WEBVTT 00:00:00.450 --> 00:00:11.204 - Okay, ladies and gentlemen, it's 530. It's the beginning of the Monroe County Planning Commission meeting 00:00:11.204 --> 00:00:21.856 - for May 7th, which is Thursday. And why don't you go ahead and call the meeting to order. Please conduct 00:00:21.856 --> 00:00:29.566 - a roll call, please. David Bush? Here. Eric Clements? Ron Enright-Randolph? 00:00:30.370 --> 00:00:45.068 - Yes. I mean, Rudy Fields is here. He's here. Am I big? OK, gotcha. And I can see you as well. So I will 00:00:45.068 --> 00:01:00.190 - change you to present. Jeff Morris here. Julie Thomas here. Van Deventer. And Bishop here. David Henry is. 00:01:00.994 --> 00:01:09.333 - yet. We do have a quorum. Please introduce the evidence. I will do the introduction of evidence. I'd 00:01:09.333 --> 00:01:17.837 - like to introduce the following items. The Monroe County development ordinance as adopted and amended. 00:01:17.837 --> 00:01:26.176 - The Monroe County comprehensive plan as adopted and amended. The Monroe County plan commission rules 00:01:26.176 --> 00:01:28.158 - of procedure as adopted 00:01:29.282 --> 00:01:44.272 - cases that were legally advertised and scheduled for hearing on tonight. Move approval of the evidence. 00:01:44.272 --> 00:01:59.262 - Second. On and write Randolph. Yes. Paris yes. Rudy Fields yes Morris yes Julie Thomas yes. David Bush. 00:01:59.394 --> 00:02:07.511 - Yes. That moves us toward the approval. We'll talk about the agenda first. On the agenda, there are 00:02:07.511 --> 00:02:15.790 - going to be two items that we are not going to talk about this evening that are going to be continued 00:02:15.790 --> 00:02:23.582 - to a subsequent meeting, and that is the point PUD outline plan for the EO Bay garages and also 00:02:24.610 --> 00:02:32.534 - The Pratt Prince Administrative Subdivision Type E Access to Lot Waivers Request and Furniture on Improved 00:02:32.534 --> 00:02:40.236 - Streets Waiver Request. Those will not be heard this evening and there are only two items on the agenda 00:02:40.236 --> 00:02:48.086 - as I see here unless you have any other changes. Motion to approve? Motion to approve the agenda. Second. 00:02:48.086 --> 00:02:53.566 - Motion to approve the agenda and a second. Greenfields? Yes. Morris? Yes. 00:02:55.074 --> 00:03:08.067 - David Bush. Yes. And off. Yes. Yes. Very six to zero. Okay. Next up is approval of the minutes for the 00:03:08.067 --> 00:03:20.933 - meeting on April 21st, 2026 to have a motion to approve. Second. There's been a motion in a second to 00:03:20.933 --> 00:03:23.582 - approve the minutes. 00:03:23.746 --> 00:03:34.101 - for March 17th, 2026. Billy Thomas? Yes. Jeffrey Morris? Yes. Rudy Fields? Yes. Scott Farris? Yes. John 00:03:34.101 --> 00:03:44.257 - Benwright Randolph? Yes. David Bush? Yes. Okay, that takes us to administrative business. First up is 00:03:44.257 --> 00:03:52.222 - SIA 24-7, Holland Field Subdivision Phase 3, Request for Reduction of Financial 00:03:52.802 --> 00:04:03.431 - guarantee amount. So this is a request for reduction of a financial guarantee amount. We currently have 00:04:03.431 --> 00:04:13.651 - a letter of credit on file that expires December 12, 2026 in the amount of $2,942.28 and we kind of 00:04:13.651 --> 00:04:18.046 - hold that money under the SIA-21-7 and the 00:04:19.138 --> 00:04:26.704 - Commission had approved back in December 2026 a performance-grade extension. We do have all the current 00:04:26.704 --> 00:04:34.051 - performance bond document and SIA document agreements filed for this and so they're there. We worked 00:04:34.051 --> 00:04:41.399 - really hard with the highway department and their engineers and come up with an estimate that we all 00:04:41.399 --> 00:04:45.982 - could agree upon for the remaining improvements that are still 00:04:51.810 --> 00:05:03.252 - and fields phase three subdivision this is an older aerial but several of these other lots have actually 00:05:03.252 --> 00:05:14.586 - built out and did get submitted an essay from them and we supplied comments back on March 30th and then 00:05:14.586 --> 00:05:21.342 - they came back with a few and directed a few things in the as 00:05:29.730 --> 00:05:42.931 - and reviewed by the highway department. This was their original estimate at $56,000. We wanted to make 00:05:42.931 --> 00:05:51.390 - a few upgrades and improvements to unit price amount and ended up 00:06:00.706 --> 00:06:09.724 - There are a couple of the changes that we did. One thing that we had entertained was to rather than 00:06:09.724 --> 00:06:18.832 - look at the sidewalks that needed to be removed and replaced, we had considered using a fine item in 00:06:18.832 --> 00:06:28.301 - the INDOT spreadsheet called sidewalk concrete reconstruction. And the average price for that, I'm going 00:06:28.301 --> 00:06:30.014 - to push this up to 00:06:30.434 --> 00:06:38.630 - $26,000 more than what they were expecting. If we had been looking at phase one of Holland field subdivision 00:06:38.630 --> 00:06:46.750 - where those sidewalks are so fiber optic utilities like indoor consideration I think the highway department 00:06:46.750 --> 00:06:54.269 - and planning would have pushed for using that reconstruction line item but instead we found it more 00:06:54.269 --> 00:06:55.998 - fair in this instance. 00:07:06.050 --> 00:07:20.456 - with an estimate that we all thought made sense. So with that, approval of the request for a new performance 00:07:20.456 --> 00:07:31.294 - with the county revisions dated April 26 and with an approved reduction in 44,000 00:07:35.298 --> 00:07:43.330 - following required conditions and that is subject to engineers report in this program. Mission one is 00:07:43.330 --> 00:07:51.283 - a new financial guarantee may be submitted in the form of either letter of credit or cashier's check 00:07:51.283 --> 00:07:59.158 - for the total amount of $58,800. If the new posted amount is desired prior. Asking for a reduction, 00:07:59.158 --> 00:08:04.670 - they would need to swap out letter of credit and deal with their bank 00:08:09.826 --> 00:08:23.295 - The performance bond document shall be signed and recorded. Number three is the subdivision improvement 00:08:23.295 --> 00:08:31.454 - agreement. The petitioner apply for a right of way acceptance. 00:08:41.890 --> 00:08:48.606 - Let's go to the Commission. Anybody to my left have a question? 00:08:50.178 --> 00:08:56.992 - I just wanted to make a recommendation to the group for item number one to not accept a cashier's check 00:08:56.992 --> 00:09:03.806 - because financial instruments of that type become void after 180 days and the extension of this project 00:09:03.806 --> 00:09:10.357 - exists beyond that. A modification to the existing letter of credit would be reasonable. Otherwise, 00:09:10.357 --> 00:09:14.878 - a new letter of credit would be or some sort of bond would be ideal. 00:09:15.426 --> 00:09:20.959 - Otherwise, the financial institution that the cashier's check would be drawn on if it exists past the 00:09:20.959 --> 00:09:24.702 - 180 days would be at their discretion, not their obligation to cash. 00:09:27.842 --> 00:09:34.746 - answer with the cashier's check when we receive that we can we automatically deposit into its own line 00:09:34.746 --> 00:09:41.516 - and it's difficult to get it out but we don't have to worry about it expiring on our part which is a 00:09:41.516 --> 00:09:48.287 - little easier on that sense with the letter of credit we have to be hyper vigilant make sure these I 00:09:48.287 --> 00:09:55.057 - did a while ago that we do not do mm-hmm yeah one more question that if you're depositing those they 00:09:55.057 --> 00:09:57.470 - go into an interest-bearing account 00:09:59.778 --> 00:10:06.303 - I know that does occur at the county government level and I don't know if these specific assets are 00:10:06.303 --> 00:10:13.023 - allowed to do that, honestly. That's the treasurer's office. Right, yeah, there's certain restrictions 00:10:13.023 --> 00:10:19.548 - on that for IELTA accounts and ASCRO accounts, things like that, so I don't know if it falls within 00:10:19.548 --> 00:10:26.138 - that purview, but if it doesn't, then. I don't think it does. I think it has to be ready to cash in. 00:10:26.138 --> 00:10:28.030 - The developer wants it back. 00:10:32.450 --> 00:10:41.655 - have one question and that is that you have in this recommendations additions one through four you have 00:10:41.655 --> 00:10:50.860 - discussed that with the petitioner I assume and everybody's in agreement correct they were given a copy 00:10:50.860 --> 00:10:59.888 - of the report and we agreed on the estimate so they already have the two on file if they want to give 00:10:59.888 --> 00:11:02.366 - us another letter of credit 00:11:03.394 --> 00:11:12.661 - that reduced amount, we just ask that file with the correct amount. And fourth one, yeah, if they don't 00:11:12.661 --> 00:11:21.749 - get their acceptance completed, then they need to come back here to the performance period extension. 00:11:21.749 --> 00:11:30.838 - All right. Looks like Tron, you got a question. Go ahead. Not really a question. I just wanted to let 00:11:30.838 --> 00:11:32.798 - Ms. Behrman know that 00:11:33.154 --> 00:11:42.680 - her mic is going in and out, maybe if the microphone was adjusted a bit. I'm hearing like one word out 00:11:42.680 --> 00:11:52.207 - every 10, so I'm able to repeat the recommendation and everything, so I'm good. Also, I appreciate Mr. 00:11:52.207 --> 00:12:01.918 - Bishop's comments from his expertise, but yeah, just for the public and for Ms. Beerman, we are able to, 00:12:02.114 --> 00:12:09.533 - Thank you, Tron. I'm the only one in here with the old microphone. And Julie just brought me a new one. 00:12:09.533 --> 00:12:17.380 - So there we go. Perfect. Teamwork makes the dream work. Thank you. All right. Because this is administrative, 00:12:17.380 --> 00:12:24.586 - we really don't have a requirement unless somebody tells me that I'm wrong. Make a statement. Nor do 00:12:24.586 --> 00:12:31.006 - we need to take and have public comment. Correct. I have a motion from one of the members 00:12:35.426 --> 00:12:41.700 - I move approval of the request for a new performance guarantee amount based on the current engineer's 00:12:41.700 --> 00:12:47.913 - estimate with the county revisions dated April 28, 2026 and with an approved reduction in the amount 00:12:47.913 --> 00:12:54.556 - of $44,048.23 with the following required conditions subject to the highway engineer reports and stormwater 00:12:54.556 --> 00:12:56.094 - program manager reports. 00:12:56.258 --> 00:13:05.000 - One, a new financial guarantee may be submitted in the form of either a letter of credit or cashier's 00:13:05.000 --> 00:13:13.828 - check for the total amount of $58,894.05, $102,948.42, original LOC minus $44,048.23 reduction request 00:13:13.828 --> 00:13:22.142 - if the new posted amount is desired prior to the completion of the required public improvements. 00:13:22.274 --> 00:13:27.685 - Two, a performance bond document shall be signed and recorded within two weeks of submitting the new 00:13:27.685 --> 00:13:33.096 - amount of the financial guarantee as stated in condition one above. Three, a subdivision improvement 00:13:33.096 --> 00:13:38.507 - agreement document shall be signed and recorded within two weeks of submitting the new amount of the 00:13:38.507 --> 00:13:44.346 - financial guarantee as stated in condition one above. And four, petitioner apply for a right away acceptance 00:13:44.346 --> 00:13:47.614 - on or before December 12, 2026. I have a friendly amendment. 00:13:48.738 --> 00:13:59.759 - as long as I don't have to read it again. Yes, backwards. I think we should add to your hauling field 00:13:59.759 --> 00:14:05.918 - subdivision phase three. I accept all that. I'll second. 00:14:17.058 --> 00:14:30.640 - request for the new performance guarantee amount for the division phase three. 24-7. Based on the current 00:14:30.640 --> 00:14:43.581 - engineer's estimate, county revisions dated 8th, 2026. Approved reduction in the amount of 44,000 or 00:14:43.581 --> 00:14:44.990 - conditions 00:14:46.050 --> 00:14:56.229 - listed in the staff report, not reread at this time. Or in the stormwater program. I'll go ahead and 00:14:56.229 --> 00:15:06.408 - call the roll. David Bush. Yes. On and write Randolph. Just a clarification. Oh, friendly amendment. 00:15:06.408 --> 00:15:14.974 - I'm sorry. The friendly amendment was nothing more than adding the the SAA 24 seven. 00:15:15.426 --> 00:15:24.170 - and making it clear that the subdivision was for phase three. Oh, absolutely. Sorry, Mr. Ferris. For 00:15:24.170 --> 00:15:33.000 - some reason, the audio is just really bad on the virtual. I vote yes. Scott Ferris. Yes. Rudy Fields. 00:15:33.000 --> 00:15:41.743 - Yes. Jeffrey Morris. Yes. Billy Thomas. Yes. Motion carries six to zero. All right. That moves us on 00:15:41.743 --> 00:15:44.254 - to new business. And we have 00:15:45.346 --> 00:15:52.198 - Rd 26 one, which is a new road name for the improved road segment off of the twenty hundred plus or 00:15:52.198 --> 00:15:59.255 - minus block of West Gordon Pike, which is adjacent to the Southwest Library Library of Bachelor Middle 00:15:59.255 --> 00:16:06.176 - School and. Thank you. As mentioned, the request is to establish a road name for what is currently a 00:16:06.176 --> 00:16:13.165 - section of driveway. The purpose of this is to take it into the Monroe County Road Inventory and make 00:16:13.165 --> 00:16:14.398 - it a public road. 00:16:15.010 --> 00:16:21.386 - The petitioner is the Monroe County Highway Department. And more specifically, they are requesting a 00:16:21.386 --> 00:16:28.014 - new road name from West Gordon Pike from the roundabouts that now forms an intersection with West Gordon 00:16:28.014 --> 00:16:34.326 - Pike, South Clearview Drive and West Fullerton Pike to its northern terminus, which is the driveway 00:16:34.326 --> 00:16:36.094 - for bachelor middle school. 00:16:37.282 --> 00:16:43.978 - The proposed 385 linear foot road in question is currently a driveway that provides access to the Monroe 00:16:43.978 --> 00:16:50.418 - County Southwest Public Library and the bachelor middle school. This petition is again requested due 00:16:50.418 --> 00:16:57.050 - to the highway department being interested in taking that section of driveway and see the Monroe County 00:16:57.050 --> 00:17:03.427 - road inventory. A current signage and map applications such as Apple Maps refer to this driveway as 00:17:03.427 --> 00:17:04.830 - bachelor school drive 00:17:05.122 --> 00:17:12.380 - but this was never officially approved nor taken into the Monroe County Road Inventory. Indian State 00:17:12.380 --> 00:17:19.638 - Statute 36-7-4-405 gives authority to the Planning Commission to assign street names and numbers. So 00:17:19.638 --> 00:17:27.184 - the following alternative names were suggested by the library themselves, such as Library Road, Literacy 00:17:27.184 --> 00:17:32.286 - Lane or Drive or Way, Enlightenment Lane, Drive or Way, Learning Road, 00:17:33.666 --> 00:17:40.044 - Sorry, Reading Road, Learning Lane or way, but it should be noted that Branch Drive and Branch Road 00:17:40.044 --> 00:17:46.550 - have been rejected as there are multiple other roads in the county that have the word branch in their 00:17:46.550 --> 00:17:53.247 - names, such as West East Branch Road. The goal is that every road name should be unique and unmistakable 00:17:53.247 --> 00:17:59.625 - from other road names that are existing. The following names have been independently suggested from 00:17:59.625 --> 00:18:02.942 - other county departments involved in this petition. 00:18:03.202 --> 00:18:09.516 - Knowledge Lane, Seekers Drive, Scholars Lane, Readers Lane, Cognitive Drive, Intellectual Drive, and 00:18:09.516 --> 00:18:15.767 - Education Drive. Alternatively, the Planning Commission can choose to officially designate the road 00:18:15.767 --> 00:18:22.268 - as Bachelor School Drive. The Bachelor Middle School and the Monroe County Community School Corporation 00:18:22.268 --> 00:18:28.645 - have not provided any recommendations at this time. Emergency Services has stated that any name would 00:18:28.645 --> 00:18:30.270 - be acceptable to dispatch 00:18:30.690 --> 00:18:37.253 - so long as it is not similar to any existing road name. Comments from various county departments are 00:18:37.253 --> 00:18:43.880 - as follows from the planning department in terms of addressing it appears that the public school that 00:18:43.880 --> 00:18:50.703 - the public library and the bachelor middle school are the only two addresses that will be impacted along 00:18:50.703 --> 00:18:53.822 - this section of roadway having the addresses of 00:18:54.306 --> 00:19:00.942 - 9 of 890 West Gordon Pike for the library and 900 West Gordon Pike for bachelor middle school. The final 00:19:00.942 --> 00:19:07.704 - determination for new address numbers are pending the establishment of road ranges. In regards to historic 00:19:07.704 --> 00:19:14.530 - preservation board, they often review and provide input regarding road name changes. However, this petition 00:19:14.530 --> 00:19:21.229 - has not been reviewed by them as this time. It is scheduled to be heard by the board during their meeting 00:19:21.229 --> 00:19:22.430 - on May 18th, 2026. 00:19:24.194 --> 00:19:31.751 - Here is a view of the entrance to the proposed road from the roundabout that is the intersection of 00:19:31.751 --> 00:19:39.535 - West Gordon Pike, West Rollerton Pike, and South Clearview Drive. And here is a picture of the roadway 00:19:39.535 --> 00:19:47.243 - itself. And here is a sign that is publicly posted along the roundabout showing it as Bachelor School 00:19:47.243 --> 00:19:52.382 - Drive, which again, the board can either, the commission can either 00:19:52.642 --> 00:20:00.514 - vote to approve or change. Here's just a GIS view showing the rough path the road follows in blue, as 00:20:00.514 --> 00:20:08.233 - well as an isometric aerial view of said road along with the two properties that connect off of it. 00:20:08.233 --> 00:20:16.028 - Staff does have a recommendation for the road name. Staff recommends that the roadway be named South 00:20:16.028 --> 00:20:21.662 - Learning Lane, conditional to review by the Historic Preservation Board. 00:20:22.050 --> 00:20:33.504 - and I will take any questions. Ron had a question. Yeah, thank you. I guess, does highway have 00:20:33.504 --> 00:20:45.802 - a recommendation? The reason I asked that is there's already existing sign that costs money to remove 00:20:45.802 --> 00:20:51.710 - a new one to be installed. I guess my additional 00:20:52.066 --> 00:21:02.989 - question on that as well. Daniel is or it's more to wait until the history plays in. Is there any urgency 00:21:02.989 --> 00:21:13.294 - here? I'm amenable to the direction that the planning commission wants to go. But those are just so 00:21:13.294 --> 00:21:21.022 - I know that some members of the highway department have had their opinions 00:21:21.538 --> 00:21:28.111 - expressed, particularly the first six names on this list were suggested by Ginger Young. I know that 00:21:28.111 --> 00:21:35.074 - Lisa Rich expressed a liking for South Education Drive, but I believe those were more personal preferences 00:21:35.074 --> 00:21:41.647 - than in their roles as members of the highway departments. I do remember an email where Lisa said it 00:21:41.647 --> 00:21:48.220 - was not an inconvenience to change the sign name that's out there. They would have had to change it, 00:21:48.220 --> 00:21:50.302 - I think, anyway because of road 00:21:51.458 --> 00:22:01.610 - the North Southeast West. So it needs an upgrade. Awesome. Thank you. Is there urgency? I kind of that 00:22:01.610 --> 00:22:11.664 - two part question. I don't believe there's any real urgency to this petition, but they are requesting 00:22:11.664 --> 00:22:20.830 - a waiver of final hearing. Okay, thank you. Appreciate that. Commissioner Thomas. Thank you. 00:22:21.218 --> 00:22:29.089 - So I had a discussion with my colleagues on the board of commissioners today about this item just to 00:22:29.089 --> 00:22:36.882 - kind of get their input. And there's an interest in just leaving it as Bachelor Drive. But then one 00:22:36.882 --> 00:22:44.675 - of my colleagues suggested adding her first name, which is Laura, L-O-R-A, I believe. We'll have to 00:22:44.675 --> 00:22:50.910 - look that up and verify it. But calling it Laura Bachelor Drive might be a nice 00:22:51.842 --> 00:22:59.228 - way to commemorate who the school is named after. And being a leader in education in our community, 00:22:59.228 --> 00:23:06.613 - I think it's a nice thing to do. And it fits in with both buildings. So I'd like to suggest that we 00:23:06.613 --> 00:23:14.220 - consider that. Okay, let's go back up to the commission. Anybody else on the left here have a comment? 00:23:14.220 --> 00:23:19.390 - I agree with Commissioner Thomas. I think this is a really good plan. 00:23:19.874 --> 00:23:28.235 - Yeah, before Commissioner Thomas spoke, I was going to recommend keeping it as is just because it's 00:23:28.235 --> 00:23:36.679 - been called that and the signs already up, but I like Commissioner Thomas. I agree with Commissioner 00:23:36.679 --> 00:23:45.374 - Thomas. That's a nice option. Alternatively, I've got wisdom way. This is going to take. I also support 00:23:45.374 --> 00:23:47.966 - Commissioner Thomas's comment. 00:23:48.354 --> 00:23:56.393 - I guess we need to go to the petitioner which is County Highway or are they going to speak or are we 00:23:56.393 --> 00:24:04.831 - pretty much have their position here? No petitioner. All right. We go to the public. We have go to teams. 00:24:04.831 --> 00:24:12.950 - Anybody online or in the room would like to take and speak? And I don't see anybody any either for or 00:24:12.950 --> 00:24:17.726 - against and so I guess we are ready for a motion. Go ahead. 00:24:18.082 --> 00:24:29.999 - I move that case number RD 26-1, the new road name from West Gordon Pike in preliminary hearing, waiver 00:24:29.999 --> 00:24:41.687 - of final hearing requested. We move that we roadway be named Laura Batchelor Drive. I'll second that. 00:24:41.687 --> 00:24:47.646 - I'll second that. Do we need to ensure that we have 00:24:48.034 --> 00:24:56.589 - name spelling correctly we make it conditional to that yes we need to we need to verify the spelling 00:24:56.589 --> 00:25:05.399 - of the first name I found it in one location but I would want staff to verify the spelling of the first 00:25:05.399 --> 00:25:14.462 - name well I don't want to offer that as a friendly amendment as I'm the second step that for a conditional 00:25:17.410 --> 00:25:26.302 - Unless Mr. Fields restate his motion to include that. I'm you know based on what I've heard here I'd 00:25:26.302 --> 00:25:35.458 - like to also recommend that that is conditional based on the Historic Preservation Board's review. I'll 00:25:35.458 --> 00:25:45.406 - second. So my question for Ms. Bierman is if the Historic Preservation Board says they don't like that road name 00:25:46.018 --> 00:25:57.092 - What happens next? Does it come back to us? It doesn't have to. Okay. Thank you. Motion in a second. 00:25:57.092 --> 00:26:08.495 - I guess my question, want to make it conditional to the review or do we want to finalize it? I'm sorry, 00:26:08.495 --> 00:26:14.526 - I know there's a motion. We have a motion in a second. 00:26:15.170 --> 00:26:28.158 - There's been a motion and a second to new road name RD-26-1 to segment of road along West Gordon Pike, 00:26:28.158 --> 00:26:40.893 - Laura Bachelor Drive. And this has the condition that one, that the spelling for Laura is confirmed, 00:26:40.893 --> 00:26:45.054 - that it is historically correct. 00:26:45.314 --> 00:27:00.689 - and two, that the HP, the Historic Conservation Board of Review, reviews the name. Go ahead and call 00:27:00.689 --> 00:27:14.238 - the roll. David Bush? Yes. Ron and Wright Randolph? Yes. Scott Ferris? Yes. Rudy Fields? 00:27:16.546 --> 00:27:24.786 - Yes, but does it need the South in front of it? Based on road, on how road names work, it would have 00:27:24.786 --> 00:27:33.434 - the South in front of it. So it would be South Laura Bachelor Drive. Julie Thomas? Yes. All right, motion 00:27:33.434 --> 00:27:42.000 - carries six to zero. All right, that concludes the new business. Let's go ahead and go to staff reports. 00:27:42.000 --> 00:27:45.182 - Anything from the planning department? 00:27:48.002 --> 00:28:00.674 - officially acting director. Congratulations. And from legal. No report. So we don't have another meeting 00:28:00.674 --> 00:28:11.294 - in May. Correct. We canceled the May meeting that was regularly scheduled for the 19th. 00:28:15.234 --> 00:28:30.398 - And I guess we need to take and address those things not on the agendas or anybody has any items that 00:28:30.398 --> 00:28:37.534 - they'd like to bring up. Okay. Move to adjourn.