demand and at a far greater and more reliable frequency.

00:33:18.356 --> 00:33:27.479
- These are things that have been identified in a very short period of time under a new manager. We'll

00:33:27.479 --> 00:33:37.054
- continue to expand those and we're looking very positively at the future. These numbers are motivational.

00:33:37.282 --> 00:33:44.337
- You know, another observation, too, is that on-time performance has always been good for Bloomington

00:33:44.337 --> 00:33:51.392
- Transit. The challenge for Bloomington Transit is finding enough drivers. There's been a shortage of

00:33:51.392 --> 00:33:58.516
- drivers ever since the 2020 COVID. Well, yeah, since COVID shut down in 2020, there's been a shortage

00:33:58.516 --> 00:34:05.501
- of drivers and how to attract them and how to keep them has always been a big challenge. Well, it's

00:34:05.501 --> 00:34:07.038
- a very high standard.

00:34:07.938 --> 00:34:22.555
- It is a standard that is ignored by Uber and Lyft. And the hours are taxing and to provide service to

00:34:22.555 --> 00:34:35.166
- the community. But I will say that our driver base has a tremendous level of morale and

00:34:35.490 --> 00:34:44.567
- dedication to meeting the call to serve. So they're a unique, wonderful group, and it's hard to add

00:34:44.567 --> 00:34:54.552
- to them. But yes, we're down, I believe, nine drivers at this point in time where we'd like to be comfortably

00:34:54.552 --> 00:35:04.446
- to manage the system and be prepared for bips and bobbles that always hit you with weather and other issues.

00:35:05.954 --> 00:35:14.020
- Yeah, thanks for the time. One last thing I want to point out is that I think the Bloomington Transit's

00:35:14.020 --> 00:35:21.931
- fleet is 40% or 45% electric buses now. That's an achievement that they've gotten in the last four to

00:35:21.931 --> 00:35:29.765
- five years. That's cut the cost substantially in terms of fuel, in terms of maintenance, in terms of

00:35:29.765 --> 00:35:35.582
- wear and tear. And then also the delivery of the two new articulated buses

00:35:35.746 --> 00:35:43.439
- full length articulated buses in recent months too. I've seen those constantly and they've always been

00:35:43.439 --> 00:35:51.056
- full. Don't you feel like a bigger city with those things wobbling around? I just think they're cool.

00:35:51.056 --> 00:35:58.600
- Yeah, we'll have more of those. And I believe, I think I heard that the university may be adding one

00:35:58.600 --> 00:36:03.230
- or two as well. Because there are certain routes that require

00:36:04.098 --> 00:36:15.701
- that level of service on a regular basis. If you've got 60 people wanting to get on a 40-person bus,

00:36:15.701 --> 00:36:27.534
- it's hard to sell that product. But it also takes almost two years once an order is placed for the bus

00:36:27.534 --> 00:36:28.798
- to arrive.

00:36:30.690 --> 00:36:40.190
- Things are changing electrically, of course. You know, you can't buy an electric bus today, new one.

00:36:40.190 --> 00:36:50.067
- And parts are non-existent. In fact, they are done with 3D printers quite a bit now when they're needed.

00:36:50.067 --> 00:37:00.414
- Luckily, electrical formats are fairly maintenance-free and do not require a lot of that type of interaction.

00:37:01.314 --> 00:37:11.858
- Signs of the times. We are buying two hybrid buses here shortly, which is really about the best that

00:37:11.858 --> 00:37:22.402
- we can do environmentally at this point on produced units. But we'll continue to have that banner in

00:37:22.402 --> 00:37:27.518
- front of us of eliminating our carbon footprint.

00:37:30.722 --> 00:37:40.824
- Okay, and then moving on to page 21, which is the project list and map. Page 20, yeah, 21 actually ends

00:37:40.824 --> 00:37:51.509
- all the projects. And I'm not gonna go through all of these. These are the projects requested for programming

00:37:51.509 --> 00:38:00.446
- by Monroe County, City of Bloomington, Indiana Department of Transportation, Rural Transit,

00:38:01.026 --> 00:38:09.182
- Bloomington Transit. I might note, as I noted before the meeting, the project sponsored by the Department

00:38:09.182 --> 00:38:16.876
- of Transportation beginning on page 29, this list of projects is set. The fiscal constraint has not

00:38:16.876 --> 00:38:24.800
- been achieved on any of the state projects at this point in time. So those amounts that are programmed

00:38:24.800 --> 00:38:30.494
- for each individual project may change slightly between now and December.

00:38:31.074 --> 00:38:38.410
- We submitted on October 13th, I believe I submitted the draft transportation improvement program for

00:38:38.410 --> 00:38:45.819
- review by the Indiana Department of Transportation, technical services staff, also by Federal Highway

00:38:45.819 --> 00:38:53.229
- Administration, Indiana Division and Federal Transit Administration's Division 5 office. They have 30

00:38:53.229 --> 00:38:57.950
- days to provide to us comments, review comments on the document.

00:38:58.402 --> 00:39:05.692
- As soon as we receive those comments, then we'll adjust the draft program into a final program, also

00:39:05.692 --> 00:39:12.910
- incorporating in all the public comments that we received during the public comment period. So what

00:39:12.910 --> 00:39:20.345
- you see now is, I don't know, 98 pages or so, and we may add another 12 to 20 pages, depending on what

00:39:20.345 --> 00:39:25.758
- happens between now and December. So any other questions anybody may have?

00:39:31.554 --> 00:39:49.617
- a lot to consume. Seeing no questions. Okay, moving on to public comment on non-voting matters not included

00:39:49.617 --> 00:39:52.126
- on the agenda.

00:39:57.602 --> 00:40:05.443
- Any communications from committee members on non-voting matters not included on the agenda?

00:40:05.443 --> 00:40:14.051
- Upcoming meetings, the technical advisory committee meeting will be December 2nd at 10 a.m. Citizens

00:40:14.051 --> 00:40:22.830
- advisory committee will be December 2nd at 530 p.m. And the next policy committee will be December 4th

00:40:22.830 --> 00:40:27.262
- at 1030 a.m. All the meetings are available hybrid.

00:40:29.218 --> 00:40:30.398
- We are adjourned.
