- The Bloomington Monroe County Metropolitan Planning Office Technical Advisory Committee meeting on Wednesday,
- April 22nd 2026 I guess we'll start with a thanks everybody for being here as well as our attendees
- online I guess we will start with introductions and maybe we'll start to my left Neil. Are you okay
- with starting off? Neil copper proxy for the city of Bloomington City engineer Proxy David Hiddle
- City Bloomington Public Works Department John Baton GIS coordinator Monroe County Jackie Jelen Monroe
- County planning Hunter Jackson proxy for the Monroe County otter Kelly Whitmer Monroe County Parks and
- Recreation Lynette Tavernier Monroe County Highway Department alternate for the highway engineer
- Megan Blair, GIS Manager, City of Bloomington. Rebecca Swift, Operations and Development, Division Director,
- Parks and Rec. Linnea Wellings, NDOT, proxy for Rebecca Packers.
- And that was John Kennedy, who also introduced himself online. Thanks. I think we're good. Thanks, everybody.
- Oh, sorry. Cheryl just joined. If you want to introduce yourself, Cheryl,
- Maybe her sound's not working. Go ahead. That's all right. Cheryl, if you get the chance later, you
- can introduce yourself. OK, so I guess that moves us to the approval of the agenda for 2026, or for
- today's meeting on April 22. Can I get a motion for approval? So moved. Second. Thanks, Jane and Nate.
- I believe that's who that was. Oh, it was Ryan. Sorry.
- Jane and Ryan it's it's early. It's actually not early, but it feels early to me. So I guess would this
- be a Have some votes now. Yeah copper. Yes Jackson Yes, Robling yes, Jelen. Yes, fleek. Yes Gilliland
- Yes, can you hear me now? Yes Baten yes
- Shelly, how do you say your last name? How do you say your last name? Stramitis. Yes. Kennedy is non-voting.
- Whitmer. Yes. Blair. Yes. Wellings. Yes. Swift. Yes. Nickel. Yes. Motion passes. Great, thanks. And
- that brings us to the approval of the past meeting minutes from February 25th, 2026.
- Is there a motion to approve? So moves. Second. Thanks, Neil and Ryan. Wells. Swift, sorry. Yes. Wellings.
- Yes. Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot you to have an ear the first time. Yes. Nickel. Yes.
- Blair Yes, Whitmer. Yes stream on us Gilliland Gilliland Jellin Yes, flake. Yes, Robling. Yes Jackson.
- Yes copper
- Yes, that motion passes I'll go yes on that one as well. I'm sorry. I think it's okay, but just I'm
- guessing we have we've got enough Yeses, but just for the land is yes as well. Sorry Okay, I guess that
- brings us to any type of communication from the chair or vice chair I Don't have a ton of things Jane.
- Do you have anything to bring up?
- I guess the only thing I would mention is that it looks like our packets are new and so I was wondering
- as we get to the communications from staff to talk about the kind of the change to the packets and things
- like that if folks are interested and just kind of the formatting but Beyond that I guess we'll move
- on to communications from officers and or committees I Guess hearing none the reports from MPO staff
- And if I'm going too quickly through this, let me know if I'm, okay, thank you. I don't think he asked.
- Did you wanna talk about the packets? Yeah, if you guys want to kind of like elucidate, I just noticed
- that the format's a little bit different. They're smaller packets with links and stuff like that. The
- one thing I noticed is that the areas where, which Nate was so fortunate to have, these bolded kind
- of things that said,
- Hey chair, this is when you have a vote that they're not bolded anymore. So if we could get those again,
- that'd be sweet for me just for like the next couple the next couple meetings Each item that required
- public comment, so that might be a nice item that kind of reinsert just to make sure we're minding our
- P's and Q's Thanks for clarifying that Nate to the asterix, but yeah, good point. Thank you. Nice catch. I
- The packets are slightly different due to the accessibility laws, which were supposed to be in effect
- this coming Friday, but are now delayed for another year. So we will probably maintain this format.
- It is challenging to make all packet items accessible, so we're still learning.
- That's why this format because this format is a lot easier to make accessible to screen readers than
- a PDF is so cool. Thanks Katie. That was really clarifying. And yeah we are in the county side as well
- just like the city working towards that accessibility. So yeah it's a big kind of lift and hopefully
- there'll be some more kind of guidance we get from either the federal or state level for us to kind
- of move forward with that. Thanks.
- I guess this just goes to the reports from the MPO staff. Okay Yeah, and the the agenda in the packets
- they're a big lift Kudos Katie for doing all this. I would have struggled still First thing I want to
- mention is public public hearing notice for three Bloomington Transit Public comment sessions. These
- are proposed service improvements for route 16 on the west side the first
- Public comment meeting is on Monday, May 4th from five to six o'clock at Ivy Tech State College, the
- Lampkin Hall out on the Ivy Tech College campus. Second meeting is on Wednesday, May 6th from 12 to
- one o'clock. It's at Bloomington Public Transit Corporation's Downtown Transit Center here on 301 West
- South Walnut Street.
- And then the third meeting is Thursday, May 7th from four to five o'clock for those that can't make
- it during the noon hour. It's also at the Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation's downtown transit
- center at 301 South Walnut. The overview is route 16 is essentially a combination of route, existing
- routes three west and 13,
- It's a 90 minute schedule from departure all around and arrival back to the downtown transit center.
- This consolidation is taking place to hopefully boost ridership. And that's about all I have to say
- other than that. Anybody have any questions? It's all there as a pop up in the packet straight from
- Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation.
- Okay, next item we have is speed limit to be reduced on C word 46 through Ellisville This is something
- we brought we the staff brought to the attention of the Indiana Department of Transportation Even though
- they were aware of it public news release on March 30th in that effective a reduction of the speed limit
- became effective on Tuesday March 31st through Ellisville
- School zone speed limit was reduced from 30 miles an hour to 25 miles an hour between 2nd Street and
- Paul Street. Advanced school signs and flashers were installed to help emphasize the change. Reduced
- speed is intended to enhance safety along the corridor. INDOT wants to remind everyone, and I'm sure
- the town of Ellisville wants to remind everyone,
- to slow down, use extra caution, and avoid distractions when driving. In other words, phone down,
- head up. And all of that is taking place right now. Next thing we have is the AASHTO wear safety software.
- Some of you may not be aware of what AASHTO is. AASHTO is the American Association of State Highway
- Transportation Officials.
- They have recently, recently as in the last few years, developed various software packages to help State
- Department of Transportation's come to a common, what I would call a common usage of software. One of
- the packages out there, it's called AASHTO, where safety software, the Indiana Department of Transportation,
- has announced that they are adopting the software. The adoption will take place, well, in beta testing,
- it'll take place over the summer and this fall. And then it goes into actual use January 1st. The software
- package replaces a program, a software program called Road Hat, which was developed by Purdue University.
- It was a custom software package
- developed at least 10, maybe 12 years ago. And the HAT stands for Hazard Analysis Tool, not as in Purdue
- Road HAT. But the new AASHTO safety software package looks at intersections, looks at segments. It takes
- a very thorough deep dive into safety analysis and crash causal factors.
- It will eventually have some sort of an AI type of module in it, which will help identify patterns,
- particularly on segments. Like I said, this will take place on January 1st. We've volunteered, Katie
- and I have volunteered to be beta testers for MPOs. Stay tuned, we'll let you know more as it comes about.
- The next thing I have is the Indiana Department of Transportation has released a draft active transportation.
- Oh, I'm sorry. I missed the in dot traffic count database system. Let me go back to that in dot traffic
- count database system. These the MPO had paid for traffic count database software over the course of the last
- nine years we had paid for it and the software wasn't used by the MPO staff it was used by the city
- of Bloomington engineering department it was also available to Monroe county highway department if they
- wanted to use it and also the town of Ellitsville we recently came upon an offer which was too good
- to be true from the department of transportation
- in that they offered to let us use their statewide license, software license that cut the cost for us
- by about $2,500. $2,500 doesn't sound like much, but it is when you're an MPO. So we went through a
- process with the engineering department staff where we uploaded all of the traffic count database system
- Accounts 311 locations. We uploaded all that several weeks ago Linked it in to the Department
- of Transportation's traffic count database system map So if you go into the TC DS map buy-in dot start
- zooming in on Bloomington You'll see all of the traffic count locations pop up and all the different
- details on whether that's one-way traffic two-way traffic and
- Um, I don't know if it's showing design hourly volume or not, but it's showing all of the results of
- all of the counts we've done over the system over the, over the last decade. Uh, this will be a permanent
- process in that it costs us nothing. And it makes it easier for management too, because it's in a central
- hard central location system with the department of transportation questions. Anybody?
- Neil, anything to add? Yeah, I looked at this map yesterday and it was a little confusing because I
- was trying to figure out what was going on with it. So that was, thanks for kind of giving the background
- on it. In terms of the traffic counts, were those things I guess carried out or compiled by essentially
- like the, those kind of sensors that are spread across roads and cars drive over them, et cetera?
- These are all road tube counts. Road tube counts that are done by Mike Stewart and one of the other
- staff members of the engineering department. It's nitty gritty dirty work and dangerous too at the same
- time. Yeah, we're not using flock cameras. We're not using anything recording license plates or anything
- like that. It's just pure road tube. And they do directional counts.
- design hourly volumes, you get your average ADT out of all of that, and we use that for, well, they
- use it for engineering decisions. We also use it for looking at crash data, looking at crash data so
- that way we can look at crash factors and determine what the frequency is for certain types of crashes,
- particularly fatal and serious injury crashes. Does that answer your question?
- Yeah, I was just kind of curious about that the methodology to the background of it Yeah, and it's the
- fact that this is free. It's great. So yeah, let's keep using it The price is right free. Yeah Okay,
- the next item I'll go back to now is the Indiana Department of Transportation draft active transportation
- report This is a draft plan which is out on the website still I checked this morning just to make sure
- it's there because sometimes it's there one day and gone the next But it's still there
- It also has a survey link where you can submit comments. The key thing about this plan is that it's
- dramatically different than other active transportation plans the department has ever published before.
- It not only identifies existing trails, greenways, and active transportation corridors, it identifies
- potential areas, areas of need, but it also specifically notes that
- the Department of Transportation will build sidewalks where sidewalks are needed. That's a,
- I would call it a, it's revolutionary. Because when I worked at the Department of Transportation, we
- weren't in the business of building sidewalks. And they weren't in the business of building sidewalks
- up until a few years ago. Now it's active, particularly in small locations, smaller,
- villages and roadways communities along state highways. Indot will build those. Indot will also actively
- seek to promote active transportation along those corridors within those small communities. You won't
- be seeing these along state highways and large rural areas, but you will be seeing them in
- smaller communities. Questions? Anybody?
- County flood man Yeah a while back both the city and the county were contacted through through the chain
- of By the US Army Corps of Engineers Louisville they are reaching out to
- communities to try and identify areas in Indiana that experience severe roadway flooding. This isn't
- loading. Oh, there we go, okay. Sorry, areas in Indiana that experience severe roadway flooding are
- potentially where fatalities or high water rescues have occurred, and they're doing this research as
- part of their flood safety and messaging signage campaign.
- So as part of this Request I learned about the county's map and I thought I would let John talk about
- it And Lynette's here as well and Ben Ayers from the highway department who might have some more insight
- But yeah, just for some background we were contacted by I believe it's a group called the silver jackets
- which sounds kind of like an interesting like superhero
- Group maybe but they're actually Army Corps of Engineers folks a long-standing organization within the
- Army Corps Looking and there's a funding opportunity and I believe it was Tammy Berman from planning
- was the one who was contacted So this was a collaborative effort between the Mineral County Planning
- Office emergency management the silver jackets and the highway department and then the GIS just was
- facilitating but what we did was we took our roadside inventory
- Within Monroe County Highway Department for where these signs might be and then also locations that
- were noted by the Monroe County Fire Protection District as well as EMA of areas where no and flooding
- occurred across these roads and that's what this map is showing right now along with a flood zone layer
- from the Department of Natural Resources to get an idea of you know, these areas
- Maybe right now we haven't witnessed flooding, but in 20 years we could be seeing things as well.
- So yeah, the goal for this is to essentially utilize funds that are existing to put those signs up that
- say turn around, don't drown, right? I think it was five or six years ago we had a fatality in Bloomington,
- right, where somebody drove into Clear Creek after it got really, one of those torrential downpours.
- So this is a great program and something that I think would really just be a benefit for everybody.
- Awesome. When I learned about your map, I thought it would be good to share with the group just so everyone
- was aware that it existed. Yeah. Thanks, Katie. And again, another resource just to share with you,
- but there's a 2026 Roadmap to Safety report that is out there if anybody's interested in seeing it.
- There is a States at a Glance section with their
- three categories of rating and Indiana does fall in the cautious section. And so this gives a kind of
- gives a number on the billions of dollars, the annual cost due to motor vehicle crashes, the number
- of fatalities in 2024, the 10 year fatality total. And then it also talks about various laws that have
- been adopted or not yet adopted.
- And so that could be an interesting report for anyone who's interested in that. Questions? Okay, I just
- wanted to share that the MPO in March received extra, received a notice from INDOT that we would be receiving
- some extra funds for fiscal year 2026. Every MPO in the state did receive some level of extra funds.
- And our amount that we're receiving is 47,894. So not too high of a number in terms of transportation
- projects, but it is extra funding nonetheless. So I just wanted to share that bit of news.
- Or Pat I just realized now see we did miss agenda item six point six I don't if we want to cover that
- at the end of this. Does that sound good? Yes. Okay. Sorry about that Item six point ten is a memo regarding
- a meeting that the MPO staff is
- city staff and county staff had on April 8th at this meeting we discussed three three main points the
- first being the use of the extra forty seven thousand almost forty eight thousand dollars in fiscal
- year 26 funds that we're receiving from in dot. Those have to be used by September 30th of 26.
- And so the group at the meeting agreed to grant these funds to the downtown curb ramps phase five project
- since they were slated to receive funds in fiscal year 26 but were not able to because of cuts to the
- funding. The next item that we discussed was that the city of Bloomington and the county both have a
- preference to move
- their projects, two of their projects, College and Walnut phase one and Dillman, old 37 and Dillman.
- They desire to move them up to the next fiscal year for a variety of reasons. And so to make this possible,
- we had to kind of figure out if the funds that were left upon them moving could be used.
- And there are a few MPOs out there that are looking for trades. And so we discussed the possibility
- of using two of those trades to help us reshift the money around to allow Dillman 37 to move from fiscal
- year 28 to 29 and to allow college and wanted to move from 29 to 30. And just a reminder that the fiscal
- year is from July 1st to June 30th.
- And so as part of these bullet points in here describe what would need to take place to try and reallocate
- those funds to the projects and use as much of the funding as possible while still allowing those projects to move.
- So in the end the group agreed it would be beneficial to move forward with both funding exchanges which
- would allow both projects to move to their desired fiscal years. The third item we talked about was
- that as a result of this trade
- and project moving scenario, there would be some extra funds left over, 162,000 in fiscal year 28 and
- 97,000 in fiscal year 29 that we would need to figure out where to allocate. And we decided to postpone
- the decision for these until a later date. There are projects that can use those funds. We just have
- to figure out how we're gonna divvy it up.
- Any questions. I have one question. Sorry. This is very helpful. I didn't read this beforehand. The
- note about the MPO can't promise a return of the remaining six percent of funds to the college and walnut
- project in the future. Is that kind of why agenda item three like to try and reduce any loss in the trade.
- but then still do the trade? Or are you saying you're just not going to do the trade at all? No, it
- just means that the city was willing to keep the project in the fiscal year if it didn't result in total
- or too many loss of funds. And doing this trade scenario,
- does result in the College and Walnut Project not getting as many funds in its new fiscal year of fiscal
- year 30. And so it just means that right now all of the fiscal year 30 funds are allocated and that
- there aren't any available at this time. And by the time there might be additional available,
- There will probably be another another tip. So we'll have made all of these decisions all over again
- And when you do the trades, right, there's no inflation adjustment like they get the other LPA the other
- agency gets the money For two million and then in a year we get just the two million back Okay, it's
- a direct trade. Thank you. I
- that if I can just to acknowledge that I Think from the city's perspective we we kind of wanted that
- noted as well that we're not we're not coming back a hundred percent hole from these trades, but it's
- very close and The trades are advantageous to us to a point where even though there's some small percentage
- where we're not getting back We want we just want to say hey, yeah, we know we're not quite getting
- it all back or not guaranteed it all back but
- We also acknowledge this is beneficial and want to move forward and appreciate Katie all of your time
- and kind of figuring out how to make all of this work. And I will add that we you'll not be voting on
- these changes at this point because the meeting was not that long ago and we have to go through the
- go through with the trades.
- At the next meeting, you'll be voting on all of these changes formally. Will you talk about the conflict?
- Okay, I'm going to jump back to the conflict of interest. This is something that was new to us. City
- clerk advised us in February.
- that all members of the well citizens advisory committee technical advisory committee and the policy
- committee were subject to completing a conflict of interest questionnaire. We did this in 2022 but we
- had not been directed in between that time either before or after 2022 to have the conflict of interest
- questionnaire completed. However
- She was rather adamant about it. It's State Board of Accounts is requiring the conflict of interest
- questionnaire. So we've sent out a notice to all the members of all three committees. Citizens Advisory
- Committee, we got 100% compliance. Thank you very much. Tech Advisory Committee, we still have nine
- names and I'm not gonna say out loud who they are.
- I'll just contact you directly with an email About the fact that we will need you to complete a questionnaire
- conflict of question interest questionnaire and then on the MPO Policy Committee we had Three people
- that have still not completed the questionnaire that will work on that the questionnaire just make sure
- that you don't have a financial interest in any of the decisions made by this body even though
- two of the committees are advisory only the requirement is that you still have to do the questionnaire
- and if you're a proxy we will ask you to do the questionnaire also just in case so if you have any questions
- please let me know catch me after the meeting I'll be happy to talk to you about that and then also
- please feel free to contact city clerk if you want to go
- Pass me to ask for more detailed questions Thank you, I Guess the only question I have about that was
- this Questionnaire that all boards and commissions were to fill out so like the planning like the Bloomington
- Planning Commission all boards and commissions and even staff They I was identified as one of the people
- that had to fill out the questionnaire. So yeah and Katie too. Thanks Pat. I
- Back down to six point eleven I wanted to share just one update from an in dot project The SR 45 10th
- Street Project from the bypass to Pete Ellis Drive intersection improvements with added turn lanes if
- you might remember that there was some Some questions about the trees that were slated for removal The
- update on that is that
- They did do some redesign to the Pete Ellis side and they were able to preserve eight trees that were
- previously slated for removal. The redesign includes shorter storage lengths for the turn lanes on Pete
- Ellis, but the overall scope of the project remains unchanged. So that's the update on the tree issue
- for that one. The letting for that project took place April 8th, 26.
- With credit for Crider and Crider got the lowest bid and then the next couple months will be Utility
- relocations and construction is anticipated So I meant to oops switch over here construction is anticipated
- In To begin in spring of 27 and
- The contract is expected to be completed in spring of 28. And then I wanted to invite Neil or Lynette
- if you guys want to share any updates on your your tip projects that you have. Yeah I can just quickly
- run through the list and then happy to answer any questions. Our second street project is in utility
- relocations and then we'll
- Quickly shift into construction throughout this year. We have a curb ramp project called downtown curb
- ramps phase four that will go to bid this fall and includes numerous locations in the downtown area
- So we're excited for that getting close to bidding You have curb ramps phase five that we're just now
- starting design. We just issued notice to proceed to a consultant that
- Project is expected to focus on crosswalks improvements in the areas of third and at water just south
- of IU campus Our high street project. We just wrapped up right away acquisition We're in utility relocation
- this year throughout 2026 and then we'll be in construction next year in 2027 we have a
- Crosswalks phase three project that is still in design And we have crosswalks phase four that is out
- in the future. We haven't started yet We're looking at consultant selection by the end of this year
- We have a multi-use path project on North Dunn Street We're in design on that. They're just getting
- started on right-of-way appraisals to start right-of-way acquisition and
- And then for our two college walnut phases, those have not started, but we're hoping to get into consultant
- selection soon. I think that's the full list of our federal funded projects at the moment. Thanks. Okay.
- For Monroe County, for the Eagleson Avenue bridge, the pre-construction meeting was on March 31st, 2026.
- We're going to be in to have bi-weekly meetings.
- to keep up to date with utility relocations. The Rockport Road Bridge pre-construction meeting was on
- April 17th. The construction will begin June 1st. CLR is the contractor. Dillman Road Bridge, still
- on schedule and working on design. For the intersection improvement at Old State Road 37 South and Dillman
- Road, you mentioned this, but we worked with the MPO and Citi to move the project to construction year
- of fiscal year twenty twenty nine and then the last one is the countywide bridge inspections and inventory
- that was completed in March and that's our required compliance month. Thank you guys so much. So I believe
- we're on to old business and it doesn't look like there's anything there. So it's a new business I guess.
- Yes, we have some some tip updates that do need voting on they are described in the memo that you see
- The first Proposed Amendment to the tip is the addition of a end up project called ID IQ bridge maintenance
- and repair with a total project cost of a million dollars There is
- not a specific location for this at this time. This is kind of just a general project that they add
- into the various counties and districts, and then they decide where they're going to use it. Similarly,
- we have another new project to add called the District Paving Project. This does have slightly more
- specific locations
- There's it involves paving in various locations of Monroe County SR 45 south of Martin Drive and then
- a couple other counties as well Again, they just give us they give us total project cost and then they
- kind of make everyone added to their tip who who's involved I
- The third amendment we need to make to the tip is a new project from NDOT called Traffic Signal Modernization
- in various locations of Monroe and Owen counties. This is a total project cost of 500,000, scheduled
- for, construction scheduled for 2029, fiscal year 2029. And the fourth update,
- for the tip is to update the funding for the slide correction on I-69 from SR-37 in Monroe County to
- Morgan County. So the funding type was changed. The right-of-way phase was moved up to 2030 from 2026 to 2030.
- due to the stability of the project. And then the total project cost was raised a little bit. And the
- construction phase was moved out of the TIP to 2031 or 2032, again, because of the stability of the
- project. The fifth amendment that we have is an update
- for the funding for the downtown curb ramps phase five project the PE phase total what needs to be updated
- to the actual contract amount of 271 490,000 then we're taking away the funds that it was allocated
- this year but then wasn't able weren't able to use
- because there wasn't enough available. That is something we talked about in a previous meeting. The
- project cost was raised a little bit due to the new PE contract. And then the PE phase is moving to
- fiscal year 27 because there's not sufficient time to do all of the needed steps to use that extra funding
- I guess I should have said we'll also be adding that extra funding that we talked about on April 8th
- with the LPAs, that $47,000 that we're getting for fiscal year 26 that we're able to use up until September.
- And so just technicality is that we have to move the PE phase to fiscal year 27 because the
- Paperwork for that will not be able to occur until fiscal year 27 I Know my explanation for that was
- a little haphazard. So if you're confused, please let me know Can you clarify what the PE stands for
- preliminary engineering? Perfect. Thank you
- So per Procedures the TAC will vote to recommend that the Recommend or deny that the policy committee
- recommend or deny approval of these amendments Move approval Second do we need to do public comment?
- Yeah before we go to vote we should do public comment and if there's a public comment about this, please
- This is your opportunity If you're online you can go ahead and unmute yourselves and speak if you have
- any public comments We're not hearing any
- So I believe it was Jane and Neil, so I guess it would be a vote. Okay. Streamata? Yes. Beighton? Yes.
- Gilliland? Fleek? Yes. Gellin? Yes.
- Yes. Jackson. Copper. Yes. Blair. Abstain. Whitmer. Yes. Nickel. Yes. Tavernier. Yes. Wellings. Yes.
- Wells. Abstain.
- Gilliland abstain, sorry Gilliland abstain, okay Motion passes with three abstain abstentions Great,
- thanks Katie. I believe this is now time for public comments on matters not included on the agenda So
- anybody here that wishes to make a public comment feel free or folks online as well. I
- Not seeing anybody here doesn't seem like anybody online either. I don't see any hands raised or anything
- like that. So I guess this moves us to communications from community members or from committee members
- on matters not included on the agenda. So non voting items anybody have anything they want to share.
- I do want to give a an acknowledgement to the city parks department and I believe also planning and
- engineering as well. I'm a big runner in town and about a month ago and I'm remiss for not acknowledging
- this earlier. I went on the beeline and I went further on the beeline than I ever have before. And so
- the extension of the beeline past Adams Street is just great. You can go all the way up to 17th Street
- and go further than that as well. But it was just a nice
- Extra little bit of distance to cover and get to see new part of town. So yeah great work and it's just
- a great contribution to the city Thanks, John, I guess we'll move on to topics for future agendas if
- folks have those as well Does not seem like it it looks like we have some upcoming meetings that are
- happening and
- Today the 22nd. So today we have the citizens advisory committee meeting which is going to be at 5 30 p.m
- It's a hybrid meeting on the 24th We have our policy committee meeting at 10 30 a.m And then our next
- technical advisory committee meeting will be May 27th 2026. Is that right after Memorial Day? Okay Something
- I must be yes, it's after okay And that's gonna be a hybrid as well
- I believe That's it. Can I get a motion to adjourn? So moved Second second. Okay. Thanks Jane, and I
- believe was that Kelly who got second or Nate? Sure second. Okay. We got Kelly Whitner at the second.
- So thanks everybody Have a great rest of your week. Thanks staff and we'll see you guys May 27th Thanks. Thank you