WEBVTT

00:00:00.130 --> 00:00:05.728
- We're going to welcome everybody to the Redevelopment Commission meeting of September 2nd, 2025.

00:00:05.728 --> 00:00:12.133
- We will start the meeting with a roll call, please. C. Scandaluri, here. Randy Cassidy, here. John West, here.

00:00:12.133 --> 00:00:18.077
- Laurie McRobbie, here. Deborah Meyerson, here. Staff present, please. Anna Killian Hansen, Housing and

00:00:18.077 --> 00:00:23.617
- Neighborhood Development. Christina Findley, Hand Department. Roy Aten, Engineering Department.

00:00:23.617 --> 00:00:28.926
- Jane Cougarsmith, Economic and Sustainable Development. Jessica McClellan, City Controller.

00:00:29.346 --> 00:00:36.237
- Amy Caswell, Hand Department. Dana Kerr, Legal Department. Thank you, everybody. We will start with

00:00:36.237 --> 00:00:43.404
- our minutes. We've got minutes from Monday, August 18, 2025. Is the attachment of the RDC versus tenant

00:00:43.404 --> 00:00:50.227
- properties, is that also from August? That was from the previous meeting. OK. I mean, I knew that.

00:00:50.227 --> 00:00:57.187
- I appreciate that it's on there. I just wanted to make sure, in terms of what we're doing, that it's

00:00:57.187 --> 00:00:58.910
- the same set of minutes.

00:00:59.522 --> 00:01:06.441
- OK, well, any questions or comments on these minutes from August 18th or the attachment? If not,

00:01:06.441 --> 00:01:14.288
- I will invite a motion. Move approval of the minutes for August 18th. Second. We've got a first and a second.

00:01:14.288 --> 00:01:21.992
- We'll take a vote by roll call. C. Scambler, yes. Raney Cassidy, yes. John West, yes. Lauren McCrobby, yes.

00:01:21.992 --> 00:01:29.054
- Deborah Meyerson, yes. Motion passes unanimously. Next on our agenda, we've got a claims register.

00:01:29.506 --> 00:01:37.718
- for August 29, 2025. Any questions or comments from commissioners on this claim register? If not,

00:01:37.718 --> 00:01:46.182
- I will invite a motion. So I move approval of claims register for August 29, 2025. Second. We've got

00:01:46.182 --> 00:01:54.645
- a first and a second. We'll do a vote by our own call, please. C. Scambler, yes. Randy Cassidy, yes.

00:01:54.645 --> 00:01:57.662
- John West, yes. Lori McRobbie, yes.

00:01:57.858 --> 00:02:05.005
- Debra Meyer saying yes. Claims register passes unanimously. OK. Next on our agenda is the payroll register

00:02:05.005 --> 00:02:12.152
- for August 22nd, 2025. Any questions or comments from commissioners about this item on the agenda? If not,

00:02:12.152 --> 00:02:19.567
- I will invite a motion, please. Move for approval. Second. First and a second. I'll vote by roll call, please.

00:02:19.567 --> 00:02:26.246
- C. Scambler, yes. Randy Cassidy, yes. John West, yes. Warren McCraven, yes. Debra Meyer saying yes.

00:02:26.246 --> 00:02:27.582
- Passes unanimously.

00:02:28.290 --> 00:02:35.008
- um legal report well we're going to go to to reports from staff please so um uh from the hand director

00:02:35.008 --> 00:02:41.791
- please sure i don't have a formal report to this evening i will say that we have a lot of activity over

00:02:41.791 --> 00:02:48.313
- at the hope well site right now um not only do we have the jackson street sub going in we also have

00:02:48.313 --> 00:02:54.966
- the remediation underway which they're actually starting now which is great um they have also started

00:02:54.966 --> 00:02:57.118
- the remediation at the 714 south

00:02:57.282 --> 00:03:04.341
- Rogers Street building, it does look like there may be some additional work that may be coming to you

00:03:04.341 --> 00:03:11.400
- sooner than later, just due to the fact that the air handler was off for so long. So we will probably

00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:18.459
- have to have another resolution for that. And then the core building did have a little bit of trouble

00:03:18.459 --> 00:03:25.726
- last week. They were installing a radon mitigation system, drilled through the slab and hit some sort of

00:03:26.274 --> 00:03:37.960
- Substance they're not sure what it was. They've taken a sample. It's been sent off I will keep you posted

00:03:37.960 --> 00:03:49.426
- as soon as we hear anything Yes, we have discussed the Memorandum agreement with the American Red Cross

00:03:49.426 --> 00:03:54.718
- and they had wanted a few changes it was in the

00:03:55.042 --> 00:04:04.532
- section regarding the indemnifications and hold harness and the commercial insurance to more match up

00:04:04.532 --> 00:04:13.278
- with what they have in place. And it went through Corporation Council, and those changes were

00:04:13.634 --> 00:04:22.628
- all agreed to and so it's in your final form. You approved it under resolution 25-100. The resolution

00:04:22.628 --> 00:04:31.975
- itself does not change. It's only the attachment that changes. So you would simply need a vote to replace

00:04:31.975 --> 00:04:39.294
- the attachment on resolution 25-100 with the one that you have before you tonight.

00:04:44.002 --> 00:04:50.512
- Any questions or comments from commissioners about this updated resolution in terms of the attachment, per se?

00:04:50.512 --> 00:04:56.377
- Does this finish everything else where we can have a blood drive and we don't have any issues? Yes,

00:04:56.377 --> 00:05:02.300
- it does for the RDC. It still does need to go to the Board of Public Works for their side of things.

00:05:02.300 --> 00:05:08.224
- But as far as the RDC property is concerned. OK, so we'll be covered on this. And will this addendum

00:05:08.224 --> 00:05:13.150
- cover not just the Red Cross, but also other things, or specifically the Red Cross?

00:05:14.050 --> 00:05:20.746
- Yeah, it's just the Red Cross. OK. And then what we previously approved as far as setups and such,

00:05:20.746 --> 00:05:27.780
- it still has to be approved by Public Works before anyone can schedule it. It would need to be approved

00:05:27.780 --> 00:05:34.611
- by Public Works if it was going to be in a non-RVC property. And so they will take it to their board

00:05:34.611 --> 00:05:41.374
- in a week or so, I believe, and hopefully approve it through there so it'll be done with everybody.

00:05:42.050 --> 00:05:49.299
- For instance, they couldn't do one on the city side right now, but they could do one in Showers West

00:05:49.299 --> 00:05:56.405
- right now, if you adopt this. Thank you. That's lovely. OK. Well, thank you for that legal report.

00:05:56.405 --> 00:06:03.367
- Anything else from commissioners about this attachment before we move to our next on the agenda?

00:06:03.367 --> 00:06:11.262
- Do we have to approve or adopt? We do need to. Oh, we do need to. OK. I wasn't sure since it was. Yeah. Yeah.

00:06:11.682 --> 00:06:19.134
- exchange, replace the attachment one from resolution 25-100 to the MOU you have in front of you tonight. Okay.

00:06:19.134 --> 00:06:25.580
- I'm going to suggest, if you don't mind, that we just wait for the rest of our reports for now,

00:06:25.580 --> 00:06:32.159
- and then we'll go back to maybe, can we, even just at the end of the reports, under old business,

00:06:32.159 --> 00:06:38.873
- just to kind of keep it top of mind. Okay. So thank you. We'll just kind of pause that for a moment

00:06:38.873 --> 00:06:40.350
- and get back to that.

00:06:40.610 --> 00:06:47.547
- Do we have a treasurer's report tonight? No. No treasurer's report. OK. Business development update?

00:06:47.547 --> 00:06:54.553
- Not this evening. Thanks. OK. Well, our list went through really quick. And we are back to resolution

00:06:54.553 --> 00:07:01.558
- 25-100 with the newly revised attachment. We've had our questions and comments. I will open it up for

00:07:01.558 --> 00:07:09.182
- public comment. Anything online or in person? Seeing none, I will invite a motion for this. Move for approval.

00:07:09.570 --> 00:07:17.398
- First and a second, we'll do a roll call vote, please. C.S. Kimbler, yes. Randy Cassidy, yes. John West, yes.

00:07:17.398 --> 00:07:25.155
- Laurie McRobbie, yes. Deborah Minersing, yes. Passes unanimously. And that is the goal report for resolution

00:07:25.155 --> 00:07:32.271
- as added to resolution 25-100 for the attachment from the Red Cross MOU. OK. Well, we will now move

00:07:32.271 --> 00:07:37.822
- on to new business. And that starts with resolution 25-106, which is approval

00:07:37.922 --> 00:07:45.576
- funding for a change order one for Hopewell West. Senator Eaton. Good evening, Roy Eaton with the City

00:07:45.576 --> 00:07:53.305
- Engineering Department. This is part of our Hopewell West project that was awarded to Crider and Crider

00:07:53.305 --> 00:08:00.959
- in the amount of $1,687,318.85. This is change order number one that has come before us. It's a result

00:08:00.959 --> 00:08:07.870
- of the project had a soil management plan that's being managed by a vet that wasn't realized

00:08:08.034 --> 00:08:14.156
- prior to bidding. So after bidding, there was some additional charges. This is a scope change order

00:08:14.156 --> 00:08:20.401
- that we've gone through where it's additional stockpiling until it's tested by vet and then the soils

00:08:20.401 --> 00:08:26.585
- move to another location and it's managing those stockpiles and keeping all the soil on the project.

00:08:26.585 --> 00:08:32.891
- So those are the items that weren't aware of prior to bidding, but we're aware of now. So we're asking

00:08:32.891 --> 00:08:35.646
- that through change order number one to have

00:08:36.002 --> 00:08:46.211
- those items added to the project. The change order is in the amount of $153,000 for 153,444,070.

00:08:46.211 --> 00:08:56.947
- And then an additional 14 days are being added to the project. So our final completion date now would

00:08:56.947 --> 00:08:59.262
- be November 15, 2025.

00:09:03.170 --> 00:09:17.988
- Any questions or comments from commissioners on resolution 25-106? Yeah, I've got one. With all that said,

00:09:17.988 --> 00:09:31.422
- isn't resolve number two incorrect? That not to exceed number is the old total, not the new one.

00:09:37.890 --> 00:10:06.878
- Yeah, so the original amount is for the bid was $1,687,318.85. This would be an add of $153,444.70. The final

00:10:07.586 --> 00:10:17.956
- The contract amount will be $1,840,763.55. So you're correct. That will need to be revised. Thank you

00:10:17.956 --> 00:10:28.936
- for that catch. Any other questions or comments from commissioners on this? So based on the soil management

00:10:28.936 --> 00:10:35.646
- plan, we didn't know we had nasty soil, essentially. Whoa. We do.

00:10:35.874 --> 00:10:43.176
- from the environmental review that we were doing. They were charging forward on Jackson Street and ended

00:10:43.176 --> 00:10:50.200
- up taking it out for bid without talking to us to say what's going on there. So there was definitely

00:10:50.200 --> 00:10:57.572
- a disconnect that we've now realized. The city was aware of it. That's why it's a change in scope instead

00:10:57.572 --> 00:11:02.718
- of an unforeseen site condition. What did it affect to the original bids?

00:11:02.818 --> 00:11:08.867
- This amount would have been incorporated in the original bid. So the original bid would have come in.

00:11:08.867 --> 00:11:15.212
- This is just work that needs to be done. And on that, we were given numbers by Crider and Crider for this.

00:11:15.212 --> 00:11:21.261
- They came in exactly what the estimate would have been for it. So there was good numbers. And when we

00:11:21.261 --> 00:11:27.665
- deal with this remediated soil, it's going to stay on site and be capped? At this point, we've incorporated

00:11:27.665 --> 00:11:32.350
- into the plan to keep this on site. It'll be tested. We're testing everything.

00:11:32.738 --> 00:11:39.219
- out there so we're anticipating that none of the tests will come back yet but the test results will

00:11:39.219 --> 00:11:45.765
- be considered safe and it's just better to leave it on site from a environmental impact page so yeah

00:11:45.765 --> 00:11:52.894
- we're going to just there's plenty of room on this job site to have Phil placed in it so that won't affect us

00:11:53.186 --> 00:11:58.469
- Is it in a negative context with any additional residences? We're not keeping contaminated soil.

00:11:58.469 --> 00:12:03.915
- If it comes back clean through the testing process, then it will be reused. Otherwise, it will have

00:12:03.915 --> 00:12:09.361
- to be taken off site, which will come back for a different, for an additional. Well, you've already

00:12:09.361 --> 00:12:14.970
- proved that through vets. Well, we will have additional if we have to, depending upon how much we have

00:12:14.970 --> 00:12:20.307
- to dump. But that's through the vet contract. OK, so the vet contract is for the site as a whole,

00:12:20.307 --> 00:12:21.342
- not just our site.

00:12:21.474 --> 00:12:30.625
- For the west side, yes, the west entirety of the west side of Hopewell, not just the isolated area where

00:12:30.625 --> 00:12:40.125
- we identified a previous gas station. Due to our environmental review, we are required because we aggregated

00:12:40.125 --> 00:12:43.262
- it under, I can't cite the CFR, but

00:12:44.258 --> 00:12:54.444
- we are required to now have the soil management plan for the entire aggregated site of blocks four through

00:12:54.444 --> 00:13:04.630
- seven. Okay, thank you. Thank you. Any other questions or comments from commissioners on resolution 25106?

00:13:04.630 --> 00:13:11.198
- If not, I'll open it for public comment, either online or in person.

00:13:11.970 --> 00:13:20.486
- Seeing none, I will invite a motion for this resolution, please. Move approval of Resolution 25106. Second.

00:13:20.486 --> 00:13:29.238
- Second. Got a first and two seconds. Do we have a roll call vote, please? Sue Scandallari, yes. Randy Cassidy,

00:13:29.238 --> 00:13:37.438
- yes. John West, yes. Laurie McCrobby, yes. Deborah Meyerson, yes. Resolution 25-106 passes unanimously.

00:13:38.882 --> 00:13:44.911
- Next item on our agenda is approval is 25-107, approval of funding for addendum number two

00:13:44.911 --> 00:13:52.001
- to the professional service contract for the beeline trail and multi-use path. This is awesome, Mr. Aiden.

00:13:52.001 --> 00:13:58.693
- This is me, Roy Aiden with City Engineering. This is our beeline multi-use path project. This is the

00:13:58.693 --> 00:14:05.385
- section of path that's between Adams and Fountain Drive that has yet to be constructed. We had hired

00:14:05.385 --> 00:14:08.830
- Caramida to do an environmental and test the soils.

00:14:08.962 --> 00:14:16.252
- There were some soils out there that had lead impacted soils. They were very low levels. We went ahead

00:14:16.252 --> 00:14:23.470
- and we have already approved to the RDC the resolution to have them do the actual contracting work of

00:14:23.470 --> 00:14:30.972
- picking it up. What we did not have though was, because we did not know the quantities of soil until now,

00:14:30.972 --> 00:14:37.342
- there's a disposal fee that is from waste management to take the soil up at twin bridges.

00:14:37.634 --> 00:14:46.350
- They have invoiced us now. We've added that to our agreement with Caramida. So this addendum number

00:14:46.350 --> 00:14:55.676
- two to their resolution is in the amount of $11,666 and is the disposal fees from Twin Bridges. Thank you.

00:14:55.676 --> 00:15:01.342
- Any questions or comments of commissioners on resolution 25-107?

00:15:04.578 --> 00:15:13.444
- There are none. I will open it for public comment, either online or in person. Seeing none, I will invite

00:15:13.444 --> 00:15:21.976
- a motion for Resolution 25-107. Move approval of Resolution 25-107. Second. Got a first and a second.

00:15:21.976 --> 00:15:31.260
- We'll do a vote by roll call, please. Sue Scambaleri, yes. Randy Cassidy, yes. John West, yes. Laura McRobbie,

00:15:31.260 --> 00:15:31.678
- yes.

00:15:32.322 --> 00:15:39.762
- Deborah Meyer saying yes. Resolution 25107 passes unanimously. Next item on our agenda is resolution 25-108,

00:15:39.762 --> 00:15:46.791
- which is approval of a lease for the 4th Street Garage commercial office space with Visit Bloomington.

00:15:46.791 --> 00:15:53.958
- Who would like to speak to that? I'll be happy to speak to that. Jane Coopersmith, Economic Development,

00:15:53.958 --> 00:16:00.783
- and then Mr. Kerr, I'm sure, can provide additional context if needed. We approved this lease under

00:16:00.783 --> 00:16:01.534
- a previous

00:16:03.362 --> 00:16:12.370
- resolution and visit Bloomington the process that was 2559 the visit Bloomington team director Mike

00:16:12.370 --> 00:16:22.008
- McAfee took that back to the board his board and they really and they also investigated in a more detailed

00:16:22.008 --> 00:16:31.646
- way the costs of building the site out and so they came back with a request to reduce the annual rent rate

00:16:34.402 --> 00:16:42.862
- know, a fair amount. And so after communicating with Director Killian Hanson and doing some additional

00:16:42.862 --> 00:16:51.240
- market research, we determined that this is on par with market rents. And the staff feels really good

00:16:51.240 --> 00:17:00.029
- about recommending approval of the requested rent rates. John West, you had asked about the renewal terms.

00:17:00.029 --> 00:17:04.382
- And this does include four additional renewal terms.

00:17:04.546 --> 00:17:11.185
- allows for addendums to be approved at the time of renewal. So those rates would be negotiated at that time.

00:17:11.185 --> 00:17:17.338
- And I think Visit Bloomington was really interested in having those additional renewal terms because

00:17:17.338 --> 00:17:23.429
- they're making significant investment in the site and in the property, and they're really committed

00:17:23.429 --> 00:17:29.764
- based on the presence of the convention center. So again, from a staff perspective, we feel really good

00:17:29.764 --> 00:17:33.662
- about making a recommendation for approval for this resolution.

00:17:34.082 --> 00:17:42.074
- And I'm happy to take additional questions and say Mr. McAfee was really disappointed not to be able

00:17:42.074 --> 00:17:50.540
- to be here to take questions as well, that he had significant conflict. OK. Thank you very much. Questions

00:17:50.540 --> 00:17:58.531
- or comments from commissioners on resolution 25-108? I'll just make a comment. I had the opportunity

00:17:58.531 --> 00:18:03.358
- to look at this document and also consult on the rental rate

00:18:04.098 --> 00:18:10.668
- I find it to be in the city's best interest to go ahead and move forward with this lease. Thank you.

00:18:10.668 --> 00:18:16.717
- Any other questions or comments from commissioners? If not, I'll open it for public comment.

00:18:16.717 --> 00:18:23.287
- Either online or in person, seeing none, I will invite a motion for a resolution 25-108. I'll make a

00:18:23.287 --> 00:18:30.052
- motion to approve 25-108. I'll second it. We've got a first and a second. We'll do a vote by roll call,

00:18:30.052 --> 00:18:33.630
- please. C.S. Campbell, Larry, yes. Randy Cassidy, yes.

00:18:33.922 --> 00:18:40.730
- John West, yes. Laura McRobbie, yes. Deborah Meyerson, yes. Resolution 25108 passes unanimously.

00:18:40.730 --> 00:18:47.888
- Next item on our agenda is resolution 25109, which is approval of a second amendment to the CARES Act

00:18:47.888 --> 00:18:55.679
- Community Development Block Grant Award to the Bloomington Housing Authority. Who would like to speak to that?

00:18:55.679 --> 00:19:00.030
- Cody Toothman from our department who will be speaking to it.

00:19:05.538 --> 00:19:11.756
- if everybody can hear me. Yeah, this amendment would actually grant an extension of time for actually

00:19:11.756 --> 00:19:17.852
- all the recipients that are on the board for tonight. The original contract it stated that they had

00:19:17.852 --> 00:19:24.191
- until May of 2023 to expend all funds, but the paragraph right underneath it would also have given them

00:19:24.191 --> 00:19:26.142
- six years to completely expend.

00:19:26.658 --> 00:19:33.426
- the HUD deadline for these funds before they are reverted back or unable to be used is actually September

00:19:33.426 --> 00:19:39.875
- of 2026. So we're seeking to expand that time to actually line up with HUD's cutoff date for the use

00:19:39.875 --> 00:19:46.388
- of those funds. Thanks. And so I'm actually going to introduce this just real quick as we discuss it,

00:19:46.388 --> 00:19:52.965
- and especially if staff have feedback on it, if it would be apt to group the extension because they're

00:19:52.965 --> 00:19:55.774
- pretty much the same for all organizations.

00:19:56.002 --> 00:20:02.886
- So this would be for resolution 25-109, which is currently on the table, all the way through 25-112.

00:20:02.886 --> 00:20:09.906
- So that's four amendments or four resolutions that are being comparably amended. So I'm just proposing

00:20:09.906 --> 00:20:16.926
- that we would approve those as a group. And if there's any, again, if staff have any, either endorsing

00:20:16.926 --> 00:20:22.174
- that idea or reasons not to do that in addition to what commissioners might.

00:20:22.594 --> 00:20:31.020
- I would recommend going ahead and doing them together. We do a lot of our CDBG contracts the same way,

00:20:31.020 --> 00:20:38.628
- grouping those social services or physical improvement projects, and these all are the same.

00:20:38.628 --> 00:20:46.154
- So with that report and that proposal being recommended by staff, any questions or comments

00:20:46.154 --> 00:20:52.126
- from commissioners on any of these four resolutions on CDBG funds or the

00:20:52.226 --> 00:21:03.974
- extension of the deadline. Not seeing any. I'll open it for public comment either in person or online.

00:21:03.974 --> 00:21:16.406
- Not seeing any. I will invite a motion for the resolutions 109 through 112. I'll move approval of resolution

00:21:16.406 --> 00:21:19.486
- 25109 through 112. Second.

00:21:20.034 --> 00:21:30.091
- We've got a first and a second. We'll do a roll call vote, please. C. Scambaleri, yes. Brady step down. Oh,

00:21:30.091 --> 00:21:39.496
- John West, yes. I was just listening. Lauren McRobbie, yes. Deborah Meyer, saying yes. Motion passes

00:21:39.496 --> 00:21:46.014
- unanimously with one abstention, shall we say? Okay, well, thank you.

00:21:46.306 --> 00:21:53.925
- Next item on our agenda is resolution 25-113, which is approval of an agreement with the Weddle Brothers

00:21:53.925 --> 00:22:01.544
- Construction Company for temporary storage at the convention center parking lot. Who would like to speak

00:22:01.544 --> 00:22:08.800
- to that? I'll speak to that one. You have the resolution before you. There is a part of the parking

00:22:08.800 --> 00:22:15.838
- lot at the convention center where the city of Bloomington owes two parts of two parcels and the

00:22:16.098 --> 00:22:26.248
- RDC owns the other part. It's actually owned by the Bloomington Municipal Facilities Corp. But there

00:22:26.248 --> 00:22:36.297
- is a deed where they have transferred it over to the RDC that we've come across and we are going to

00:22:36.297 --> 00:22:44.638
- be recording that, but the deed has been signed. So the RDC does own the property.

00:22:44.802 --> 00:22:53.165
- and part of the property. There is an attachment that has a map that shows the, at the top of the map

00:22:53.165 --> 00:23:01.529
- would be the hotel that's adjacent to the convention center on the south side. Then there's a parking

00:23:01.529 --> 00:23:09.810
- lot owned by others. And then the blue hatch area on the right is the location where Weddle Brothers

00:23:09.810 --> 00:23:14.238
- would like to store materials during the construction

00:23:14.530 --> 00:23:24.075
- of the convention center expansion. So they have asked for a right of entry to do that. And we have

00:23:24.075 --> 00:23:33.334
- a right of entry agreement and a resolution accepting that agreement. So the blue hatch is ours.

00:23:33.334 --> 00:23:42.974
- The blue hatch is the northern part of it is RDC. The southern part of it is the city of Wilmington.

00:23:43.170 --> 00:23:54.557
- longer strips the city of Bloomington does. Then it goes into the county? Yes. How's that going to affect

00:23:54.557 --> 00:24:05.621
- parking? You mean current parking for the convention center? Yeah, current parking. I was going to ask

00:24:05.621 --> 00:24:11.422
- that same question. That's my concern as far as we're

00:24:13.634 --> 00:24:25.862
- I didn't negotiate that. Do you guys want to jump in? That's a lot of parking that you're taking off of.

00:24:25.862 --> 00:24:37.158
- They're taking all three of those. You got too many lines here. Anyway, both of those blue hash.

00:24:37.158 --> 00:24:41.118
- They're taking both of them? Yes.

00:24:41.346 --> 00:24:50.547
- the blue hatch here. That's dozens of parking spaces. Was the Convention Center consulted? Yeah.

00:24:50.547 --> 00:25:00.982
- I wasn't even consulted about this. I don't know anything about this. OK. Sounds like we have some additional

00:25:00.982 --> 00:25:10.942
- questions before. Yeah, who negotiated this to begin with? This was brought to our attention by the CIV.

00:25:11.554 --> 00:25:19.212
- with whether we need to store the materials. Just to move things forward, I'm assuming they don't need

00:25:19.212 --> 00:25:26.647
- this within the next week or so. Well, it'll be a couple weeks. Yeah, no, a couple weeks because of

00:25:26.647 --> 00:25:34.453
- our next meeting. It's going to come back to us and I would have a hard time approving it without making

00:25:34.453 --> 00:25:39.806
- sure the Convention Center knew about it and I don't want to, you know,

00:25:39.970 --> 00:25:46.256
- put them out of business while we're, mm-hmm. Hey Jane, were you present for any of these conversations

00:25:46.256 --> 00:25:52.240
- about this? No, I mean I was at the last CIB, but I didn't, this wasn't discussed at that meeting.

00:25:52.240 --> 00:25:58.949
- What's the procedure for table until we have the ability to have some additional conversations? We just do it.

00:25:58.949 --> 00:26:05.175
- Just do it. Yeah. I'll make a motion to table until such time as our economic development director can

00:26:05.175 --> 00:26:09.950
- have conversations with the convention center and see how that's gonna impact.

00:26:10.114 --> 00:26:20.057
- Or whoever. Or whoever, yeah. Yeah. Toysha Coppock was on that email list, so she's aware of it.

00:26:20.057 --> 00:26:30.819
- And John Weichardt and Jim Weillach, along with the controller and Margie and I, and the Weigel Brothers

00:26:30.819 --> 00:26:38.814
- project manager were all on the request to draft that. But we don't know yet.

00:26:38.914 --> 00:26:48.261
- Somewhere in the world, there's emails and socks. Margie Rice, Corporation Counsel, is online and has

00:26:48.261 --> 00:26:57.426
- her hand up if anybody would like to consult with her. Margie, you're up. Hey, everybody. I do want

00:26:57.426 --> 00:27:06.956
- to make sure, Dana, I did hear Dana just say that the Convention Center is aware of this. They're super

00:27:06.956 --> 00:27:08.606
- excited about the

00:27:09.026 --> 00:27:15.593
- convention center construction. They've been communicating on a regular basis with the CIB and their

00:27:15.593 --> 00:27:22.420
- representatives, and they brought this to our attention to bring to you guys through your consideration.

00:27:22.420 --> 00:27:29.247
- And so that's what we're doing tonight, agreeing to your consideration. There's been no concerns at all.

00:27:29.247 --> 00:27:36.075
- Talisha was on the original email when Little Brother said, hey, we're gonna need some area for staging.

00:27:36.075 --> 00:27:37.310
- And so they asked,

00:27:37.602 --> 00:27:44.772
- you know, what area was available. And so Dana put this together for your guys' consideration. But for sure,

00:27:44.772 --> 00:27:51.415
- the Convention Center is aware of this request. And I think they're on board because they want to do

00:27:51.415 --> 00:27:58.256
- whatever they can to facilitate the construction of the Convention Center. My only concern, Margie, is,

00:27:58.256 --> 00:28:04.965
- well, it's an email trend. There's been conversation that says it's not how it's going to affect them

00:28:04.965 --> 00:28:07.070
- from an operational standpoint.

00:28:10.018 --> 00:28:17.610
- I'm sorry, you're concerned because you think it's going to? No, I don't. I don't know. We as a community

00:28:17.610 --> 00:28:24.414
- as a whole have confirmation from the Convention Center operator, which... It's Talisha. Yeah,

00:28:24.414 --> 00:28:31.649
- Talisha Coppock, that this is a good place for a lay down area and it won't negatively impact any of

00:28:31.649 --> 00:28:38.238
- the operations that they're currently doing during the next year when we have construction.

00:28:38.754 --> 00:28:46.542
- So Talisha is the one who initiated the request and said that the project manager for Weddle Brothers

00:28:46.542 --> 00:28:54.636
- needed to apply for a permit for construction staging and that it required an affidavit from the property

00:28:54.636 --> 00:29:02.730
- owner, which is why, since a couple of the parcels are owned by you guys, we wanted to get your approval.

00:29:02.730 --> 00:29:07.006
- I don't think Talisha would have been recommending this

00:29:07.426 --> 00:29:14.006
- she thought it was gonna affect their operations. Okay, she's recommended it, so. She's the one who

00:29:14.006 --> 00:29:20.390
- initiated it. Okay, that's what we're trying to clarify. Yeah, and so, you know, a lot of these,

00:29:20.390 --> 00:29:27.562
- as you can imagine, a lot of things that come to you guys have gone through a lot of different conversations

00:29:27.562 --> 00:29:34.209
- with staff before it lands in a public meeting. And so, this is just an example of that. I think the

00:29:34.209 --> 00:29:36.446
- different boxes have been checked

00:29:37.154 --> 00:29:44.935
- um, before it came to you guys for consideration. Now, if anybody in the room thinks, you know, that that's,

00:29:44.935 --> 00:29:52.572
- you know, there are concerns about this from a city standpoint, like if we care about it, um, let us know.

00:29:52.572 --> 00:29:59.710
- But we, we also are trying, you know, it's a little bit one of those truth bags. We're trying to do

00:29:59.710 --> 00:30:06.206
- what we can to facilitate the construction of the Convention Center and save costs because

00:30:06.818 --> 00:30:13.763
- It's coming out of our pocket, our food and beverage pocket. And so we have an interest in trying to

00:30:13.763 --> 00:30:20.915
- facilitate the construction of it. And we're often accused of dragging our feet or slowing things down.

00:30:20.915 --> 00:30:28.273
- And so we're trying not to do that. So Margie, I don't have a, with what you said, I don't have a problem.

00:30:28.273 --> 00:30:36.318
- I think that this probably would have gone smoother if the resolution had maybe indicated that the convention center

00:30:36.962 --> 00:30:44.446
- operators were involved in this and approved it. Because the way we got it, it was kind of a dead end topic.

00:30:44.446 --> 00:30:51.312
- And as Randy said, it looked to me like we were just taking away parking spaces that the convention

00:30:51.312 --> 00:30:58.178
- center might likely need. So that was the issue. Yeah. I can appreciate that. I'm glad we were able

00:30:58.178 --> 00:31:05.043
- to answer these questions. But I do think that they're not concerned about it. And certainly, Dana,

00:31:05.043 --> 00:31:06.142
- the way this is

00:31:06.658 --> 00:31:15.994
- written, it can be adjusted as needed, isn't that right? The way you've drafted it? Yes, as far as the

00:31:15.994 --> 00:31:25.329
- area that they have, yes, it could be negotiated. Let me pull it back in here. Yeah, it's such a weird

00:31:25.329 --> 00:31:34.847
- site because they are using all of that parcel for construction. They need some place to put their stuff

00:31:34.847 --> 00:31:36.478
- nearby. I get it.

00:31:39.458 --> 00:31:44.901
- I think we're okay. I'm okay with it after you said that Talisha specifically initiated it in regards

00:31:44.901 --> 00:31:50.024
- to the Operating Convention Center. We just want to make sure we didn't come back, as you said,

00:31:50.024 --> 00:31:55.361
- as a community and appear that we were slow-walking anything in regards to the construction of this

00:31:55.361 --> 00:32:00.804
- Convention Center. This is a community project that we're all involved in and the City of Bloomington

00:32:00.804 --> 00:32:06.301
- is financing it through our F&D, so it's important to make it. Yeah, and you guys know, I mean, you've

00:32:06.301 --> 00:32:08.382
- already allowed Wilder Brothers to use

00:32:08.482 --> 00:32:17.829
- an RDC on building for space. We're trying to be as accommodating as we can be, just so that we are

00:32:17.829 --> 00:32:27.269
- not causing extra delay, which is cost. Well, I guess because there is the agreement reads that with

00:32:27.269 --> 00:32:33.438
- 30-day notice, it could be terminated either in whole or in part.

00:32:34.018 --> 00:32:43.241
- When Talisha found out or decided that she just took off too much parking, we could redo the agreement

00:32:43.241 --> 00:32:52.464
- and cut down on the allocation space and try to accommodate her. We can, yep, for sure. The only other

00:32:52.464 --> 00:33:00.702
- thing I have is just to make sure that, and I know Weddle Brothers will do a fantastic job,

00:33:01.090 --> 00:33:08.684
- to make sure that it gets put back in the same condition it was, or better. Yes, it states that Weddle

00:33:08.684 --> 00:33:16.572
- Brothers shall return possession of the property in the same or improved condition as when Weddle Brothers

00:33:16.572 --> 00:33:24.608
- took possession. Any improvements must be approved by city staff. Perfect. Thank you, Dan. I just wanted to,

00:33:24.608 --> 00:33:27.262
- it's just kind of an editing thing,

00:33:27.554 --> 00:33:35.633
- At the top of the resolution, sorry, I'm just trying to get to the space. Sorry, I was just scanning

00:33:35.633 --> 00:33:43.792
- to make sure that my question wasn't answered in the resolution and now I'm getting back to the space

00:33:43.792 --> 00:33:51.870
- where it says that they all agree. Well, that's what I'm trying to recapture where I was looking at.

00:33:51.870 --> 00:33:54.270
- It was a statement that said,

00:33:55.042 --> 00:34:04.882
- the city RDC all agree on this. Sorry I just lost it. Let me just quick look do a search because there

00:34:04.882 --> 00:34:15.200
- was an abbreviation of BCM and I was looking to see if that was specifically indicated what that stood for.

00:34:15.200 --> 00:34:22.078
- OK so this is page 205 in the packet. This is I guess from the previous

00:34:23.650 --> 00:34:31.428
- Because it says on the second day of August. Should that say second day of September? Or is this, again,

00:34:31.428 --> 00:34:39.207
- I'm trying to like just, anyway. So my question is specifically in the middle of the page where it says,

00:34:39.207 --> 00:34:47.060
- now therefore in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions of this agreement, the city,

00:34:47.060 --> 00:34:51.134
- RDC, and BCM agree to the following. I just don't see.

00:34:51.426 --> 00:35:02.224
- a specific reference that says what BCM refers to. That's a good catch. Bench or construction management.

00:35:02.224 --> 00:35:12.512
- And that was related to construction at the pool world. Yeah, good catch. And also was the date then

00:35:12.512 --> 00:35:14.142
- incorrect also?

00:35:33.282 --> 00:35:39.510
- Yeah, the top. Right, where it says 2nd of August. It's supposed to be 2nd of September. It's got to

00:35:39.510 --> 00:35:46.047
- be wrong because your resolution. Right. I, again, was trying to make sense of if there was some addendum

00:35:46.047 --> 00:35:52.522
- that was from a previous reference or whatever, but. And I can have that modified here. So this is under

00:35:52.522 --> 00:35:58.874
- the contract cover memorandum is the first page of it and then the summary of the contract is what I'm

00:35:58.874 --> 00:35:59.614
- looking at.

00:36:00.130 --> 00:36:06.173
- And then that's the next page that says agreement for temporary storage at conventions under parking lot.

00:36:06.173 --> 00:36:11.931
- So it's the date that needs to be updated to September instead of August. And then the other parties

00:36:11.931 --> 00:36:17.917
- to the agreement, again, BCM is obviously left over from a different document. So just, is there a third

00:36:17.917 --> 00:36:23.390
- party that should be in there? Is that Weddle Brothers? I guess it'd be Weddle Brothers. Right.

00:36:44.258 --> 00:36:50.719
- I'm just quick scanning the rest of the summary to see if it's all consistent as far as I can tell.

00:36:50.719 --> 00:36:57.375
- But it looks like Weddle Brothers is a consistent reference. And then again, I was just looking at the

00:36:57.375 --> 00:37:03.836
- signatures, which is again, Weddle Brothers should be Bloomington and the REC. So it seems like the

00:37:03.836 --> 00:37:10.879
- rest of it is as needed was just those two edits. Okay. Any further comments or questions for commissioners?

00:37:10.879 --> 00:37:14.110
- Otherwise I'll open it for public comment either.

00:37:14.274 --> 00:37:22.802
- Online or in person. Seeing none, I will invite a motion for Resolution 25-113 as amended. I'll make

00:37:22.802 --> 00:37:32.089
- a motion to approve 25-113 as amended with the date and the Weddle Brothers being added. I'll second. Second.

00:37:32.089 --> 00:37:41.208
- OK, first and second. Can we do a roll call vote, please? C. Scambleri, yes. Randy Cassidy, yes. John West,

00:37:41.208 --> 00:37:41.630
- yes.

00:37:42.594 --> 00:37:50.036
- Lori McRobie, yes. Deborah Meyers, yes. Motion passes unanimously for resolution 25-113. Thank you.

00:37:50.036 --> 00:37:58.147
- Next item on the agenda is resolution 25-114, which is approval of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith,

00:37:58.147 --> 00:38:05.440
- Incorporated, Care of Bank of America, National Association, key provisions of lease termination.

00:38:05.440 --> 00:38:12.286
- Who would like to speak to that? OK. I can, or I'm not sure if Margie was planning on that.

00:38:12.386 --> 00:38:22.166
- So I can move forward with that one. I'm happy to chime in whenever. Dana, why don't you do that since

00:38:22.166 --> 00:38:32.230
- you have the resolution right in front of you. You do the start and I'll answer any questions. All right,

00:38:32.230 --> 00:38:41.630
- will do. OK, so we negotiated with Merrill Lynch their termination of their lease at Showers West.

00:38:42.178 --> 00:38:51.804
- What they requested was to be able to stay until March 31st, and they'd like to not have to remove their

00:38:51.804 --> 00:39:01.155
- equipment and furniture. They want to just walk away. And in return for that, the city would not need

00:39:01.155 --> 00:39:11.422
- to reimburse them for any moving expenses or anything under the lease agreement. So this is, we considered it a

00:39:11.618 --> 00:39:21.935
- win-win, because the RDC is not paying anything. And they will be out. And we still got some tenants

00:39:21.935 --> 00:39:32.353
- that we're working with. And so we feel that this is a good way to go. And if others wanted to do the

00:39:32.353 --> 00:39:41.342
- same thing, stay till March 31st. And the RDC not have to pay any moving expenses, then

00:39:42.018 --> 00:39:49.570
- they could set forward and do that as well. Who paid for the original furniture and equipment? Sorry,

00:39:49.570 --> 00:39:57.270
- they did. I was about to invite questions. Yeah, they did. They had done a build out, plus they provide

00:39:57.270 --> 00:40:04.748
- the furniture and equipment. My understanding from the discussions is that they're actually going to

00:40:04.748 --> 00:40:11.486
- be downsizing the office some. There was only three people that worked there, and this was

00:40:11.746 --> 00:40:19.050
- a larger space and they're probably going to do something smaller and may just update their equipment.

00:40:19.050 --> 00:40:26.213
- And again, they just want to walk away from it. What is meant by equipment exactly? Here's where I'm

00:40:26.213 --> 00:40:33.446
- headed with this. If any of this is computer related and requires us to wipe hard drives or follow up

00:40:33.446 --> 00:40:40.254
- with dispositional confidential material or anything like that, I'm just trying to get at that.

00:40:41.090 --> 00:40:50.949
- Yes, no, they would be liable if they transferred data that was personal or identifying information to us.

00:40:50.949 --> 00:41:01.176
- That would be opposed to their contracts with their clients. It would be opposed with their business practice.

00:41:01.176 --> 00:41:10.206
- It could really set them up for liability. So I wouldn't anticipate anything like that happening.

00:41:13.762 --> 00:41:24.783
- So they're going to pay rent through March. Yes, well, that's my understanding. Yeah, and I can jump in here.

00:41:24.783 --> 00:41:35.404
- I have been working. Merrill Lynch reached out to CBRE, which is a company that works in multiple states.

00:41:35.404 --> 00:41:42.718
- I've been working with one of their transactions personnel at Cleveland.

00:41:43.362 --> 00:41:51.128
- He's been interacting with Merrill Lynch in New York. And so the local team, I had originally reached

00:41:51.128 --> 00:41:58.132
- out to the local team, Eric Seuer, and met with him, and then was quickly directed to these

00:41:58.132 --> 00:42:06.051
- other professionals to work with. And I think this is a great deal for the city of Wilmington. Frankly,

00:42:06.051 --> 00:42:10.238
- it's probably the nicest office space in Showers West.

00:42:10.786 --> 00:42:18.111
- They had not long ago updated that office. And so the fact that they want to leave their furniture,

00:42:18.111 --> 00:42:25.509
- and then I don't know exactly if they're going to take any of the furniture with them, but what they

00:42:25.509 --> 00:42:32.907
- don't want, the leave and their fixtures, will not be a problem for us. It's to the city's advantage

00:42:32.907 --> 00:42:40.158
- to walk away. And they've been very professional. They understand the terms of the lease, I think,

00:42:40.770 --> 00:42:49.259
- kind of a more global perspective, and they have been very good to work with, and I would highly recommend

00:42:49.259 --> 00:42:57.352
- that we take this offer. So Margie, I've only got really one question, and it's a bit of a delay from

00:42:57.352 --> 00:43:05.842
- what you were trying to achieve. How does bond counsel feel about that? You know, it's not ideal. Ideally,

00:43:05.842 --> 00:43:08.222
- I wanted them out in October,

00:43:08.386 --> 00:43:15.917
- um, REC granted until December, but if we are able to, um, just get the keys back and not have to pay

00:43:15.917 --> 00:43:23.595
- a settlement, I think that is worth the extra delay. There may be, if we have to end up litigating, um,

00:43:23.595 --> 00:43:31.199
- you know, if we had to litigate, it could take longer. Um, so I think that- I don't, I'm not, I'm not,

00:43:31.199 --> 00:43:37.918
- you don't have to justify the arrangement. I like the arrangement. I just didn't want, uh,

00:43:39.042 --> 00:43:47.015
- I didn't want a bonding issue January 1 because we didn't move everybody out. That's where I was heading.

00:43:47.015 --> 00:43:54.461
- One of the conversations I've had with Bond Council also is just sort of the ratio of the quicker.

00:43:54.461 --> 00:44:02.058
- We've got somebody who's going to be able to potentially move out in October. This will hopefully be

00:44:02.058 --> 00:44:04.766
- the longest tenant that holds over.

00:44:05.090 --> 00:44:13.450
- but we will we are slowly but surely reducing the percentage of space that is privately used and increasing

00:44:13.450 --> 00:44:21.268
- the amount of public space and so I I'm not that I'm not concerned that we're going to get a finding

00:44:21.268 --> 00:44:29.086
- in in January as we are actively and we can prove that we're actively working on getting the tenants

00:44:29.086 --> 00:44:34.814
- out and reducing the private use. Thank you. Quick question in regards to

00:44:34.914 --> 00:44:41.080
- The only potential possibility we would have from a financial situation is if they leave and then we

00:44:41.080 --> 00:44:47.429
- have to move something out in order to make room. Because they're going to walk away. I've been in that

00:44:47.429 --> 00:44:53.594
- space when I went over for the first time to look at it. I don't think there's anything that's going

00:44:53.594 --> 00:45:00.187
- to cause our facilities team a big problem. No, I just want to make sure. Hopefully you can reuse it as is.

00:45:00.187 --> 00:45:04.766
- It's a great space. It's a nice space. I was going to ask if there was any

00:45:05.122 --> 00:45:10.145
- inventory that had been, you know, even preliminary just again kind of following up a little bit with

00:45:10.145 --> 00:45:15.119
- Sue's question about what does equipment mean and then partly with Randy's question about, you know,

00:45:15.119 --> 00:45:20.191
- that any cost that might be incurred would be the cost of moving which again because we don't know yet

00:45:20.191 --> 00:45:25.164
- how the space is going to be used if all of what they leave is going to be useful or not. I just was

00:45:25.164 --> 00:45:26.494
- wondering if there was any

00:45:27.426 --> 00:45:32.945
- to have an inventory of exactly what they have and ideally even what's likely to be left behind that

00:45:32.945 --> 00:45:38.519
- would make it easier to say oh this is a good deal because I have no idea what they're leaving behind

00:45:38.519 --> 00:45:44.148
- and I realize there's uncertainty in terms of how the space will be used and if what's left behind can

00:45:44.148 --> 00:45:49.667
- be used so there's not every question can be answered but a little bit more in terms of an inventory

00:45:49.667 --> 00:45:55.678
- would make it a little more practical to be able to gauge whether the trade-off is worthwhile to me at least.

00:45:56.514 --> 00:46:04.536
- I can tell you they have a receptionist desk that is fixed. That's a fixture. They have individual offices.

00:46:04.536 --> 00:46:12.484
- They do have a server room. They will be taking their equipment, their computer equipment, all information

00:46:12.484 --> 00:46:20.135
- that's confidential. Obviously, they're going to take that information and any of the equipment that's

00:46:20.135 --> 00:46:25.854
- got that information on it. There is nothing. Again, I've been in the space.

00:46:26.786 --> 00:46:34.900
- I consider this, you know, they spent six figures outfitting this space. It's a very nice space.

00:46:34.900 --> 00:46:43.600
- And the fact that they are willing to and that we were able to negotiate their departure without having

00:46:43.600 --> 00:46:52.468
- paid them any damages is worth it. And I don't think that there's any, you know, anything in there that's

00:46:52.468 --> 00:46:56.734
- a deal breaker that's going to cause this problem.

00:46:56.962 --> 00:47:03.977
- It may be space that is, again, I don't know what the long-term plans are other than using it for public use.

00:47:03.977 --> 00:47:10.609
- There are no details. There's not been a master plan done for that space yet. But it's definitely space

00:47:10.609 --> 00:47:17.241
- that you could move into right now and use. I would just chime in and say that I've been in this space.

00:47:17.241 --> 00:47:23.682
- And I would feel that anything that's in that space that it's been left behind would be an asset and

00:47:23.682 --> 00:47:24.766
- not a liability.

00:47:25.826 --> 00:47:32.731
- it's got marketability. Okay well even just because I don't know that they may take some stuff so yeah

00:47:32.731 --> 00:47:39.502
- you know like just trying to kind of gauge but it's helpful certainly to hear the people who've seen

00:47:39.502 --> 00:47:46.406
- it engaged you know even if we don't know exactly what they're taking what they're leaving just trying

00:47:46.406 --> 00:47:51.166
- to kind of. It would be wonderful for the city if we could utilize it.

00:47:53.602 --> 00:48:02.586
- Quick question in regards to, is Merrill Lynch's downsizes, are they going to be staying and keeping

00:48:02.586 --> 00:48:11.482
- an office in Bloomington, Indiana? Yes, yes, for sure. In fact, their agent from CBRD has asked for

00:48:11.482 --> 00:48:20.555
- my recommendations on agents or places they might go. And they're definitely wanting to stay in town.

00:48:20.555 --> 00:48:22.334
- And so I intend to.

00:48:22.434 --> 00:48:28.176
- talked to him, I told him I would follow up with him after this meeting. But yeah, they definitely want

00:48:28.176 --> 00:48:33.917
- to stay. It's just they have a fairly small office. Mayor Lynch, again, is a company that's got offices

00:48:33.917 --> 00:48:39.714
- all over the United States. And they don't need as much office space as they were using in Showers West.

00:48:39.714 --> 00:48:45.566
- And so they're just looking to find the right smaller space here in Bloomington. Wonderful. As it becomes

00:48:45.566 --> 00:48:50.590
- a requirement that we have to move them out for our bond, I just want to make sure that we

00:48:50.946 --> 00:49:02.131
- capture that company still in our community as a whole. They've already downsized the number. As I went

00:49:02.131 --> 00:49:12.670
- in there, there was eight or nine rosers. It was a fairly big operation and now it's what, three?

00:49:13.154 --> 00:49:19.956
- So that's really good. Yeah, I think, yeah, it's a smaller. Two on a staff person. I mean, it's really

00:49:19.956 --> 00:49:27.088
- shut down. Yeah, well, COVID changed everything. Yeah. So with that. Well, technology does too. Yeah. Well,

00:49:27.088 --> 00:49:34.220
- thank you for those questions and responses. I will open it for public comment, either online or in person.

00:49:34.220 --> 00:49:41.022
- Seeing none, I will invite a motion for resolution 25-114. Move approval of resolution 25-114. Second.

00:49:41.378 --> 00:49:48.909
- We've got a first and a second. We'll do a roll call vote, please. C. Scandler, yes. Randy Cassidy, yes.

00:49:48.909 --> 00:49:56.369
- Next. Lori McRobbie, yes. Oh, John West, yes. Sorry. You're dragging. Deborah Meyerson, yes. Resolution

00:49:56.369 --> 00:50:02.967
- 25-114 passes unanimously. Thank you. Last resolution on our agenda this evening is 25-115,

00:50:02.967 --> 00:50:09.566
- approval of Bloomington Health Foundation incorporated key provisions of lease termination.

00:50:09.666 --> 00:50:18.508
- So going along a theme, who would like to speak to that? Before you do, I need to recuse myself because

00:50:18.508 --> 00:50:27.180
- I'm on the board of directors for the Health Foundation. Thank you. This resolution is similar to the

00:50:27.180 --> 00:50:35.766
- Merrill Lynch, but this is the Bloomington Health Foundation. And the key terms that were negotiated

00:50:35.766 --> 00:50:39.422
- with them was that the RDC would waive the

00:50:40.354 --> 00:50:53.525
- the lease payments for August, September, and up to October 15, that they would leave the property by

00:50:53.525 --> 00:51:07.213
- October 15 of this year. And for their moving expenses, they are asking for the sum of $19,542.50, again,

00:51:07.213 --> 00:51:09.150
- with the other

00:51:09.666 --> 00:51:18.836
- potential is margined with litigation and things like that. The fact that they're going to be out earlier

00:51:18.836 --> 00:51:28.180
- and be able to get moved to a new location, I believe this would be a benefit to the RDC and the community.

00:51:28.180 --> 00:51:33.630
- Thank you. Questions or comments from commissioners on 25-115?

00:51:34.786 --> 00:51:43.341
- They're staying local. We've reviewed the moving costs, find it adequate and within reasonable amounts. Yes,

00:51:43.341 --> 00:51:51.661
- we determined that this was within reason based on what they declared their expenses would be for moving.

00:51:51.661 --> 00:51:59.745
- And if this is approved, how many additional do we have to deal with? Margie, do you remember how many

00:51:59.745 --> 00:52:03.198
- are still there? You know, right now, stop.

00:52:03.298 --> 00:52:10.637
- I have seven in my hand, but that could be, I don't have the sheet correctly. Yeah, I think there's

00:52:10.637 --> 00:52:17.975
- five left after these two. Five left, okay. I believe it is. And we're still in active negotiations

00:52:17.975 --> 00:52:25.534
- with those individuals? Yes. Okay, because Bloomington companies, we want to keep them in Bloomington.

00:52:25.890 --> 00:52:34.651
- Yes, absolutely. And there are multiple factors that go into these kinds of negotiations, and there's

00:52:34.651 --> 00:52:44.185
- not a cookie-cutter approach. This is a nonprofit organization. They do great work here in Bloomington. Again,

00:52:44.185 --> 00:52:52.946
- I have talked to an exec team of their board members. I found them very reasonable to deal with, even

00:52:52.946 --> 00:52:54.750
- though their cost is

00:52:54.946 --> 00:53:00.991
- obviously higher than, and we're not paying Maryland anything, but they're getting out earlier.

00:53:00.991 --> 00:53:07.477
- They do have increased rent cost. They're a very tiny space, and so they're having to move to a little

00:53:07.477 --> 00:53:13.962
- bit larger space. Frankly, they were, again, very good to work with in the negotiations. We value them

00:53:13.962 --> 00:53:20.007
- as a community partner. Don't think that these costs for the increased rent they're gonna have,

00:53:20.007 --> 00:53:22.526
- extra parking costs they're gonna have,

00:53:23.202 --> 00:53:32.149
- We don't think that these are unreasonable costs to pay to keep this good community partner in downtown.

00:53:32.149 --> 00:53:41.097
- They're going to work with Cook, RCFC. And so all in all, I find this to be, again, an RDC in the city's

00:53:41.097 --> 00:53:48.510
- best interest. So I would recommend approval. And again, I just want to reiterate that

00:53:48.610 --> 00:53:58.113
- We are trying very hard to work with the tenants and not against them. It's easier with some than others.

00:53:58.113 --> 00:54:07.347
- But I found that Health Foundation be really sincere and helpful in the negotiation process. Any other

00:54:07.347 --> 00:54:14.878
- questions? The 19-5-42-50, what is the source of that payment from our perspective?

00:54:17.986 --> 00:54:27.077
- Oh, Margie, you're in me. I made it myself, yeah. So there are some forgiven rent, some costs for parking,

00:54:27.077 --> 00:54:34.978
- costs and increased expenses that they're going to have for rent, some moving of technology,

00:54:34.978 --> 00:54:43.559
- some IT disassembly, relocation costs, and AV equipment, some of those things that have to be moved.

00:54:43.559 --> 00:54:45.598
- So essentially, moving.

00:54:45.954 --> 00:54:53.861
- packing supplies, relocation of equipment, and then the costs that they're going to, like actual costs

00:54:53.861 --> 00:55:01.691
- that they're going to incur. And then what are we paying that out of? Out of what account? Is Jessica

00:55:01.691 --> 00:55:09.752
- in the room? Yes, can you repeat the question? It's probably the two-sided one. There's the same problem

00:55:09.752 --> 00:55:11.134
- we pay all of the

00:55:11.714 --> 00:55:18.759
- I don't know if it's the, is it, used to be called the. Oh, what we're playing the settlements out of.

00:55:18.759 --> 00:55:25.873
- It's the 2519. I would imagine that's probably the 25. The same phone we collect around. Exactly. Yeah.

00:55:25.873 --> 00:55:32.713
- Got it. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. You're welcome. And again, what they actually would be entitled

00:55:32.713 --> 00:55:39.552
- to is likely different from this number, but given that they're a community partner, they need help

00:55:39.552 --> 00:55:40.510
- in relocating

00:55:40.674 --> 00:55:48.858
- And they are getting out early. We do believe it's an acceptable number. Okay. Okay. I'm going to open

00:55:48.858 --> 00:55:57.201
- it up for public comment, either online or in person. Seeing none, I will invite a motion for resolution

00:55:57.201 --> 00:56:05.068
- 25-115. I'll make a motion to approve 25-115 as presented. Second. We've got a first and a second.

00:56:05.068 --> 00:56:09.438
- We'll do a roll call vote, please. See Scamblary, yes.

00:56:09.698 --> 00:56:18.495
- Randy Cassidy, yes. John Wissemstein. Warren McRobbie, yes. Motion passes unanimously with the abstention.

00:56:18.495 --> 00:56:26.800
- I don't know if that's the right terminology, but that's what we got. Okay, well that's all the item

00:56:26.800 --> 00:56:35.844
- under our new business tonight. And is there anything else that is remains for business or general discussion

00:56:35.844 --> 00:56:37.406
- before we adjourn?

00:56:38.498 --> 00:56:45.381
- I have one thing I want to ask, and I think today we've approved 100 and obviously seven rep solutions.

00:56:45.381 --> 00:56:52.131
- How much have we spent, Jessica, since January 1st? Oh my gosh. Well, give me a minute. You get time.

00:56:52.131 --> 00:56:58.947
- It doesn't have to happen today, but in a couple weeks. I'm just curious. How much have we spent since

00:56:58.947 --> 00:57:05.168
- January 1st? It's a whole lot less than what we committed to. There we go. I'll go with that.

00:57:05.168 --> 00:57:06.558
- Isn't that just a...

00:57:08.322 --> 00:57:13.657
- We've still got a few more months in the calendar year. Well, isn't that just updating the

00:57:13.657 --> 00:57:19.989
- TIF reconciliation, whatever you call it? Yeah, I think that will answer the question. Yeah, yeah, it will,

00:57:19.989 --> 00:57:26.086
- definitely. Let me just... We're probably due to get an update on that. Yes, we're due to get an update

00:57:26.086 --> 00:57:32.242
- on that. I was going to say, I can put my thinking cap on real quick and get to that. It's not something

00:57:32.242 --> 00:57:37.342
- I need immediately. It's just something that I thought... Not very much, to be honest.

00:57:37.474 --> 00:57:44.105
- The feeling. And you're talking about, Randy, out of the TIF account, right? Not out of the operational

00:57:44.105 --> 00:57:50.799
- account. Yeah, operational, just out of TIF. TIF was my primary concern. The other one is an operational

00:57:50.799 --> 00:57:57.621
- account, but we don't have as much flexibility. Can you most certainly give me a report for the next week?

00:57:57.621 --> 00:58:03.742
- Sure. For sure, for sure. I know we'll be coming up with a quarterly report. Consolidating TIF.

00:58:05.154 --> 00:58:11.822
- Just request for future. I just would hate for it to be answered off the cuff. Oh, no. I would prefer

00:58:11.822 --> 00:58:19.078
- to have a little time. That's why I asked, possibly by next meeting. Perhaps we could remove the pressure now.

00:58:19.078 --> 00:58:26.139
- Yeah. We'll recognize that control and follow-up have to be buttoned in. That could be part of the business

00:58:26.139 --> 00:58:29.342
- report. Next month. Next two weeks. Is that 1.1?

00:58:29.506 --> 00:58:36.398
- $1.4 million in August, and so far this year we spent $5.3 million. There's a $2.1 million in January,

00:58:36.398 --> 00:58:43.290
- and I can't remember what that is off the top of my head. Was that the payment for IU Health? Oh yeah,

00:58:43.290 --> 00:58:50.718
- it was the payment. The final payment for IU Health was $2.1 million, and then very low months, like $400,000.

00:58:50.882 --> 00:58:59.829
- 180,000, 74,000, so our months have been running really low. 300,000, 335,000, and then 1.3

00:58:59.829 --> 00:59:10.234
- million last month, which must be a milestone thing. Or we required some documentation. So we have running

00:59:10.234 --> 00:59:20.542
- very low. So we have way less than what we had last year. Our internal rule is that we update that report

00:59:20.642 --> 00:59:26.647
- every quarter, right? So it'd be the beginning of, it'd be October, the first meeting in October. Yes,

00:59:26.647 --> 00:59:32.652
- I think so. So, I mean, I'd like, I don't want you to have to do the report in the middle just because

00:59:32.652 --> 00:59:39.123
- we're on the air. More or least fine. Can we just stick to what we've already agreed to? Yeah, we can do that.

00:59:39.123 --> 00:59:44.487
- Just making sure as we, as we- You're concerned and you just wanted a general update. Well,

00:59:44.487 --> 00:59:50.608
- it's not even a concern, it's just a matter of being able to update the public and ourselves as we know.

00:59:50.608 --> 00:59:55.901
- what our actual spend is and the accomplishments that we have. We have a plan that we're going to do. Well,

00:59:55.901 --> 01:00:00.752
- and I just also want to flag that even just because it's what's spent is not what we committed to.

01:00:00.752 --> 01:00:05.946
- There are two different things and so don't think that just because we've only spent five million dollars

01:00:05.946 --> 01:00:10.896
- or whatever the number is that there aren't more things coming down the pipeline. I'm just trying to

01:00:10.896 --> 01:00:11.582
- look at that.

01:00:11.810 --> 01:00:18.691
- Actual spent dollars versus commit dollars to make sure that we don't get ahead of our skis and cars to it.

01:00:18.691 --> 01:00:24.872
- We are not going to get ahead of our skis. Wonderful. We have a wonderful control over our skis.

01:00:24.872 --> 01:00:31.243
- Nana will not let us get ahead of our skis. I won't. Trust me. I'll send it right back. And I have.

01:00:31.243 --> 01:00:37.742
- Would you trust us, Finn? Yep. Thank you. I appreciate it. You're welcome. No problem. OK. So we will

01:00:37.742 --> 01:00:41.374
- look forward to that next month. In the meantime, I will

01:00:41.826 --> 01:00:46.142
- request a motion to adjourn. So moved. Okay, thank you everybody.
