WEBVTT 00:00:01.954 --> 00:00:14.350 - I will lead us on the pledge. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to 00:00:14.350 --> 00:00:26.868 - the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. 00:00:26.868 --> 00:00:31.486 - Roll call, please. David Drake. Here. 00:00:32.034 --> 00:00:41.717 - Recording in progress. Steve Hale. Zach Michael. Here. Pamela Samples. Ryan Steggs. Here. Pat Leselowski. 00:00:41.717 --> 00:00:50.577 - Here. First item on our agenda is approval of the minutes from the meeting on April 9th of 2026. 00:00:50.577 --> 00:01:00.168 - So moved. Second. We have a motion and a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Hearing none. 00:01:00.168 --> 00:01:01.630 - Motion carries. 00:01:02.786 --> 00:01:11.345 - Does anybody have any conflict of interest? Statement. No old business, new business. Petition for a 00:01:11.345 --> 00:01:19.904 - zoning map amendment to rezone two partials, 2.2, 2.03 acres from commercial two to residential two, 00:01:19.904 --> 00:01:29.310 - medium density residential at 5010 North Lakeview Drive. Petitioner is Guy Kevin Ferris, case number PC 26-50. 00:01:30.786 --> 00:01:39.938 - tonight petitioner Kevin Ferris is requesting to rezone two parcels totaling approximately 2.03 acres 00:01:39.938 --> 00:01:49.269 - from commercial to residential to medium density residential. Subject parcels are located at 5010 North 00:01:49.269 --> 00:01:58.332 - Lakeview Drive. Current uses of the parcels are single family residential and the outdoor storage of 00:01:58.332 --> 00:02:00.126 - our campers, boats, 00:02:00.866 --> 00:02:07.745 - The Monroe County GIS shows parcels have the same address and parcel number, but research from petitioners, 00:02:07.745 --> 00:02:14.114 - engineer, found each showing two separate parcels have never been consolidated into one parcel. The 00:02:14.114 --> 00:02:20.611 - Oldsville Comprehensive Plan designates land to be single-family residential. The Unified Development 00:02:20.611 --> 00:02:27.553 - Ordinance states the intent of residential two zoning is to establish areas for single-family and two-family 00:02:27.553 --> 00:02:28.254 - dwellings. 00:02:28.418 --> 00:02:35.186 - petitioners intent is to construct single family housing on the lots. The parcels have significant great 00:02:35.186 --> 00:02:41.954 - changes and sewer main runs through the middle of the parcels. In our two zoning designation would allow 00:02:41.954 --> 00:02:48.593 - development pattern better suited to the physical characteristics of the property. Our two zoning will 00:02:48.593 --> 00:02:54.974 - allow work around the site constraints because of the setback lot width and lot size requirements. 00:02:55.842 --> 00:03:02.585 - Has a side note, R2 zoning allows same square footage of living area, has residential one zoning. 00:03:02.585 --> 00:03:09.466 - And further, it allows for a smaller neighborhood with a smaller footprint. The reduced development 00:03:09.466 --> 00:03:16.622 - footprint and flexibility associated with R2 zoning will result in more compatible and responsible site 00:03:16.622 --> 00:03:20.062 - design given the property's difficult topography. 00:03:21.954 --> 00:03:28.520 - So the analysis of the required findings one comprehensive plan, the comprehensive plan designates land 00:03:28.520 --> 00:03:35.023 - to be single family residential and both single family and plan neighborhoods. Two current conditions, 00:03:35.023 --> 00:03:41.462 - the change zoning is based on the current conditions of the property and the surrounding character of 00:03:41.462 --> 00:03:47.902 - the land. The parcels are currently zoned commercial too and have been underutilized for a long time. 00:03:48.546 --> 00:03:55.049 - The parcels are narrow, rectangular lots, and commercial two-zoning only allows multifamily dwellings. 00:03:55.049 --> 00:04:01.489 - The surrounding character land is a mixture of land uses that includes single-family residential. The 00:04:01.489 --> 00:04:07.866 - use of the property, the change in zoning, does result in the allowance of the most desirable use of 00:04:07.866 --> 00:04:14.243 - the property. The designation of residential two-zoning aligns with the proposed use of the land, as 00:04:14.243 --> 00:04:16.958 - the use will be single-family residential. 00:04:17.762 --> 00:04:23.815 - Conservation of property values, the use or value of adjacent properties and those throughout the town 00:04:23.815 --> 00:04:29.868 - will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The reason of this property to residential two 00:04:29.868 --> 00:04:35.921 - will have an effect on neighboring properties in an adverse manner, will have no effect on neighboring 00:04:35.921 --> 00:04:41.915 - properties in an adverse manner along North Lakeview Drive. Five, responsible development. The change 00:04:41.915 --> 00:04:46.558 - in zoning does promote the responsible development and growth of the property. 00:04:47.362 --> 00:04:54.602 - The proposed use of the property is single family residential. The zoning map amendment will align with 00:04:54.602 --> 00:05:01.842 - the intent of the comprehensive plan and similar zoning along North Lakeview Drive. The plan commission 00:05:01.842 --> 00:05:09.082 - action shall be in the form of favorable, unfavorable or no recommendation to town council, which takes 00:05:09.082 --> 00:05:13.886 - final action on zoning map amendment petition. Staff recommendation, 00:05:14.690 --> 00:05:22.385 - Zoning of residential two is covered in the Ellsville comprehensive plan under neighborhood residential. 00:05:22.385 --> 00:05:29.859 - And there are other properties with single family residential, even though the zoning district is C2, 00:05:29.859 --> 00:05:37.261 - north of the parcels residential in Monroe County. The area will accommodate the proposed use of the 00:05:37.261 --> 00:05:39.166 - single family residential 00:05:39.682 --> 00:05:46.952 - Therefore staff recommends a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the town council to amend the 00:05:46.952 --> 00:05:54.440 - zoning of the parcels, outline a paragraph one from commercial two to residential two. And petitioners 00:05:54.440 --> 00:06:01.929 - representative is present if you have any questions. Okay, does anybody have any questions for Denise? 00:06:01.929 --> 00:06:07.454 - Yeah, I got a question. I got two questions. You know I'd have to have a... 00:06:09.570 --> 00:06:17.875 - Was, did we rezone that commercial from residential? Correct, we rezoned it commercial three and then 00:06:17.875 --> 00:06:26.099 - with the zoning, when we did the zoning map with the UDO, we did away with commercial three and then 00:06:26.099 --> 00:06:34.405 - it became commercial two. But we changed it from residential to commercial. I don't remember what the 00:06:34.405 --> 00:06:37.662 - county had it zoned when we annexed it. 00:06:38.562 --> 00:06:48.945 - Okay, the other question I have is, do we have a square footage for our house? Has to be such and such? 00:06:48.945 --> 00:06:59.228 - 960 feet on the first floor. 960? Thank you, that's all I need. Sure, the minimum for residential one, 00:06:59.228 --> 00:07:07.614 - the minimum lot size is 8,000 and I think R2, I should have looked it up, it may be 00:07:08.322 --> 00:07:18.265 - five or four, but the setbacks reduced to seven feet on this side in 20, 25 in the front and 15 in the 00:07:18.265 --> 00:07:27.919 - rear, I think. I think. Memory serves when it was passed in order to, by the planning commission in 00:07:27.919 --> 00:07:36.414 - order to make those very southern lots there storage units. I think Kevin Ferris wanted 00:07:36.546 --> 00:07:45.353 - one of the lots to be commercial because he was storing things on. That makes sense. So maybe that's 00:07:45.353 --> 00:07:54.683 - why it was just left commercial at that time. Okay, thank you. Anybody have any more questions for Denise? 00:07:54.683 --> 00:08:03.403 - AJ, do you want to say anything or just answer questions? Okay, does anybody have any questions for 00:08:03.403 --> 00:08:04.798 - the petitioner? 00:08:07.874 --> 00:08:16.672 - Does anyone from the public have any comments or questions? Seeing none, I will make a motion that we 00:08:16.672 --> 00:08:25.384 - forward case number PC 26-15 to the town council with a favorable recommendation. I'll second it. Do 00:08:25.384 --> 00:08:34.182 - we have a motion to second? Roll call, please. David Drake? Yes. Zach Michael? Yes. Ryan Skaggs? Yes. 00:08:34.182 --> 00:08:37.374 - Pat Wesolowski? Yes. Motion carries. 00:08:37.666 --> 00:08:48.610 - Next item on our agenda is the Planning Department update. We will have new business for June 4th and 00:08:48.610 --> 00:08:59.554 - for you and Pat, we will be having a BZA meeting next week. What day? 13th. Wednesday. Wednesday. And 00:08:59.554 --> 00:09:06.206 - that's it. Okay. And we'll also have a reorganization meeting 00:09:07.234 --> 00:09:14.582 - So you may be meeting in the little room there again. Sorry, I didn't know. We're still having those? 00:09:14.582 --> 00:09:21.858 - Yes, we're at the tail end. We've got three more we think. Gotcha. Yes. Privilege of the floor, does 00:09:21.858 --> 00:09:29.278 - anybody have any comments from the public? Any comments from the Planning Commission? We're adjourned.