WEBVTT

00:00:00.674 --> 00:00:10.136
- The main item on our agenda today is going to be the annual reports, which are we have to turn over

00:00:10.136 --> 00:00:19.693
- then to the county commissioners and then they have to approve moved on to the state by loading them

00:00:19.693 --> 00:00:25.086
- onto the gateway for the process we've used in the past.

00:00:35.170 --> 00:00:45.640
- All right. Let me make one kind of overview comment about these reports. As you are aware, these TIF

00:00:45.640 --> 00:00:56.007
- districts have origins at different points in time, varying levels of activities. One of the things

00:00:56.007 --> 00:01:03.678
- I noticed as I was going through them is that the reports themselves have

00:01:04.226 --> 00:01:14.447
- different kind of forms, particularly in the beginning, in terms of what gets divulged and what doesn't

00:01:14.447 --> 00:01:24.275
- get divulged. And as a general comment, it would be nice if we had the same kind of information for

00:01:24.275 --> 00:01:31.646
- each of these reports. I think the one for the large one for the west side

00:01:32.674 --> 00:01:42.436
- probably has the most information since they're the longest and have been accumulating it. And I noticed

00:01:42.436 --> 00:01:51.826
- that there is a allocation area definition for that TIF. There are various funds that are applicable

00:01:51.826 --> 00:02:02.238
- for that particular TIF. There's history of some of the major issues occurred which are of current information.

00:02:02.466 --> 00:02:12.380
- There's notice about insufficient funds. And then there is the summary of findings. I don't for these

00:02:12.380 --> 00:02:22.197
- other reports notice that kind of delineation of the allocation area and talking about it. And I did

00:02:22.197 --> 00:02:30.750
- not find for any that we knew from when the TIP began and when the TIP is going to end.

00:02:32.098 --> 00:02:39.970
- And those, that kind of information I think would be helpful in these reports, particularly in terms

00:02:39.970 --> 00:02:48.232
- of making them look the same for us. That's possible to do. I certainly think some of that can, beginning

00:02:48.232 --> 00:02:56.259
- date, ending date, those kind of things are kind of known items and we can certainly. The Westside TIF

00:02:56.259 --> 00:03:00.702
- is always going to be different. That's the one we have.

00:03:00.866 --> 00:03:08.189
- Bonds out there that require us to do. Disclosures and things through the through the federal process

00:03:08.189 --> 00:03:15.513
- the other the the bonds and the others I think are much more. Helper back bonds and things were. Have

00:03:15.513 --> 00:03:22.693
- that market presentation of debt that people are buying the others are kind of bought. There's just

00:03:22.693 --> 00:03:27.934
- a little different nuance to that and that's probably is why some of the

00:03:28.898 --> 00:03:36.492
- Right. It would be nice, though, for the public if they kind of were able to look at these and say,

00:03:36.492 --> 00:03:44.163
- oh, okay, that one's like this, this one's like this, this one started then, this one started there.

00:03:44.163 --> 00:03:51.833
- I'm not even sure it tells us in both cases where the developer has purchased the bonds. That nuance

00:03:51.833 --> 00:03:55.934
- is not quite clear to someone who's looking at these.

00:04:00.034 --> 00:04:09.683
- order do you want to proceed? Well, the preference that I would have would be start with the Curry and

00:04:09.683 --> 00:04:19.988
- then probably go to the Thornton Pike and then the west side. We're going to do Curry, Fullerton, Bloomington

00:04:19.988 --> 00:04:23.454
- Township, end up with the west side.

00:04:29.058 --> 00:04:38.837
- We still don't have anybody online to do the presentation, do we? All right. Well, I will continue,

00:04:38.837 --> 00:04:49.105
- and then when he comes on, he can correct everything I say. Okay. Sounds good. All right. So we'll start

00:04:49.105 --> 00:04:56.830
- with the Curry Profile TIF District. This was created, I believe, in 2018 when

00:04:57.986 --> 00:05:06.866
- A developer bought the former GE site, and it was two parcels. And at that point in time, they had huge

00:05:06.866 --> 00:05:15.490
- plans, great plans. We were really excited to see what they were going to do. And so they bought it.

00:05:15.490 --> 00:05:24.200
- We could put a TIF district in. We issued up to $6 million in bonds. We only went through the closing

00:05:24.200 --> 00:05:26.078
- cost because shortly,

00:05:26.242 --> 00:05:33.533
- Developer did a lot of work on the property and it kind of this property ended up right now. It's part

00:05:33.533 --> 00:05:40.682
- of the Simtra family and the Simtra is going into this to do quite a few manufacturing lines and the

00:05:40.682 --> 00:05:48.326
- work that the previous developer, which was Cook Group, what they put in the building made that transaction

00:05:48.326 --> 00:05:53.918
- ultimately possible and it attracted this business into this facility that had

00:05:55.426 --> 00:06:03.674
- really major issues and needed a lot of work. And so in some respects, it still was a great thing that

00:06:03.674 --> 00:06:11.361
- that all occurred because that property would not be where it's at today if it hadn't occurred.

00:06:11.361 --> 00:06:19.369
- But in 2020, COVID issues, the development stalled and that the developer decided that they weren't

00:06:19.369 --> 00:06:25.214
- going to be able to continue to use the property in a business decision.

00:06:25.378 --> 00:06:32.822
- They didn't draw any of the money. They had a pretty sophisticated abatement schedule that they did

00:06:32.822 --> 00:06:40.266
- not utilize because they realized that they weren't going to invest in it. So that was how this TIF

00:06:40.266 --> 00:06:47.860
- district was generated. We have accelerated the payments as much as we could to get the bond paid off

00:06:47.860 --> 00:06:55.006
- so we can get it off our books, get it off the developer's books. We have $10,600 left in that.

00:06:55.778 --> 00:07:02.786
- Purchaser center purchased the property and they're doing a lot of work. They also got a lot of abatements,

00:07:02.786 --> 00:07:09.275
- right? They got an abatement package that was probably the most generous that the county has given,

00:07:09.275 --> 00:07:15.958
- but it also had a lot more requirements from the business than we've ever required of anybody else for

00:07:15.958 --> 00:07:22.642
- an abatement. So I think at the end of the day, we gave more, but we got more. And so I think that was

00:07:22.642 --> 00:07:23.550
- a good thing.

00:07:24.770 --> 00:07:32.414
- So as far as long-term plans for the allocation area, I think at this point it's to get the hook bomb

00:07:32.414 --> 00:07:40.582
- paid off. I think this is also an area where as we do phase two or phase three of the career reconstruction,

00:07:40.582 --> 00:07:48.226
- I think this is able to support that to the extent they have revenues, but right now the revenues are

00:07:48.226 --> 00:07:53.022
- not going to come in very quickly because of the Abatement Act.

00:07:54.402 --> 00:08:01.990
- So I think that's kind of the long-term plan and as far as Going off the impact on each of the taxing

00:08:01.990 --> 00:08:09.727
- units. This is a two-parcel TIF. I think the impact of the taxing units are going to be Nominal at best

00:08:09.727 --> 00:08:17.686
- I think without this stiff district and without the The incentives that were created when this was created

00:08:17.686 --> 00:08:21.406
- property would not be where it's at today. So any

00:08:22.338 --> 00:08:30.834
- Impact I think long term the impact of this district is going to be very good. At the taxing units,

00:08:30.834 --> 00:08:39.414
- it's just a matter of getting that property up and up and going. OK, Charlie is on sweet Charlie and

00:08:39.414 --> 00:08:48.335
- I just finished curry profile TIF district. We want to note that Randy Cassidy has shown up. That sounds

00:08:48.335 --> 00:08:52.158
- good. This is Charlie. Can you guys hear me?

00:08:58.146 --> 00:09:09.311
- Yes, we can. I don't know. Is a straight line statement for the entire tenure graduated? Kind of neither,

00:09:09.311 --> 00:09:19.845
- right? What it is is I think it's very high for at least the first three years. And then there is a

00:09:19.845 --> 00:09:26.270
- commitment of the business that if they put in another line,

00:09:26.530 --> 00:09:32.445
- within the first three or four years, I don't remember, then aims at a high rate, and that new, that

00:09:32.445 --> 00:09:38.301
- second one will start at the high rate, and then that repeats a couple times, so that at the end of

00:09:38.301 --> 00:09:44.040
- the day, the first 10 years of the initial abatement has the potential to be very high, not 100%,

00:09:44.040 --> 00:09:50.131
- but like 90, 80, somewhere in that range, and then each additional ones have the ability to stay higher

00:09:50.131 --> 00:09:55.870
- until the last one, which would just, I think, standard abatement, because there's nothing there,

00:09:56.066 --> 00:10:03.249
- there's not a further action that would push it higher. Right. So it's here to approach. Well, it's

00:10:03.249 --> 00:10:10.505
- an incentive approach, right? If they meet their incentives, the abatement stays high. The abatement

00:10:10.505 --> 00:10:18.047
- starts to decrease. Right. So there will be some income from it because they're not at 100%. Well, first

00:10:18.047 --> 00:10:25.374
- year I think they are. Right. I think all abatements start first year 100%. There will be it won't be

00:10:25.634 --> 00:10:37.722
- 10 years of 100%. So there is in this then a service schedule put in here for the 10,600, which is not

00:10:37.722 --> 00:10:49.810
- going to happen because we're not going to pay them $133 a year, once a year, twice a year. We do have

00:10:49.810 --> 00:10:53.918
- some funds available. Now have 21,

00:10:57.346 --> 00:11:08.329
- Our plan for the current year is to pay that $10,660 and let it start accumulating again to be used

00:11:08.329 --> 00:11:19.421
- for things like the curry pike which is adjacent to the property. We can use it. But we're not going

00:11:19.421 --> 00:11:25.022
- to have much money coming in to do the curry pike.

00:11:26.818 --> 00:11:35.077
- few years, what's our plan for that money after the Curry Pike is done? Do we have a plan? I am I'm

00:11:35.077 --> 00:11:43.583
- not aware of what that plan would be. Right. We when we set this district up it was to support the the

00:11:43.583 --> 00:11:52.337
- exterior of that facility and that is that is not kind of in the cards for that right now. I think that's

00:11:52.337 --> 00:11:55.806
- a great thing to have Lisa Ridge look at.

00:11:56.482 --> 00:12:09.161
- And could SIMTRA potentially buy a bond from us which would cover whatever they're paying in taxes to

00:12:09.161 --> 00:12:15.998
- get their taxes? Property? I mean, that's a potential.

00:12:16.290 --> 00:12:23.524
- I guess at this point, I mean, you just expressed we're getting $10,000 to $20,000 in revenue a year.

00:12:23.524 --> 00:12:31.112
- I'm not sure it's worth the cost of issuance, right, at this point. So at that point, though, does revenue

00:12:31.112 --> 00:12:38.275
- that we should be giving back? I think it could. I also think Cook still owns that it's a two lot. I

00:12:38.275 --> 00:12:45.438
- think Cook still owns a second. I really want to have conversations with both Simtra and Cook to see

00:12:45.634 --> 00:12:53.369
- what kind of needs they see in that area. I'd also really like to talk to Lisa Ridge to see what kind

00:12:53.369 --> 00:13:01.029
- of support she thinks, particularly the Curry Profile intersection. Did Simter buy both lots or just

00:13:01.029 --> 00:13:08.840
- the one? Just the one. Okay, so the one that's in the back that Cook did some work on. So that's going

00:13:08.840 --> 00:13:15.134
- to generate some income. I think Cook kept the parking lot. That's the second lot.

00:13:15.330 --> 00:13:23.773
- I think the second lot is kind of the one closer to the Cook's campus that is essentially parking. From

00:13:23.773 --> 00:13:32.135
- the stop light north, right? If Cook held onto the parking lot, is that what you're talking about? The

00:13:32.135 --> 00:13:40.741
- parking lot on the west side which was the old General Electric that it enters off of. There's a building

00:13:40.741 --> 00:13:44.638
- in there. What is the road Mike Curry lived on?

00:13:45.090 --> 00:13:55.944
- Right there. Now it's profile off of Daniels Road. Next one to the east. There's that road and then

00:13:55.944 --> 00:14:07.558
- the parcel itself is where the retention pond. Right. The excesses. Did they take down that other building

00:14:07.558 --> 00:14:13.854
- that was there? There was no building on that particular.

00:14:14.434 --> 00:14:21.163
- There's two buildings on what I'm calling the center parcel. There's still two buildings. Actually,

00:14:21.163 --> 00:14:28.162
- three. Two manufacturing and then there's like a utility building. Then there's a central plant. Right.

00:14:28.162 --> 00:14:34.892
- Okay. That central plant then is on the parcel that was purchased. The other one is vacant or has a

00:14:34.892 --> 00:14:41.150
- parking lot. I think it's utilized for parking. But it does generate a little bit of income.

00:14:43.714 --> 00:14:51.668
- So that would then accumulate, figure out what we're gonna do after, because we'll have to make that

00:14:51.668 --> 00:14:59.622
- decision next year, if we pay that bond off, have to make that decision about what to do next. Right

00:14:59.622 --> 00:15:07.497
- now there's what, approximately $40,000? No, 10. 10 total. I think the plan is to get that paid off

00:15:07.497 --> 00:15:11.198
- this year. Yeah, we'll pay that off this year,

00:15:11.586 --> 00:15:19.641
- do that, we look at the revenue and see what the bonding case is. We ask SEMTRA and Cooke what their

00:15:19.641 --> 00:15:28.094
- infrastructure needs are in order to support their. If there would be a potential possibility of bonding.

00:15:28.094 --> 00:15:36.308
- So little money. We will have a couple of years of Curry Pike work. Whatever is there for the next two

00:15:36.308 --> 00:15:38.302
- or three years at least.

00:15:40.610 --> 00:15:48.119
- And I think Lisa would be who I'd first ask about. Because I remember when she was there, then also

00:15:48.119 --> 00:15:55.853
- after Cook purchases, there were railroad track issues, dealing with electricity, just kind of strange

00:15:55.853 --> 00:16:03.437
- things. We got the sidewalk along Curry. We got the three-plot along Curry. There's plenty of places

00:16:03.437 --> 00:16:08.318
- to put the money. And it's not that much money. It's just a map.

00:16:08.898 --> 00:16:18.513
- we're going to allocate that or we're going to use it for something that's going to be a private increase

00:16:18.513 --> 00:16:28.127
- the employment on. Jeff, so help me out here. In the event of a reorganization of Ellisville and Richland

00:16:28.127 --> 00:16:38.014
- Township. Well, it's in Richland Township. That is right. That is true. I haven't seen their final document.

00:16:39.682 --> 00:16:48.836
- I think either they're voting on or they're reviewing it tonight. A lot of it depends on if it's going

00:16:48.836 --> 00:16:57.902
- to be part of the town. There are a lot of rules that says if an area within a county TIF district is

00:16:57.902 --> 00:17:06.789
- annexed, what happens? Right. There is not a whole lot of rules on I don't think that the merger is

00:17:06.789 --> 00:17:09.278
- an annexation of this area.

00:17:10.018 --> 00:17:18.707
- If it's not annexed, I think the rules we have would still apply. But without seeing exactly what they're

00:17:18.707 --> 00:17:27.642
- doing, and I should say I've had a brief conversation with Mr. Farmer. I don't think they have any intention

00:17:27.642 --> 00:17:36.002
- of annexing this area or anything like that. I think their intent is to let the TIFDIS continue to do

00:17:36.002 --> 00:17:37.150
- what they do.

00:17:38.018 --> 00:17:45.022
- I think they're looking to do different things, right? So I don't want to, I'm not throwing shade anywhere.

00:17:45.022 --> 00:17:51.183
- Yeah, yeah, I know you're not. And I think based on my conversations with Mike Farmer is being

00:17:51.183 --> 00:17:58.057
- a reorganization, not an annexation. Right. That makes sense. Yeah. And if it's not in a municipal limit,

00:17:58.057 --> 00:18:05.191
- then I think the rules don't change. If it were to be annexed and we didn't have debt, then those properties,

00:18:05.191 --> 00:18:06.942
- that property would become

00:18:07.362 --> 00:18:13.649
- part of the city or town. Or the reorganization area for the original township. Reorganization areas,

00:18:13.649 --> 00:18:20.060
- there's not a lot out there on that, right? And there's not a lot of rules and statute on what happens.

00:18:20.060 --> 00:18:26.223
- Probably Adams Township in Hamilton County which they looked at, right? Sheridan Adams has been the

00:18:26.223 --> 00:18:32.757
- model. I don't think they have this kind of situation. But it helps add clarity if we know this obviously

00:18:32.757 --> 00:18:36.702
- for sure that looking beyond with the future will center there.

00:18:37.410 --> 00:18:44.622
- We have an obligation at the present moment, that obligation is minimal amount. So consequently, either

00:18:44.622 --> 00:18:51.627
- way we go, within a year we would have financial clarity in regards to which way it would go once we

00:18:51.627 --> 00:18:58.909
- pay off that. The only question is, is talking to Lisa and the other individual about what public needs.

00:18:58.909 --> 00:19:04.734
- I'm on here. Oh, wonderful. Hello, Ms. Lisa. I can use some homework for next year.

00:19:05.026 --> 00:19:12.616
- Sorry, I've had my hand raised for a few minutes, so I apologize. But, you know, in that area, when

00:19:12.616 --> 00:19:20.206
- SEMTRA took over, we did have an agreement with Cook for some improvements. And we also, instead of

00:19:20.206 --> 00:19:27.872
- doing the original Vernal Pike trail connection, we've come up with a different option that would go

00:19:27.872 --> 00:19:32.350
- along Profile Parkway, which is already built, and then go

00:19:32.514 --> 00:19:40.397
- of Curry Pike and build that trail on the south side of Profile Parkway to connect to the Karst Farm

00:19:40.397 --> 00:19:48.359
- Trail. So that's still out there. Also the railroad tracks that have been eliminated by the railroad.

00:19:48.359 --> 00:19:56.320
- It would be great to have those removed. We also have Profile Parkway west of Curry Pike on our radar

00:19:56.320 --> 00:20:02.174
- that it is going to need a reconstruction eventually just like Curry Pike.

00:20:05.890 --> 00:20:12.353
- from a from a money standpoint, Lisa, you're needing the redevelopment to help fund those. Yeah, yeah,

00:20:12.353 --> 00:20:18.690
- that would be that would be ideal. If that would be that we are still I don't know how the talks are

00:20:18.690 --> 00:20:25.216
- going. I know planning has been talking with center to see if they would commit to some of those things

00:20:25.216 --> 00:20:31.930
- that cook had originally committed to. And part of that was that trail on the north side of their property

00:20:31.930 --> 00:20:34.942
- goes along profile Parkway that would eliminate

00:20:35.202 --> 00:20:43.167
- that Vernal Pike Trail project that was going to be like 1.8 million in the West Side Tiff. And then

00:20:43.167 --> 00:20:51.527
- you would have everything connecting from Bloomington to the Karst Trail. I would be remiss to not remind

00:20:51.527 --> 00:20:59.650
- people that when the state did send an old act a year ago, they made changes to personal property that

00:20:59.650 --> 00:21:02.174
- do not affect people in a tiff.

00:21:04.258 --> 00:21:11.425
- There is no floor if you're outside of TIF district, but if you're inside of TIF district that was put

00:21:11.425 --> 00:21:18.732
- in place prior to when they enacted it, then there is a floor for your personal property. So I'm curious

00:21:18.732 --> 00:21:25.829
- how, when we talk to the businesses, I think year one, year two, year three, it's not going to really

00:21:25.829 --> 00:21:33.066
- matter, but year 10, year 15, year 20, there might be some, hey, actually having this in a TIF district

00:21:33.066 --> 00:21:34.110
- is hurting us.

00:21:35.106 --> 00:21:41.510
- So I don't think that's a next four or five year issue, but I think it will be interesting to see how

00:21:41.510 --> 00:21:48.039
- that all plays out. When Lisa is looking at it, we're looking at the infrastructure cost. It's a matter

00:21:48.039 --> 00:21:54.695
- of how our bonding costs will be, what our revenues are, and at this present moment we have a territorial

00:21:54.695 --> 00:22:00.094
- item that needs to be addressed so it will be set in November. And I'm not even sure.

00:22:00.706 --> 00:22:06.959
- what they're doing over their effects is territorial. I think it might be totally neutral. My expectation

00:22:06.959 --> 00:22:13.034
- is it would probably be pretty neutral to the TIF district. And what we're actually doing. Yeah. Okay.

00:22:13.034 --> 00:22:18.933
- Then it's just a matter of where the bonding capabilities are based upon our system cash flow is. I

00:22:18.933 --> 00:22:25.127
- think what we'll probably end up is because these areas anywhere that serves these areas will also serve

00:22:25.127 --> 00:22:29.374
- the Westside TIF district. So what I think you'll end up seeing is more

00:22:29.634 --> 00:22:42.442
- cost allocation between those two districts. Either bond or pay as you go, either way. Is there any,

00:22:42.442 --> 00:22:55.123
- I mean, what we do, we might want to put it back in the West side? I'm with the same thing. I would

00:22:55.123 --> 00:22:57.406
- say probably not.

00:22:57.698 --> 00:23:05.668
- we took it out of the west side to give it a longer duration right so this will give it well and and

00:23:05.668 --> 00:23:13.559
- to to make and to enable the process to occur i mean cook wasn't going to do the whole west side no

00:23:13.559 --> 00:23:21.845
- but i even if you collected it within that i mean we could designate certain areas of that tiff district

00:23:21.845 --> 00:23:26.974
- to pay for certain it's just the the time length was expanded by

00:23:27.234 --> 00:23:34.856
- The time length was expanded into the base was at its all time low because there wasn't anything there

00:23:34.856 --> 00:23:42.700
- anymore. I don't know why you would put it back in particularly because I'm not sure there's any projects

00:23:42.700 --> 00:23:50.470
- in the west side TIF that we have on the books that aren't physically connected to this district, right?

00:23:50.470 --> 00:23:54.910
- And that's the requirement to utilize the money. All right.

00:23:56.930 --> 00:24:10.453
- So we had no changes or corrections in this report other than what I made to make sure that some term

00:24:10.453 --> 00:24:24.638
- of the TIF was identified. From a sunset standpoint. Yeah. What are we looking at on our Prairie Pike TIF?

00:24:28.674 --> 00:24:40.053
- after 2039 because that's when it's scheduled. I think it's 25 years from 2043. We've got adequate time

00:24:40.053 --> 00:24:51.104
- for tax revenues to be generated. All right. One down. I guess maybe this what I'm going to what I'm

00:24:51.104 --> 00:24:58.654
- going to recommend that we do and this is for the on the cover page.

00:24:59.874 --> 00:25:10.556
- For this time, put a beginning and end here for each of these. That's good for everybody to be able

00:25:10.556 --> 00:25:21.559
- to look at in a quick view that says this one's going to go to here, to here, and then they know where

00:25:21.559 --> 00:25:26.686
- the revenues are going. Fullerton Pike is next.

00:25:30.562 --> 00:25:38.897
- I'm going to let Charlie take over unless he wants me to continue. As long as you guys can hear me okay.

00:25:38.897 --> 00:25:47.073
- Yes. Okay. I hear a little feedback, but as long as you guys are okay or you don't hear it. All right.

00:25:47.073 --> 00:25:55.250
- You're fine. Perfect. And I'm showing my screen. I don't know if you guys can see that, but you've got

00:25:55.250 --> 00:25:57.790
- a copy of the reports, I think.

00:25:57.922 --> 00:26:06.473
- And Jeff, you did a good job on Curry. Sorry, I was late joining. We just had some technical issues.

00:26:06.473 --> 00:26:15.279
- That's why I put the easy one first. Yeah, that was good. That was good. So Fullerton Pike, and I won't

00:26:15.279 --> 00:26:23.999
- go page by page. I don't know if you did, Jeff, or not. But there's a lot here in Fullerton, just like

00:26:23.999 --> 00:26:26.878
- there are in the other TIF areas.

00:26:27.970 --> 00:26:35.899
- Page three of the report shows our tax rates. Just wanna make sure everybody sees that. Just like in

00:26:35.899 --> 00:26:43.829
- the past, we do not capture the school referendum tax rates. So those are taken out, the schools get

00:26:43.829 --> 00:26:52.072
- to collect all the referendum money, even if it's in a TIF area. And the tax rates have been very stable

00:26:52.072 --> 00:26:55.134
- in this area and really in all of our,

00:26:55.234 --> 00:27:05.379
- districts. But for pay 26, the tax rate we will collect is 1.2425. Any questions about the tax rate

00:27:05.379 --> 00:27:15.829
- or how that impacts the different entities here? I'll explain how it's going to impact them in regards

00:27:15.829 --> 00:27:23.742
- to are you talking based upon where we're on their pay portion? Yes. Yeah, so

00:27:25.186 --> 00:27:32.646
- The main idea with the TIF is that whatever we're capturing would not have been built had we not done

00:27:32.646 --> 00:27:40.471
- the TIF area. So the school and the library and the township, they all get whatever tax, whatever assessed

00:27:40.471 --> 00:27:48.150
- value they had when we created the area. And then in the case of the school, they also get those dollars

00:27:48.150 --> 00:27:53.342
- from the referendum tax rates. We don't get any TIF revenue from that.

00:27:54.722 --> 00:28:10.579
- Now you have me confused. Okay. In the 2026 payable tax rate, you said 1.2425. Yes. But in the table

00:28:10.579 --> 00:28:21.726
- on page 5, you're showing a net tax rate of 9592. The difference being

00:28:22.146 --> 00:28:31.158
- The fire district has been removed. Yes, and that is also the case. So if it's a fire district, we don't

00:28:31.158 --> 00:28:40.256
- get to collect TIF revenue on that either. That falls into the same category as school referendum. That's

00:28:40.256 --> 00:28:47.294
- what decreases our total overall collective rate. Yeah, and we probably ought to,

00:28:47.906 --> 00:28:53.329
- put that on this page three, the fire district and just kind of keep those together. That would clarify

00:28:53.329 --> 00:28:58.543
- that a little bit, I think, because that is kind of disconnected. I looked at these two numbers and

00:28:58.543 --> 00:29:03.914
- they weren't the same. And I said, why aren't they the same? And I finally figured out that it was the

00:29:03.914 --> 00:29:09.337
- fire district. Yeah, we will. And we want to, you know, I think every year we constantly improve these.

00:29:09.337 --> 00:29:14.603
- And I think the end date of the TIF areas is great to put on the cover and we'll make this change as

00:29:14.603 --> 00:29:17.054
- well. So we'll have this flow together better.

00:29:17.666 --> 00:29:27.302
- So based on looking at on page five, we're at 0.9592 actual collectible tax rate. Correct. That's exactly

00:29:27.302 --> 00:29:36.574
- right. Yes. That will be added to page three before it's turned in. Correct. And the other thing that

00:29:36.574 --> 00:29:40.574
- happens is a couple of parcels out of this.

00:29:58.242 --> 00:30:09.820
- Well, in 2023, issued these bonds, but the parcel count was different. Yeah, and we can go back and

00:30:09.820 --> 00:30:21.398
- ask the auditor what happened to those. So I'm looking at page seven, that's the list of parcels. I

00:30:21.398 --> 00:30:27.998
- think you're referring to, there's a parcel, Bill Brown,

00:30:28.738 --> 00:30:35.923
- trust in a busted block. I can tell you why they were removed if that's the question. They were removed

00:30:35.923 --> 00:30:42.831
- because they had been annexed into the city. And so since there was no there were also no increment

00:30:42.831 --> 00:30:49.878
- nothing had been done so when they were removed because they were annexed into the city and we didn't

00:30:49.878 --> 00:30:53.470
- have debt on any of the TIF districts so by statute

00:30:54.178 --> 00:30:59.929
- if it's if when it gets annexed into the city out of a tiff district unless there's a bond obligation

00:30:59.929 --> 00:31:05.737
- then it is removed from the district district it didn't have a bond obligation at the time correct and

00:31:05.737 --> 00:31:11.488
- and those are the parcels where the where a site was proposed for the jail is that what we're talking

00:31:11.488 --> 00:31:17.352
- about close to the interstate right yeah but that's that it's that and i i forget how far north it went

00:31:17.352 --> 00:31:20.510
- from there yeah it doesn't yeah it matches up almost to

00:31:21.442 --> 00:31:34.846
- That makes sense. And we'll add that footnote to page seven of why those parcels show a zero for pay

00:31:34.846 --> 00:31:48.384
- 25 and pay 26. They came on and then they went off. Yeah. Yes. The question I had, what is what's the

00:31:48.384 --> 00:31:51.038
- MPT of Bloomington?

00:31:55.458 --> 00:32:06.582
- at the hospital. Yeah. Yeah. Surgery center. Oh, is that Monroe? It'd be Monroe Hospital. It's really

00:32:06.582 --> 00:32:17.815
- the only major hospital. The property's adjacent, right? Yeah, they're, they're in the TIF. It is. Now

00:32:17.815 --> 00:32:23.486
- Southern Indiana Medical's in there's off Tap Road.

00:32:26.082 --> 00:32:37.758
- that's in this district. The full of the mineral hospital. The hospital is in the district hospitals

00:32:37.758 --> 00:32:49.550
- is Indiana medical is not part. Part two. Map is on page. Here's our personal and exceed the interest

00:32:49.550 --> 00:32:54.174
- rate. These are all south of Fullerton.

00:32:55.714 --> 00:33:06.354
- Southern Indiana Medical is north. Southern Indiana Medical is north, but there's two parcels to it.

00:33:06.354 --> 00:33:17.099
- Couldn't figure out, because the parcel numbers are not on the map. Are for a couple of them, but not

00:33:17.099 --> 00:33:22.366
- the others. Finally figured out which one was the

00:33:22.562 --> 00:33:33.287
- There's a power station there. Yeah, Dukes got there, but that's that's to the south of the Monroe Hospital.

00:33:33.287 --> 00:33:43.618
- Southwest side as it comes, but it's it's designated. Southern Indiana Medical Park Monroe Medical Park.

00:33:43.618 --> 00:33:50.014
- Monroe what? No MPT of Bloomington. That is the Monroe Hospital.

00:33:55.202 --> 00:34:06.710
- Oh, okay. Let's look. Is that the parcel that is to the south of the Monroe Hospital? Good question.

00:34:06.710 --> 00:34:18.105
- Here's our parcel numbers when we look at our Southern Indiana Medical Park. Here's Monroe Hospital

00:34:18.105 --> 00:34:24.030
- at the present moment. This is the Duke substation.

00:34:24.674 --> 00:34:33.171
- the parcel that cuts through, because this is the roadway that extends from Monroe Hospital. That's

00:34:33.171 --> 00:34:41.752
- the hospital. That's the hospital, that's the Duke substation. No. This is the Duke substation. Duke

00:34:41.752 --> 00:34:50.419
- substation is over on the right here. Okay, so let's look at this parcel. Is this the parcel? This is

00:34:50.419 --> 00:34:52.798
- it right here. By this 008.

00:34:53.026 --> 00:35:04.646
- 0590008 including that one and 64 is the one at the bottom. Right, right here. That's this one down

00:35:04.646 --> 00:35:16.383
- here called Southern Indiana Medical Park. Right, we've also got these other parcel numbers which is

00:35:16.383 --> 00:35:23.006
- 08 and 64. 64, got 50, 61, 63, 61, 60. None of them are.

00:35:24.866 --> 00:35:37.210
- T.P. at Bloomington. 59, but that should be right here. It's not parcelized out. That should be. Time

00:35:37.210 --> 00:35:49.312
- off Fullerton. We have the roundabout and this is the hospital site. But it's a, it's a, isn't it a

00:35:49.312 --> 00:35:53.790
- not-for-profit now? AKB development.

00:35:53.954 --> 00:36:08.619
- mpkb that's the that's the back there's all of that all of the southern indiana medical part two here's

00:36:08.619 --> 00:36:22.014
- what i'm talking about richard here all southern indiana medical part yeah that house part two

00:36:22.146 --> 00:36:34.338
- And what we're referring to in our dialogue and discussion, I'm thinking Southern Indiana Medical Park,

00:36:34.338 --> 00:36:46.062
- one off Tap Road, which is not in the TIF district. We're everything essentially south of Fullerton

00:36:46.062 --> 00:36:51.806
- Pike. It's just. Well, at any point, in any way,

00:36:52.578 --> 00:37:05.758
- The map which is appearing on the page is missing partial numbers.

00:37:23.842 --> 00:37:41.323
- Well listed The listing of the parcels and the map are corresponding do not correspond One of the things

00:37:41.323 --> 00:37:53.310
- that we are told to do in the recommendation Parcel numbers and the map

00:37:54.754 --> 00:38:15.351
- And they do not match. We need a correction on that. That needs to get fixed. All right. So there's

00:38:15.351 --> 00:38:24.414
- that part of it. The second issue I had was

00:38:25.922 --> 00:38:40.645
- There is a recommendation that we should use 50% of the annual TIF revenue for the payment of the 2023

00:38:40.645 --> 00:38:52.510
- bridge bonds. There is a schedule of payments for those bonds on page 6, and it is

00:38:53.666 --> 00:39:04.544
- looks like the schedule for the entire bond. It doesn't tell me anything about the schedule of this

00:39:04.544 --> 00:39:15.422
- with respect to our TIF revenue. Yep, that's a good point of clarification. The way the TIF revenue

00:39:15.422 --> 00:39:18.142
- was pledged was that 50%

00:39:18.658 --> 00:39:27.095
- of the TIF revenue was pledged to the debt service on the bond. So the county auditor should be, and

00:39:27.095 --> 00:39:35.615
- that's why the recommendation is in there, should be using 50% of whatever TIF revenue we bring in to

00:39:35.615 --> 00:39:44.303
- make the bond payment. And whatever is left after that is gonna come from the county major bridge fund.

00:39:44.303 --> 00:39:46.558
- Right, that works for now.

00:39:46.882 --> 00:39:57.142
- looking at long-term in regards to what we think the overall revenue will be prior to the sun setting?

00:39:57.142 --> 00:40:07.104
- Well, if you look at what our TIF revenues have been, it is entirely possible that by the time this

00:40:07.104 --> 00:40:16.766
- bond gets to 29, TIF revenue will be sufficient to pay the bond. Off. To make the bond payments.

00:40:17.570 --> 00:40:28.020
- And I noticed that there's a big difference between the first five years and the rest of this bond.

00:40:28.020 --> 00:40:38.575
- Was it the intent or is it this district is to take over 100% obligation of that bond at that point?

00:40:38.575 --> 00:40:45.054
- That was the original intention. My memory is that the 50% is

00:40:46.370 --> 00:40:53.833
- dedicated to that, while the intent's probably not. The hope may be the better word. Because we've always

00:40:53.833 --> 00:41:00.944
- had the concern with this TIF district with Monroe Hospital, right? Because that's what happens when

00:41:00.944 --> 00:41:08.125
- they go not for profit. That's always been a concern with this TIF district, in which case the bottom

00:41:08.125 --> 00:41:15.518
- could fall out of the revenues. And so the hope was always that we front loaded the payment of the bonds

00:41:15.682 --> 00:41:22.272
- with the hope that once we get through year five, Lisa probably may not know off the top of her head,

00:41:22.272 --> 00:41:28.992
- but at that point in time, there was a second or third major bridge fund project that we wanted to make

00:41:28.992 --> 00:41:35.776
- sure we had revenues for, that if we needed the bond for, we could. That was gonna be four or five years

00:41:35.776 --> 00:41:42.431
- down the road. All right, some dialogue in this report should reflect that. Why'd you look at this and

00:41:42.431 --> 00:41:45.662
- say, well, the bond payments went from a million,

00:41:45.954 --> 00:41:53.834
- Wait a minute. What kind of magic happens right there? Frontload everything to the bond in hopes to

00:41:53.834 --> 00:42:01.951
- build up the cumulative bridge so that whenever we have additional bridges that are needed we have the

00:42:01.951 --> 00:42:09.832
- capacity to pay for it because the first majority of the bridge or the Florida flag bridge is being

00:42:09.832 --> 00:42:15.742
- paid from county share standpoint. I think the other part of that equation

00:42:16.002 --> 00:42:23.608
- of it reducing is also what we talked about kind of with the annexation stuff, right? And so as long

00:42:23.608 --> 00:42:31.289
- as we have debt on that property in that TIF district, then that district would contain and the other

00:42:31.289 --> 00:42:39.421
- half of that is we also wanted to make sure the debt remained in place for the duration of the TIF district

00:42:39.421 --> 00:42:45.822
- so we can continue to make whatever improvements we need for the floor. Makes sense.

00:42:45.922 --> 00:42:54.364
- the schedule doesn't make any sense at all. It just shows us debt services. It's not showing, it's not

00:42:54.364 --> 00:43:02.888
- showing how much of the debt is anticipated to be paid by the district at any particular point in time.

00:43:02.888 --> 00:43:11.167
- It just says, and we kick in a little bit here and there if we can. I think it would be better if we

00:43:11.167 --> 00:43:12.478
- actually showed

00:43:16.642 --> 00:43:24.581
- We showed the reality of the contribution that the TIF district is making rather than this. Well, the

00:43:24.581 --> 00:43:32.520
- whole bond is being paid off by the county and we're going to kick in what we can when we can because

00:43:32.520 --> 00:43:40.926
- right now we've did a resolution which takes 50% of our annual revenue. And right now our annual revenue is

00:43:47.874 --> 00:43:58.502
- Hopefully, it's going to be about 150,000, 160,000, something like that. And so we would take 80,000

00:43:58.502 --> 00:44:09.235
- of that, or whatever the half of that is, and we'd make that a contribution to the county general. It

00:44:09.235 --> 00:44:17.022
- would work. I think that the money would go straight to the debt payment.

00:44:18.018 --> 00:44:27.268
- a check to the debt holder part of that funding would come from this fund come from the major bridge

00:44:27.268 --> 00:44:36.884
- fund okay so we would have to dedicate now so since it's not a precise amount do we have to on an annual

00:44:36.884 --> 00:44:45.950
- basis set that figure as a payment as a claim right correct okay all right now at present there is

00:44:47.778 --> 00:44:56.161
- $600,000 sitting in that pot. Are we to take 50% of that? Just the revenue. Huh? Just the revenue, not

00:44:56.161 --> 00:45:04.869
- the principal. Just the revenue. Okay. Okay. And I believe that the, I can confirm this with bond council,

00:45:04.869 --> 00:45:13.334
- I think what bond council had said at the time is that you have, that's available for the bond payment,

00:45:13.334 --> 00:45:17.566
- but as long as the bond gets paid from the sources,

00:45:18.178 --> 00:45:28.723
- You're okay. Right. So then, so there will be a claim for 50% of revenue that will come through some

00:45:28.723 --> 00:45:39.477
- point, twice a year? Because we're, we get twice a year? I don't know when, are the bond payments, the

00:45:39.477 --> 00:45:45.950
- bond payments look like they are? Yeah, they're twice a year.

00:45:46.434 --> 00:45:55.200
- We're going to have two claims each year for half of our distributed revenue. Pay this off, right? And

00:45:55.200 --> 00:46:04.221
- I guess I'd ask Charlie the question of if the county chose to pay for 100% of this debt from a different

00:46:04.221 --> 00:46:11.710
- funding source, that doesn't violate any pledge or anything like that, is that correct?

00:46:14.946 --> 00:46:22.857
- That's what we would argue, Jeff. That's a good point. But I think going back to what you said and the

00:46:22.857 --> 00:46:30.614
- way the pledge resolution reads, I think we've pledged that 50% of the TIF revenue because we needed

00:46:30.614 --> 00:46:38.449
- to show that in order to keep those TIF revenues on those parcels if they were annexed. So I think we

00:46:38.449 --> 00:46:43.902
- would want to make those TIF payments on the bonds if at all possible.

00:46:44.354 --> 00:46:52.046
- Is there a way you could add a column to this exhibit E that would have an estimated payments for each?

00:46:52.046 --> 00:46:59.073
- I think that makes a lot of sense in the end. It'll be an estimated because we don't know what

00:46:59.073 --> 00:47:06.470
- our collections are going to be. But just to show that we do have that commitment. Jeff, I think we

00:47:06.470 --> 00:47:14.014
- do have some cash. And we don't spend much out of that Fullerton Pike TIF because of this commitment.

00:47:15.266 --> 00:47:22.366
- Well, I think that the commitment is to pay at least 50%. I think if the redevelopment chose to, they

00:47:22.366 --> 00:47:29.465
- could pay more than that. But I think we should at least get what our commitment is in the paper. And

00:47:29.465 --> 00:47:36.426
- then much like what we did with Curry Pike, if you guys chose to pay additional to free up money in

00:47:36.426 --> 00:47:40.254
- Major Bridge, we could certainly consider that. Right.

00:47:40.930 --> 00:47:48.892
- What appears on page six would stay there. We just add a column to the right, which is estimated. If

00:47:48.892 --> 00:47:57.012
- district commitment, yeah. OK, with that we know exactly where we are from a fine. Additional 50% that

00:47:57.012 --> 00:48:05.446
- we utilize for any other projects that are necessary. Correct. That makes me more comfortable. Our biggest

00:48:05.446 --> 00:48:10.334
- biggest concern on this one is simply a matter of our largest

00:48:10.658 --> 00:48:21.787
- you know, partner on this, taxpayer, which is why we pledged a percentage and not an amount, to be honest

00:48:21.787 --> 00:48:32.286
- with you, is because. All right. Okay. I'm going to, so that's the map and modification of schedule

00:48:32.286 --> 00:48:39.006
- on page six. All right. All right. That sounds good. Moving on.

00:48:40.322 --> 00:48:50.320
- Okay, let's go to the big one. Wilmington Township. Save the west side for the last. Okay. That sounds

00:48:50.320 --> 00:49:00.027
- good. So again, I think you guys all have copies of our report. Yes. I am presenting on the screen.

00:49:00.027 --> 00:49:09.054
- This is similar in a lot of ways to Curry profile in that we have a bond outstanding that is

00:49:09.314 --> 00:49:17.836
- could be up to 4.5 million, but the developer has only drawn 61,500 of that so far, and that's the amount

00:49:17.836 --> 00:49:25.876
- that's outstanding. We've paid interest on that every year, but we have not paid any principal down

00:49:25.876 --> 00:49:33.915
- so far. And it's our understanding the developer is still looking at the area, and there is still a

00:49:33.915 --> 00:49:37.694
- possibility that they may have something there

00:49:38.306 --> 00:49:46.228
- that they wanna do, that they wanna be reimbursed for some infrastructure and some costs out there that

00:49:46.228 --> 00:49:53.998
- this still could happen. Although our time is getting short because this one will expire in 2033 when

00:49:53.998 --> 00:50:01.997
- that bond is paid off. So. And I would give a little update to that. I've seen the emails from the state

00:50:01.997 --> 00:50:06.110
- where they got their last NOMAR. Is that the correct?

00:50:06.466 --> 00:50:14.177
- word there, Lisa Lomar. No, their map. What are map revision for Hunter Valley for Hunter Valley? So

00:50:14.177 --> 00:50:21.888
- I think that and I've talked with Mr Crider and I think their intention is to build the project this

00:50:21.888 --> 00:50:29.599
- year. At their last remaining obstacle seems to have been overcome. So essentially where we're at is

00:50:29.599 --> 00:50:36.318
- just a matter of, you know, approving it as it moves forward from a funding standpoint.

00:50:39.074 --> 00:50:46.597
- Yeah, and once he gets started, I will probably have a conversation with you guys, and I'll probably

00:50:46.597 --> 00:50:54.045
- have a conversation with Bond Council. The original amortization schedule, of course, was scheduled

00:50:54.045 --> 00:51:01.791
- based upon a longer payback period to see what the options are. I don't think it's the intent of anyone

00:51:01.791 --> 00:51:06.334
- not reimburse what we can. Well, there is. OK, so we do have

00:51:07.138 --> 00:51:22.332
- Schedule on page 5 for the listing And then we have another one on page And then we have another one

00:51:22.332 --> 00:51:32.862
- on page 8 which looks like it is for the full 4.5 beginning this year

00:51:37.890 --> 00:51:46.370
- That is correct. And the one on page eight is really for illustration purposes, I would say. And that's

00:51:46.370 --> 00:51:54.523
- assuming that the developer would draw the full $4.5 million, what the payments would be every year

00:51:54.523 --> 00:52:02.758
- after that in order to get the bonds retired on time. I have no doubt that he will take it all. Once

00:52:02.758 --> 00:52:06.590
- he gets the project moving, they will take it.

00:52:06.882 --> 00:52:19.096
- What I have a question about is how does, what they've drawn already, the 61500 figure into this amortization

00:52:19.096 --> 00:52:30.199
- schedule, assuming that the debt already is 61500, and I don't see that on this schedule, so that's

00:52:30.199 --> 00:52:33.086
- got me a little confused.

00:52:33.218 --> 00:52:44.823
- assumed to be included in the four and a half million. It's not broken out separately on the second

00:52:44.823 --> 00:52:57.357
- one. Yeah, it's just the full 4.5. So we would assume then that the first principle, okay, so it's included

00:52:57.357 --> 00:53:00.606
- in the 4.5. And in page 16,

00:53:14.850 --> 00:53:27.469
- estimated TIF revenue. On page 16, you've given us our estimated revenue based upon revenue expectations

00:53:27.469 --> 00:53:40.208
- for 2026, which are considerably less than the debt service which is projected here. Now, as I understand

00:53:40.208 --> 00:53:43.934
- it then, the developer ends up

00:53:46.530 --> 00:53:59.227
- that but this only goes through 2030 so there's three more years yeah you're your assumption is correct

00:53:59.227 --> 00:54:11.070
- I think what if we don't get any more build out if he doesn't build anything else that's taxable

00:54:11.362 --> 00:54:18.709
- we won't have enough TIF revenue to pay the full bond. If he draws the four and a half million. Yeah.

00:54:18.709 --> 00:54:26.417
- And then the developer eats that because they're, you know, that the only thing that gets paid is whatever

00:54:26.417 --> 00:54:33.620
- TIF revenue comes in. Right. Okay. So it behooves him to either find tenants to use his property or

00:54:33.620 --> 00:54:37.726
- the net effect just on, just I'm clear on this, Charlie.

00:54:38.178 --> 00:54:48.004
- is when we're looking at the difference, you know, we're half a million dollars short based on what

00:54:48.004 --> 00:54:58.222
- our recent tax revenues, if it doesn't grow from an increment standpoint, there's approximately 670,000

00:54:58.222 --> 00:55:05.886
- that would. If I look at on page nine, this is the allocation fund estimates.

00:55:07.586 --> 00:55:30.818
- if settlements are running $500,000. So why is estimated if revenue $260,000 on page 16? We made an

00:55:30.818 --> 00:55:33.374
- assumption

00:55:33.954 --> 00:55:43.156
- may not be correct that we need to update. We assumed that some of the property was going to be sold

00:55:43.156 --> 00:55:52.358
- to the county for a project. And by doing that, we were gonna take some taxable property and make it

00:55:52.358 --> 00:56:01.925
- tax exempt. That may not happen now. So I think we need to look at that and maybe update that projection

00:56:01.925 --> 00:56:03.838
- of TIF revenue. Yes.

00:56:05.026 --> 00:56:12.815
- Or at least annotate that. I guess we're sitting here and we're going through the fiscal plan of this.

00:56:12.815 --> 00:56:20.377
- Jeff, is that a correct statement? Is there still something out there or for them to correct to get

00:56:20.377 --> 00:56:28.014
- this correct? Just an annotation on the note. I would do an annotation because of my opinion until a

00:56:28.014 --> 00:56:34.366
- site is chosen, a site's not been chosen. And there are a number of possible sites.

00:56:35.010 --> 00:56:44.619
- You know, where it goes, I have no idea. But I would think that you annotate it this year, the next

00:56:44.619 --> 00:56:54.517
- year you correct it together. Given the circumstance with the bond holder that's already purchased the

00:56:54.517 --> 00:57:03.646
- bond, hasn't drawn down on it, he's aware of this type of situation. Yes. There is debt on it.

00:57:05.410 --> 00:57:14.053
- His debt at this question is, do we pay off this sixty one five or do we let it hang? I. I wouldn't

00:57:14.053 --> 00:57:22.868
- pay it off because he's informed us or he's informed me that he's going to try to build the road this

00:57:22.868 --> 00:57:32.894
- year, and I'd rather have the road at the road and get everything. And since this is a debt on the entire district,

00:57:34.050 --> 00:57:41.693
- anything that gets annexed in that district is still going to be in the tip, right? Okay. All right.

00:57:41.693 --> 00:57:49.638
- So it just, it, it, I guess the issue is that we would like that annotation on page 16. It'd be a little

00:57:49.638 --> 00:57:57.206
- more emphasis on the speculative or the unknown nature of what's going to happen there. Cause right

00:57:57.206 --> 00:58:02.654
- now it shows us upside down. Yep. That's a good point. We will do that.

00:58:09.058 --> 00:58:22.843
- there was something again you've got this the same issue with the that tax rate on page 6 yes which

00:58:22.843 --> 00:58:33.182
- is including the fire district and fire district actually comes out and it

00:58:41.922 --> 00:59:05.851
- sure that comes out. And Jeff, am I correct at the West River LLC at the property that the county purchase?

00:59:05.851 --> 00:59:11.390
- Would not be. I wouldn't

00:59:11.938 --> 00:59:30.410
- Page 15. It's a negative $14 million. That is another parcel. I think it's a senior living center that

00:59:30.410 --> 00:59:40.094
- it looks like has become fully tax exempt for pay 26.

00:59:40.386 --> 00:59:52.655
- We're going to confirm that with the auditor as well. But that's why it went down to zero for pay 26.

00:59:52.655 --> 01:00:05.045
- So that's a big impact for us. And the VA is non-profit anyway. That sounds more like why it went down

01:00:05.045 --> 01:00:08.894
- from $250,000. Yep. That's big.

01:00:13.122 --> 01:00:21.239
- doesn't make any sense. Yeah. And that's why we've got the question in on that because in the past part

01:00:21.239 --> 01:00:29.355
- of the facility had been given tax exempt status. So we, we captured most of the AV, but there was some

01:00:29.355 --> 01:00:37.316
- that was tax exempt, but for as of now pay 26, it looks like a hundred percent tax exempt. So we will

01:00:37.316 --> 01:00:41.374
- get that resolved before we issue the final report.

01:00:43.234 --> 01:01:04.024
- Now, I do know that facility had some kind of change occur at the middle of last year as we saw a big

01:01:04.024 --> 01:01:10.750
- difference in their water usage.

01:01:12.322 --> 01:01:22.226
- It went down by half. I don't know whether that, there was some transition that occurred there in terms

01:01:22.226 --> 01:01:31.939
- of who owned it. Something like that. It's a big enough difference. We had to make sure we understand

01:01:31.939 --> 01:01:40.414
- what's going on there. Yeah. We will definitely do that. The other thing that I noticed,

01:01:42.370 --> 01:01:52.092
- And this is taking the parcels against the map. The map which appears on page at the end of this, which

01:01:52.092 --> 01:02:01.440
- is gonna be paid. Whatever it is, whatever page it is, it's the map. This map does not show all the

01:02:01.440 --> 01:02:12.190
- parcels that are in the TIF, as far as I can tell. Because it is showing the parcels that are in Bloomington Town.

01:02:12.354 --> 01:02:31.105
- Yep, but showing the parcels that are in There should be a bunch of parcels in Richland Township that

01:02:31.105 --> 01:02:34.782
- are part of the TIF

01:02:47.202 --> 01:02:55.076
- Okay, Lisa or Jeff, can you help us with that? Yeah, and get us in. Yeah, well, I'll get in touch with

01:02:55.076 --> 01:03:03.102
- John Baten, our GIS coordinator. Okay. And have him run. I'm gonna I'm gonna have him run all four maps.

01:03:03.102 --> 01:03:10.823
- Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And I sent these maps, those, John had sent those to me in February that they were

01:03:10.823 --> 01:03:16.862
- all updated. So that's that came from him. That particular map is not correct.

01:03:18.594 --> 01:03:30.322
- Okay. Another thing I had. I did have a question. Oh, this is for Lisa. On the proposed projects listing,

01:03:30.322 --> 01:03:42.382
- it is showing the extension of Curry Pike, which is now Hunter Valley, as being four lanes with intersection

01:03:42.382 --> 01:03:47.582
- turn lanes, et cetera, et cetera. And there is

01:03:48.162 --> 01:03:56.745
- a note about construction costs and fixes two lane and four lane numbers and comes up with a different

01:03:56.745 --> 01:04:05.077
- number. So I didn't change those because I haven't really been in contact with Steve Crider. He was

01:04:05.077 --> 01:04:13.493
- in contact with Paul. I don't have the the cost estimate that he he would need to provide. I can get

01:04:13.493 --> 01:04:14.910
- that updated but

01:04:15.234 --> 01:04:22.409
- I have been, I really haven't been involved in this project. Jeff and Jeff and Steve Crider usually

01:04:22.409 --> 01:04:29.584
- contact Jeff Cockrell and then Steve Crider would contact Paul. So I can get the most latest update

01:04:29.584 --> 01:04:36.975
- from Steve Crider. Okay, that's what we need. Yeah, and my memory is that it's once it gets beyond the

01:04:36.975 --> 01:04:41.854
- creek there, it's two lanes. That's what I was remembering as well.

01:04:42.850 --> 01:04:51.093
- It definitely is in four lanes all the way. So I think that was just in the original setup. I was originally

01:04:51.093 --> 01:04:58.883
- supposed to be four and then we cut it back down and we didn't have the money. Correct. But that note,

01:04:58.883 --> 01:05:06.445
- which is note number two underneath that table, that needs to be corrected so that it's clear about

01:05:06.445 --> 01:05:11.134
- what's going on. And then the entry in the table itself needs

01:05:11.298 --> 01:05:20.761
- be corrected too, because there is a, I think it's four lanes up to the bridge and then it's two lanes

01:05:20.761 --> 01:05:30.133
- after that, I believe. But that needs to be corrected in this report. Okay. All right. So that's what

01:05:30.133 --> 01:05:38.494
- we've got for this one. All right, that sounds great. We'll get that revised and back out.

01:05:40.066 --> 01:05:50.227
- Are these estimates still good, Lisa? For Westside? What'd you ask me, Randy? Are these estimates still,

01:05:50.227 --> 01:06:00.098
- you feel so good with Hunter Valley? That's what I want to check with Steve Kreider because he hasn't

01:06:00.098 --> 01:06:07.646
- provided me any numbers recently. All right. And I, yeah. On to the Westside.

01:06:12.802 --> 01:06:22.953
- That sounds good. So we will, just like we said earlier, we'll make sure on the cover page on all of

01:06:22.953 --> 01:06:33.104
- those, we'll put our expected expiration date. So we'll have that on the west side. That one will be

01:06:33.104 --> 01:06:40.542
- ending. And we do have two bond issues outstanding on that district. Yep.

01:06:42.530 --> 01:06:52.075
- And in this one, we do have some parcels that the city of Bloomington annex. So we've got some sharing

01:06:52.075 --> 01:07:01.528
- of revenues, but since we had those bonds outstanding, we got to keep our tax rate, everything except

01:07:01.528 --> 01:07:08.478
- the city. Bloomington gets their portion of the tax rate on those parcels.

01:07:08.738 --> 01:07:18.947
- we'll go to 2039, that's the final payment on both bond issues. So is there certain pages we wanna go

01:07:18.947 --> 01:07:29.356
- through on this or how would you guys like to handle this one? Let's look at the tax rates again. Okay.

01:07:29.356 --> 01:07:36.062
- Because there's no annotation at the bottom of the tax rate table.

01:07:36.578 --> 01:07:43.576
- telling us what gets included and what doesn't get included. Okay. And that's, that's a good point.

01:07:43.576 --> 01:07:50.783
- So, um, right now, and this would be possibly impacted as we talked about with Ellisville and the, um,

01:07:50.783 --> 01:07:57.851
- reorganization, but as of now, Richland beam blossom does not have, uh, the school district does not

01:07:57.851 --> 01:08:05.758
- have any referendum rates. So we get the full school tax rate and there is no fire district out there. Uh, it's,

01:08:06.178 --> 01:08:14.294
- So we get we get the full tax rate for this this area. Good. But there is a vote tonight on the fire

01:08:14.294 --> 01:08:22.329
- district. Yeah, changes, right? I think that's the territory or the territory and I'm not sure. I'm

01:08:22.329 --> 01:08:30.606
- not sure the what I know the rules aren't totally the same for both the district and territory. I just

01:08:30.606 --> 01:08:34.302
- don't know how it's affected here, right? OK.

01:08:37.154 --> 01:08:45.573
- Yeah, and it would most likely reduce our TIF revenue. We would lose the fire tax rate that's in the

01:08:45.573 --> 01:08:54.326
- township right now. That will go away and there will be a fire territory rate that we would not collect.

01:08:54.326 --> 01:09:02.078
- They're basically treated the same as fire districts now. That law changed a few years back.

01:09:04.866 --> 01:09:13.720
- So if the territory is successful, that would most likely reduce our TIF revenue in the future. Is that

01:09:13.720 --> 01:09:22.234
- something we need to look at from a projection standpoint? We can definitely, we've got a cash flow

01:09:22.234 --> 01:09:30.833
- back in later in the report. We could show the cash flow with that assumption. I think that's a good

01:09:30.833 --> 01:09:34.238
- way to look at it. That's a good point.

01:09:40.322 --> 01:09:50.544
- two schedules, one for the 2020 bond. Yep. In bonds. I'm trying with each of those. And you give us

01:09:50.544 --> 01:10:00.971
- an estimated debt service coverage. And we've had better coverage now than we've ever had before. The

01:10:00.971 --> 01:10:08.126
- question is, why don't we have any money? Coverage was on cash. Yeah.

01:10:08.322 --> 01:10:15.771
- And we are building our cash back up. So, you know, we did dip down, but when we get back to that cash

01:10:15.771 --> 01:10:23.291
- flow page, you'll see that we are starting to build that back up. Now, Lisa may have some more projects

01:10:23.291 --> 01:10:30.523
- that come into play in the future. We'd kind of stopped, you know, because we didn't have any money

01:10:30.523 --> 01:10:36.670
- to spend. A couple questions for Charlie. I'm looking at the time coverage, I guess.

01:10:37.698 --> 01:10:45.815
- If the Art Redevelopment Commission chooses to do another bond in the future, I mean, should they be

01:10:45.815 --> 01:10:53.932
- reminded or is it still the case that, you know, 10 years is probably the shortest you want to issue

01:10:53.932 --> 01:11:01.406
- the bonds for? Or am I? That is a, that's a good rule of thumb. You know, there's, you know,

01:11:01.698 --> 01:11:08.169
- Sometimes that's different, but that is a good way to look at it. That's kind of the minimum because

01:11:08.169 --> 01:11:14.705
- of the costs you have to go through to do a bond issue. 10 years is kind of that good starting point.

01:11:14.705 --> 01:11:21.112
- If we're going to look for a big project, let's look for one in the next couple of years so that we

01:11:21.112 --> 01:11:25.982
- can get that bonding completed before 29. So it can be a nice 10 year. Yes.

01:11:36.610 --> 01:11:46.775
- I guess I had another question. I noticed that we were getting between 24 and 25, had the same amount

01:11:46.775 --> 01:11:56.939
- of cash invested, but our interest went way down in 25. Anybody know why that went down? I don't know

01:11:56.939 --> 01:12:05.310
- why, other than that's across the board, everything we saw at the county level with

01:12:05.986 --> 01:12:16.353
- Interest received from investments, I think. I think it's the rate that the banks are paying and the

01:12:16.353 --> 01:12:26.721
- treasuries are paying. I think it's going. It's hard to get interest on funds. I mean, I think for a

01:12:26.721 --> 01:12:33.598
- couple years when the Fed increased the rate to control inflation,

01:12:35.874 --> 01:12:44.126
- when we got all the revenue from from savings right now that it's being reduced i mean that's one of

01:12:44.126 --> 01:12:52.459
- the costs of that or the ratchet down a little bit too yeah that's probably the biggest thing here is

01:12:52.459 --> 01:13:00.874
- our our fund balance just went down you know by quite a bit so at the at the end of 24 we just had you

01:13:00.874 --> 01:13:05.694
- know 347 000 of cash so that that made a big difference in

01:13:05.986 --> 01:13:19.134
- 25 of how much interest we could earn. We need to look at projects that have occurred two years from now.

01:13:41.698 --> 01:13:57.944
- Okay. Changes in value. Put that together. We've got our expected TIF revenue, which is running

01:13:57.944 --> 01:14:10.974
- a million-dollar ballpark. In the past, we were expecting it to be something

01:14:11.298 --> 01:14:30.011
- Like that? Yeah, we expect our TIF revenue for 26 to be just over 3.1 million. Right, right. Okay.

01:14:30.011 --> 01:14:35.870
- On page 21, the total revenue.

01:14:40.642 --> 01:14:48.876
- And we've got a new page, a corrected page, and we'll get that. The report you have does not have the

01:14:48.876 --> 01:14:57.110
- project cost in 26 that Lisa provided to us. So we're gonna spend more in 26 than what that shows. So

01:14:57.110 --> 01:15:05.183
- I've got a revised page. I don't know if you guys can see this on the screen or not, but. Is that a

01:15:05.183 --> 01:15:06.878
- revised page for 16?

01:15:11.362 --> 01:15:25.283
- for page 21. Just a brief note, you could probably take off the with school payment. Yeah, that's a

01:15:25.283 --> 01:15:32.382
- good point too. Yeah, we're committed to that now.

01:15:34.114 --> 01:15:43.496
- So the page 21 that you guys have at the bottom, the projects are all blank for 2026, that's not correct.

01:15:43.496 --> 01:15:52.966
- The version I've got on the screen right now shows a Curry Pike reconstruction, 750,000 for 26 and 165,000

01:15:52.966 --> 01:16:01.994
- for Vernal Pike Connector Road. So with that, our estimated spending for 26 is just over 2.4 million.

01:16:01.994 --> 01:16:04.030
- And that would give us

01:16:05.858 --> 01:16:17.354
- All right, my question goes up to the top part of this chart. Okay. Where it says total revenue, 2027.

01:16:17.354 --> 01:16:28.850
- The sum of 2.7 million and 3.1 million is not 3.1 million. We're not including the fund balance in the

01:16:28.850 --> 01:16:34.654
- total revenue line. So the beginning balance. Okay.

01:16:36.642 --> 01:16:44.151
- is excluded. So, and we've got some extra things there that were in the past like that beginning balance

01:16:44.151 --> 01:16:51.445
- from the 20. When you draw a straight line and then you do a total below it, that would be the sum of

01:16:51.445 --> 01:16:59.026
- the two numbers above it. Yeah, we need to space that out better. That's a good point. It's the beginning

01:16:59.026 --> 01:17:04.318
- balance should just stand on its own and then have some space after that.

01:17:05.186 --> 01:17:13.137
- We'll turn that up too. There's actually two pieces to this up above. There's the beginning balance

01:17:13.137 --> 01:17:20.453
- and beginning balance, and then there's the one which has to do with estimated TIF revenue,

01:17:20.453 --> 01:17:28.563
- federal funding, total. Yeah. So there should be a total balance up above there too. That begins. And

01:17:28.563 --> 01:17:34.686
- we've got the bonds, school payment, fire truck, and then the items that you

01:17:34.850 --> 01:17:48.945
- just mentioned that need to go into this. Yep. And what was your final year? The end of 26,

01:17:48.945 --> 01:18:01.662
- we have a 1,822,837 is the estimated ending balance for 26. 1,832? 822. 1,822,837.

01:18:06.082 --> 01:18:16.552
- this chart should have a subtotal for beginning balance a subtotal for total revenue a subtotal for

01:18:16.552 --> 01:18:27.441
- total disbursements and then an ending balance yeah we will make that update right so it's the subtotal

01:18:27.441 --> 01:18:31.838
- for beginning balance that you're missing

01:18:36.258 --> 01:18:42.883
- I guess part of what confuses me in this is that we have an estimated TIF revenue, and I know historically

01:18:42.883 --> 01:18:49.321
- we've had other revenue components to it, but this year we don't. So your estimated TIF revenue is also

01:18:49.321 --> 01:18:55.574
- your total revenue, and so I don't know if, at least for this year, that could be simplified or not,

01:18:55.574 --> 01:19:00.094
- if that makes sense. That is our total overall revenue plus the balance.

01:19:06.402 --> 01:19:32.670
- It does get shown later on. There's a five. Yeah, just the way that that chart is written. Yeah.

01:19:32.770 --> 01:19:38.840
- We'll clean that up, and I think Jeff's got a good point. In the past, we had other revenue besides

01:19:38.840 --> 01:19:45.092
- TIF in there, and the total revenue was more applicable. Now it kind of, it doesn't make as much sense

01:19:45.092 --> 01:19:51.283
- because it's repeating that same number. But I think we can format this better. Yeah, I think you can

01:19:51.283 --> 01:19:54.622
- format it so that it's better. It's better, yes. Okay.

01:20:01.122 --> 01:20:10.093
- we're expecting them to end up in twenty seven. That ending balance will be two million six thirty two

01:20:10.093 --> 01:20:19.934
- four fifty one and that's after putting eight hundred thousand in for Curry Pike reconstruction in twenty seven.

01:20:36.322 --> 01:21:01.267
- We're on to Parsons didn't check all these I'm assuming they're correct because it's a lot of work I

01:21:01.267 --> 01:21:04.478
- noticed that

01:21:07.426 --> 01:21:19.463
- Base for 2026 is down by 5 million. I know why that's occurred. That's a result of the formula required

01:21:19.463 --> 01:21:31.037
- by DLGF. So the county auditor has to put in certain things into that. And it's just a mathematical

01:21:31.037 --> 01:21:32.542
- computation.

01:21:36.674 --> 01:21:45.501
- that they go parcel by parcel on changes and they have to determine if it's a higher value, if it was

01:21:45.501 --> 01:21:54.415
- caused by somebody actually building something new or if it's trending. And they have to identify that

01:21:54.415 --> 01:22:03.934
- the same thing with abatement roll offs. And then there's a final item that they have to enter as far as what

01:22:04.098 --> 01:22:12.248
- if anything was demolished or if something became tax exempt. So when they enter all those things in,

01:22:12.248 --> 01:22:20.558
- the DLGF calculation tells them what that new base value has to be. And I can confirm, I can check with

01:22:20.558 --> 01:22:28.228
- the assessor's office, but my memory is that one of the, part of this district is part of that,

01:22:28.228 --> 01:22:33.342
- you know, the complex that has the strip mall off of, with low,

01:22:34.434 --> 01:22:41.331
- and all those. So this part of that is contained in there and one of those businesses had done a major

01:22:41.331 --> 01:22:48.095
- appeal through the assessor's office and got their assessed value reduced by, I don't think the full

01:22:48.095 --> 01:22:55.059
- amount, but by a significant amount that would have. I know Lowe's did it. That was a couple years ago.

01:22:55.059 --> 01:22:57.470
- That would have only had an effect.

01:22:58.562 --> 01:23:05.316
- Yeah, I think they, I think they filed it a couple years ago, but I think it just. When I look at the,

01:23:05.316 --> 01:23:11.940
- when I look at the Bloomington township packet, there is a, a chart which is called major changes in

01:23:11.940 --> 01:23:18.629
- assessed value, which is very helpful because it gives me an idea of what's going on and what to look

01:23:18.629 --> 01:23:23.678
- for. That was the thing about the hospital. We don't have that for this one.

01:23:25.634 --> 01:23:34.901
- What we've got is the historical values for the prop. And so when I, one of the things I did was kind

01:23:34.901 --> 01:23:43.986
- of run my finger down and say, oh, this one's a big difference. This one's a big. I don't know what

01:23:43.986 --> 01:23:52.254
- this is. But we do have that on page 18. We do have that similar kind of parcel. 18? Yeah.

01:23:55.042 --> 01:24:01.763
- It's just for a few years because I think at one point in time they had 20 years worth of these major

01:24:01.763 --> 01:24:08.353
- changes all in the same report and it just got a little burnt. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, so we've got, I

01:24:08.353 --> 01:24:11.582
- guess we've got three years. Okay, I see it now.

01:24:24.866 --> 01:24:43.647
- missed it. The other thing is to make sure that we've got things. That is correct. And I didn't see

01:24:43.647 --> 01:24:52.286
- any obvious things in this that weren't here.

01:24:58.338 --> 01:25:06.776
- The question was why were some of the things not in it? That's a separate issue. And I think the answer

01:25:06.776 --> 01:25:15.052
- to that is twofold. One, there are a few that aren't in it, period. And then at one point in time, if

01:25:15.052 --> 01:25:23.166
- the property was not at a taxable property, then it was not included in the TIF district as part of

01:25:23.166 --> 01:25:25.438
- what's in the LAO software.

01:25:34.242 --> 01:25:44.916
- But if you're gonna run the map for the others, you might as well run the map. This map would be a little

01:25:44.916 --> 01:25:55.591
- cumbersome. I've already had that conversation with him. I just need to circle back and see where they're

01:25:55.591 --> 01:26:02.942
- at with that. And the last thing we've got then is the local cost table.

01:26:04.898 --> 01:26:13.896
- are projections for the future. All right. Anybody got anything else on these? I would just ask, at

01:26:13.896 --> 01:26:23.254
- the next meeting or maybe the meeting after that, you guys are going to receive some resolutions asking

01:26:23.254 --> 01:26:31.262
- you to declare whether there is any excess assessed value in any of these TIF districts.

01:26:31.394 --> 01:26:41.970
- And so when we go through these with our financial advisor, I always ask them, through the four reports,

01:26:41.970 --> 01:26:52.345
- do they have any recommendations on how to answer that question? And Jeff, we recommend the commission

01:26:52.345 --> 01:27:01.310
- capture all of the assessed value in all of the districts for pay 27. And I think we've,

01:27:01.538 --> 01:27:08.952
- you know, as we walk through these, we've identified those costs and debt payments on each of the areas

01:27:08.952 --> 01:27:16.080
- that we do need the TIF revenues for in 27. One question regards to that total overall, and this is

01:27:16.080 --> 01:27:23.422
- a question, Jeff, in regards to, is there ever any possibility of doing consolidated TIFs so you could

01:27:23.422 --> 01:27:29.054
- utilize this money into one specific project that the county needs as a whole?

01:27:33.186 --> 01:27:42.666
- I don't know if one, that's really. I guess you have two districts, one district that's off on its own

01:27:42.666 --> 01:27:51.870
- that doesn't in any way connect to it. So I don't know how you can consolidate that, right? I think

01:27:51.870 --> 01:28:01.534
- with the expiration dates on the state road 46 corridor being, what, 2033, that's only six, seven years.

01:28:01.954 --> 01:28:08.298
- It's seven years away, which in the grand scheme of things isn't a whole lot of time to really think

01:28:08.298 --> 01:28:14.705
- that consolidation makes a lot of sense. And I think we've already talked about whether Curry Profile

01:28:14.705 --> 01:28:21.174
- and the Westside TIF District should be consolidated. I guess in theory, yes. I actually think instead

01:28:21.174 --> 01:28:27.644
- of consolidation, maybe the more interesting question and the one that we probably should consider is,

01:28:27.644 --> 01:28:29.214
- you know, we've got that

01:28:30.690 --> 01:28:38.391
- 46 corridor that still hasn't really gone. And so does it make sense? We had looked at a residential

01:28:38.391 --> 01:28:46.168
- TIF there. I actually I think there's one property owner that's not with Logan land development. They

01:28:46.168 --> 01:28:54.326
- had called me prior to spring break and we're looking at maybe some kind of multifamily housing or they're

01:28:54.326 --> 01:28:59.358
- trying to figure out what they're going to do with that property.

01:28:59.554 --> 01:29:06.428
- you know, if we had, if they were going to do something that would be a high revenue generator, particularly

01:29:06.428 --> 01:29:12.797
- if it's multifamily or something like that. I really think, plus with how the PUD got changed, where

01:29:12.797 --> 01:29:19.481
- that kind of that northern section across 40. And what I'm asking is not specifically for that particular

01:29:19.481 --> 01:29:25.913
- one or residential TIF because we've looked at that, but just as we look at these large projects that

01:29:25.913 --> 01:29:27.742
- need to be done, if we look.

01:29:28.354 --> 01:29:35.836
- you know, 10,000 here, we've got 1.5 million on this particular TIF, and of course, TIF given the geographic

01:29:35.836 --> 01:29:42.974
- areas, if it would be consideration to do that, and if you do that, would that allow for the additional

01:29:42.974 --> 01:29:50.182
- sun setting time to extend longer? Well, I think once, and Charlie, if you know, if what I say is wrong,

01:29:50.182 --> 01:29:56.222
- please step in, but the second you extend the timeline of that TIF, you reset the base.

01:29:58.050 --> 01:30:05.060
- Well, so the State Road 46 has areas where resetting the base may not be a big deal because they haven't

01:30:05.060 --> 01:30:11.737
- developed. And so that's kind of where I was going with it is that, you know, you look at the areas

01:30:11.737 --> 01:30:18.880
- in those TIFs that haven't developed and that's where you look at, hey, does it make sense to do something

01:30:18.880 --> 01:30:25.623
- different there? So let me just add to that a little bit. So when you consolidate the TIF areas, you

01:30:25.623 --> 01:30:26.558
- do not extend

01:30:27.202 --> 01:30:36.594
- any of the dates of expiration and you wouldn't reset the base. So the only thing consolidation does

01:30:36.594 --> 01:30:46.359
- is allow you to spend the money in those other areas. It doesn't change the allocation area calculations

01:30:46.359 --> 01:30:56.030
- at all. So west side would still expire when it currently expires and the base would still be the same.

01:30:56.162 --> 01:31:04.104
- Consolidation and Bloomington did this a while back. It just allows them to spend money in that wider

01:31:04.104 --> 01:31:12.358
- area. It doesn't impact collection of TIF revenues. If that makes sense. That makes perfect sense. That's

01:31:12.358 --> 01:31:20.144
- what I was looking at in regards to it's just utilized as a financing vehicle in overall area. When

01:31:20.144 --> 01:31:24.894
- I know any sun setting or collections, you just pick it out.

01:31:25.154 --> 01:31:34.443
- And the one thing- So it may make sense to think about for Curry and Westside. I'm trying to remember

01:31:34.443 --> 01:31:43.731
- and I need to get the map out to see how contiguous the state road 46 and Westside are, right? I just

01:31:43.731 --> 01:31:52.838
- can't remember. I think they are, but I think we'd have to make sure that is the case if you wanted

01:31:52.838 --> 01:31:54.750
- to think about that.

01:32:06.594 --> 01:32:21.726
- I have no claims. I have comment. Lisa, have you got any comments? I do not. Do you have a comment?

01:32:21.726 --> 01:32:28.990
- No, we'll just, I guess, I assume that you guys

01:32:29.122 --> 01:32:35.574
- Well, I think you guys probably should go ahead and move and vote that we go ahead, make the corrections

01:32:35.574 --> 01:32:41.719
- discussed at this meeting, file the corrected versions of these reports with the county council and

01:32:41.719 --> 01:32:48.109
- make sure they get put in the gateway by April 15th. So I would comment that that motion vote hopefully

01:32:48.109 --> 01:32:54.254
- will happen tonight. Other than that, I mean, this is a great meeting. And I think the next meeting

01:32:54.254 --> 01:32:56.958
- I already heard from Dr. Sanders and I will

01:32:57.122 --> 01:33:11.690
- But we will have the presentation from the RBB. Given that comment, I'm going to move that we request

01:33:11.690 --> 01:33:24.830
- FSG to prepare a new set of reports with actions. I deliver those to Jeff for submission to

01:33:27.426 --> 01:33:41.012
- to the council I believe on a council and then ultimately on into the Indiana gateway and it posted

01:33:41.012 --> 01:33:55.006
- to the Indiana gateways that like a 15th have a motion and a second or do we have to call roll on this

01:33:55.618 --> 01:34:02.925
- No, because no one's online, but I'm more than happy to call roll if you want. Call the roll. Commissioner

01:34:02.925 --> 01:34:09.891
- Martin. Yes. Commissioner McCarty. Yes. Commissioner Jones. Yes. Commissioner Cassidy. Yes. Motion is

01:34:09.891 --> 01:34:16.720
- approved, four to zero. All right. Commissioner Comins. Randy, you got anything else? I think we're

01:34:16.720 --> 01:34:21.022
- good. Just call anything. Same here. We're good. I'm good too.

01:34:23.330 --> 01:34:36.855
- these reports done and filed. Mr. Crider building a road for us. Work on Curry Pike. Sort it out so

01:34:36.855 --> 01:34:50.516
- we can get started on that. Bids have been approved. Contracts? Thank you, Charlie. Thank you, guys.

01:34:50.516 --> 01:34:53.086
- Have a good night.

01:34:55.074 --> 01:34:55.870
- Getting adjourned.