We call to order the Monday, July 27th meeting of the Eltsville Town Council. William, you want to do
the prayer? Yes. Thank you, Lord Jesus. Give us wisdom over the decisions we make this night and for
the town in general. And make sure that we keep the best interest of the community and for your will
to be done. In your name, amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag
of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible,
with liberty and justice for all. Rose Ball when you're ready. Scott Oldham. Here. Dan Swaffer. Here.
William Ellis. Here. Trevor Sager. Here. Pamela Samples. Moving down to minutes from the 7-13-2026 town
council meeting.
Actually, we're not doing those things. Yes, sir. I have them available They were available today, but
I didn't want to send them out and not have the council any time to review them So we'll have both of
them available for the next council meeting. Okay, we'll leave that go X to pay accounts powerful vouchers
and payroll vouchers Motion second all his favor say aye. Aye any opposed any abstaining There are multiple
resolutions this evening. The first resolution is 13 20 26 and
Transfer of funds and appropriations MVH restricted to local roads and bridge matching fund This is
in conjunction with the community crossings matching grant This is what the town has to pay for their
portion So we are just transferring it from the restricted to the grant fund in order to pay the grant
Okay, and how much was this in total? $29,566 and 82 cents
Questions from Council? There are motions from Council. Okay, I apologize, is there anyone from the
public? Seeing no one, Council? Move to approve Resolution 13-2026, Transfer of Funds and Appropriations
MVH Restricted to Local Roads and Bridge Matching Fund. Second. Motion to second roll call please.
Oldham yes, Dan Swafford. Yes, William Ellis. Yes, Trevor Sager. Yes motion passes Resolution fourteen
twenty six twenty six clerks department additional appropriation Fifty nine thousand dollars
for miscellaneous professionals is for Baker Tilly nine thousand one hundred forty two dollars is for
the Monroe County Animal Control, the increase that happened from the 25 to 26 contract, because we
approved the contract in October after the budgets were already approved. So the 2025 budgeted amount
was 28,350.
The 2026 budgeted amount was the same because in 25, we only paid $23,158. And so the 2026 budgeted
amount of 28,350 does not meet the contracted amount that they gave us for $37,492. It was a 61.9% increase.
the council approved at the time so yes, sir, okay anything else the $27,300 for promotion of town business
is to cover the Communications contract we have with fields and company to carry us through the end
of the year and the six thousand three hundred and twenty five in the CCD fund for computers and software
is for a server update that we're splitting with the DPW department because we need to update our servers
here and at the DPW building and
Yes, sir for a grand total of what? for both of the funds under this resolution 101 thousand seven hundred
and sixty seven dollars, okay questions from council For the promotion of town business That is a contract
that we have with fields and company Which is our communication contract and that will carry us through
the end of the year. I Mean, what is it? What do they do?
They promote town business on social media. They take care of all of our anything that we want to put
out to the general public. They've been helping us promote the reorganization and getting the word out
to people who attend the meetings, things like that. This was a contract we approved, what, three or
four months?
This is a contract we approved what three or four months ago Last year, I thought yeah, okay So this
is the entire year the 27,000 no, sir This is to carry us through the rest of the year. The original
contract was for nineteen thousand five hundred dollars and we exceeded that so this will carry through
the rest of the year at the rate that was established with the town manager and
for the hours and I do not have the contract sitting in front of me but I can get the contract for you.
We had to do quite a bit of work out of contract to promote and to not promote but to notify the public.
The public that rare organizations takes place when the meetings were and so we did a lot of Facebook,
things like that. Text blasts, the blasts for the text cost money too.
So, but the 19,000 was the contract. The 27 is what I'm asking, is that the total? No, sir. So it's
19 plus the 20. Yes, sir. In addition to. Okay. One of the projects that we're currently starting to
look at is updating the website, because in order to be compliant with the new legislation, we need
to move to an IN.gov, and they're helping facilitate that project. Okay. Other council questions?
for the public. Seeing none, back to council. I'll make a motion to approve resolution 14-2026, clerk
department additional appropriation. Second. Motion to second, focal please. Scott Oldham. Yes.
Dan Swafford. Yes. William Ellis. Yes. Trevor Sager. Yes. Motion passes.
next resolution 1520 26 dpw department additional appropriation. The constraints. Cutting budgets especially
in the community crossings grant I mean it went from like 300 million to 100 million all they distribute
so there's a lot of small towns in Indiana that didn't even get any of the grand at all. We did fortunately
get part of the grant for some of the streets and
those streets that I didn't get funding for, I was wanting to pay it also so that we didn't pay part
of the subdivision and leave the rest of it wide, leave one last street out. So I'm coming before you
for this appropriation to help pay for some of that work and some additional work that we'll be doing
in a house with our own paver as well. Okay, and how much is that in total? 35,000. And that's in my
NVH, that's not to do with the general fund. Sure, just for purposes of public knowledge. Okay, questions
from council?
from the public and back to count. I'll make a motion to approve resolution 15-2026, the additional
appropriation for DPW. Second. Motion second. Scott Oldham. Yes. Dan Swafford. Yes. William Ellis. Yes.
Trevor Sager. Yes. Motion passes. Thank you. Next is resolution 16-2026, fire department additional
appropriation. This would be me.
This will to put some money back in the overtime line We've currently got two full-time positions are
open that we're working on getting filled But we've obviously been having to keep those shifts filled
plus we've had some injuries and illnesses so far Already this year and then just an increase in calls
for service. So the amount of
that we're requesting is basically taking an average of what we've been using to get us through the
end of the year. Hopefully, when we get these spots filled, we won't be having to fill them with people
that are already in overtime. We have increased our part-time staffing. We hired four or six month ago.
So the hopes is that we won't have to have all of this used at all, but this should carry us through
the rest of the year.
How much is this until 53,000 questions council. From the public. In fact, council. Make a motion to
approve resolution 16 dash 2026. The additional appropriation for the fire department. Motion and second
when you're ready.
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
This is Zach Michael, LTP. We too have also had an unfilled position, so we've had to use quite a bit
of overtime to keep our shifts staffed. So that's the request for 55,000 additional overtime. You'll
see an additional appropriation for an officer spot that is filling. Well, we had filled it. Now we
have another one open.
because of a recent retirement. So that is to get us through the end of the year for that position.
So similar to the fire department, we're hoping when we're fully staffed, we won't have to use as much
of the overtime, but we do have a couple of events coming up that's gonna expend some of that money
as well. Okay, questions from council? From the public and back to council.
to approve resolution 17 dash 2026 police department additional appropriation. Second. And in a while
before we do this, how much was this in total? The total for this police resolution is $111,301
and 40 cents. And I would like to make a note that this is out of the lit public safety fund, not the
general fund. None of these transfers from what I understood
on the emails and the explanation are putting any of these funds in jeopardy? No, sir. Actually, I included
in the packet a supplemental lit distribution that we received in May. For the general fund, we received
$94,257,000 for the lit public safety. For the lit public safety, we received
Twenty three thousand eight hundred and thirteen dollars and in the lit public safety currently we have
a cash reserve of four hundred and fourteen thousand dollars and for economic development an additional
revenue came in of a hundred and fifty four thousand three hundred and thirty seven Scott Oldham. Yes,
Dan Swaffer. Yes, William Ellis. Yes, Trevor Sager. Yes, motion passes
Next is resolution 18, 2026 planning additional appropriation. Two additional appropriations totaling
65,127. The first is for heritage, heritage trail plan update for $35,702. Due to a change in the routing
the heritage trail, the DNR told us we had to have a new completely engineered set of plans.
Bynum, Fanion and Associates had already surveyed a majority of the trail. So we hired them to provide
the engineer plans of the trail. The other one is for Taylor Seifert and Williams Design Group. That's
for $29,425. They've been hired to update the UDO, the comprehensive plan and the zoning map for the
town reorganization. The amount of their contract is the $29,425.
Questions from Council? Is the Heritage Trail money, is that any that go into those bathrooms? I was
just thinking today they've been fixed, finished, completed the restrooms. Okay. I'll be sending you
some information in the next couple weeks about Heritage. Okay, thanks. And I'm sorry, I don't remember
what it was in the rotations. Are there any questions from Council?
Any questions from the public? And back to council I Make a motion to approve resolution 18-2026 planning
department additional appropriation second motion second Scott Oldham. Yes, Dan Swaffer. Yeah,
William Ellis. Yes Trevor Sager motion passes Next is resolution 2026
Adopt a resolution for financial or sorry, we go back Resolution 19 2026 transfer funds and appropriation
for the police department again No, I'm just making sure we're correct here we have typo, okay There are
We're taking two thousand dollars out of uniforms and gear to fund our physicals and testing line That's
in in anticipation for the new employee We have to send in public safety medical to do their testing
that line does not have anything in it right now the second one vehicles and equipment 22,000 from that
to radar arms and equipment We've got some equipment we need to buy and we're shuffling the money over
to make it come out of an appropriate line and then
police body armor and a thousand thirty one ninety five from tasers and camera equipment into building
maintenance we had got hit with a bill for an AC repair and that money is in excess this year so we're
just moving it to building maintenance to cover that bill questions from council anything from the public
back to council
Resolution nineteen dash twenty twenty six transfer of funds and appropriations for the police department.
Since I. Got one of them yes Dan Swaffer yeah William Ellis yeah Trevor Saker yes motion passes. Next
resolution twenty twenty six twenty dash twenty twenty six to adopt a resolution for fiscal plan Daniel
Commission meeting. As you are aware, voted to send the Mr. Rary's petition for annexation to the town
council with a positive recommendation. And so what is on your agenda tonight is the resolution to adopt
the fiscal plan for that annexation. And then later on in the agenda is the actual ordinance to adopt
the annexation or pass the annexation. Questions from council.
the public on this one. Anything you want to say, Mr. Rary? Back to council. I'll move to adopt resolution
2020-2026 to adopt a resolution for fiscal plan. Daniel R. Rary, Revocal Trust. Second. Motion second.
Scott Oldham. Yes. Hans Wofford. Yes. William Ellis. Yes. Trevor Sager. Yes. Motion passes.
Resolution 21 dash 2026 transfer funds and appropriation for town improvements Someone anyone This is
for transferring money out of property and liability and fleet insurance where we have a surplus down
to town improvements for paving at the fire department by MVH and
Okay. Questions from Council? What is this for? The fire department. We're gonna pay station 81's parking.
And instead of not parking a lot, it's our approach parking to the building. We should have done it
last year, we did not. And it's in disrepair, and this is really a band-aid until we figure out what
we wanna do for the new building. This is Curry Pike, correct?
correct. And instead of doing an additional appropriation, I did have $10,000 between those
two appropriations that we could just transfer down. But the insurance is in the 300s and the
town improvements is in the 400. So we need permission. We put it in a town improvement line, probably
could have put it in fire and made the same thing happen, but just sound like a good idea to put in
town improvements.
from council. From the public. And back to council. All right I'll make a motion to approve twenty one
dash twenty twenty six transfer funds and appropriations town improvements. Motion second. Scott Oldham
yes Dan Swafford yes William Ellis yes
Go back on resolution 15 is my fault. I overlooked it. The total appropriation for the resolution of
15-2026 is not 35,000. It's 182,834 and nine cents. And Noel might be able to explain it better than
I can, but we have to take the money that's already in that
To pay for the grant. So that's a hundred and forty seven thousand eight hundred thirty four dollars
and nine cents That's grant money dumped into that fund. Yes, recycle. Yes, sir. Okay, so I apologize
I'll overlook that on no worries where you guys call the vote. We don't just for the well just for the
council's record Does anyone wish a revote on that issue? Questions that want to further delve into
this issue Seeing none miss Brown. Do you have a problem letting that boat stand? I
Okay, then we'll move on. Thank you for calling that to our attention now. On the first reading this
evening, it is orders 2026-13 to amend employee handbook to convert unused holiday hours to floating
holiday hours for the employees of the police department. This potential change to the personnel policy
was discussed at the last town council meeting. This is for the police department only, and the consensus
from the board at the last meeting was that this
particular change should be implemented? I think we want to table this. We have a couple other, we have
a couple other issues in the personnel policy and we thought we'd change that, came up and we're gonna
change that, send it to the board again, give you heads up on what we're doing. It's just a minor changes,
but it has to do with overtime. And so we thought we'd just put those in, let you vote.
for both of them at the same time. If we could just see it for the next time we get to a holiday, that'd
be great. Yeah, that's planned. Next meeting. Yeah, okay. Yeah, that was discussed. Okay. I'm just saying,
let's not hold on to it. No, no, it came after me. Let's not play this game again, boys and girls. I
can't remember which department brought it up. Now we'll move to ordinances on second reading. Ordinance
2026-12 regarding the voluntary annexation
2326 2328 West Woodyard Road Bloomington, Indiana On July 9th the Plan Commission gave a unanimous favorable
recommendation to town council for the annexation of two parcels owned by Dan rary the parcels totaled
approximately forty seven point eight six acres and they are located at 53 26 West Woodyard Road and
53 28 West Woodyard Road and
proposed annexation areas 23% contiguous to town of Ellsville and 100% of the property owners or parties
to the petition The parcels are currently zoned a gr agricultural residential by Monroe County and are
recommended to be designated as agricultural upon annexation Party the properties will be located in
council ward 5 and petitioners present if you have any questions
Questions from council? Just Darrell, this is one because of the period we're in, the township has to
approve also, correct? The township has to approve and it's my understanding that the township board
intends to have a meeting the first week of August. I think the council can pass this condition, make
a condition upon the township approving the annexation and so long as it is neither
Recorded nor published in the HD until after the township passes Are you opposed to the agricultural
zoning designation Okay any further questions for counseling
action from council. I move to approve ordinance twenty twenty six dash twelve regarding a voluntary
annexation for fifty three twenty six fifty three twenty eight Westwood Yard Road Bloomington Indiana
conditional to the township permit correct yes. Motion is second you're ready Scott Oldham yes Dan Swafford
yes William Ellis yes Trevor Sager yes motion passes
twenty six ten twenty twenty six dash ten an ordinance to amend chapter seventy three schedule to Elkville
town code to add additional stop intersections. This is the second hearing on this particular ordinance
I was asked to make a change to the schedule of stop intersections so that the intersection at Southridge
Lane North Sycamore and North Wallace Harmon Way
Will be a three-way stop Anyone in the public back to count Ordinance to amend chapter 73 schedule to
the Elton town code to add additional stop intersection motion second when you're ready
Yes, Dan Swaffer. Yes, William Ellis. Yes, Trevor Sager. Yes motion passes Another ordinance on second
reading this evening is ordinance 26 dash 20 26 dash 11 a Wholesale water tracker cost ordinance to
change the water rates by Eltsville municipal water utility Yeah, I'll take this one. So the water tracker
means that we ask for a raise in the rates of
Reflect the new costs we pay for per thousand gallons to the city of Blanton utilities They supply our
water for us. They recently went through a rate change and the wholesale users, which would be like
Alexville our rate Went up Significantly and so we just asked that the tracker path. It's a pass through
we didn't ask for any more than what CBU charges per thousand
Increase It allows us to retain the rates we had before and without this tracker Our rates would go
out of deficit and then we we prep one way or the other we'd probably we'd have to figure out how to
Recoup the money. So this is basically penny for penny to track what CBU raised
our rates to and it just it applies to our new schedule water rates. Questions from council. Anyone
from the public. And we're back to council. All right, I'll move to approve ordinance 2026 dash 11 wholesale
water rate tracker ordinance to change water rates.
by the Ellisville Municipal Water Utility. Second. Motion is second when you're ready. Scott Woodham.
Yes. Hans Walker. Yes. William Ellis. Yes. Trevor Sager. Yes. Motion passes. We'll follow a question
from a constituent the other day, and I think I know the answer to this already. Is it feasible? And
they want to know if it was feasible to reopen the wells that the town used to own.
And I told them, no, it'd probably be millions of dollars to do that, even if it was successful, because
we'd have to have a water treatment plant. Am I correct? Well, it's an interesting question. And there
are wells available, I believe. That's how, in the 60s, our wells were out on Bank Road and along the
stars and bank roads, and that was our original wells that supplied water. You cannot mix.
of groundwater with surface water when you're providing water service. So it's not feasible to utilize
it in that way now. We have talked about the wells, but with Lake Monroe being what it is and how good
a water quality we get from the city of Bloom to utilities. And they always seem to stay ahead of being
able to supply it. That's why that's part of their water rate increase.
It just money monetarily and physically. It's just not a good idea. It's doable, but not economically
affordable Okay We would require now well No, we would have to revisit the wells how deep they are exactly
where right, you know where they're at but I'm on BBP water and we get our water out of
If you will and so they have wells not exactly in that area But out that way and so and and their system
is almost as big as ours if not bigger And so they work off entirely off of wells, so they have a couple
well fields, right? Yeah. Yeah, so I mean It's something we'll probably look at in the next 20 years I
I'll still be around as I always say. And so anyway, so it's not a bad idea that we continue to look
at that being something we might have to do as we grow. I mean, we're not gonna stay the same size,
but with the Lake Monroe and how good of water we get from City of Bloor to Utilities right now, it's
just not a good idea. Just for the trivia portion of today's meeting, how deep are our wells,
do you know? No, I do not know that.
Moving on, there is no old business. Under new business, it's a contract approval for, somebody help
me with this one. Copic SLT. Copic SLT, is that what it is? Yeah, it's for Rick Copic. Okay. I'll take
it. So, as you know, Rick Copic's been an engineer and worked, used to work for Bino Fenyo Associates,
and he has been taking care of the town of Elisil for
35, 40 years. Maybe, yeah, he's pretty old. And so we have him on retainer to help us with engineering
questions, concerns, even to help us with design. He also helps with stormwater planning. He helps planning
with issues, comes to all of our
Check reviews any time a new entity comes into town. So all around, he's valuable and we just use him
per hour and so a lot of months we don't use him at all and then other months we do. He's like, he's
a treasure and so this is a no-brainer. I'd like to vote on this one myself. How much is his contract
retainer that we're voting on this evening? $750 a month and it's an hourly rate
$100 per hour that goes against the retainer when it's needed This contract is the exact same with the
just the dates change from last year Okay, as long as Rick's good with it questions from council Money
well spent I will take it. I believe from the public seeing them back to council
Well, I'll move to approve the contract for Copic SLT, LLC. Second. Motion's second. Are you ready?
Scott Oldham. Yes. Dan Swaffer. Yes. William Ellis. Yes. Trevor Saker. Yes. Motion passes. It will be
not a privilege of the floor anyone having business for the council not part of our normal agenda this
evening? Seeing none, the supervisor comments. Beginning with the town manager.
Put your kids to bed, cancel your vacations, clear your calendars. We've got budget meetings coming,
so. Good luck with all of that. Okay, yeah, so we'd like to have, first of all, do we want a work budget
session? Okay, and so we need to have, what? Pre-adoption hearing
Thank you. So September 14th, September 28th are the two days we need. So I'd be glad to come get you
if I have. Are these dates flexible? Well, they are if you guys say they are. If we need to move them
to August, it would be preferable to move them forward, not backwards. And the reason behind that is
because the Gateway platform has completely changed this year.
and we've already started inputting things. We have to put in the fire territory budget and
the reorganization budget. We had to separate out the police and the fire. It's a new platform. It's
taking three times as long as it normally does. Is it possible to just mirror August council dates?
Absolutely. This was a draft just because the town manager asked me to get something together. If we
could do that and then we run into a snag where we think we need a work session, we can add another
date where this gives us some time
because I think a couple council members have got issues with one or more of these dates. So if we could
push forward to August, if you guys will be prepared by then. You mean push back to office? Yes. Okay,
because she said forward to move it to where we're adopting it earlier than later. All right. Yeah.
Sorry, makes sense back. Don't make any sense. So that way gives us more time, like she said,
to get it. Actually, if we hit a stand, we can have a work session.
That's fine. And you know, because of reorganization, we've done a lot of the work. I mean, actually,
we've done almost all the work just to be prepared so we could get it to the DLGF. So the budgets are
pretty much ready to go. Let me ask you this, and it's probably one more from Ms. Brown. Are we voting
on both budgets? So we'd be voting on the current town budget, and then the budget should consolidation pass?
Sorry for my understanding so if we were voting on the current town budget the current town We get to
January 1 and it is no longer the current town It is a consolidated town if that passes who's then voted
on that budget
the way that we're going to present the council the budgets are the reorganization budget with the all
the Fiscal analysis that Baker Tilley had done and all the department heads have put their line items
in the Larger budget is what we're going to put into the DLGF. The DLGF will not be technically approving
that budget until after the vote because if reorganization for whatever reason does not pass a
We wouldn't have to re-advertise it because the council would then have the authority to go in and reduce
the budgets and the reductions would be based off of taking everything that we put in for reorganization
out. And then the fire territory budget would also be taking an effect that the council were still waiting
on approval from the DLGF for the fire territory because once that's approved then the council has to
appoint fire territory board and then they have to approve their budget as well.
in essence approving as a consolidated budget and should that vote fail in November, we would have to
very quickly the scale that as it were. And we'll have that reduction budget is a skeleton basically
because we can take everything that we just put in because that's how when the department heads built
their budget, they built the budget without reorganization and then added for reorganization. So we
have both of them together. So let me throw a bigger
Questioner does the township need to approve this budget since assuming we get to January? They would
have been part of a combined counselor. However, we're doing it. Do they need to weigh in even if it's
just tacitly? Well, the DOGF told me when I when I spoke with the rep that the township will be approving
their budget doing this normal process without the fire budget in their
regular budget because that will become part of the fire territory. So the township is doing their general
fund and their parks and recs fund and everything but the fire fund for their budgets. But they don't
need to do the consolidated budget or they don't need to approve it? No, sir. Because all of the resolutions
and the ordinances and everything that we pass for reorganization, that was what the DLGF representative
told me as far as like what happens with the budget. Well, how about this?
If I can suggest and if I'm wrong, you guys tell me let's at least pass this budget to the Township
board for comment before we vote since they're gonna be part of this assuming we do consolidation I'd
least like to be able to give them the opportunity to see this budget up close to say hey, yes, I'm
good I'm not good, etc, etc not that they necessarily need to vote I guess but I'd certainly like for
them to weigh in on this and
for participation. That has been in the talks, especially after when I spoke to the DLGF rep, she was
having some communications with the township and I don't think we're aligned on what actually needs
to happen because the township was thinking that they needed to do the fire budget as well. So there
has been an ask for. Well, in the sake of fairness, in the sake of covering all our bases,
Do you guys have an objection to pushing this to the township prior to where we vote in this? Because
if they're gonna have a meeting the first of August, they can definitely look at it and give us input
before we arrive at our conclusions. Can we make that happen, please? Yes, sir. Thank you. All right.
Those dates work, though, for the two town council meetings in August? Oh, sure. That's fine. We wanted
to put it up for tonight, so you guys can adjust your dates.
Okay, I just would like to say, hopefully, by next meeting, we'll have a UTV ordinance for you to look
at first reading, and we'll try to get it out ahead of schedule so you can read it and comment before
the next meeting. And then I'd also like to say,
You know, usually when we annex, I'm always proud of it for Ellisville because that means people want
to be part of Ellisville. The reorganization has to do with two entities that share a common bond. Dan
was in the township all this time, and yet he is one of the local leaders of Ellisville. And I just
can't, you know, this is just one of those times when I think it just,
makes Elksville technically that much better because we have Dan as one of our residents. I agree.
I mean, you know, when you get a certain age, which I'm not too far behind Dan, you always think about
the people that's led us in the past, the people that got our schools consolidated.
Saved our identity and saved our schools and those people like should be legendary and we should always
remember to pass down that information of what they did for Ellisville. That's Dan's one of those guys
up till today and he's still active. And so I'm just really proud that Dan's in town. Couldn't agree
more. That's all I know. Pardon? Deputy Chief.
Sure, okay Why are we not locked this down we have I thought we did not Know
It's okay, Jeff. We're not good. We do not need to catch you up.
Oh my goodness. So we catch off right now. Following that, I'm gonna talk about wastewater. So wastewater
plant, as y'all know, was built in 1995 and went online in 1997. We're starting to experience some age
problems. A couple items we've already replaced is the UV system and a new approved
replacing the skating system. About a month ago, we had a clarifier fail us and was out of operation.
Had some guys come and inspect with me. Had spent about $5,500 putting it back in operation. But after
being down in the tank and looking at it, it's looking like it's ready for a total replacement in the
near future, which you're talking about a half million dollars to replace clarifiers.
the inside of the clarifier. Other things that are, I mean, everything down there is having an age.
Fortunately, I think it's been well maintained and it's made it this long, but I will be sending you
some information about what I think we need to do. Fortunately, we have some money in the bank that's
jointly funded by Eastern Rocham as well as Elksville. I think we have about a million dollars in there,
but I could see us possibly
Instead of spending all that, maybe doing a small project where we fix a lot of things. Our oxidation
ditches, all the rotors, everything down there is original. Valves, rotors, but we're starting to see
some age. So I just wanted to forewarn you that you'll be seeing a report coming to you. Any questions? No.
I'm sorry. Well, the plant was construction started in 95 and went on online in November of 1997. So
pushing 30 years. If you want to be, I just got this email this afternoon from America team from the
waste production district of Monroe County. She wanted me to help spread the word that
The district is going to do a another tire and this the day it'll be in September the 19th from 9 a.m. To 2 p.m.
At the Monroe County Fairgrounds and Everybody can bring in the county their passenger car or light
truck tires Out to the fairgrounds from 9 a.m. To 2 p.m. That day Okay, thank you Okay council comments anyone
And we're just into July this year, I Mean I Understand what we're doing, but it's still a little concerning
to me that there's this many so far and we're just halfway through the year, so Okay, not asking for
a reason why I'm just making a comment
Any other questions or any other comments council Seeing none no no further business for council or adjourned